¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Needle bearings and axial play, is this a significant performance problem and how difficult is it to fix?

 

Alan,

First, I never power through motor stalls. In fact,I do not even get them. ?Second, no, can you post a link please. I like the idea a checking the current and will no that.

When you are over 2500ms of measured backlash it has to come from some place. ?Others here has even larger values on a brand new mount.?I've already gone over this. 1. Gearbox, 2. Coupler, 3. Worm mesh, and 4. needle bearings (which I know you do not agree play a role). I will be checking my backlash again tonight after some mods made and will report back.

I'm going to nail this sucker,

Peter


Re: Motors too loud

 

Alen,

As someone who has taken apart their worm/motor assembly dozens of times these past few weeks. I have found that a noisy motor is not a good thing. I worry about what is going on inside the gearbox, specifically the position of the pinion gear relation the first gear in the box. The noise is a sign of undo loading I would say. It sounds like you have the tucked motor assembly so this may not apply. ?I now slightly loosen off the two screws holding down the motor and torque it, usually clockwise, until things sound right. Keeping presure on the motor I then lock it down. I make this adjustment until the sound is the same in both directions. It is not always easy to find the sweet spot. In your case there may be other points of misalignment, but I would say it's definatly from the gearbox. Perhaps the transfer gear is putting undue presure on the output gear of the gearbox as another possibility. Good luck sorting this out.

Peter


Re: How to determine mechanical CWD position?

 

Why don't you level the tripod first?? My HD tripod has two levels on it, which makes it easy.? Then you use the levels on the mount to get it in the home position and adjust AZ with a viewfinder or telrad to get close enough.

The setting circles are adjustable for calibration.? Level the tripod, aim the scope at a known star then turn the setting circles to match.? This is how I started with my G11S that had a non-goto tracking system until I motorized it with OnStep.


Re: How to determine mechanical CWD position?

 

Let's assume I think the mount is in CWD position, but the DEC axis is actually 3 degrees off.
When I start the polar alignment, I adjust the az knob so the pole is somewhat centered.? To make the telescope straight, now the az is off by 3 degrees.
After I rotate the RA axis 90 degrees, I find that I have to adjust the az back 3 degrees.


Re: Motors too loud

 

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:21 PM, John Kmetz wrote:
Other than the motor adjustment, touching up the gears with a bit of Superlube can help. If you take the motors off you can dab some on the pinion gear and inside the gearbox with a small pick or screwdriver. Applying some more to the spur gears and the worm likewise can help. The grease seems like it gets pushed aside over time and piles up outside the contact areas. A touch up now and then can be prudent.?
The two transfer gears appear to have a dark grey lube on them.


Re: Motors too loud

 

I already did that


Re: Motors too loud

 

What seems to be loud noise when sitting next to mount late at night can be a relative experience. When I get back inside the house and run remotely I can't hear anything, even with the windows open.

Other than the motor adjustment, touching up the gears with a bit of Superlube can help. If you take the motors off you can dab some on the pinion gear and inside the gearbox with a small pick or screwdriver. Applying some more to the spur gears and the worm likewise can help. The grease seems like it gets pushed aside over time and piles up outside the contact areas. A touch up now and then can be prudent.?

You know I had a CEM60 for a short period before I returned it to Ioptron for a refund. Nice and quiet, but it vibrated like a tuning fork at the slightest disturbance.?


?are daily summaries stored long term for future reference, do i need to store said summaries myself

 

Bob H. here, my primary question does the server, or some other storage modailty required i.e. meaning my own on PC storage capability. Many of these daily summaries are full of need to know data, answers to need only once in a while, etc. I need to know how to access said info from .io or my own personal storage. Respectfully submitted.?


Re: How to determine mechanical CWD position?

 

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 09:07 PM, Brian Valente wrote:
Hi ALan
?
>>>This is because I use Sharpcap for polar alignment, and I always start with adjusting the alt, az knobs to get the scope roughly pointing at the pole.
?
>>>You may be thinking, "well, you love plate solving so much, why don't you use that after the polar alignment?"??
?
Afaik Sharpcap PA routines use platesolving to do its thing? and doesn't require precise CDW position to work effectively
?
?
?
?

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 8:05 PM alan137 <acfang137@...> wrote:
Hello,?
Is there a way to figure out how to set the mount to the CDW position without using the bubble levels?? Since I set the mount on pavement, it's not always perfectly level.? But I do need the DEC axis (for example) to be pointing EXACTLY straight forwards.? This is because I use Sharpcap for polar alignment, and I always start with adjusting the alt, az knobs to get the scope roughly pointing at the pole.? This is BEFORE I do the "rotate the RA axis by 90 degrees" part and finish with fine adjustments.
My mount has the setting circles on it, but for some reason I don't understand, the scales are rotateable, so that doesn't help me.? I would have thought there would be inscribed marks on the axis?? (Now that I think about it, my old DEC G8 axis did have an inscribed mark with a non-rotatable scale, which was helpful.)?
You may be thinking, "well, you love plate solving so much, why don't you use that after the polar alignment?"? The problem is that when you do plate solve near the pole, it doesn't take into account cone / pointing error and only sends the center of the frame back to the mount for sync. (I think it doesn't send the rotation of the frame)? Anyway, if you have any cone / pointing error, the RA and DEC values will be way off.

?

?


?
--
Brian?
?
?
?
Brian Valente
portfolio
That was what I was understanding / hoping too

I think if you really need to worry about it, SharpCap has a tool for it. I've never used it though


Re: How to determine mechanical CWD position?

 

Hi ALan

>>>This is because I use Sharpcap for polar alignment, and I always start with adjusting the alt, az knobs to get the scope roughly pointing at the pole.

>>>You may be thinking, "well, you love plate solving so much, why don't you use that after the polar alignment?"??

Afaik Sharpcap PA routines use platesolving to do its thing? and doesn't require precise CDW position to work effectively





On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 8:05 PM alan137 <acfang137@...> wrote:
Hello,?
Is there a way to figure out how to set the mount to the CDW position without using the bubble levels?? Since I set the mount on pavement, it's not always perfectly level.? But I do need the DEC axis (for example) to be pointing EXACTLY straight forwards.? This is because I use Sharpcap for polar alignment, and I always start with adjusting the alt, az knobs to get the scope roughly pointing at the pole.? This is BEFORE I do the "rotate the RA axis by 90 degrees" part and finish with fine adjustments.
My mount has the setting circles on it, but for some reason I don't understand, the scales are rotateable, so that doesn't help me.? I would have thought there would be inscribed marks on the axis?? (Now that I think about it, my old DEC G8 axis did have an inscribed mark with a non-rotatable scale, which was helpful.)?
You may be thinking, "well, you love plate solving so much, why don't you use that after the polar alignment?"? The problem is that when you do plate solve near the pole, it doesn't take into account cone / pointing error and only sends the center of the frame back to the mount for sync. (I think it doesn't send the rotation of the frame)? Anyway, if you have any cone / pointing error, the RA and DEC values will be way off.



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


Re: Motors too loud

 

You might try adjusting the motor position






On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 8:12 PM alan137 <acfang137@...> wrote:
Hello folks,?
I have a new version of the mount with the tucked motors.? When slewing, they are really loud, like SCREEEEEEEEE!
I'm worried it disturbs my neighbors in the middle of the night.??
Is the noise coming from the motor, gearbox, or the two transfer gears?
I already tried to do the thing where you loosen the motor screws and try slightly different positions for the motor, but that didn't help.
Is there any good reason not to replace the two transfer gears with a belt drive?
How about covering the entire motor assembly with a cloth?
My rickety CEM25P uses a belt drive with no gearbox and it is really quiet.



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


Re: Needle bearings and axial play, is this a significant performance problem and how difficult is it to fix?

 

Have u seen my long post where I talk about characterizing the DEC backlash with PHD2 guiding assistant?
Too tight worm mesh will cause backlash as well, and I suspect you have a too tight worm mesh because you keep talking about having to "power thru" motor stalls.
The "correct" worm mesh is a really light touch with low clutch pressure and shouldn't take more than about 300mA to slew.


Motors too loud

 

Hello folks,?
I have a new version of the mount with the tucked motors.? When slewing, they are really loud, like SCREEEEEEEEE!
I'm worried it disturbs my neighbors in the middle of the night.??
Is the noise coming from the motor, gearbox, or the two transfer gears?
I already tried to do the thing where you loosen the motor screws and try slightly different positions for the motor, but that didn't help.
Is there any good reason not to replace the two transfer gears with a belt drive?
How about covering the entire motor assembly with a cloth?
My rickety CEM25P uses a belt drive with no gearbox and it is really quiet.


How to determine mechanical CWD position?

 

Hello,?
Is there a way to figure out how to set the mount to the CDW position without using the bubble levels?? Since I set the mount on pavement, it's not always perfectly level.? But I do need the DEC axis (for example) to be pointing EXACTLY straight forwards.? This is because I use Sharpcap for polar alignment, and I always start with adjusting the alt, az knobs to get the scope roughly pointing at the pole.? This is BEFORE I do the "rotate the RA axis by 90 degrees" part and finish with fine adjustments.
My mount has the setting circles on it, but for some reason I don't understand, the scales are rotateable, so that doesn't help me.? I would have thought there would be inscribed marks on the axis?? (Now that I think about it, my old DEC G8 axis did have an inscribed mark with a non-rotatable scale, which was helpful.)?
You may be thinking, "well, you love plate solving so much, why don't you use that after the polar alignment?"? The problem is that when you do plate solve near the pole, it doesn't take into account cone / pointing error and only sends the center of the frame back to the mount for sync. (I think it doesn't send the rotation of the frame)? Anyway, if you have any cone / pointing error, the RA and DEC values will be way off.


Re: First image with GllG

 

And here is part II (now to try to stitch them)



Re: New G11G Looking for final tweaking advice

Keith
 
Edited

Good call.? I'll put my money on it being related to the worm bearings (either the worm blocks, despite the OPW block, being slightly misaligned so pinching, or a bad bearing).? Of course your 76s error supports this so not that much of a guess.

Of the many things I've tried over the years, one of the only things that led to a noticeable improvement on these kind of rapid jumps was to replace the bearings.? And I don't necessarily mean going to an ABEC-7, since even some ABEC-5s were smoother (and can hand picked from a bunch, literally).? Of course you'd have to be comfortable exploring this, but best to let Losmandy help sort this out on a new mount.

Keith


Re: Parts For Celestron/Losmandy G-11

 

They should all fit just fine. The only parts that I know of that cannot be carried directly from the current G11 to the older Celestron labeled G11 are the plastic clutch discs and the second elevation screws.? ??

?
--

Chip Louie Chief Daydreamer Imagination Hardware?

? ?Astropheric Weather Forecast - South Pasadena, CA?


Re: New G11G Looking for final tweaking advice

 

Logged a ticket directly with Losmandy to get to the bottom of these issues. I dont think a 1"-3" re-occurring RA variance (+/-) is expected, so I must have set something up wrong.

Will report back with what I learn


Parts For Celestron/Losmandy G-11

 

Hello, Does anyone know if the following replacement/upgrade parts for the G-11 will fit on the old Celestron branded G-11? ?

G-11 SPDV saddle plate
CKS (or CKS B) clutch knobs
Polemaster adapter for G-11

Thanks


Re: feeding usb-gps data from a laptop to a gemini II controller through ascom gemini net

 

Hi Jean-Philippe,

Yes, you can set Gemini location and time from the GPS connected to your PC. In Gemini.NET driver, bring up the GPS window and connect to the GPS. You should see data being received from the GPS and latitude, longitude - and time updated. Click OK to close the GPS window when you see the new data there. You can then send the location and time to Gemini by pressing Set Now buttons under Site and Time in Gemini Settings window.

Regards,

? ? -Paul


On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:34 PM, jean-philippe jahier wrote:
Hello
I have discovered that under the gemini telescope set-up windows I can configure (port # and baud rate) a USB gps receiver and get data (tiem and position)
Is there a way to feed directly the position data to the mount?
It's of course possible to create a new location, but this is a little bit heavy since I'm regularly changing from one (random) location to another (more random even!)

clear skies!