开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Date

Re: Dinner before RASC - both Janice and I IN!

Rob Robotham
 

Hmmm,

Given that time will be on our side (compared to a Friday evening), fast
food certainly isn't a requirement.

Hmmm... good chinese restaurants in the area...I know a fairly good Thai
restaurant (again at Alta Vista and Bank), and there is a Cathay
something or other somewhere on St. Laurent I believe. But my
impression of them (there used to be one around the corner) (well around
the corner and down the street) was pretty average. There is a Hooters
on St-L. (which my wife mentioned - incidentally her name is Chris so
I'll stop using that term from now on - mentioned, though she isn't
willing to stand behind it as a suggestion). There is also a Texas
Steak Co. on St-L, though I recall not being impressed. There is a
Robbie's Italian restaurant too - I've either been to it or to a
Robbie's Spaghetti House (on Walkley) and it was pretty good.

For chinese we tend to get take out (we're a little bit west of the
museum's neighbourhood) from the Penan Wok on Bank (just south of the
canal) which is generally pretty good... ummm, how many oafs are going
to meet for dinner? And do any of them have problems with large,
friendly (but not a jumper) dogs (just the one)? Or issues with eating
from their laps (well, maybe plates could be found, but the plates would
be on your knees - or we could use the dining room, but really take-out
chinese doesn't seem appropriate somehow in the dining room)? And will
Chris actually let me make the implied invite???? (Seriously, I would
expect her to).

And we are 5-10 minutes drive from the Museum, which isn't really close
(or really far). And we do have control over music or video selections,
though I'm not sure about putting in Life of Brian with the kids
around...Apollo 13 perhaps?

On the other hand, the Pizza Hut at Industrial and St.L bears little
resemblance to *fast* food - others could debate about the "food" part
but that's not what I'm getting at... I believe there is a Milano's in
the area too.

I guess on the opposite side of the museum from us, there is the
Mandarin Ogilvie (which may have had some sort of issue with an
inspection, or maybe it was just a reviewer a couple of years ago - but
they certainly had a lot of loyal fans as well).

Anyone else with thoughts? I realize it is monday (and after the time
change and everything) so having thoughts may be a lot to ask, but look
at all I've typed without the benefit of thoughts...

Rob

attilla.danko@... wrote:

I'd like to avoid fast-food.
Both
suggestions of Lick's and Kelsey's sound good to us.
Should be pick based on location, like near St-Laurent ave?
I'm not too familliar with the restaraunts in the neiborhood.
I know of kelsy's and red lobster. Any good chineese
restaurants in the area?

-ad

"un bucket pour Monsieur"


Re: Dinner before RASC - both Janice and I IN!

 

I'd like to avoid fast-food.
Both
suggestions of Lick's and Kelsey's sound good to us.
Should be pick based on location, like near St-Laurent ave?
I'm not too familliar with the restaraunts in the neiborhood.
I know of kelsy's and red lobster. Any good chineese
restaurants in the area?

-ad

"un bucket pour Monsieur"


Re: Dinner before RASC

Wagner,Rick [CIS-ADS]
 

Unfortunately I will have to miss dinner again, as I do almost every month.
The leader of the SMARTScope software development team has decided, and most
members agreed, that dinner before each RASC meeting is the ideal time to
discuss progress and plan the way ahead. Normally on Friday nights it's my
daughter's dance class that interferes, but I thought I might escape on a
Saturday. Oh well...
Rick


Re: Etch-a Sketch?

Attilla Danko
 

Hi Roland.

Yes, I've been having some trouble with my cloud-movent
sensing algorithm. I'm going to turn it off while I figure
it out.

Clear skies.

----- Original Message -----
From: <r.prevost@...>
To: <OAFs@...>
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 7:07 PM
Subject: [OAFs] Etch-a Sketch?


Ho Sir Attilla!

Um... I don't want to sound ungrateful or anything, but have your
weather-prediction maps on the OAFs home page gotten more um ...
"sophisticated" recently. What do these three colours mean again?
Are you sure you haven't just found a way to interface an old red
Etch-a-Sketch to an ATI computer graphics card? Looks mighty
suspicious... ;-)

Anyway, some kind of short Coles Notes "Weather-Map Squigglys
Explanation for OAFs" would really be nice, if that were possible.

Hope you are feeling better from the flu bug...

NI!

Sir Rol of Photon





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


Etch-a Sketch?

 

Ho Sir Attilla!

Um... I don't want to sound ungrateful or anything, but have your
weather-prediction maps on the OAFs home page gotten more um ...
"sophisticated" recently. What do these three colours mean again?
Are you sure you haven't just found a way to interface an old red
Etch-a-Sketch to an ATI computer graphics card? Looks mighty
suspicious... ;-)

Anyway, some kind of short Coles Notes "Weather-Map Squigglys
Explanation for OAFs" would really be nice, if that were possible.

Hope you are feeling better from the flu bug...

NI!

Sir Rol of Photon


Dinner before RASC - both Janice and I IN!

 

Dear (Starry Knights of) OAFs...

Janice and I have had a chance to verify our schedules now, and find
that we will be going to the RASC meeting next Saturday. So... we'd
just love to join Rob, Frank, MikeZ, Richard and any other OAFs,
any friends of OAFs (or anyone who's seen or heard a Photon and
enjoyed it, for that matter) at dinner beforehand.

Since this will be a Saturday, and not a Friday, perhaps we don't need
to go to a "fast food" place like MacDonald's or Harvey's. Both
suggestions of Lick's and Kelsey's sound good to us. I have to admit
Rob's description of Lick's sounds interesting. If there are any
other suggestions, let's hear them. Then, if we need to, we could set
up a quick vote, maybe, and make a decision? Time of dinner ( 2 or 3
hours before RASC meeting? )

We're both looking forward to sharing dinner with you. Bring
observing logbooks, photos, pictures of scopes, books, maps, articles,
questions, whatever -- or not. Just be sure to bring yourselves!

Looking forward to it!

Photon Man (& Lady J)


Cubs cancelled - and other musings...

 

Just a note to say that this evening's ( Sat. March 31st ) observing
session at Conroy Pit with beavers and cubs has been cancelled due to
the weather. So it goes... Thanks to everyone who offered to help
out!!

We both got home late from work last night, and so did not get the
message re: possible friday nite dinner until around 8pm. It sounds
like a great way for a "muddle of OAFs" to spend a cloudy evening. So
maybe we can try for that again real soon.

B.T.W.- I would like to bestow honorary OAF-hood (any OAF has the
power) upon Mike Zeidler's wife, for coining the phrase "muddle of
OAFs". This term, especially when applied to a dozen amateur
astronomers, milling about in total darkness in Mike Wirths'
observatory, is most apt!

Photons for breakfast,
Photons for lunch,
Photons for dinnertime!...

Rol ( & Jan )

P.S.- The Meaning of Life was on TV last nite. Janice and I watched
and got to hear the "Galaxy Song" a couple of times.

"Right... So, can we have your liver?"


Re: Dinner? Cloud Cursing? Pre-observing comestibles?

 

Sorry, I have another commitment tonight, but Rob's suggestion of a gathering of oafs (can't come up with any clever expression for that just now, but I'm sure someone will) pre-RASC next week sounds good to me.

----- Original Message -----
From: attilla.danko@...
To: OAFs@...
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 12:11 PM
Subject: [OAFs] Dinner? Cloud Cursing? Pre-observing comestibles?


Anyone feel like a communial cloud cursing seesion,
with fellow oafs, at a restaurant tonight?

Would Kanata or west end be a good location for most people?
If so, Issacs is a has very good food (though, they are not cheap).

It seems it may clear much later in the evening.
(Or is that wishful thinking?)


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Paid Net2phone Advertisement - Click Here!


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Re: Dinner? Cloud Cursing? Pre-observing comestibles?

 

My wife just provided the appropriate term, a muddle of OAFs, and I'm
up for a burger or something next Saturday. Lets set a time and place.

Mike Z


--- In OAFs@y..., "Frank Bayerl" <moxie@m...> wrote:
Sorry, I have another commitment tonight, but Rob's suggestion of a
gathering of oafs (can't come up with any clever expression for that
just now, but I'm sure someone will) pre-RASC next week sounds good
to me.
----- Original Message -----
From: attilla.danko@s...
To: OAFs@y...
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 12:11 PM
Subject: [OAFs] Dinner? Cloud Cursing? Pre-observing comestibles?


Anyone feel like a communial cloud cursing seesion,
with fellow oafs, at a restaurant tonight?

Would Kanata or west end be a good location for most people?
If so, Issacs is a has very good food (though, they are not
cheap).

It seems it may clear much later in the evening.
(Or is that wishful thinking?)


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Paid Net2phone Advertisement - Click Here!


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.




Re: Dinner? Cloud Cursing? Pre-observing comestibles?

Richard Harding
 

I agree that a "gathering" before the next meeting is a great ideal! I will go where goes the group. BTW, I as well like Starry Knights. I have done a logo (uncommissioned!!) for the "Starry Knights of the OAFs". I digitized it but had trouble sending it. I will try again from work on Monday.
Eventual clear skies?
Richard


Re: Dinner? Cloud Cursing? Pre-observing comestibles?

Rob Robotham
 

Alas (not to be confused with a lass), not myself tonight.

On the other hand the RASC meeting is next Saturday, and I was wondering
if there was going to be a collection of oafs pre-meeting? I would
invite people over for a BBQ, but unless the weather really turns around
I'm afraid that would be premature. Maybe next meeting...

If we want to do the hamburger thing, may I recommend Licks at Bank and
AltaVista (best burgers you pay someone for - maybe you can make better
but for a fast food place...), otherwise Kelsey's or somewhere else?

Rob

P.S. OAFs is a fine name, but really Starry Kaa-Nigg-Its would have had
some potential... (Sorry my brain is mush, that's the only Python
reference I could come up with on short notice)

attilla.danko@... wrote:

Anyone feel like a communial cloud cursing seesion,
with fellow oafs, at a restaurant tonight?

Would Kanata or west end be a good location for most people?
If so, Issacs is a has very good food (though, they are not cheap).

It seems it may clear much later in the evening.
(Or is that wishful thinking?)


Dinner? Cloud Cursing? Pre-observing comestibles?

 

Anyone feel like a communial cloud cursing seesion,
with fellow oafs, at a restaurant tonight?

Would Kanata or west end be a good location for most people?
If so, Issacs is a has very good food (though, they are not cheap).

It seems it may clear much later in the evening.
(Or is that wishful thinking?)


Re: Larger Solar Spot...

Wagner,Rick [CIS-ADS]
 

Light from the sun works the same way as light from a nebula - it just
happens to be at the other extreme of the range of brightness we astronomers
have to deal with. Let's compare a 6x30 finder with naked eye - let's
assume a 5mm pupil (the solar astronomer's will be smaller than this, the
stellar astronomer's probably larger). The 30mm aperture of the finder is 6
times larger in diameter or 36 times the area of the naked eye pupil. It
therefore accepts 36 times as much light. However, when using the telescope
the image of the sun on the retina will also be 6 times larger in diameter
or 36 times the area of the image when observing naked eye. So 36 times as
much light spread over 36 times as much area gives the same intensity per
unit area. What if we reduce the magnification of the scope to say 3x?
Then the exit pupil of the scope will be 10mm so 1/4 of the light coming
from the scope will be blocked from entering the eye by the pupil and we end
up with the same intensity.

Finally - the welding filters are designed for use with arc-welding which
generates copious amounts of UV and IR. They are guaranteed safe naked eye.
And, of course, the UV and IR are both affected the same way as visual light
as far as aperture and magnification goes.

Therefore if a filter is safe for naked eye viewing it will also be safe in
front of any scope.

Note that all this works the same for nebulae. A nebula can never have a
higher intensity of light on the retina than when observing naked eye. So
why does the telescope help? By increasing the size of the nebula at the
same intensity the eye/brain combo is able to better detect the photons
arriving over a larger area - they don't ignore it as noise. For more
detail check out, for example, Mel Bartel's web pages on optimal visual
magnification - . All
this doesn't work for stars though. A star is essentially a point object so
it doesn't look any bigger in a 60x300 telescope than a 6x30 so it does get
much brighter in the larger scope.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce McGlashan [mailto:mcglashanb2@...]
Sent: Thursday, 29 March 2001 22:13
To: OAFs@...
Subject: Re: [OAFs] Larger Solar Spot...


Thanks. I was not really concerned with the visible light, but with the UV.
I guess what I was concerned about was whether the glass is as efficient at
blocking UV as it is at blocking visible light. It could be minimally
acceptable in the UV band for naked-eye observation, but magnification would
put it over the safe limit. See what I mean? {pardon the pun}


Re: Larger Solar Spot...

Wagner,Rick [CIS-ADS]
 

Well, I got mine in a little welding supply shop in Cold Lake Alberta but
I'm sure there are closer places than that. It was actually a nation-wide
chain called Acklands and I believe they are in Ottawa as well.
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: r.prevost@... [mailto:r.prevost@...]
Sent: Thursday, 29 March 2001 17:48
To: OAFs@...
Subject: [OAFs] Re: Larger Solar Spot...


--- In OAFs@y..., "Wagner,Rick [CIS-ADS]" <rick.wagner@e...> wrote:
Sure it's safe. I have a 2x4" welder's glass which I use in front
of my 9x21 binos for quick checks of the sun. A telescope/binocular
can't concentrate the light to any greater intensity than that which
is coming into the objective. Therefore anything which is safe to
look through with the naked eye is also safe in front of the
objective.
I'm glad to know that. Better safe than sorry. You explanation makes
sense -- the light is already at a safe level before entering your
binoculars.

Thanks Rick!

Where does on get welder's glass anyway?

Rol





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


TO Bruce re: collimation

 

Hi Bruce,

Here's something that happened to me not long after I got my SCT8"...

If ever you defocus a star for the purposes of star testing, using,
for example, a 10mm eyepiece, you may not see a perfect star pattern.

It took me a while to notice what "heat plumes" look like. I know you
may think you let your scope cool down, but if ever you get a pattern
that forms a kind of a "V" shape, with the point of the "V" being
close to the center of your "out of focus star" and the two arms of
the "V" being at the outer edges of your "out of focus star", there's
a good chance you may have a heat plume going on.

How would you know? Try the following:

Make sure that with the diagonoal in, your eyepiece is pointing
skyward ( straight up ). If from this angle, the view of the out of
focus star in your eyepiece shows the two arms of the "V" pointing
visually up ( heat rises ), you probably have a heat plume. No amount
of collimation can fix that. However, as you fiddle with collimation,
it seems to improve a bit ( as it is cooling).

Note that your body heat can "reheat" your scope a bit, and cause such
a plume. That happenned to me a few times before it clicked that in
cold conditions, I had to be careful about where I place my body, so
as not to transfer heat to the tube.

Also, temperatures are changing alot between day and night, so unless
the temperature is stable for an hour or two, you have no guarantee
that one hour cooling or even two hour cooling will work. Two hours
"at the same temperature" should cool it though.

Anyway, such a pattern could be some kind of optical aberration, I
guess, but at first impression, it sure sounds alot like a heat plume
to me. I hope that's the case, as that's not much of a problem.

Best of luck with your new scope!

Roland


Re: Larger Solar Spot...

Bruce McGlashan
 

Thanks. I was not really concerned with the visible light, but with the UV.
I guess what I was concerned about was whether the glass is as efficient at
blocking UV as it is at blocking visible light. It could be minimally
acceptable in the UV band for naked-eye observation, but magnification would
put it over the safe limit. See what I mean? {pardon the pun}

-----Original Message-----
From: Wagner,Rick [CIS-ADS] <rick.wagner@...>
To: 'OAFs@...' <OAFs@...>
Date: March 29, 2001 08:35
Subject: RE: [OAFs] Larger Solar Spot...


Sure it's safe. I have a 2x4" welder's glass which I use in front of my
9x21 binos for quick checks of the sun. A telescope/binocular can't
concentrate the light to any greater intensity than that which is coming
into the objective. Therefore anything which is safe to look through with
the naked eye is also safe in front of the objective. BUT, make sure you
fasten it on well and make sure that it covers the whole objective. The
optical quality of the filters isn't great but at 9 or 10x it's fine.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce McGlashan [mailto:mcglashanb2@...]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2001 18:33
To: OAFs@...
Subject: Re: [OAFs] Larger Solar Spot...


snip

My wife suggested I haul the finderscope off the scope and look at the sun
through it and the welder's glass (glass in front). I didn't try it,
because I wasn't sure that's a safe thing to do. Anybody know?
snip




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to



Re: Larger Solar Spot...

Richard Harding
 

Hi Bruce!
I have read many threads about people using welder's glass in the front of binoculars for viewing solar events. I have often heard the warning to make sure that the glass is SECURELY fastened to prevent it falling off or shifting to let some light in. However, I have never heard of a UV danger (ie. a concentration of UV light). I suggest that if you are concerned, that you buy a piece of Bader filter material (quite cheap I think) and use that with your finder scope and binos. This is obviously safe, as people are spending hours at the eyepiece of telescopes with Bader filters looking at the sun at far higher magnifications than you are talking about, without reported problems. Just my two cents worth!
Richard

Return-Path: <sentto-2911285-245-985922045-rharding=iosphere.net@...>
Received: from hj.egroups.com (hj.egroups.com [208.50.99.212])
by homer.iosphere.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f2U3E8k24456
for <rharding@...>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:14:09 -0500 (EST)
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-2911285-245-985922045-rharding=iosphere.net@...
Received: from [10.1.4.53] by hj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 30 Mar 2001 03:14:05 -0000
X-Sender: bruce-mcglashan@...
X-Apparently-To: OAFs@...
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 30 Mar 2001 03:14:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 75357 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2001 03:14:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 30 Mar 2001 03:14:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO femail2.rdc1.on.home.com) (24.2.9.89) by mta3 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2001 04:15:09 -0000
Received: from BruceHome ([24.42.87.234]) by femail2.rdc1.on.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010330031357.QHXO1545.femail2.rdc1.on.home.com@BruceHome> for <OAFs@...>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 19:13:57 -0800
Message-ID: <011301c0b8c7$790be800$0300a8c0@BruceHome>
To: <OAFs@...>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
X-eGroups-From: "Bruce McGlashan" <bruce-mcglashan@...>
From: "Bruce McGlashan" <mcglashanb2@...>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list OAFs@...; contact OAFs-owner@...
Delivered-To: mailing list OAFs@...
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:OAFs-unsubscribe@...>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:13:25 -0500
Reply-To: OAFs@...
Subject: Re: [OAFs] Larger Solar Spot...
Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: RO

<html><body>
<tt>
Thanks.&amp;nbsp; I was not really concerned with the visible light, but with the UV.<BR>
I guess what I was concerned about was whether the glass is as efficient at<BR>
blocking UV as it is at blocking visible light.&amp;nbsp; It could be minimally<BR>
acceptable in the UV band for naked-eye observation, but magnification would<BR>
put it over the safe limit.&amp;nbsp; See what I mean? {pardon the pun}<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Wagner,Rick [CIS-ADS] &amp;lt;rick.wagner@...&amp;gt;<BR>
To: 'OAFs@...' &amp;lt;OAFs@...&amp;gt;<BR>
Date: March 29, 2001 08:35<BR>
Subject: RE: [OAFs] Larger Solar Spot...<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
&amp;gt;Sure it's safe.&amp;nbsp; I have a 2x4&amp;quot; welder's glass which I use in front of my<BR>
&amp;gt;9x21 binos for quick checks of the sun.&amp;nbsp; A telescope/binocular can't<BR>
&amp;gt;concentrate the light to any greater intensity than that which is coming<BR>
&amp;gt;into the objective.&amp;nbsp; Therefore anything which is safe to look through with<BR>
&amp;gt;the naked eye is also safe in front of the objective.&amp;nbsp; BUT, make sure you<BR>
&amp;gt;fasten it on well and make sure that it covers the whole objective.&amp;nbsp; The<BR>
&amp;gt;optical quality of the filters isn't great but at 9 or 10x it's fine.<BR>
&amp;gt;<BR>
&amp;gt;Rick<BR>
&amp;gt;<BR>
&amp;gt;-----Original Message-----<BR>
&amp;gt;From: Bruce McGlashan [mailto:mcglashanb2@...]<BR>
&amp;gt;Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2001 18:33<BR>
&amp;gt;To: OAFs@...<BR>
&amp;gt;Subject: Re: [OAFs] Larger Solar Spot...<BR>
&amp;gt;<BR>
&amp;gt;<BR>
&amp;gt;snip<BR>
&amp;gt;<BR>
&amp;gt;My wife suggested I haul the finderscope off the scope and look at the sun<BR>
&amp;gt;through it and the welder's glass (glass in front).&amp;nbsp; I didn't try it,<BR>
&amp;gt;because I wasn't sure that's a safe thing to do.&amp;nbsp; Anybody know?<BR>
&amp;gt;snip<BR>
&amp;gt;<BR>
&amp;gt;<BR>
&amp;gt;<BR>
&amp;gt;<BR>
&amp;gt;Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <a href="></a><BR>
&amp;gt;<BR>
&amp;gt;<BR>
&amp;gt;<BR>
<BR>
</tt>

<br>

<!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->

<table border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2>
<tr bgcolor=#FFFFCC>
<td align=center><font size="-1" color=#003399><b>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor</b></font></td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor=#FFFFFF>
<td width=470><a href=" target="_top"><img width=468 height=60 src=" alt="www.debticated.com" border=0></a></td>
</tr>
<tr><td><img alt="" width=1 height=1 src="></td></tr>
</table>

<!-- |**|end egp html banner|**| -->



<br>
<tt>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <a href=">Yahoo! Terms of Service</a>.</tt>
</br>

</body></html>


Re: Mike: Cadets are interested......

Richard Harding
 

Hi di ho neighbours!!
I would love to come. However, Judith will be back home for the long weekend.......sooooo we'll have to see!
Richard

Sir, your sheep are all in the trees!!
Ah yes....they're nesting.
Like birds??
Ar..Exactly!! It is my belief that these sheep are labouring under the misapprhension that they're birds. Witness their attempts to fly from tree to tree.....notice they do not so much fly as plummet!! BAAAAAAAA......THUD!!


Re: Mike: Cadets are interested......(reply)

 

--- In OAFs@y..., "Mike Wirths" <mwirths@s...> wrote:
Hi Jean,

How about April 14th thats a day before last quarter, does this
conflict
with any other event?


--L8tr

Mike W
Mike,

I've advised the Squadron that the 14th is our GO date...of course
we'll be crossing our fingers for good weather and the final Go-NoGO
decision will be yours to make....I'm guessing the cellular network
will be humming on the 14th!

Again, I can't thank you enough for this....the kids are sparked
right up as are the 4 members of the staff interested in going...

Jean


Re: Larger Solar Spot...

Bruce McGlashan
 

-----Original Message-----
From: r.prevost@... <r.prevost@...>
To: OAFs@... <OAFs@...>
Date: March 29, 2001 17:48
Subject: [OAFs] Re: Larger Solar Spot...


[snip]



Where does on get welder's glass anyway?

I bought mine at Messer at 1750 Woodward Drive. It was #14, and it measures
about 4x6".