开云体育

Hello everyone Aas you may be aware I am in the process of putting together an exhibition and organising a Mass on 13th Feb 2995 here in Bradford UK. re the ebay and photos etc is theer any chance

Barb - My father and aunt were at Abercorn...Last name Dzieciol.. grace Barbara Kwietniowski <barbkwie@...> wrote:Zbyszek, I have one of these pictures in my mum's files - It is in Abercorn

- Hello Eve, You are correct, however Poland was abandoned by the UK and USA in 1943 at the Teheran conference, Nov.28-Dec.1.,where Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin agreed that the post-war Poland

Henry, Very good point. Before I donate the photo album, if I win it, I/we'll have to check this out. First I'll post all pictures in high quality. And provide better scans for anyone that is

Yes I agree, Chamberlain’s judgment was rather na?ve. And probably Poland was very na?ve when she signed an agreement with Britain prior to WWII. After all, how could Britain help Poland, when

The Hoover Institute may consider donations of documents and photos as well. Donation to small libraries and museums is dangerous since they often have very limited staff, space and funds and may

--- HJ Trevelyan <hjtrevelyan@...> wrote: End quote Thank God that only the Brits and the Americans are guilty of

--- Ralph Apel <Ralph.Apel@...> wrote: The only people who could have brought matrerial aid to Poland in the event of a German invasion were the Russians. End quote Hardly. France

--- Ralph Apel <Ralph.Apel@...> wrote: The Channel would have been ablaze and mustard gas would have coated the invasion beaches. End quote This scenario has been wargamed to death

The Incredible Will to Survive: During the Second World War, millions of Poles were banished to remote labour camps. Five Calgarians share their stories David Bly, Calgary Herald Anatoli

Hi Eve, my historical knowledge is not brilliant but one thing that I have read up on is that Britain and France (for whatever reason) did not 'physically' come to Poland's aid in time and Britain

Hello Ralph, I'm familiar with the pro-Russian historical line that you are expressing. It was and is part of the anti-Polish Russian propaganda. The Russians also learned that throwing in a bit

Dear Group, Eve, thanks for this post. One needs to look at the facts of WWII with reason and not self-laudatory emotion as the British and Americans tend to do. Despite treaty obligations, no

it was in order to deter Hitler from attacking Poland that the British Governemnt gave its guarantee. The next step was war, and so it was. The only way to have prevented it was an

--- Ralph Apel <Ralph.Apel@...> wrote: Let us not now go into the matter of the Warsw Uprising of '44 lest we discuss that of '43. end quote The Warsawa ghetto uprising been discussed

--- Ralph Apel <Ralph.Apel@...> wrote: --------------------------------- Oh and one thing more: the RAF flew missions to Warsaw during the uprising to help the AK with supplies

Ralf, I appreciated your comments as you bring up some valuable points, however, it is not fair to quote facts out of context or state partial facts either. Yes it is true that Poland expanded

I forgot another couple of points: The Germans set up the Ukraine after the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in 1917. After the First World War, during the Civil war the Ukraine became a Socialist Republic

If I recall correctly, shortly after the war ended, Britain did not recognize the Polish-Government-in-Exile, did it? The British formally recognized the Communist Government in Warsaw.

I do not agree that Britain's declaration of war against Germany was a "token gesture," and that the British only became serious when they were attacked by Germany a year later. I wasa child in