¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Technique question for Jimmy Bruno


Paul Erlich
 

Hi Jimmy -- thanks for all your wonderful remarks.

Since we have you here, and we normally talk about playing
jazz guitar rather than "who's better than who", I thought
I'd try to steer the discussions in a different direction,
before we lose you entirely (I'm sure you're a busy man)!

I started playing guitar many years ago, mostly rock,
blues-rock, and classical-rock. After a few years, I
realized that in order to be able to pick as fast as I
wanted to, I needed to use "economy" picking, i.e., sweeping
wherever possible, like you demonstrate in your video. I
practiced hard and now, it only takes me a few days of solid
practice to get to the point where I can play ridiculously
fast scales, picking every note.

A few years ago I started focusing on jazzier techniques,
such as swing eighth notes. I found that all the years I had
spent on economy picking straight sixteenth notes did not
help one bit. There was no way I was going, in less than 10
years of further practice, to learn to make my sweeping
swing. Instead, when playing jazz or jazzy music, I've
reverted to alternate picking for swung eighths, and throw
in economy-picked lines in triplets here and there, as a nod
to my previous technique. But if the tempo of a swing-feel
tune is too fast -- I'm lost.

So I guess my question is, do you have any particular
advice/approaches for practicing swing feel soloing? Or is
it just a matter of practice, practice, practice?

Thanks -- just picked up _Like That_ and I'm lovin' it!
-Paul


 

Paul wrote

'do you have any particular
advice/approaches for practicing swing feel soloing? Or is
it just a matter of practice, practice, practice? '

Can I second Pauls request, having recently recorded some gigs and
rehearsals I would have to say that I'm disappointed with the lack of swing
in my lead playing. I listened to the Pat Metheny guitar lessons that were
discussed in recent postings and I totaly agree with what he was saying
about the need to get inside the rhythm rather than floating above (or in my
case sometimes fighting it). Could I request some thoughts on how and what
to practise to develope that sense of playing within the rhythm.
Paul like you I find it harder as the tempo increases. I'm sure we cann't be
the only ones.
Thanks in advance to all those who reply.

Best wishes
Ian


Paul Erlich
 

--- In jazz_guitar@y..., <ian.jackson.nuages@n...> wrote:

Can I second Pauls request, having recently recorded some gigs and
rehearsals I would have to say that I'm disappointed with the lack
of swing in my lead playing. I listened to the Pat Metheny guitar
lessons that were discussed in recent postings and I totaly agree
with what he was saying about the need to get inside the rhythm
rather than floating above (or in my case sometimes fighting it).
Could I request some thoughts on how and what
to practise to develope that sense of playing within the rhythm.
Paul like you I find it harder as the tempo increases. I'm sure we
cann't be the only ones.
After some serious playing and listening last night, I've come to the
conclusion that most jazz guitarists _can't_ play uneven eighth notes
at very fast tempos, the way most sax players can. My solution is to
simply play fast lines straight but a little bit behind the beat --
if you can synchronize the weak eighths with those in the rhythm,
your lines will both swing and be "inside the rhythm" while still
containing equal note values. I've heard various jazz instumentalists
use this technique from time to time.


Eric Brazier
 

It's called feeling and soul, all the technique,theory,
and degrees in the world ain't gonna give you that!!!
Eric


 

Hi Jimmy -- thanks for all your wonderful remarks.

Oh please! What wonderful remarks? Bruno's comments have been no
more than knee-jerk, childish personal jabs and a declaration that he
doesn't listen much to other guitarists and that he doesn't give a
damn who's the best guitarist, which is certainly a noble stance but
hardly reflected in his impulse to insult where he can.

Sorry, Alisdair, to harp on this. I promise you this is the last
time. I just found Bruno's responses to be appalling, especially for
one who, as a guitarist, has the respect of so many.


Paul Erlich
 

--- In jazz_guitar@y..., Eric Brazier <ericbrazier@y...> wrote:
It's called feeling and soul, all the technique,theory,
and degrees in the world ain't gonna give you that!!!
Eric
Was that intended as an answer to me? If so, I am insulted. I put
prime importance on feeling and soul, and I expect Jimmy Bruno does
to. I was asking him a specific technique question, because sometimes
my "soul" has this "feeling" that it wants to play a fast line in
swung eighths. Do you have a problem with that?


Paul Erlich
 

I found the vast majority of Jimmy Bruno's remarks to be very good-
natured, wise, and to the point. Play music because music is _fun_,
and warms the spirit. If it turns into a competitive game of one-up-
manship, you've lost the whole reason it exists in the first place.


Jimmy Bruno
 

-
I can try to answer your question. The technique part has to be like
on auto pilot. so that you're not thinking about the execution of the
line. Once that happens you can listen to the music and play what
you feel. That's the only thing it's about. Hope it helps although
I am not sure who I am answering

-- In jazz_guitar@y..., "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote:
--- In jazz_guitar@y..., Eric Brazier <ericbrazier@y...> wrote:
It's called feeling and soul, all the technique,theory,
and degrees in the world ain't gonna give you that!!!
Eric
Was that intended as an answer to me? If so, I am insulted. I put
prime importance on feeling and soul, and I expect Jimmy Bruno does
to. I was asking him a specific technique question, because sometimes
my "soul" has this "feeling" that it wants to play a fast line in
swung eighths. Do you have a problem with that?


Jimmy Bruno
 

--- sorry if my life does not revolve around the guitar. I have a
family and other interests. Doesn't matter what I say you will find
insult so I will no longer waste my time with this. Everyone is
entitled to their opinion about music, players etc.... sorry if mine
do not meet with your approval. It would be a boring place if
everyone liked the same things. Some of my favorite and most
innovative music has come form Stravinsky, Ravel, and Debussy. I
also think George van eps is still the most innovative guitarist but
one has to listen closely to his weaving of harmonies... to me that
is innovation and not change for the sake of change. Well, I enjoyed
this brief exchange of ideas. Bye for now


In jazz_guitar@y..., ardishall@e... wrote:

Hi Jimmy -- thanks for all your wonderful remarks.

Oh please! What wonderful remarks? Bruno's comments have been no
more than knee-jerk, childish personal jabs and a declaration that he
doesn't listen much to other guitarists and that he doesn't give a
damn who's the best guitarist, which is certainly a noble stance but
hardly reflected in his impulse to insult where he can.

Sorry, Alisdair, to harp on this. I promise you this is the last
time. I just found Bruno's responses to be appalling, especially for
one who, as a guitarist, has the respect of so many.


Mark Stanley
 

Ya know, I think it's true that you
cant please everyone.

I get a lot from listening to Jimmy and his
video has given me new ideas for right hand
utilization of ideas. That being said , I think a
great player is a great player. I dont like to
break it down to technique, "chops" or anything.
If you can play, you can play. If there is something
you cant play that you want to play, you have to
work at it.

People's opinions are just that and you cant change
them.
The best way to learn, I think, is to listen.

-Mark

--- Jimmy Bruno <jbguit@...> wrote:

--- sorry if my life does not revolve around the
guitar. I have a
family and other interests. Doesn't matter what I
say you will find
insult so I will no longer waste my time with
this. Everyone is
entitled to their opinion about music, players
etc.... sorry if mine
do not meet with your approval. It would be a
boring place if
everyone liked the same things. Some of my favorite
and most
innovative music has come form Stravinsky, Ravel,
and Debussy. I
also think George van eps is still the most
innovative guitarist but
one has to listen closely to his weaving of
harmonies... to me that
is innovation and not change for the sake of change.
Well, I enjoyed
this brief exchange of ideas. Bye for now


In jazz_guitar@y..., ardishall@e... wrote:
Hi Jimmy -- thanks for all your wonderful
remarks.


Oh please! What wonderful remarks? Bruno's
comments have been no
more than knee-jerk, childish personal jabs and a
declaration that he
doesn't listen much to other guitarists and that
he doesn't give a
damn who's the best guitarist, which is certainly
a noble stance but
hardly reflected in his impulse to insult where he
can.

Sorry, Alisdair, to harp on this. I promise you
this is the last
time. I just found Bruno's responses to be
appalling, especially for
one who, as a guitarist, has the respect of so
many.


Mark Stanley
 

I agree with both of you.
It's hard to talk about something like technique
while listening to great musicians that transcend
the instrument like, for me, Metheny, Coltrane,
Wayne Shorter, Hubbard, Tyner, lots more.
But, I am in practice-mode so much lately that
I appreciate anything that helps me play better.
-Mark



--- Paul Erlich <paul@...> wrote:

--- In jazz_guitar@y..., Eric Brazier
<ericbrazier@y...> wrote:
It's called feeling and soul, all the
technique,theory,
and degrees in the world ain't gonna give you
that!!!
Eric
Was that intended as an answer to me? If so, I am
insulted. I put
prime importance on feeling and soul, and I expect
Jimmy Bruno does
to. I was asking him a specific technique question,
because sometimes
my "soul" has this "feeling" that it wants to play a
fast line in
swung eighths. Do you have a problem with that?


Ross Ingram
 

To me, this seems kind of quick to judge.
Maybe Jimmy is busy listening to other stuff right now-piano voicings???, saxophone lines??? or whatever???. Maybe you misinterpreted his comment or he could of worded it a little better for you?
Ross

----- Original Message -----
From: ardishall@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:12 PM
To: jazz_guitar@...
Subject: [jazz_guitar] Re: Technique question for Jimmy Bruno

Hi Jimmy -- thanks for all your wonderful remarks.

Oh please! What wonderful remarks? Bruno's comments have been no
more than knee-jerk, childish personal jabs and a declaration that he
doesn't listen much to other guitarists and that he doesn't give a
damn who's the best guitarist, which is certainly a noble stance but
hardly reflected in his impulse to insult where he can.

Sorry, Alisdair, to harp on this. I promise you this is the last
time. I just found Bruno's responses to be appalling, especially for
one who, as a guitarist, has the respect of so many.


Eric Brazier
 

NO,this by no means was meant to insult anyone.It
seems that guitarist are a little anal when it comes
to the execution of song.I include myself in this
catagory and time to time have to check myself and
realize that most of my audience is made up of non
musicians and could not give a hoot about my knowledge
of theory.A humbling example was when I was playing an
absolutely scorching solo over dolphin dance and I was
proud,that same eve during my set I let a friend come
up,who btw,plays nothing but blues.needless to
say,after his first long ,vibrating,sustained,and very
soulful note,my regular audience took several minutes
to quiet down for the rest of his song.My point,grab
the audience with something that is emotional even if
it's mary had a lil lamb...so,so,solly...Eric...


Jimmy Bruno
 

thank you Ross.... I don't feel the need to explain the fact that I
don't listen to jazz guitar cds... I play in person with most of
those people anyway. we are all friends. And yes you are right...
for me... at this point... sax lines and trumpet lines and different
types of music have my attention. And sometimes... I get sick of
music. I am a professional and do this 24/7 you need a break
once in a while. This will be my last post. I don't feel it is
appropriate for me to state any opinion of any kind.


--- In jazz_guitar@y..., "Ross Ingram" <beadgcf7@m...> wrote:
To me, this seems kind of quick to judge.
Maybe Jimmy is busy listening to other stuff right now-piano
voicings???, saxophone lines??? or whatever???. Maybe you
misinterpreted his comment or he could of worded it a little better
for you?
Ross
----- Original Message -----
From: ardishall@e...
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:12 PM
To: jazz_guitar@y...
Subject: [jazz_guitar] Re: Technique question for Jimmy Bruno

Hi Jimmy -- thanks for all your wonderful remarks.

Oh please! What wonderful remarks? Bruno's comments have been no
more than knee-jerk, childish personal jabs and a declaration that
he
doesn't listen much to other guitarists and that he doesn't give a
damn who's the best guitarist, which is certainly a noble stance but
hardly reflected in his impulse to insult where he can.

Sorry, Alisdair, to harp on this. I promise you this is the last
time. I just found Bruno's responses to be appalling, especially
for
one who, as a guitarist, has the respect of so many.


Zeek Duff
 

jazz_guitar@... wrote:

Original Message:
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Brazier <ericbrazier@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Technique question for Jimmy Bruno

NO,this by no means was meant to insult anyone.It
seems that guitarist are a little anal when it comes
to the execution of song.I include myself in this
catagory and time to time have to check myself and
realize that most of my audience is made up of non
musicians and could not give a hoot about my knowledge
of theory.A humbling example was when I was playing an
absolutely scorching solo over dolphin dance and I was
proud,that same eve during my set I let a friend come
up,who btw,plays nothing but blues.needless to
say,after his first long ,vibrating,sustained,and very
soulful note,my regular audience took several minutes
to quiet down for the rest of his song.My point,grab
the audience with something that is emotional even if
it's mary had a lil lamb...so,so,solly...Eric...
Ah, another epiphany!!! Well done Eric, and it bears repeating. If the SONG loses it's meaning in a flurry of overexposed chops, it's no longer "the song."


A note Re: Lan Mosher's "Farewell Comments:"

Too bad Lan's Prozac ran out... Didn't anyone tell him to get the digest version? Didn't anyone advise him to lay off the coffee? Sheesh... ;)

Alisdair, I wouldn't be too bothered by Lan's comments, ego and taste are part of what determines who does what and how. A freely discussed set of opinions is a healthy thing, and becoming offended and thereby reticent only leads to greater misunderstanding. Avoiding conversation altogether accomplishes nothing. Lan may develop on his own, but his development will be devoid of much
in his absence from here. I hate to see anyone leave any discussion group, but I have to think it's more his loss than anyone else's... Guitarists notoriously have a hard time taking criticism, and an even harder time accepting a dissection of their playing, especially via comparison to another guitarist. However, it's not personal, even when it's taken personally; it's just that
there's no other way to express in few words what one enjoys, or would like to hear, or even expected...

Some people become arrogant with success and that's too bad, but a fact of life. When negative comments are made or taken out of context, egos become easily bruised, even if it just seems someone a person likes is the brunt. If one's taste is in question, their whole reason for existing is in question. However, growth and knowledge through discussion can change one's taste and
their existence as well; so in an abstract manner, that's a good thing. That's why I suggested Jimmy Bruno write a song based on his one rather intense paragraph. How we live does affect how we play and certainly, vice versa... Anyway, I think all discussion is a good thing, something that contributes to knowledge and especially, if one holds an indefensible position, that
discussion is of great intrinsic value to them and any potential growth. Angry flurries of emotion have their place, but if that's all there is and one just isn't listening... :&#92;

This is just like an after-hours jam session. Lan is leaving the tune on a sus11 and it's really too bad he'll never hear the resolution. ;)

Jimmy left because he doesn't care to defend statements he doesn't recall making, doesn't read his interviews, and doesn't have time to monitor what "his people" release about him, etc. If he truly doesn't practice anymore, he's either stopped growing or is fast becoming bored. I find that boring, and from cats like that, if you've heard 'em play one tune, you've heard 'em all.
Harsh? You betcha. That's life on Earth... I would have liked, even expected a little more humility from Mr. Jimmy Bruno. Had he said something like, "I never meant to imply Metheny can't play jazz, I just don't care for his kind of music." End of discussion. Ah well, onward! :)

Regards,
...z


"When the song is over, the music is gone; it's in the air, and you can never capture it again." -- John Coltrane

-- =---Seek the truth, speak the truth!---= --

L.G. "Zeek" Duff
WHAT!Productions!
Blue Wall Studio
303.485.9438
ICQ#35974686


Paul Erlich
 

--- In jazz_guitar@y..., Eric Brazier <ericbrazier@y...> wrote:
NO,this by no means was meant to insult anyone.It
seems that guitarist are a little anal when it comes
to the execution of song.I include myself in this
catagory and time to time have to check myself and
realize that most of my audience is made up of non
musicians and could not give a hoot about my knowledge
of theory.A humbling example was when I was playing an
absolutely scorching solo over dolphin dance and I was
proud,that same eve during my set I let a friend come
up,who btw,plays nothing but blues.needless to
say,after his first long ,vibrating,sustained,and very
soulful note,my regular audience took several minutes
to quiet down for the rest of his song.My point,grab
the audience with something that is emotional even if
it's mary had a lil lamb...so,so,solly...Eric...
Well, I guess if you knew me, you'd know that I agree with you
100% . . . that said, I still would like to be able to "scorch" in
more of a jazz style, as opposed to the blues style which I have
down, for the sake of more variety when I play five-hour gigs . . .
anyway, Jimmy Bruno still hasn't answered the original question, so I
may have to give up! :)


Lonnie Brown
 

zeek quoted


"When the song is over, the music is gone; it's in the air, and you
can never capture it again." -- John Coltrane

-- =---Seek the truth, speak the truth!---= --
Actually, Eric Dolphy was the one who said that. It was at a gig
in Europe about 10 days before he died. It's on an album he
recorded live at the gig.

Lonnie


Jimmy Bruno
 

-That's a good question Paul. I never had that problem. If you
truly have the economy picking down you should try practicing it with
swing 8th notes. Also, remember about articulations... long notes
short notes. Take a Bird solo and try practicing that with the
picking. I myself cannnot play alternate picking at all. Practice
slurs,,, two downs etc.... all these techniques will give some
shape to your lines. I always found it easier to edit what I have
practiced.

-- In jazz_guitar@y..., "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote:
Hi Jimmy -- thanks for all your wonderful remarks.

Since we have you here, and we normally talk about playing
jazz guitar rather than "who's better than who", I thought
I'd try to steer the discussions in a different direction,
before we lose you entirely (I'm sure you're a busy man)!

I started playing guitar many years ago, mostly rock,
blues-rock, and classical-rock. After a few years, I
realized that in order to be able to pick as fast as I
wanted to, I needed to use "economy" picking, i.e., sweeping
wherever possible, like you demonstrate in your video. I
practiced hard and now, it only takes me a few days of solid
practice to get to the point where I can play ridiculously
fast scales, picking every note.

A few years ago I started focusing on jazzier techniques,
such as swing eighth notes. I found that all the years I had
spent on economy picking straight sixteenth notes did not
help one bit. There was no way I was going, in less than 10
years of further practice, to learn to make my sweeping
swing. Instead, when playing jazz or jazzy music, I've
reverted to alternate picking for swung eighths, and throw
in economy-picked lines in triplets here and there, as a nod
to my previous technique. But if the tempo of a swing-feel
tune is too fast -- I'm lost.

So I guess my question is, do you have any particular
advice/approaches for practicing swing feel soloing? Or is
it just a matter of practice, practice, practice?

Thanks -- just picked up _Like That_ and I'm lovin' it!
-Paul


Paul Erlich
 

Thanks for answering, Jimmy! I truly appreciate it.

--- In jazz_guitar@y..., "Jimmy Bruno" <jbguit@y...> wrote:

-That's a good question Paul. I never had that problem.
Well you're more lucky and/or agile than I am.

If you
truly have the economy picking down you should try practicing it
with
swing 8th notes.
I have -- it's just extremely difficult for me (at the moment), and
even if I sort of get it down at one tempo, then I have to sort of
start from square one at a different tempo. Alternate picking does
not present these problems for me. Given that I don't have too much
time to practice these days, I've simply learned to revert to
alternate picking when I want to play a swing-8th line, and if I want
to sound like I'm swinging at faster tempos, playing straight with
economy picking but a little behind the beat seems to get the effect
across.

Next time my schedule opens up, I'll have to try working on swinging
the economy picking again. Thanks for the advice!

I'm surprised to hear that you never had this problem. When playing a
sweep arpeggio, it's so much easier to play it straight then swung.
To play it straight, you simply drag the pick across the strings at a
constant speed. To play it swung . . . aarrrggghh!