开云体育

Hi Ron can you send pics of your computer ip settings as well? [email protected]> wrote: -- Brian Brian Valente portfolio brianvalentephotography.com <http://brianvalentephotography.com>

Hello Group: Based on Brians Connecting the Losmandy Gemini via Direct Ethernet, all IP address settings have been incorporated into the HC, changing ethernet adapter options, telescope configuration

Great stuff, this looks like a very deep rabbit hole, too bad I've got work to do! I thought that Airy was just a way of describing the way it looked, but no that's the person that figured out why

Hi! Thanks for your clarity! However, could you explain the logic here: "For example, suppose the DEC component is 0.10" and RA is 0.16", then the contribution of mount mechanics is

Seeing is actually a very interesting phenomenon. Very simplistically, the movement of air causes what should be an Airy pattern determined primarily by the aperture of your scope and scatters it over

me. it's a mystery for a lot of people! it's very difficult to quantify the best to measure of seeing conditions, but it sounds like it is also measuring imperfections in the mount. RMS values are

Thanks for that explanation, that is the clearest one I've heard about this topic yet. Seeing condition measurement still feels like a bit of a mystery for me. I'll have to take some time reading up

Yeah, I am totally jealous of you Southern Hemisphere folks for objects such as this! The bulge of the Milky Way passes right through zenith there and makes for some spectacular images.

From 22 degrees it's pretty impressive. It passes at the zenith here and that would still be an excellent field.

Jamie, The Point Spread Function, which is the way a point source of light such as a star is rendered, depends on the Airy disc size of your scope, the guiding, and the seeing. Mathematically, it is

So I had an absolutely awesome night last night photographing R for the Iris nebula. My guiding was looking real nice, usually in the 0.7s, but dipping into the mid? .6's. not a lot of corrections so

It looks like this was a mount problem.? I adjusted the RA worm block and it looks resolved.? I just ran 30ea 3 min subs and everything looks OK.? I dithered every 3 subs as before.

I just got done working on my mount.? It felt like the RA worm was shifting side to side so I adjusted the outer worm block.? I need to do testing tonight. FYI - Last week I posted an issue about

That's on my list of things to try tonight - no dithering. FYI https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/713708-getting-double-images-when-i-image-with-nina/#entry10278985

I've often thought about a camera to do remote monitoring, and also sky monitoring (with the same camera). I usually don't realize that the clouds have found me until I go out and see the sky has

Don't know Jim. It appears to be consistent, two distinct images. Have you tried with no dithering? Try eliminating one thing at a time. I had "Space Ships" for a time. My stars looked like the

BTW - The above image is of Vega. I went back to a previous beta release (014) of NINA and the same thing happened after dithering.? Its always in the same direction.? I increased the NINA PHD2 Max

Well, this platform isn't really meant for much more than link sharing. More meant for information sharing. I usually share mine with friends on a Photography

Beautiful, Thank you. HAPPY SKIES AND "KEEP LOOKING UP" Deric

Why would my GM811G be doing this?? There's very little wind, guiding is OK and nothing is moving around.? I just upgraded to NINA 1.10 Beta 015.? This has never happened before. I am dithering