开云体育

1. Did Ukraine make a mistake giving up it's nuclear weapons in 1994? Yes 2. What was the most egregious scientific hoax of the 20th century? Anthropogenic global warming aka climate change. 3. Should

My big concern is that not enough people are really tuned into just how bad the fake news media is.? Trump made it a front-page issue but I'm not sure there will be a strong enough personality to

Yes, of course they did. Piltdown Man Currently there's not enough evidence to conclude that they shouldn't be allowed. Time will tell, though. Putin Not so much Aloha, Celeste

1. Did Ukraine make a ,mistake giving up it's nuclear weapons in 1994? Emphatically yes - there is a saying about the future of sheep who sit down to dinner with wolves 2.? What was the most

1. Did Ukraine make a ,mistake giving up it's nuclear weapons in 21994? 2.? What was the most egregious scientific hoax of the 20th century? 3.? Should biological males who self identify as female

Well, at least the people have been shown clearly over the past two years that "the news" has in our time become effectively a propaganda arm of the ruling establishment. Whether or not the people

America and Canada are both ruled by fools. This is possible because of two things. The first is that both use majority rule. The second, which follows on from the first, is that both have become

Post Script - just watched a clip from tonight's CBC National news, in which they report on the meeting at the EU today. They talked about how Trudeau addressed parliament, but just showed him close

Justin Trudeau has been swanning around Europe lately, meeting with world leaders, pretending to be helping to solve the Russia/ Ukraine problems. We Canadians here at home wonder why the world

For purposes of reatity - virtually all energy that humans use come from the sun - the only exceptions are geothermal and tidal. Marvin Well, hello Tom. Haven't heard from you in years. Sorry to see

Well, hello Tom. Haven't heard from you in years. Sorry to see you're still just as far-left as you used to be. Yes, Canada has developed the cleanest methods in the world for extracting the oil from

On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 13:33 re: Re: [M-Powered] Keystone cancellati … Pat Trivers <[email protected]>said: Cleanest oil???? * It takes about 30% of the energy to run the extra

Does that "cleanest"part include the burning of the oil products afterwards? I am a bit set back at the idea of clean internal combustion... :) Darrell G King, MA, RN Rochester, NY, US

That brings up some of the misleading points that we keep hearing about this war, that Ukraine or Russia produce a high percent of this or that commodity or food to some poor country or worse, some

touche! Actually, Canada could produce significantly more oil than we do. The Keystone XL pipeline was expected to allow increased production. Canada's oil patch is in Alberta, and Alberta is

Actually, Canada could produce significantly more oil than we do. The Keystone XL pipeline was expected to allow increased production. Canada's oil patch is in Alberta, and Alberta is landlocked. We

Oh you're just trying to bury me in technicalities. The cancelled pipeline, however specific you want you want me to be about the nomenclature, would have delivered more domestic and Canadian oil to

<<830,000 barrels per day is a lot. Venezuela only produces about 900,000, and it's a major exporter. We're talking exports, not usage. If you're saying that part of Keystone will be shut down when

<< Very good answers. >> Thank you, Amy. Rhonda

Ed, The Keystone pipeline has been in operation continuously since 2010. I think you're actually referring to the Keystone XL, which wasn't scheduled to be completed until 2030. It has absolutely no