|
HI guys!? I had hoped to share my concern with AER members but apparently I'm not getting through to the AER listserv so I'll share it with youns (Pittsbughese for "y'all"!) - I know a lot of you are AER members.??
?
One of my biggest concerns in this world is the increasing division among people, an "us vs. them" approach with factions trying to energize us with fear or anger (in what Arthur Brooks calls on the national level the "outrage industrial complex") to pressure us to choose and identify with one side or the other.? It is toxic and leads to dysfunctional organizations, where people can't work together and don't trust each other.? This is what is going on with our government.
?
I'm very concerned that our AER leadership is going down this path.? As I understand it, several months ago AER's Executive Director, Lee Sonnenberg, told the board he would resign rather than work with President-Elect Mark Richert.? After the board voted not to remove Richert, Sonnenberg reached out directly to the membership, setting in motion a campaign to support him by removing Richert.??
?
This is no way to run an organization. If a board member needs to be removed, that is a serious issue that should be carefully considered on its own merits.? It should be separate from any considerations of whether the board member's removal will satisfy the Executive Director's preferences.
?
If Sonnenberg's resignation is reconsidered and he remains as Executive Director, I'm wondering what happens if the board does not agree with him on another matter, or there is someone else he can't get along with.? Will he again appeal directly to the members to take his side, further dividing us?
?
In my opinion, an Executive Director who asks the membership to choose sides is divisive and not a good fit for an organization whose mission is to work together to find common ground and consensus to "speak with one voice."
?
— Dona
?
—————————
Dona Sauerburger, COMS
Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist
?
|
?
?
|
Dear AER Members,
?
The Board of Directors of the Association for the Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired (AER) held a special meeting Tuesday evening to discuss the future leadership of the organization. The meeting resulted in a vote to remove Mark Richert as president-elect, which also means he is no longer on the Board of the organization.
?
The Board did not make this decision lightly. Only after receiving a significant amount of input from members and other constituents of AER did we take this action.
?
The Board will now begin to evaluate new candidates for President and President-Elect. Olaya Landa-Vialard, AER’s current president, has agreed to extend her term until a new President is chosen.
?
While change is always difficult, the Board is enthusiastic about the future of AER. We look forward to seeing many of you at our upcoming International Conference in July.
?
Board of Directors, AER
|
?
?
|
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
|
Dona,
From this one perspective, there are individual personalities that can be so very destructive (at times) they create much duress. There are things you may be unaware of, things that came up in previous tenure that would likely make you reconsider your present perspective. Regardless of whether Lee returns; I believe he acted with integrity in an untenable situation to do his utmost to restore collaborative spirit rather than devisiveness.?
-- Sent from iPhone chris@... 512.660.2750
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Jun 26, 2024, at 9:25?PM, Dona Sauerburger <dona@...> wrote:
?
HI guys!? I had hoped to share my concern with AER members but apparently I'm not getting through to the AER listserv so I'll share it with youns (Pittsbughese for "y'all"!) - I know a lot of you are AER members.??
?
One of my biggest concerns in this world is the increasing division among people, an "us vs. them" approach with factions trying to energize us with fear or anger (in what Arthur Brooks calls on the national level the "outrage industrial complex") to pressure us to choose and identify with one side or the other.? It is toxic and leads to dysfunctional organizations, where people can't work together and don't trust each other.? This is what is going on with our government.
?
I'm very concerned that our AER leadership is going down this path.? As I understand it, several months ago AER's Executive Director, Lee Sonnenberg, told the board he would resign rather than work with President-Elect Mark Richert.? After the board voted not to remove Richert, Sonnenberg reached out directly to the membership, setting in motion a campaign to support him by removing Richert.??
?
This is no way to run an organization. If a board member needs to be removed, that is a serious issue that should be carefully considered on its own merits.? It should be separate from any considerations of whether the board member's removal will satisfy the Executive Director's preferences.
?
If Sonnenberg's resignation is reconsidered and he remains as Executive Director, I'm wondering what happens if the board does not agree with him on another matter, or there is someone else he can't get along with.? Will he again appeal directly to the members to take his side, further dividing us?
?
In my opinion, an Executive Director who asks the membership to choose sides is divisive and not a good fit for an organization whose mission is to work together to find common ground and consensus to "speak with one voice."
?
— Dona
?
—————————
Dona Sauerburger, COMS
Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist
?
|
?
?
|
Dear AER Members,
?
The Board of Directors of the Association for the Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired (AER) held a special meeting Tuesday evening to discuss the future leadership of the organization. The meeting resulted in a vote to remove Mark Richert as president-elect, which also means he is no longer on the Board of the organization.
?
The Board did not make this decision lightly. Only after receiving a significant amount of input from members and other constituents of AER did we take this action.
?
The Board will now begin to evaluate new candidates for President and President-Elect. Olaya Landa-Vialard, AER’s current president, has agreed to extend her term until a new President is chosen.
?
While change is always difficult, the Board is enthusiastic about the future of AER. We look forward to seeing many of you at our upcoming International Conference in July.
?
Board of Directors, AER
|
?
?
|
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
|
Thank you Chris, I appreciate this. ?I’ve come to firmly believe there never is any objective truth, only our perspective of it. — Dona ————————— Dona Sauerburger, COMS Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist for the blind www.sauerburger.org
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Jun 27, 2024, at 12:51 AM, Chris Tabb <chris@...> wrote:
? Dona,
From this one perspective, there are individual personalities that can be so very destructive (at times) they create much duress. There are things you may be unaware of, things that came up in previous tenure that would likely make you reconsider your present perspective. Regardless of whether Lee returns; I believe he acted with integrity in an untenable situation to do his utmost to restore collaborative spirit rather than devisiveness.?
-- Sent from iPhone chris@... 512.660.2750 On Jun 26, 2024, at 9:25?PM, Dona Sauerburger <dona@...> wrote:
?
HI guys!? I had hoped to share my concern with AER members but apparently I'm not getting through to the AER listserv so I'll share it with youns (Pittsbughese for "y'all"!) - I know a lot of you are AER members.??
?
One of my biggest concerns in this world is the increasing division among people, an "us vs. them" approach with factions trying to energize us with fear or anger (in what Arthur Brooks calls on the national level the "outrage industrial complex") to pressure us to choose and identify with one side or the other.? It is toxic and leads to dysfunctional organizations, where people can't work together and don't trust each other.? This is what is going on with our government.
?
I'm very concerned that our AER leadership is going down this path.? As I understand it, several months ago AER's Executive Director, Lee Sonnenberg, told the board he would resign rather than work with President-Elect Mark Richert.? After the board voted not to remove Richert, Sonnenberg reached out directly to the membership, setting in motion a campaign to support him by removing Richert.??
?
This is no way to run an organization. If a board member needs to be removed, that is a serious issue that should be carefully considered on its own merits.? It should be separate from any considerations of whether the board member's removal will satisfy the Executive Director's preferences.
?
If Sonnenberg's resignation is reconsidered and he remains as Executive Director, I'm wondering what happens if the board does not agree with him on another matter, or there is someone else he can't get along with.? Will he again appeal directly to the members to take his side, further dividing us?
?
In my opinion, an Executive Director who asks the membership to choose sides is divisive and not a good fit for an organization whose mission is to work together to find common ground and consensus to "speak with one voice."
?
— Dona
?
—————————
Dona Sauerburger, COMS
Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist
?
|
?
?
|
Dear AER Members,
?
The Board of Directors of the Association for the Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired (AER) held a special meeting Tuesday evening to discuss the future leadership of the organization. The meeting resulted in a vote to remove Mark Richert as president-elect, which also means he is no longer on the Board of the organization.
?
The Board did not make this decision lightly. Only after receiving a significant amount of input from members and other constituents of AER did we take this action.
?
The Board will now begin to evaluate new candidates for President and President-Elect. Olaya Landa-Vialard, AER’s current president, has agreed to extend her term until a new President is chosen.
?
While change is always difficult, the Board is enthusiastic about the future of AER. We look forward to seeing many of you at our upcoming International Conference in July.
?
Board of Directors, AER
|
?
?
|
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
|
Well said, Chris.? I suspect that Lee tried to work through the board, but like the previous valued employee who resigned under similar circumstances found the board unwilling to do its job.? I'm glad Lee made us aware of the situation and that the board found the courage to make a very difficult decision after apparently hearing from enough members who found this appalling.? I was having difficulty deciding whether to drop my AER membership because I would also be dropping support of the O&M Division.? I don't have to make that decision now.
Susan?
Dona,
From this one perspective, there are individual personalities that can be so very destructive (at times) they create much duress. There are things you may be unaware of, things that came up in previous tenure that would likely make you reconsider your present perspective. Regardless of whether Lee returns; I believe he acted with integrity in an untenable situation to do his utmost to restore collaborative spirit rather than devisiveness.?
-- Sent from iPhone 512.660.2750 On Jun 26, 2024, at 9:25?PM, Dona Sauerburger <dona@...> wrote:
?
HI guys!? I had hoped to share my concern with AER members but apparently I'm not getting through to the AER listserv so I'll share it with youns (Pittsbughese for "y'all"!) - I know a lot of you are AER members.??
?
One of my biggest concerns in this world is the increasing division among people, an "us vs. them" approach with factions trying to energize us with fear or anger (in what Arthur Brooks calls on the national level the "outrage industrial complex") to pressure us to choose and identify with one side or the other.? It is toxic and leads to dysfunctional organizations, where people can't work together and don't trust each other.? This is what is going on with our government.
?
I'm very concerned that our AER leadership is going down this path.? As I understand it, several months ago AER's Executive Director, Lee Sonnenberg, told the board he would resign rather than work with President-Elect Mark Richert.? After the board voted not to remove Richert, Sonnenberg reached out directly to the membership, setting in motion a campaign to support him by removing Richert.??
?
This is no way to run an organization. If a board member needs to be removed, that is a serious issue that should be carefully considered on its own merits.? It should be separate from any considerations of whether the board member's removal will satisfy the Executive Director's preferences.
?
If Sonnenberg's resignation is reconsidered and he remains as Executive Director, I'm wondering what happens if the board does not agree with him on another matter, or there is someone else he can't get along with.? Will he again appeal directly to the members to take his side, further dividing us?
?
In my opinion, an Executive Director who asks the membership to choose sides is divisive and not a good fit for an organization whose mission is to work together to find common ground and consensus to "speak with one voice."
?
— Dona
?
—————————
Dona Sauerburger, COMS
Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist
?
|
?
?
|
Dear AER Members,
?
The Board of Directors of the Association for the Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired (AER) held a special meeting Tuesday evening to discuss the future leadership of the organization. The meeting resulted in a vote to remove Mark Richert as president-elect, which also means he is no longer on the Board of the organization.
?
The Board did not make this decision lightly. Only after receiving a significant amount of input from members and other constituents of AER did we take this action.
?
The Board will now begin to evaluate new candidates for President and President-Elect. Olaya Landa-Vialard, AER’s current president, has agreed to extend her term until a new President is chosen.
?
While change is always difficult, the Board is enthusiastic about the future of AER. We look forward to seeing many of you at our upcoming International Conference in July.
?
Board of Directors, AER
|
?
?
|
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
|
Dona, Thank you very much for sharing your thoughtful and well recent comments about the operations of the AER. I agree with you that is is a time for civility and collaboration ?among the members of AER. Sincerely, Coby ?Livingstone, retired CVRT, OTR/L,? COAPS, CPSW, MA ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Jun 26, 2024, at 11:52?PM, Dona Sauerburger via groups.io <dona@...> wrote: ? Thank you Chris, I appreciate this. ?I’ve come to firmly believe there never is any objective truth, only our perspective of it. — Dona ————————— Dona Sauerburger, COMS Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist for the blind www.sauerburger.org On Jun 27, 2024, at 12:51 AM, Chris Tabb <chris@...> wrote:
? Dona,
From this one perspective, there are individual personalities that can be so very destructive (at times) they create much duress. There are things you may be unaware of, things that came up in previous tenure that would likely make you reconsider your present perspective. Regardless of whether Lee returns; I believe he acted with integrity in an untenable situation to do his utmost to restore collaborative spirit rather than devisiveness.?
-- Sent from iPhone chris@... 512.660.2750 On Jun 26, 2024, at 9:25?PM, Dona Sauerburger <dona@...> wrote:
?
HI guys!? I had hoped to share my concern with AER members but apparently I'm not getting through to the AER listserv so I'll share it with youns (Pittsbughese for "y'all"!) - I know a lot of you are AER members.??
?
One of my biggest concerns in this world is the increasing division among people, an "us vs. them" approach with factions trying to energize us with fear or anger (in what Arthur Brooks calls on the national level the "outrage industrial complex") to pressure us to choose and identify with one side or the other.? It is toxic and leads to dysfunctional organizations, where people can't work together and don't trust each other.? This is what is going on with our government.
?
I'm very concerned that our AER leadership is going down this path.? As I understand it, several months ago AER's Executive Director, Lee Sonnenberg, told the board he would resign rather than work with President-Elect Mark Richert.? After the board voted not to remove Richert, Sonnenberg reached out directly to the membership, setting in motion a campaign to support him by removing Richert.??
?
This is no way to run an organization. If a board member needs to be removed, that is a serious issue that should be carefully considered on its own merits.? It should be separate from any considerations of whether the board member's removal will satisfy the Executive Director's preferences.
?
If Sonnenberg's resignation is reconsidered and he remains as Executive Director, I'm wondering what happens if the board does not agree with him on another matter, or there is someone else he can't get along with.? Will he again appeal directly to the members to take his side, further dividing us?
?
In my opinion, an Executive Director who asks the membership to choose sides is divisive and not a good fit for an organization whose mission is to work together to find common ground and consensus to "speak with one voice."
?
— Dona
?
—————————
Dona Sauerburger, COMS
Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist
?
|
?
?
|
Dear AER Members,
?
The Board of Directors of the Association for the Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired (AER) held a special meeting Tuesday evening to discuss the future leadership of the organization. The meeting resulted in a vote to remove Mark Richert as president-elect, which also means he is no longer on the Board of the organization.
?
The Board did not make this decision lightly. Only after receiving a significant amount of input from members and other constituents of AER did we take this action.
?
The Board will now begin to evaluate new candidates for President and President-Elect. Olaya Landa-Vialard, AER’s current president, has agreed to extend her term until a new President is chosen.
?
While change is always difficult, the Board is enthusiastic about the future of AER. We look forward to seeing many of you at our upcoming International Conference in July.
?
Board of Directors, AER
|
?
?
|
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
|
The messages that have been shared this morning regarding the unfortunate crisis our organization faces have been heartfelt and sincere. I do agree with Dona that ?objective truth is hard to find. I respect both of these gentlemen and consider
them friends. I believe the board is trying to act in good faith as well, but certainly there have been mistakes and perhaps ?egos that have driven what has become an existential crisis for our organization. ?We can have debate and work through all of this
in the coming months but it does take time to sort through it all and heal. There is no guarantee that our ?leadership or our many members will feel justice and fairness prevailed after all of this but we can all decide to stick with AER and not become polarized.
Many of us have strong feelings about what went down from what we have heard and perhaps first hand for some of us. Let’s have the hard discussions and expect the board to go forward with ethical principles in mind— not simply based on loyalty to either individual.
However it turns out.. let’s all take a breath and support each other and AER.
Paul Olson?
ND Vision Services
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
|
You don't often get email from coby.livingstone@....
|
|
CAUTION: This email originated from an outside source. Do not click links
or open attachments unless you know they are safe.
Dona,
Thank you very much for sharing your thoughtful and well recent comments about the operations of the AER. I agree with you that is is a time for civility and collaboration ?among the members of AER.
Sincerely,
Coby ?Livingstone, retired CVRT, OTR/L,?
COAPS, CPSW, MA ?
On Jun 26, 2024, at 11:52?PM, Dona Sauerburger via groups.io <dona@...> wrote:
?Thank you Chris, I appreciate this. ?I’ve come to firmly believe there never is any objective truth, only our perspective of it.
— Dona
—————————
Dona Sauerburger, COMS
Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist for the blind
www.sauerburger.org
On Jun 27, 2024, at 12:51 AM, Chris Tabb <chris@...> wrote:
?Dona,
From this one perspective, there are individual personalities that can be so very destructive (at times) they create much duress. There are things you may be unaware of, things that came up in previous tenure that would likely make you reconsider your
present perspective. Regardless of whether Lee returns; I believe he acted with integrity in an untenable situation to do his utmost to restore collaborative spirit rather than devisiveness.?
--
Sent from iPhone
chris@...
512.660.2750
On Jun 26, 2024, at 9:25?PM, Dona Sauerburger <dona@...> wrote:
?
HI guys!? I had hoped to share my concern with AER members but apparently I'm not getting through to the AER listserv so I'll share it with youns (Pittsbughese for "y'all"!) - I know a lot of you are AER members.??
?
One of my biggest concerns in this world is the increasing division among people, an "us vs. them" approach with factions trying to energize us with fear or anger (in what Arthur Brooks calls on the national level the "outrage industrial complex") to pressure
us to choose and identify with one side or the other.? It is toxic and leads to dysfunctional organizations, where people can't work together and don't trust each other.? This is what is going on with our government.
?
I'm very concerned that our AER leadership is going down this path.? As I understand it, several months ago AER's Executive Director, Lee Sonnenberg, told the board he would resign rather than work with President-Elect Mark Richert.? After the board voted
not to remove Richert, Sonnenberg reached out directly to the membership, setting in motion a campaign to support him by removing Richert.??
?
This is no way to run an organization. If a board member needs to be removed, that is a serious issue that should be carefully considered on its own merits.? It should be separate from any considerations of whether the board member's removal will satisfy
the Executive Director's preferences.
?
If Sonnenberg's resignation is reconsidered and he remains as Executive Director, I'm wondering what happens if the board does not agree with him on another matter, or there is someone else he can't get along with.? Will he again appeal directly to the
members to take his side, further dividing us?
?
In my opinion, an Executive Director who asks the membership to choose sides is divisive and not a good fit for an organization whose mission is to work together to find common ground and consensus to "speak with one voice."
?
— Dona
?
—————————
Dona Sauerburger, COMS
Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist
?
|
?
?
|
Dear AER Members,
?
The Board of Directors of the Association for the Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired (AER) held a special meeting Tuesday evening to discuss the future leadership of the organization. The meeting resulted in a vote to remove
Mark Richert as president-elect, which also means he is no longer on the Board of the organization.
?
The Board did not make this decision lightly. Only after receiving a significant amount of input from members and other constituents of AER did we take this action.
?
The Board will now begin to evaluate new candidates for President and President-Elect. Olaya Landa-Vialard, AER’s current president, has agreed to extend her term until a new President is chosen.
?
While change is always difficult, the Board is enthusiastic about the future of AER. We look forward to seeing many of you at our upcoming International Conference in July.
?
Board of Directors, AER
|
?
?
|
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
|
Right on, you all. I appreciate this very honorable discussion. Pamela Cory? Retired Vision Rehabilitation Therapist, Hamburg, Germany? Von meinem iPhone gesendet
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Am 27.06.2024 um 16:57 schrieb Olson, Paul H. via groups.io <polson@...>:
?
The messages that have been shared this morning regarding the unfortunate crisis our organization faces have been heartfelt and sincere. I do agree with Dona that ?objective truth is hard to find. I respect both of these gentlemen and consider
them friends. I believe the board is trying to act in good faith as well, but certainly there have been mistakes and perhaps ?egos that have driven what has become an existential crisis for our organization. ?We can have debate and work through all of this
in the coming months but it does take time to sort through it all and heal. There is no guarantee that our ?leadership or our many members will feel justice and fairness prevailed after all of this but we can all decide to stick with AER and not become polarized.
Many of us have strong feelings about what went down from what we have heard and perhaps first hand for some of us. Let’s have the hard discussions and expect the board to go forward with ethical principles in mind— not simply based on loyalty to either individual.
However it turns out.. let’s all take a breath and support each other and AER.
Paul Olson?
ND Vision Services
|
|
You don't often get email from coby.livingstone@....
|
|
CAUTION: This email originated from an outside source. Do not click links
or open attachments unless you know they are safe.
Dona,
Thank you very much for sharing your thoughtful and well recent comments about the operations of the AER. I agree with you that is is a time for civility and collaboration ?among the members of AER.
Sincerely,
Coby ?Livingstone, retired CVRT, OTR/L,?
COAPS, CPSW, MA ?
On Jun 26, 2024, at 11:52?PM, Dona Sauerburger via groups.io <dona@...> wrote:
?Thank you Chris, I appreciate this. ?I’ve come to firmly believe there never is any objective truth, only our perspective of it.
— Dona
—————————
Dona Sauerburger, COMS
Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist for the blind
www.sauerburger.org
On Jun 27, 2024, at 12:51 AM, Chris Tabb <chris@...> wrote:
?Dona,
From this one perspective, there are individual personalities that can be so very destructive (at times) they create much duress. There are things you may be unaware of, things that came up in previous tenure that would likely make you reconsider your
present perspective. Regardless of whether Lee returns; I believe he acted with integrity in an untenable situation to do his utmost to restore collaborative spirit rather than devisiveness.?
--
Sent from iPhone
chris@...
512.660.2750
On Jun 26, 2024, at 9:25?PM, Dona Sauerburger <dona@...> wrote:
?
HI guys!? I had hoped to share my concern with AER members but apparently I'm not getting through to the AER listserv so I'll share it with youns (Pittsbughese for "y'all"!) - I know a lot of you are AER members.??
?
One of my biggest concerns in this world is the increasing division among people, an "us vs. them" approach with factions trying to energize us with fear or anger (in what Arthur Brooks calls on the national level the "outrage industrial complex") to pressure
us to choose and identify with one side or the other.? It is toxic and leads to dysfunctional organizations, where people can't work together and don't trust each other.? This is what is going on with our government.
?
I'm very concerned that our AER leadership is going down this path.? As I understand it, several months ago AER's Executive Director, Lee Sonnenberg, told the board he would resign rather than work with President-Elect Mark Richert.? After the board voted
not to remove Richert, Sonnenberg reached out directly to the membership, setting in motion a campaign to support him by removing Richert.??
?
This is no way to run an organization. If a board member needs to be removed, that is a serious issue that should be carefully considered on its own merits.? It should be separate from any considerations of whether the board member's removal will satisfy
the Executive Director's preferences.
?
If Sonnenberg's resignation is reconsidered and he remains as Executive Director, I'm wondering what happens if the board does not agree with him on another matter, or there is someone else he can't get along with.? Will he again appeal directly to the
members to take his side, further dividing us?
?
In my opinion, an Executive Director who asks the membership to choose sides is divisive and not a good fit for an organization whose mission is to work together to find common ground and consensus to "speak with one voice."
?
— Dona
?
—————————
Dona Sauerburger, COMS
Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist
?
|
?
?
|
Dear AER Members,
?
The Board of Directors of the Association for the Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired (AER) held a special meeting Tuesday evening to discuss the future leadership of the organization. The meeting resulted in a vote to remove
Mark Richert as president-elect, which also means he is no longer on the Board of the organization.
?
The Board did not make this decision lightly. Only after receiving a significant amount of input from members and other constituents of AER did we take this action.
?
The Board will now begin to evaluate new candidates for President and President-Elect. Olaya Landa-Vialard, AER’s current president, has agreed to extend her term until a new President is chosen.
?
While change is always difficult, the Board is enthusiastic about the future of AER. We look forward to seeing many of you at our upcoming International Conference in July.
?
Board of Directors, AER
|
?
?
|
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
|
Thank you Paul! ?-- Sent from iPhone chris@... 512.660.2750
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Jun 27, 2024, at 8:57?AM, Olson, Paul H. <polson@...> wrote:
?
The messages that have been shared this morning regarding the unfortunate crisis our organization faces have been heartfelt and sincere. I do agree with Dona that ?objective truth is hard to find. I respect both of these gentlemen and consider
them friends. I believe the board is trying to act in good faith as well, but certainly there have been mistakes and perhaps ?egos that have driven what has become an existential crisis for our organization. ?We can have debate and work through all of this
in the coming months but it does take time to sort through it all and heal. There is no guarantee that our ?leadership or our many members will feel justice and fairness prevailed after all of this but we can all decide to stick with AER and not become polarized.
Many of us have strong feelings about what went down from what we have heard and perhaps first hand for some of us. Let’s have the hard discussions and expect the board to go forward with ethical principles in mind— not simply based on loyalty to either individual.
However it turns out.. let’s all take a breath and support each other and AER.
Paul Olson?
ND Vision Services
|
|
You don't often get email from coby.livingstone@....
|
|
CAUTION: This email originated from an outside source. Do not click links
or open attachments unless you know they are safe.
Dona,
Thank you very much for sharing your thoughtful and well recent comments about the operations of the AER. I agree with you that is is a time for civility and collaboration ?among the members of AER.
Sincerely,
Coby ?Livingstone, retired CVRT, OTR/L,?
COAPS, CPSW, MA ?
On Jun 26, 2024, at 11:52?PM, Dona Sauerburger via groups.io <dona@...> wrote:
?Thank you Chris, I appreciate this. ?I’ve come to firmly believe there never is any objective truth, only our perspective of it.
— Dona
—————————
Dona Sauerburger, COMS
Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist for the blind
www.sauerburger.org
On Jun 27, 2024, at 12:51 AM, Chris Tabb <chris@...> wrote:
?Dona,
From this one perspective, there are individual personalities that can be so very destructive (at times) they create much duress. There are things you may be unaware of, things that came up in previous tenure that would likely make you reconsider your
present perspective. Regardless of whether Lee returns; I believe he acted with integrity in an untenable situation to do his utmost to restore collaborative spirit rather than devisiveness.?
--
Sent from iPhone
chris@...
512.660.2750
On Jun 26, 2024, at 9:25?PM, Dona Sauerburger <dona@...> wrote:
?
HI guys!? I had hoped to share my concern with AER members but apparently I'm not getting through to the AER listserv so I'll share it with youns (Pittsbughese for "y'all"!) - I know a lot of you are AER members.??
?
One of my biggest concerns in this world is the increasing division among people, an "us vs. them" approach with factions trying to energize us with fear or anger (in what Arthur Brooks calls on the national level the "outrage industrial complex") to pressure
us to choose and identify with one side or the other.? It is toxic and leads to dysfunctional organizations, where people can't work together and don't trust each other.? This is what is going on with our government.
?
I'm very concerned that our AER leadership is going down this path.? As I understand it, several months ago AER's Executive Director, Lee Sonnenberg, told the board he would resign rather than work with President-Elect Mark Richert.? After the board voted
not to remove Richert, Sonnenberg reached out directly to the membership, setting in motion a campaign to support him by removing Richert.??
?
This is no way to run an organization. If a board member needs to be removed, that is a serious issue that should be carefully considered on its own merits.? It should be separate from any considerations of whether the board member's removal will satisfy
the Executive Director's preferences.
?
If Sonnenberg's resignation is reconsidered and he remains as Executive Director, I'm wondering what happens if the board does not agree with him on another matter, or there is someone else he can't get along with.? Will he again appeal directly to the
members to take his side, further dividing us?
?
In my opinion, an Executive Director who asks the membership to choose sides is divisive and not a good fit for an organization whose mission is to work together to find common ground and consensus to "speak with one voice."
?
— Dona
?
—————————
Dona Sauerburger, COMS
Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist
?
|
?
?
|
Dear AER Members,
?
The Board of Directors of the Association for the Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired (AER) held a special meeting Tuesday evening to discuss the future leadership of the organization. The meeting resulted in a vote to remove
Mark Richert as president-elect, which also means he is no longer on the Board of the organization.
?
The Board did not make this decision lightly. Only after receiving a significant amount of input from members and other constituents of AER did we take this action.
?
The Board will now begin to evaluate new candidates for President and President-Elect. Olaya Landa-Vialard, AER’s current president, has agreed to extend her term until a new President is chosen.
?
While change is always difficult, the Board is enthusiastic about the future of AER. We look forward to seeing many of you at our upcoming International Conference in July.
?
Board of Directors, AER
|
?
?
|
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
|
I am replying here to both Dona and Chris. ? Dona, I was going to weigh in on the current AER difficulties, but your initial statement absolutely parallels my thoughts. I have little more to add aside from saying me too. If that were my only reason for responding, however, I probably would not bother as I often tire of reading “me too.” Messages on many lists. ?Chris Tabb’s response to you, and then yours to him, however, concerns me. ? Let me disclose ahead of what I am about to say that I consider Mark Richert to be a personal friend, and I do not know Lee Sonnenberg at all. I am nonetheless attempting to restrict my comments here to what I know objectively. My personal feelings are not relevant to these comments. ? ? I worked with Mark Richert as a member of the American Council of the Blind (ACB) Resolutions Committee during the seven years that I chaired the resolutions committee. I have also worked with him on some national legislative advocacy projects over the many years I have known him. ?Mark is probably the finest legal scholar and legal wordsmith with regard to the overall field of blindness in the Country. His work on the Macy Act truly was inspired.? Brilliant people, however, often do have an irascible ?streak, and mark is no exception. I am not going to say that I always found Mark to be easy to work with, but I always found that doing so was well worth the effort. ?I personally do not feel that AER can afford to lose Mark. Executive Directors, however, come and go. ?I frankly do not know how good of an acting director, or earlier how good of an Executive Director Mark was for AER, but he is a giant in the field of blindness, and AER can ill afford to do without his work and guidance. What Lee has done would appear to have cast disgraceful ?dispersion on Mark’s career and reputation. ?That in and of itself would suggest to me that Mr. Sonnenberg is not a good fit for AER. ? I must acknowledge that I am an outsider looking in when it comes to the daily operation of AER. ?What Chris said about there being things of which Dona may be unaware probably applies tenfold to me. As a legally blind guy who has been a practitioner in the blindness field for most of the past 45 years, however, I know who the trusted blind leaders are, and should be. Mark is one such person, and AER has been lucky to have him working with and for them over many years. ?Michael Byington, Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist President of Kansas Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired, Inc. > Membership Coordinator for Friends In Art of the American Council of the Blind > 712 S. Kansas Avenue > Suite 414D-F > Topeka, Kansas 66603 > (785) 221-7111 > ByingtonCOMS@...?? ? ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] < [email protected]> On Behalf Of Dona Sauerburger Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2024 12:53 AM To: [email protected]Cc: Aer O&m Listserv <oandm@...> Subject: Re: [OandM] My concern for AER ? Thank you Chris, I appreciate this. ?I’ve come to firmly believe there never is any objective truth, only our perspective of it. — Dona Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist for the blind
On Jun 27, 2024, at 12:51 AM, Chris Tabb <chris@...> wrote:
?Dona, From this one perspective, there are individual personalities that can be so very destructive (at times) they create much duress. There are things you may be unaware of, things that came up in previous tenure that would likely make you reconsider your present perspective. Regardless of whether Lee returns; I believe he acted with integrity in an untenable situation to do his utmost to restore collaborative spirit rather than devisiveness.? ?
On Jun 26, 2024, at 9:25?PM, Dona Sauerburger <dona@...> wrote:
? HI guys!? I had hoped to share my concern with AER members but apparently I'm not getting through to the AER listserv so I'll share it with youns (Pittsbughese for "y'all"!) - I know a lot of you are AER members.?? One of my biggest concerns in this world is the increasing division among people, an "us vs. them" approach with factions trying to energize us with fear or anger (in what Arthur Brooks calls on the national level the "outrage industrial complex") to pressure us to choose and identify with one side or the other.? It is toxic and leads to dysfunctional organizations, where people can't work together and don't trust each other.? This is what is going on with our government. I'm very concerned that our AER leadership is going down this path.? As I understand it, several months ago AER's Executive Director, Lee Sonnenberg, told the board he would resign rather than work with President-Elect Mark Richert.? After the board voted not to remove Richert, Sonnenberg reached out directly to the membership, setting in motion a campaign to support him by removing Richert.?? This is no way to run an organization. If a board member needs to be removed, that is a serious issue that should be carefully considered on its own merits.? It should be separate from any considerations of whether the board member's removal will satisfy the Executive Director's preferences. If Sonnenberg's resignation is reconsidered and he remains as Executive Director, I'm wondering what happens if the board does not agree with him on another matter, or there is someone else he can't get along with.? Will he again appeal directly to the members to take his side, further dividing us? In my opinion, an Executive Director who asks the membership to choose sides is divisive and not a good fit for an organization whose mission is to work together to find common ground and consensus to "speak with one voice." Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist ? The Board of Directors of the Association for the Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired (AER) held a special meeting Tuesday evening to discuss the future leadership of the organization. The meeting resulted in a vote to remove Mark Richert as president-elect, which also means he is no longer on the Board of the organization. The Board did not make this decision lightly. Only after receiving a significant amount of input from members and other constituents of AER did we take this action. The Board will now begin to evaluate new candidates for President and President-Elect. Olaya Landa-Vialard, AER’s current president, has agreed to extend her term until a new President is chosen. While change is always difficult, the Board is enthusiastic about the future of AER. We look forward to seeing many of you at our upcoming International Conference in July. |
|
|
Chris Tabb