Will there ever be another run of the board?

Tech Guy All Messages By This Member #1269 I guess the run is finished for the Jack AI board never to be repeated? I never heard of it till recently. Is there any other board for using a Teensy in a raduino? 73 John N4HNO
jjpurdum Member Profile All Messages By This Member #1271 Hi John: Most people seem to have lost interest. I still have a few populated boards if you want one. The cost is $35 plus shipping. Let me know if you're interested. Jack, W8TEE On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 09:33:56 PM EDT, Tech Guy <tech48055@...> wrote: I guess the run is finished for the Jack AI board never to be repeated? I never heard of it till recently. Is there any other board for using a Teensy in a raduino? 73 John N4HNO
Tech Guy All Messages By This Member #1272 What displays are supported? Are the surface mount parts installed? I really don’t know much about the board except processor change and improved performance. John
jjpurdum Member Profile All Messages By This Member #1273 All of the parts are on the board and it's the same board QRP Guys used to sell. To tell you the truth, I would not buy the board. Support is spotty and the web site is not at all active. Also, it's not an easy board to install into the BIX. I would look at the other BIX product uBITX, sBIX, truSDR, and some others before you buy. Jack, W8TEE On Wednesday, May 8, 2024 at 03:49:50 PM EDT, Tech Guy <tech48055@...> wrote: What displays are supported? Are the surface mount parts installed? I really don’t know much about the board except processor change and improved performance. John
K9HZ All Messages By This Member #1274 开云体育 You might consider stepping up to the T41 instead… ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? toggle quoted message Show quoted text From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jjpurdum via groups.io Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 3:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JackAl] Will there ever be another run of the board? ? All of the parts are on the board and it's the same board QRP Guys used to sell. To tell you the truth, I would not buy the board. Support is spotty and the web site is not at all active. Also, it's not an easy board to install into the BIX. I would look at the other BIX product uBITX, sBIX, truSDR, and some others before you buy. ? Jack, W8TEE ? On Wednesday, May 8, 2024 at 03:49:50 PM EDT, Tech Guy <tech48055@...> wrote: ? ? What displays are supported? Are the surface mount parts installed? I really don’t know much about the board except processor change and improved performance. John
Tech Guy All Messages By This Member #1275 I have a ubitx v6. So this board adds better screen performance and some filtering and cw decode? Is this with the original screen and doesn’t require a Nextion?
Tech Guy All Messages By This Member #1276 I am aware of that project. That is a bigger commitment than I have time for now. I was an electronics tech for years before getting into networking. I operate some qrp cw now and then. Some qrp phone. Chasing down a long list of components is not really what I want to do now. It looks amazing but realistically don’t think I should jump into a project that big. Improved response from the display and dds if the other board is a raduino replacement would be useful. Just trying to understand what exactly it gains and how hard is it to setup. John N4HNO
K9HZ All Messages By This Member #1277 开云体育 I know what it does.? I was part of the prototype group to test it.? I still have one on one of my uBITx machines.? It has its issues and its not the JackAl that has the problems. ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? toggle quoted message Show quoted text From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tech Guy Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 4:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JackAl] Will there ever be another run of the board? ? I have a ubitx v6. So this board adds better screen performance and some filtering and cw decode? Is this with the original screen and doesn’t require a Nextion?
Tech Guy All Messages By This Member #1278 Can you explain? What exactly does it provide? What shortcomings? Does it improve the raduino performance? The ubitx is a basic transceiver. I’m not expecting commercial performance but does it improve the screen redraw? ?The nano was pushed to its limits. That’s why some went with the Nextion. I have heard of the Jack AI board but know little about it. From what I have read I think ?it had some dsp and cw decode and better performance with a simpler and cheaper lcd. I don’t really need cw decode. I am not really interested in SDR. I understand sdr is the future but I have seen more than enough digital in my job. I also don’t do FT8. Better filtering would be nice.? John N4HNO
jjpurdum Member Profile All Messages By This Member #1279 The JackAl did have better performance, but not enough. Some of your comments sound like you are referring to the T41-EP rig we designed. You can read more about it at Amazon B0D25FV48C It is a 20W CW/SSB rig with many features even the big rigs don't have. The cost is more (4 States QRP sell a semi kit--all SMD's are on the boards--for about $400), but it is a solid performer. You'd throw rocks at the JackAl by comparison. Check out our web site: /g/SoftwareControlledHamRadio for more info. Jack, W8TEE On Wednesday, May 8, 2024 at 07:21:48 PM EDT, Tech Guy <tech48055@...> wrote: Can you explain? What exactly does it provide? What shortcomings? Does it improve the raduino performance? The ubitx is a basic transceiver. I’m not expecting commercial performance but does it improve the screen redraw? ?The nano was pushed to its limits. That’s why some went with the Nextion. I have heard of the Jack AI board but know little about it. From what I have read I think ?it had some dsp and cw decode and better performance with a simpler and cheaper lcd. I don’t really need cw decode. I am not really interested in SDR. I understand sdr is the future but I have seen more than enough digital in my job. I also don’t do FT8. Better filtering would be nice.? John N4HNO
Tech Guy All Messages By This Member #1280 Thanks. I get the idea. I appreciate all you have accomplished with this. I have been following the Software Controlled Ham Radio Group occasionally. 73s John N4HNO
K9HZ All Messages By This Member #1281 开云体育 I’ll try… ? Does it improve the raduino performance… not really… it improves the user interface for sure.? The raduino is really just a square wave generator with a basic interface so I really don’t think you can improve that per-se… besides going to a higher performance frequency generator… maybe a si570 or something better. ? The JackAL has a good graphic interface… its more nice than the crude/ toy-ish 16x4 character display.? The processor also has some really nice features coded into it like DSP, some frequency shaping, and morse decoding that is cool.? It also can do some simple band-stacking.? Oh it also has a new audio amp that sounds better than the original. ? However its lipstick on a pig. ? The uBITx is a demonstration of minimalistic use of parts to build something that functions.? Dual direction IF, it does have a crystal filter somewhat matched, pathetic audio, even worse frequency gain response (40W on 40M and 2W on 80M… I worked quite a bit to fix the IF chain and RF Output sections to fix this… you will find a boat load of articles from Allison and myself on this very topic.? I still have hundreds of simulations of the thing to fix such issues.? I finally would up bobbing the whole RF output section out of te radio with a hack-saw and designing my own which led to my 20W 1-54MHz flat response PA kit I sell). ? What else do you want to know? ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? toggle quoted message Show quoted text From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tech Guy Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 6:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JackAl] Will there ever be another run of the board? ? Can you explain? What exactly does it provide? What shortcomings? Does it improve the raduino performance? The ubitx is a basic transceiver. I’m not expecting commercial performance but does it improve the screen redraw? ?The nano was pushed to its limits. That’s why some went with the Nextion. I have heard of the Jack AI board but know little about it. From what I have read I think ?it had some dsp and cw decode and better performance with a simpler and cheaper lcd. I don’t really need cw decode. I am not really interested in SDR. I understand sdr is the future but I have seen more than enough digital in my job. I also don’t do FT8. Better filtering would be nice.? John N4HNO
jjpurdum Member Profile All Messages By This Member #1282 John: FWIT, both Al and I are using Bill's 20W PA for our own personal T41 builds. You can fire up the T41, set it to CW mode, put a brick on the key, go on vacation for two weeks, come back and it will still be working perfectly and cool as a cucumber. Jack, W8TEE On Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 02:12:46 PM EDT, K9HZ <bill@...> wrote: I’ll try… ? Does it improve the raduino performance… not really… it improves the user interface for sure.? The raduino is really just a square wave generator with a basic interface so I really don’t think you can improve that per-se… besides going to a higher performance frequency generator… maybe a si570 or something better. ? The JackAL has a good graphic interface… its more nice than the crude/ toy-ish 16x4 character display.? The processor also has some really nice features coded into it like DSP, some frequency shaping, and morse decoding that is cool.? It also can do some simple band-stacking.? Oh it also has a new audio amp that sounds better than the original. ? However its lipstick on a pig. ? The uBITx is a demonstration of minimalistic use of parts to build something that functions.? Dual direction IF, it does have a crystal filter somewhat matched, pathetic audio, even worse frequency gain response (40W on 40M and 2W on 80M… I worked quite a bit to fix the IF chain and RF Output sections to fix this… you will find a boat load of articles from Allison and myself on this very topic.? I still have hundreds of simulations of the thing to fix such issues.? I finally would up bobbing the whole RF output section out of te radio with a hack-saw and designing my own which led to my 20W 1-54MHz flat response PA kit I sell). ? What else do you want to know? ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? toggle quoted message Show quoted text From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tech Guy Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 6:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JackAl] Will there ever be another run of the board? ? Can you explain? What exactly does it provide? What shortcomings? Does it improve the raduino performance? The ubitx is a basic transceiver. I’m not expecting commercial performance but does it improve the screen redraw? ?The nano was pushed to its limits. That’s why some went with the Nextion. I have heard of the Jack AI board but know little about it. From what I have read I think ?it had some dsp and cw decode and better performance with a simpler and cheaper lcd. I don’t really need cw decode. I am not really interested in SDR. I understand sdr is the future but I have seen more than enough digital in my job. I also don’t do FT8. Better filtering would be nice.? John N4HNO
Brian Bowling All Messages By This Member #1283 :) Now that’s what I call “rock solid”! toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 2:37?PM jjpurdum via <jjpurdum=[email protected]> wrote: John: FWIT, both Al and I are using Bill's 20W PA for our own personal T41 builds. You can fire up the T41, set it to CW mode, put a brick on the key, go on vacation for two weeks, come back and it will still be working perfectly and cool as a cucumber. Jack, W8TEE On Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 02:12:46 PM EDT, K9HZ <bill@...> wrote: I’ll try… ? Does it improve the raduino performance… not really… it improves the user interface for sure.? The raduino is really just a square wave generator with a basic interface so I really don’t think you can improve that per-se… besides going to a higher performance frequency generator… maybe a si570 or something better. ? The JackAL has a good graphic interface… its more nice than the crude/ toy-ish 16x4 character display.? The processor also has some really nice features coded into it like DSP, some frequency shaping, and morse decoding that is cool.? It also can do some simple band-stacking.? Oh it also has a new audio amp that sounds better than the original. ? However its lipstick on a pig. ? The uBITx is a demonstration of minimalistic use of parts to build something that functions.? Dual direction IF, it does have a crystal filter somewhat matched, pathetic audio, even worse frequency gain response (40W on 40M and 2W on 80M… I worked quite a bit to fix the IF chain and RF Output sections to fix this… you will find a boat load of articles from Allison and myself on this very topic.? I still have hundreds of simulations of the thing to fix such issues.? I finally would up bobbing the whole RF output section out of te radio with a hack-saw and designing my own which led to my 20W 1-54MHz flat response PA kit I sell). ? What else do you want to know? ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tech Guy Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 6:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JackAl] Will there ever be another run of the board? ? Can you explain? What exactly does it provide? What shortcomings? Does it improve the raduino performance? The ubitx is a basic transceiver. I’m not expecting commercial performance but does it improve the screen redraw?? The nano was pushed to its limits. That’s why some went with the Nextion. I have heard of the Jack AI board but know little about it. From what I have read I think ?it had some dsp and cw decode and better performance with a simpler and cheaper lcd. I don’t really need cw decode. I am not really interested in SDR. I understand sdr is the future but I have seen more than enough digital in my job. I also don’t do FT8. Better filtering would be nice.? John N4HNO -- Brian - N8BDB
K9HZ All Messages By This Member #1284 开云体育 You can short out the antenna jack or leave the antenna off and transmit too… doesn’t phase it.? It’s completely bullet proof for guys like me that makes a mistake once in a while (more as I get older). ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? toggle quoted message Show quoted text From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Brian Bowling Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 1:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JackAl] Will there ever be another run of the board? ? :) Now that’s what I call “rock solid”! ? On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 2:37?PM jjpurdum via <jjpurdum=[email protected]> wrote: John: ? FWIT, both Al and I are using Bill's 20W PA for our own personal T41 builds. You can fire up the T41, set it to CW mode, put a brick on the key, go on vacation for two weeks, come back and it will still be working perfectly and cool as a cucumber. ? Jack, W8TEE ? On Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 02:12:46 PM EDT, K9HZ <bill@...> wrote: ? ? I’ll try… ? Does it improve the raduino performance… not really… it improves the user interface for sure.? The raduino is really just a square wave generator with a basic interface so I really don’t think you can improve that per-se… besides going to a higher performance frequency generator… maybe a si570 or something better. ? The JackAL has a good graphic interface… its more nice than the crude/ toy-ish 16x4 character display.? The processor also has some really nice features coded into it like DSP, some frequency shaping, and morse decoding that is cool.? It also can do some simple band-stacking.? Oh it also has a new audio amp that sounds better than the original. ? However its lipstick on a pig. ? The uBITx is a demonstration of minimalistic use of parts to build something that functions.? Dual direction IF, it does have a crystal filter somewhat matched, pathetic audio, even worse frequency gain response (40W on 40M and 2W on 80M… I worked quite a bit to fix the IF chain and RF Output sections to fix this… you will find a boat load of articles from Allison and myself on this very topic.? I still have hundreds of simulations of the thing to fix such issues.? I finally would up bobbing the whole RF output section out of te radio with a hack-saw and designing my own which led to my 20W 1-54MHz flat response PA kit I sell). ? What else do you want to know? ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tech Guy Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 6:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JackAl] Will there ever be another run of the board? ? Can you explain? What exactly does it provide? What shortcomings? Does it improve the raduino performance? The ubitx is a basic transceiver. I’m not expecting commercial performance but does it improve the screen redraw?? The nano was pushed to its limits. That’s why some went with the Nextion. I have heard of the Jack AI board but know little about it. From what I have read I think ?it had some dsp and cw decode and better performance with a simpler and cheaper lcd. I don’t really need cw decode. I am not really interested in SDR. I understand sdr is the future but I have seen more than enough digital in my job. I also don’t do FT8. Better filtering would be nice.? John N4HNO -- Brian - N8BDB
Tech Guy All Messages By This Member #1285 The four states qrp group ran their first batch. Who knows if or when there will be another. Sounds interesting but I don’t really have the time. Just so I understand, how does the Jack ai board connect to a ubitx v6? Is it just vfo and bfo and ptt? ? Is there a document that describes the installation in the files somewhere? The stock radunio acts like it can be tuned faster than it can respond and end up on a frequency far away from where it started or there is some speed sensitive tuning? The display on mine may show LSB highlighted. I press CW and LSB is still highlighted at times. CPU too busy drawing the screen to keep up?
K9HZ All Messages By This Member #1286 开云体育 So….. by chance…. have you checked the files section of this forum? ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? toggle quoted message Show quoted text From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tech Guy Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 2:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JackAl] Will there ever be another run of the board? ? The four states qrp group ran their first batch. Who knows if or when there will be another. Sounds interesting but I don’t really have the time. Just so I understand, how does the Jack ai board connect to a ubitx v6? Is it just vfo and bfo and ptt? ? Is there a document that describes the installation in the files somewhere? The stock radunio acts like it can be tuned faster than it can respond and end up on a frequency far away from where it started or there is some speed sensitive tuning? The display on mine may show LSB highlighted. I press CW and LSB is still highlighted at times. CPU too busy drawing the screen to keep up?
K9HZ All Messages By This Member #1287 开云体育 Oh I forgot!? The best part was that the JackAl had/ has a very nice real AGC… not a AVC like more cheaper radios tout as AGC. ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? toggle quoted message Show quoted text From: Dr. William J. Schmidt <bill@...> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 1:13 PM To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [JackAl] Will there ever be another run of the board? ? I’ll try… ? Does it improve the raduino performance… not really… it improves the user interface for sure.? The raduino is really just a square wave generator with a basic interface so I really don’t think you can improve that per-se… besides going to a higher performance frequency generator… maybe a si570 or something better. ? The JackAL has a good graphic interface… its more nice than the crude/ toy-ish 16x4 character display.? The processor also has some really nice features coded into it like DSP, some frequency shaping, and morse decoding that is cool.? It also can do some simple band-stacking.? Oh it also has a new audio amp that sounds better than the original. ? However its lipstick on a pig. ? The uBITx is a demonstration of minimalistic use of parts to build something that functions.? Dual direction IF, it does have a crystal filter somewhat matched, pathetic audio, even worse frequency gain response (40W on 40M and 2W on 80M… I worked quite a bit to fix the IF chain and RF Output sections to fix this… you will find a boat load of articles from Allison and myself on this very topic.? I still have hundreds of simulations of the thing to fix such issues.? I finally would up bobbing the whole RF output section out of te radio with a hack-saw and designing my own which led to my 20W 1-54MHz flat response PA kit I sell). ? What else do you want to know? ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tech Guy Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 6:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JackAl] Will there ever be another run of the board? ? Can you explain? What exactly does it provide? What shortcomings? Does it improve the raduino performance? The ubitx is a basic transceiver. I’m not expecting commercial performance but does it improve the screen redraw? ?The nano was pushed to its limits. That’s why some went with the Nextion. I have heard of the Jack AI board but know little about it. From what I have read I think ?it had some dsp and cw decode and better performance with a simpler and cheaper lcd. I don’t really need cw decode. I am not really interested in SDR. I understand sdr is the future but I have seen more than enough digital in my job. I also don’t do FT8. Better filtering would be nice.? John N4HNO
Tech Guy All Messages By This Member #1288 Yes.? I see the documentation.? Since there appears to be little activity on the group and I just recently discovered it I was asking about what was the most recent. It sounds like it improved the stock unit it replaces with quite of few features.? It gives me something to check out.??
K9HZ All Messages By This Member #1289 开云体育 10-4.? That’s a perfect place to start…? Remember to check out uBITx.net too… ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner – Operator Villa Grand Piton – J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? toggle quoted message Show quoted text From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tech Guy Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 4:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JackAl] Will there ever be another run of the board? ? Yes.? I see the documentation.? Since there appears to be little activity on the group and I just recently discovered it I was asking about what was the most recent. It sounds like it improved the stock unit it replaces with quite of few features.? It gives me something to check out.??

Previous Topic Next Topic