¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

PREVIEW: New Tutorial on calculating your Image Scale


Brian Valente
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

This isn¡¯t yet published, but I wanted to pass this along to this special group of folks and see if there¡¯s any feedback

?

It¡¯s Part 1 of Practical PEC for your Gemini

?

It was supposed to be a short ¡®here¡¯s how to calc your image scale¡¯ but it ended up 18 minutes long

?

?

?

Thanks

?

Brian

?

Brian Valente

Losmandy Astronomical

?

Losmandy.com

Tutorials and vids at

?


Jim Waters
 

Good tutorial and information but I am confused.? Shouldn't you enter your auto-guider information and not your imaging scope if you intend to use PEMPro?


 

Great question -?

I covered this briefly, but to clarify, you really want to use your imaging scope. Recording your PEC data has nothing to do with guiding.?



On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:25 AM Jim Waters <jimwaters@...> wrote:
Good tutorial and information but I am confused.? Shouldn't you enter your auto-guider information and not your imaging scope if you intend to use PEMPro?



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


 

Great video! The start and finish are awesome!?

Very informative, I don't know if you need to add this but you can install?
locally, on your imaging computer and it will always be there as long as you're imaging computer is. That's how mine is setup. I've found that it runs faster when it's installed locally, and is of course more reliable when I'm imaging.?

Jamie



 

Local astrometry is even easier

Andy Galasso over at PHD built Ansvr and a wizard to walk you through downloading the relevant catalogs - just install and go, no build necessary

??


On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:02 AM Jamie Amendolagine <jamie.amendolagine@...> wrote:
Great video! The start and finish are awesome!?

Very informative, I don't know if you need to add this but you can install?
locally, on your imaging computer and it will always be there as long as you're imaging computer is. That's how mine is setup. I've found that it runs faster when it's installed locally, and is of course more reliable when I'm imaging.?

Jamie




--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


Jim Waters
 

I need to clarify.? Yes; you need to use your imaging scope.? I am not taking about PHD2 guiding.? I used my auto-guider (QHY-5L-II) for PEMPro PEC training and my 630mm scope last week.? Are you saying I should use my imaging camera (ASI2600MC Pro)?? Both have?3.75um pixels.


 

Hi JIm

In your case, probably either is fine

The general recommendation is that you use your existing imaging setup so you can avoid the inconvenience of reconfiguring your telescope setup, etc.

the imaging camera?+ scope is preferable because it is generally more secure to the mount (i.e., no rings or other source of possible error) and usually has a finer imaging scale, both of which improve the data you collect

if you want to send your data i'm happy to take a look at it

hth

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 7:21 PM Jim Waters <jimwaters@...> wrote:
I need to clarify.? Yes; you need to use your imaging scope.? I am not taking about PHD2 guiding.? I used my auto-guider (QHY-5L-II) for PEMPro PEC training and my 630mm scope last week.? Are you saying I should use my imaging camera (ASI2600MC Pro)?? Both have?3.75um pixels.



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


 

Another reason you want to use the main scope/camera is that the larger sensor area of the main camera will usually allow for more drift before the star being tracked will fall off the sensor.

-Ray Gralak
Author of APCC (Astro-Physics Command Center):
Author of PEMPro V3:
Author of Astro-Physics V2 ASCOM Driver:

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Valente
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 7:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Losmandy_users_io] PREVIEW: New Tutorial on calculating your Image Scale

Hi JIm

In your case, probably either is fine

The general recommendation is that you use your existing imaging setup so you can avoid the inconvenience of
reconfiguring your telescope setup, etc.

the imaging camera + scope is preferable because it is generally more secure to the mount (i.e., no rings or other
source of possible error) and usually has a finer imaging scale, both of which improve the data you collect

if you want to send your data i'm happy to take a look at it

hth

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 7:21 PM Jim Waters <jimwaters@...> wrote:


I need to clarify. Yes; you need to use your imaging scope. I am not taking about PHD2 guiding. I used
my auto-guider (QHY-5L-II) for PEMPro PEC training and my 630mm scope last week. Are you saying I should
use my imaging camera (ASI2600MC Pro)? Both have 3.75um pixels.







--

Brian



Brian Valente
portfolio brianvalentephotography.com <>