Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Losmandy_users
- Messages
Search
Re: Nice discussions leading toward perfection...
Yes...you have to experiment.? The external reflective insulation may not have a clear effect...depends too on what type of tube you have.? Carbon fiber or fiberglass might not be much affected but my thick aluminum tube (12 inch for a 10 inch f/6 mirror) certainly changes dimension from hot to cold during a night.?? If you are imaging with your Newtonian then keep the fan on the back of the mirror on,? in a low speed, and look for optical fluctuations from tube currents with the fan on vs off.? Since the Newtonian tube is open (most are open anyway), there might be an airflow even without a fan.?? Having a slow constant fan going probably makes the imaging conditions more consistent.? Just beware to isolate the fan to allay any vibration.?? Have fun, and good luck imaging, Michael On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, 2:01 PM wa1vta01452 <loeblt@...> wrote: Makes sense Michael. I use a fan on the back of the mirror and I place a small fan at the mouth of the OTA? (my park position is with the tube horizontal to the south) about an hour prior to imaging. I will give the insulation a shot to both the OTA as well as the guide scope. |
Re: Nice discussions leading toward perfection...
wa1vta01452
Makes sense Michael. I use a fan on the back of the mirror and I place a small fan at the mouth of the OTA? (my park position is with the tube horizontal to the south) about an hour prior to imaging. I will give the insulation a shot to both the OTA as well as the guide scope.
Tom |
Re: Duda sobre g11.
Hi David Please write to Tanya here tanyak@... with exactly the products what you want and your full shipping address. she can give you an accurate quote for delivery to spain On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1:26 PM Davidspain via <algayaterro80=[email protected]> wrote: Brian, he enviado varios mensajes a losmandy ventas sobre el coste del envio de una montura a espa?a o si seria mejor pedirla a un distribuidor en mi pais, por que el cambio del dolar al euro hay un importante ahorro. --
Brian? Brian Valente portfolio |
Re: Duda sobre g11.
Claro, tambien pensando para astrofoto, antiguamente tenia la mitica celestron G11 y los goto no los dejaba dentro del ocular con el 300mm, con el otro telescopio 200mm f / 5 era diana en el centro. Asi que la G11T lo manejaria muy bien el 300mm f/4. En precio no hay mucha diferencia entre las dos monturas, 700 euros es asumible y con la G11T podria poner en el futuro telescopios mas pesados
|
Re: Is the Titan Mount still being made?
Hola David I understand you are asking if we have an option to update a G11T to a Titan mount? We do not currently offer that option. The G11T supports weights up to 75lb, it is a very capable mount I hope this answers your question Brian On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 11:58 AM Davidspain via <algayaterro80=[email protected]> wrote: Brian, teneis pensado en el futuro un eje de AR como actualizaci¨®n de la G11T, para asi tener el titan completo ?. Ya teniendo en mente hacerme con una G11T es una actualizacion que sin duda me haria con ella --
Brian? Brian Valente portfolio |
Re: Nice discussions leading toward perfection...
Since this thread turned to temperature equilibration, I've always wondered why the SCT/Mak's are traditionally in enclosed tubes while other compound?scopes are not (like RC's, DK's, Newt's, Cass, ...). And since temperature equilibration is such a large issue with these SCT's, it would seem reasonable to un-enclose them. I guess the same could be said for refractor's, but I thought that protecting the glass takes precedence. -yurij |
Re: Duda sobre g11.
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 12:12 AM, Davidspain wrote:
El telescopio no tiene marca, es fabricado por mi 300mm f / 4, con anillas parallax y milano losmandy 44cm. Mi otro telescopioHello David I assume you want to image and not just for visual? I think the G11 is a good choice to support this telescope. 24kg is within weight limit, i assume camera and other equipment will not add much weight to this? f/4 means your focal length is not as long, so guiding should be okay.? The G11T can also support your telescope, but i think it may be too much for you.? Brian |
Re: Is the Titan Mount still being made?
Greg For the time being we are not making more Titan mounts. This is primarily because the G8, GM811 and G11 are so popular we have a hard time keeping up with demand.? On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:39 AM Greg Crawford <rover53@...> wrote:
--
Brian? Brian Valente portfolio |
Is the Titan Mount still being made?
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI am looking for a mount that can carry a load of 45 kilograms or more. The TRA axis upgrade maxes out at 34 kgs. I wondered about the ¡°full¡± Titan, but I cannot find it anywhere on Losmandy¡¯s two websites. ? Greg |
Re: Nice discussions leading toward perfection...
Aha,... great question! The most recommended thing for Newtonians is to put a fan at the back behind the mirror cell and blow air at the mirror back.? I also put a "draw" fan at the front of my Newtonian.? I remove that front fan before imaging of course. Also important: if you leave the back fan on a slow speed it's airflow will break up any thermal "tube currents" that degrade image quality and stability.? I use rubber bands (some use hair bands!) to mount and isolate the back fan plate from vibrating the Newtonian tube.?? If you do use fans then the reflective insulation will not affect the mirror cool down time. I use it on refractors like finder scopes too to save them from fogging up as much as possible.?? It's the SCTs with their closed OTAs that present the worst thermal issues.? I put small fans inside mine behind or under the primary mirror to circulate the air and eliminate tube currents.? I also wrap my thermal blanket around the OTA to conserve it's heat.? I do not think the huge internal SCT primary will ever be at the same temp as the outside air it just needs to be all at the same temperature to prevent optical surface distortion.?? That's about it! Michael On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, 9:43 AM wa1vta01452 <loeblt@...> wrote: Hi Michael, |
Re: Nice discussions leading toward perfection...
wa1vta01452
Hi Michael,
thanks for the details of the reflective insulation. I believe it's readily available at Home Depot here but appreciate the offer. looks like I may go that route as well with my newt. Only question is, will this extend the required cool-down time of the primary mirror? Tom |
Re: Yup its the 75 second cycle
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:00 AM, Michael Herman wrote:
Michael, By loading the outer bearing's outer shell you are loading all three pieces, putter bearing, worm and inner bearing. So the side of the mount should not make any difference and the 76 second error will not be present on either side of the pier if done correctly and no other issues are present in the mount or drivetrain.? ? -- Chip Louie Chief Daydreamer Imagination Hardware? ? ?Astropheric Weather Forecast - South Pasadena, CA? |
Re: Yup its the 75 second cycle
Very nice work. You have nicely demonstrated a faster and more consistent way to polish down the R4 bearing OD.?? As you say, you must always be very careful around any power tools.? We are in a hobby for fun, not for danger.? So care if the hands and eye protection, and a face mask to avoid inhaling dust are important precautions.? That said, I have used my bargain priced Wen brand drill press to polish ODs down (on brass rods) before, so this is an accessible way of polishing small round items at rather low cost.? The drill press has no explicit cutting tool in it...just a round bearing.?? The only thing doing the cutting is an emery cloth or fine sandpaper.? (I like the 3M "wet or dry" paper because the grit is well embedded in a kind of string waterproof adhesive.? You can wet the paper to keep polishing dust down.? ). The sandpaper can get hot, but it generally won't cut you.?? The notion about extra benefits of allowing the bearing (at least the far bearing away from the gearbox) to self adjust it's angle in the worm block...these are new ideas.? We don't really yet know a "spec" on the best amount of OD slack to use.? Ideally you don't need any slack at all if all the parts are perfectly made.? Most people never see the 76 sec oscillation so never need this extra workmanship.?? A theory for the riddle: ? ? "why is a single Belleville washer under the (OD loose) far end bearing sufficient?? Why don't you need that spring under both bearings? " An idea:? Many people preload their RA axis with an intentional East bias. Say a weight on a cord, wrapped so the weight hangs to the East side of the RA axis.? We have discovered that the East bias eliminates a vibration ("chatter") that occurs if you bias to the West instead.?? When you preload the RA axis (ring gear) with an East bias, this forces the worm to move West.? That presses the worm against the West "far" end RA worm bearing center, and leaves the near (near the gearbox) bearing center looser.? So the West far worm bearing becomes the more critical surface for the RA drive: the worm is mostly rotating on that ball bearing race surface, not in the bearing closest to the gearbox.? ?That's why eliminating rumble of that far bearing becomes more critical for low noise sidereal tracking.?? This idea might explain why we see a reduction or elimination of the 76 sec oscillation when we reduce the OD (allowing tilt) and put a Belleville spring behind just the far worm bearing... the spring allows the bearing when tilted to still ride on a "self-leveling" seat.? ? Otherwise, reduction of the 76 sec oscillation should only be effective some of the time...but it seems to be working all the time.? The East side bias effect could explain this riddle.? By this reasoning, using a West side bias might create a 76 sec oscillation even with a Belleville spring under the far West bearing? ...there's another experiment to try!? ? All the best, Michael ? On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, 10:01 PM John Kmetz <jjkmetz54@...> wrote: Alan/Michael/all: |
Re: Yup its the 75 second cycle
Alan/Michael/all:
Just tried the bearing spinning rig today with success. I placed the assembly in a drill press at 100 RPM and started trying small metal files and types of sandpaper to hone down the bearing. Surprisingly the outer race is fairly hard steel and doesn't shed diameter easily. Finally I used the corner of a sharpening stone, like that used for scissors or straight razors, and that was the trick. Subsequently I polished with 200 then 600 mesh sandpapers. It looks like reducing OD about 0.002" is the point where the bearing will begin to slide freely inside the block (see pics). The outside race also seemed to be virtually round and smooth after this process. Before pulling apart the rig, I sprayed away all the sanding dust with some WD-40 and then some compressed air. Upon finger turning the finished bearing I did not sense any hang up or grittiness inside. Perhaps this is a new way for reducing the bearing OD to allow the Belville washer to do its thing. I found this a bit easier than turning down by hand. Perhaps a bit more OD reduction might be needed for those who wish some off axis tilt, but too much might start the bearing turning inside the block. But I think polishing down to 0.623" is the place to start. But just a note a caution for those who are not that familiar with moving machinery: the spinning drill assembly could easily cut the skin, or send particles into the unprotected eye. Use precautions. Hope this info is of use. John |
Re: DIY spring loaded worms v3
I don't see where this design allows for tilt self-alignment of the worm blocksGood point Alan.? I need to pull the near worm block down in order to prevent tilt.? One or two Belleville washers would work fine. I tried this last night and noticed that the flex coupler moves the near block all over the place.? By pulling the block down so it remains flat, this effect will be greatly reduced.? For now I stuck a plastic washer in between and that already helps a great deal. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss