¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

QMN history


 

I vaguely remember reading a history of the QMN founding, perhaps in a monthly mailing many years ago. Does anyone have a document like this?
For instance, I think the net frequency was planned to be "3665 kilocycles", but the crystals that were ground and sold for a dollar each later measured at 3663 kHz. That's only .05% which was quite accurate in 1935.
My first VFO dial (Heathkit HG-10B) was maybe a tenth inch per 10 kHz, so whatever frequency NCS established was what I would QNZ. QNY to pass traffic meant first tune the receiver to the other station, and then spot the transmit VFO to zero on it. Sometimes a station would forget to move the transmitter VFO off frequency and we would get a laugh listening to it on net frequency. NCS would QNE while going to QNM that station.
Today's transceivers with precise digital displays are so much better.


 


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Mike,

See the latest QMN net report for an answer to your question ;)

Tom W8MK

On 3/5/2025 3:05 PM, Mike WB8DTT via groups.io wrote:

I vaguely remember reading a history of the QMN founding, perhaps in a monthly mailing many years ago. Does anyone have a document like this?
For instance, I think the net frequency was planned to be "3665 kilocycles", but the crystals that were ground and sold for a dollar each later measured at 3663 kHz. That's only .05% which was quite accurate in 1935.
My first VFO dial (Heathkit HG-10B) was maybe a tenth inch per 10 kHz, so whatever frequency NCS established was what I would QNZ. QNY to pass traffic meant first tune the receiver to the other station, and then spot the transmit VFO to zero on it. Sometimes a station would forget to move the transmitter VFO off frequency and we would get a laugh listening to it on net frequency. NCS would QNE while going to QNM that station.
Today's transceivers with precise digital displays are so much better.