Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Is G11g/T remote observatory ready....Well almost remote
I am building a new observatory. I will have an sct ( 8-11") and a 4.5" refractor to be placed on the mount.? I'll likely reduce the sct's ( .7x) . While I stated in my heading it's remote, I'm likely to be at the site when I use the equipment.? I would prefer to automate a night's imaging sequence. as if I was remote.? I'm guessing the weight of the equipment will be in the range of 40 - 60 lbs.? The questions I have are as follows;
1.? Is the G11 series with Gemini up to the automated task? 2.? Should I really be looking at the G11T vs. G11G? because of the imaging equipment? 3.? Does the G11G with the spring-loaded Ra and DEC perform better than the G11T if you stay within its weight limits? 4.? If I purchase the G11G, the RA extension should be included. 5. What else should I be considering? I would appreciate any advice from the group. Thanks, Jim |
Hi Jim I am sure you wrote me, but i can't for the life of me find that email, so I apologize for the late response my answers are inline below: On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 6:04 PM <jwj1217@...> wrote: I am building a new observatory. I will have an sct ( 8-11") and a 4.5" refractor to be placed on the mount.? I'll likely reduce the sct's ( .7x) . While I stated in my heading it's remote, I'm likely to be at the site when I use the equipment.? I would prefer to automate a night's imaging sequence. as if I was remote.? I'm guessing the weight of the equipment will be in the range of 40 - 60 lbs.? The questions I have are as follows; --
Brian? Brian Valente portfolio |
A loaded question, Jim. You may want to decide on what size SCT you want first. From what I have seen from the experience of those with 11" scopes, guiding starts getting tricky if you are doing deep sky imaging. You really need a steady mount for the long focal length and the tinier objects you'll be going after. I've seen some reports that there can be disappointment that the local seeing conditions can work against these large apertures.
Of course there is the temptation to place all your scopes on one mount and have them all ready to go. But you need to consider flexure and that the greater weights will be flexing all the connections and whatever brackets you might select. If you go side by side that might be an option if you pick some good hardware. Over and under puts a lot of stress on the base scope. And with all the counterweights with a multi-setup you need to control a large mass with precision.? ? With my G11, I use a C925 during winter and spring to capture galaxies, then switch over to a 102mm refractor for the summer with all the large nebula targets. Sometimes I do a side by side with the 102mm and a 60mm on the other side. But I really would not try mounting all these things all at once due to the complexity. If you start having guiding issues, it might be harder to nail down the solution. If I were to get an 11" SCT, I would get a Titan just for that, to better manage the payload. But I think the Titans are way backordered right now with the high G11 demands at Losmandy. Hope this helps. John ? |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss