MITN Tue. 02-25 3.966
WB8TQZ
By
Mike and Laura Horn
·
#2723
·
|
MACS Tue. 02-25 7.236
...unless, of course, somebody else jumps on it.
WB8TQZ
By
Mike and Laura Horn
·
#2722
·
|
Monday MITN 3962
Monday MITN 3962
ND8W
By
ND8W
·
#2721
·
|
Macs Monday Morn
K8ED took the net on 7233 a minute or two past ten. Passed me a piece of
traffic for Columbus in St. Clair Co. Nobody else on freq. Never heard you
Pete if you attempted to check in.
K8DLW
By
Dave
·
#2720
·
|
Re: interference on 3950
I am looking at this situation through the eyes of the FCC and the Volunteer Monitoring Program..
If I were "them"- I would have a transceiver set to 3950 and one to 3952. I would record the
By
John Tallman
·
#2719
·
|
MACS
Well, it's Monday. Joe's in the Bikini State, so no net. I looked here and
zip. Then scrolled 3920 to 3960. Absolutely clear. Not a sound
Then moved to 72325 and scrolled to 7260 and back to 7220.
By
Pete Hardin
·
#2718
·
|
Re: interference on 3950
But most do not use the reflector- Perhaps a wider distribution of this to the general ham population is needed? If folks do not know where we are, no newbies come by - Hence we don't grow in
By
Joseph Bell
·
#2717
·
|
Re: interference on 3950
I know in my case, continued bad regional communications has made me less likely to appear on the nets at all- And when I need extra time to? select a freq,monitor it and issue it on the reflector
By
Joseph Bell
·
#2716
·
|
23FEB 2025
Stations for the Michigan traffic at 3970 for 23 February 2025.
*Sincerely, Michael Shirey *
*ARRL Official Relay Station and NET. Manager *
*for the **Great Lakes Emergency & Traffic Net.
By
KD8ZCM - Michael Shirey
·
#2715
·
|
Re: interference on 3950
I think 3950 +/- can work if the NC properly posts on the Reflector.
Too many times someone refuses to post a move, then people have to guess
where the net is.
I hope somehow all will smooth
By
Pete Hardin
·
#2714
·
|
Re: interference on 3950
Well, it looks like the time change idea is a non-starter so let's forget that. I can, indeed, hear those guys, if they are transmitting. I have no trouble hearing the whiner when he comes up ib
By
Mike and Laura Horn
·
#2713
·
|
Re: interference on 3950
Next thought.. if most don't care to bother looking- maybe they don't want to really be here. Can't make somebody do something that they don't want to do.
________________________________
Sent:
By
John Tallman
·
#2712
·
|
Re: interference on 3950
The reflector seems to work out well for MACS. It opened this morning at 7245, somehow everybody found the net. I just kept turning the VFO up band and would have found the net, even without the
By
John Tallman
·
#2711
·
|
MACS Sun. 02-23 7.245
WB8TQZ
By
Mike and Laura Horn
·
#2710
·
|
Re: interference on 3950
That's why we have a reflector at our disposal... Good for mass communications. Not that we have many check-ins anymore, but if PGW is unwilling to cause willful interference and not check-in at all,
By
ND8W
·
#2709
·
|
Re: interference on 3950
If we move too far from 3.952 LSB then most won't know where we moved to- Or bother looking- That is what killed off the GLETN many years ago-?
That change if permanent will need to have? a wide
By
Joseph Bell
·
#2708
·
|
Re: correction
Sorry to hear of the problems back home- JB
By
Joseph Bell
·
#2707
·
|
Re: 22FEB2025 Net control
[email protected]> wrote:
By
Dave
·
#2706
·
|
Re: 22FEB2025 Net control
Nobody around for MITN. No NC for GL. Three of on GL. K8DLW
<Kd8zcm@...> wrote:
By
Dave
·
#2705
·
|
22FEB2025 Net control
Not gonna make it home in time to do MITN net control. Someone please pick
it up for me. Thank you in advance.
*Sincerely, Michael Shirey *
*ARRL Official Relay Station and NET. Manager *
*for
By
KD8ZCM - Michael Shirey
·
#2704
·
|