开云体育

Okay thanks, I'll call (I emailed her but never heard back). I signed up for the waitlist on the store awhile back so I assume I'm in a spreadsheet or something.

Just as a data point, I ordered an OPW for a GM8 in February, and a GM811G in March. Got the mount, but still waiting for the OPW. Can't really sell the GM8 with the PE it has right now so i guess i'm

Jim it gets hard over time and also tends to spread out. if you search on this group you will find some examples (pics) of really bad consequences of lithium -- Brian Brian Valente portfolio

UPDATE (sorry Keith, i thought you were sending me an email directly) I don't have that info - i did ask and it varies from month to month depending on how much demand is for new vs. additional so

Brian - any updates to this? Thanks Keith

Hello, I have done a study of the available greases. Here is the data: 4-ball test coeff of friction: CRC Brake and Caliper grease 4 ball wear scar 0.6 mm Timken load 60 lbs Copper corrosion 1B (shiny

I use SuperLube on my GM811G.? What are the specific issues with lithium grease?? Just want to know.? Thx -- ------------------------ Jim W Phoenix, AZ. USA Losmandy GM811G, NINA 1.11, ASI2600MC

I recently switched from super lube to moly based CRC brake and caliper lube.? The moly based stuff, to my senses, handles higher friction loads considerably better.? I am using custom spring loaded

please do NOT use lithium grease. we use arctic lube here at the shop, and many others use superlube -- Brian Brian Valente portfolio brianvalentephotography.com

I have just finished taking out the backlash from my 1992 steel wormed CG11.? I had the gearbox off and the Oldham connector.? During this process I removed a small amount of lube from the bearings

Yup, that's basically it. A few bigger popular galaxies here & there but mostly the bigger nebulae for now Thanks for your help Edward !

I would not worry about the under-sampling per se.? At that image scale, you are probably going to target larger emission nebula. If you have enough subs, you can drizzle x2 or x3 and certainly

So after bashing my head a few times on the bahtinov mask I finally remembered it was a Carey mask and not a bahtinov after all ! Downside is that NINA can’t analyze that for me. Upside is I feel

Thanks, I will post up a stretched version - the stars visually look good to me, so maybe I should just stop obsessing ? Regarding the undersampling - I guess the only solution there is a smaller

Due to the image under-sampling, I am not sure the star sizes are really 6-7 arcsec.? I was hard pressed to find stars more than 2 pixels across in the image. Perhaps it would help to stretch the

Thanks Edward. Yeah 3.5 pixels I believe is what NINA reports, that translates into 6-7 arc seconds (2.18 as/px scale) Many people report getting 2-3 arc/sec which seems not achievable to me That link

Nick,? Thanks for posting some curves.? You might temporarily bump up number of points it computes on either side of the minimum (keeping the AF step size the same) to make sure the curves continue

Nick, A couple of things come to mind if you are not getting HFR low enough: -Double check your sampling. If you are far less than one this could cause bloating. If you have a mono cam try binning 2X2

This is a link also to a 10 min test sub (NEF format) - no processing done on it https://drive.google.com/file/d/184Ki_dSmfsH7Wbh1v0e3QJ9RuGtma-5k/view?usp=sharing

Good point. I have a couple of "normal" looking ones and the first one thats a bit odd - I think because I had changed the exposure time to 4 seconds which is not enough HFR of my subis is around