Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- QRPLabs
- Messages
Search
Re: Fault during transmitting
I did it: my QMX is now fixed. I solved the double output frequency problem by replacing the IC204 with a new SI5351A. This also solved the problem with the unclean signal during transmission. I have now called CQ into the dummy load via WSJT-X for 1 hour and the signal remained clean all the time. This weekend I will try some real QSOs. |
Re: QMX / QCX Mini New Feet?
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 12:26 PM, mike/w1mt wrote:
Check out laptop stands or laptop cooling feet at amazon - B07772JBX1I have had good results with Amazon?B0BDZNFFLT tablet stand, for small radios and for a little audio mixer in the shack.? Height and angle adjust. 73, Don N2VGU? |
Re: QMX / QCX Mini New Feet?
Kind of off-topic, but the best things I have found for elevating the front of larger radios or lab instruments for better visibility are hockey pucks.??
They are a good height singly or can be stacked securely as they are non-slip.? Inexpensive and indestructible. 73, Don N2VGU |
Re: off topic. - 2004 QEX article on a class E Push pull HF amp / 200 W / 2 off SMPS Mosfets
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýSee post further back in this thread.?6 On 20 Oct 2023, at 16:14, Muhsin TA1MHS <muhsin.dogrular@...> wrote:
|
Re: QMX / QCX Mini New Feet?
Check out laptop stands or laptop cooling feet at amazon - B07772JBX1
or B09M9XX8ZV are just two such objects. -mike/w1mt On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 12:23?PM Jim Bennett / K7TXA via groups.io <w6jhb@...> wrote:
|
QMX / QCX Mini New Feet?
Since my QMX usually sits on my desk I was thinking it would be nice if it could be slightly tilted towards me rather than sitting completely flat. Does anyone have info on some larger rubber feet I could replace the top two feet with?
-- Jim / K7TXA Eagle, ID SKCC 10447C BUG 301 |
Re: QMX PC Connect, Anyone?
It was a struggle because there was a NO log file to show. The logging program never made the connection until a day or so ago, thus nothing in the QMX CAT log file. Once the MLDX developer changed his program to not send a carriage return, QMX was able to connect and a log was available. Didn't take too long after that to see why audio went down the tubes. Anyway, water under the bridge now. QMX working pretty well (NEEDS AGC!) - lots of CW contacts and several FT8, including VK2LAW (20 M) and 5W1SA (30 M) a few minutes ago - both with my flagpole vertical!
-- Jim / K7TXA Eagle, ID SKCC 10447C BUG 301 |
Re: QMX suffers zero negative impact from deleting L401 (with measurements)
Stephan, you had asked for some simulation results.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I couldn't resist ;-) The LTspice simulation below shows some of the fascinating properties of the Tayloe detector. The simulation uses ideal voltage controlled switches to perform the MUX function of the detector. This avoids complications with parasitics and device performance.The switch model also has an optional internal resistance. Since the switches change state 'hard' at defined voltage points, the four phase clock system can simply be four sine generators staggered by phase. I used 2 X 4 just to keep the visual clutter down. As shown, the clock is running at 1MHz. The input signal is a single sharp spike, an approximation to the Dirac Delta function, which produces a very wide spectrum. The simulation output is selected as the voltage at the input winding of the balun. As you might expect, it is also a single sharp spike. The voltage at that node can be taken as a surrogate for the input impedance of the detector. The real treasure of the simulation is the FFT spectrum at that node, shown. You can clearly see the intrinsic bandpass behavior of the Tayloe circuit, as well as its receptivity at odd clock harmonics. As the clock frequency changes, the response curve follows it. As the Cacc parameter alters the values of the accumulating capacitors, the bandwidth changes. JZ KJ4A On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 3:17?AM Alan G4ZFQ <alan4alan@...> wrote:
|
Re: Idle - Receive current
#qmx
This illustrates another characteristic of DC-DC converters, they have a negative resistance characteristic in that their current draw increases with decreasing voltage.??
I have had issues when feeding a DC-DC, especially when trying to ramp up from 0, the load draws excessive current trying to deliver its output voltage/power.? Well-designed converters will not try to turn on until a workable input voltage has been applied, to avoid this issue. Instead of starting from 0 you need to set the supply on the low side, connect it to the load and then adjust upwards.? And don't try to run it from a too-low voltage. 73, Don N2VGU |
Re: Idle - Receive current
#qmx
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýYes, voltage is 12 volts so = 1.4 watts. It doesn't seem to warm up the case significantly if left in that state for a while, but I have noticed it will increase to 130ma as the radio warms up.I'm not overly concerned, but do wonder why and if anything can be done to reduce it since it all builds up heat in the case. 73, Cliff, AE5ZA
|
Re: Idle - Receive current
#qmx
Perhaps mention what model you are talking about for better answers.? ?I'm guessing QMX but? . .??
|
Re: Idle - Receive current
#qmx
It's better in this case to think in watts. Voltage times current = power 12v X .09A = 1.08 watts 9v X .12A = 1.08 watts Same thing. 1.08 watts is being delivered in both cases in receive mode. So expect about 120 mA at 9 volts and 90 mA at 12 volts. This will not be the case if comparing the operation of linear regulators, but should be close when comparing switching regulators. Ron On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 7:47?AM mike/w1mt <w1mt.qrp@...> wrote: ?I should add that these are measured at 12.0V supply voltage. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss