On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 02:05 PM, Brian Maynard wrote:
I know the stated capacity of the g11t (75lbs imaging 90lbs visual) but having this mount for a few months I think that's overrated.
I think a 16" SCT (67lbs) for planet imaging is definitely pushing it. I'm looking for some feedback from anyone who has their g11t loaded, over 70lbs.?
?
Do you already own the M16" SCT?? ?If not the classic planetary SCT for portable use is a C11 or with a second person to help load it a C14.? At some point the return in resolution vs weight vs cost tips and it seems like a C14 is just past that point.? Some of the best planetary images captured here on Earth were with C11 and C14 SCTs.? If this is a dedicated planetary imaging OTA the wider FOV corrected optics of an EdgeHD or Meade ACF are a waste of money as only the optical sweet spot is used for planetary imaging.? You could use this money to chase the best weather conditions at the highest altitude to get the best? planetary images that no amount of additional aperture can capture.? ??
?
?
--
Chip Louie Chief Daydreamer Imagination Hardware?
Astrospheric Forecast - South Pasadena, CA?
?
?
?
Chip Louie