Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- HallicraftersRadios
- Messages
Search
Re: HT-9
开云体育I used to have that information in my head...... The round meter ones are the last production of the HT9. The square meter HT9's were the first production runs.? Look at some of the internal parts for product numbers and that would be a clue. Hope this helps. mike On 10/5/2024 8:18 AM, Tom Smith wrote:
I have a 4 digit serial number around 4500. It’s got a black cabinet and has round Hallicrafters marked meters recessed in the front panel. |
For sale Items Update
开云体育Following items are for sale.Heathkit AT-1 Transmitter with AC1 Tuner $85 + shipping Hallicrafters S-107 5 Band Shortwave Receiver $70 + shipping (reduced price) Please click the link below and read the page for further details on the above listed items. 73 Mike W5RKL |
Re: Hallicrafters Items For Sale
开云体育Hi Paul,Thank you for your kind words of support and encouragement. I'm not too far behind you. I've been hamming for 58 years, started in high school in Sept 1966. I'm retired now and spend a lot of time repairing and in some cases fully restoring ham gear. At 76 it's fun and keeps my mind active. I'm not as active as I use to be but I do get on 40 CW now and then. 73 Mike W5RKL On 10/3/24 11:36 PM, Paul Beckwith via
groups.io wrote:
|
Re: Hallicrafters Items For Sale
Hi Mike. I'm Paul, K2LMQ in Kingman, AZ. Still on the air after 69 years of hamming. Just saw your project listing and wanted to tell you how impressed I am with your thoroughnes in every respect! All hams could take lessons from you on workmanship and docomentation! I'm still active on 80 & 40m using vintage AM.CW and SSB rigs. The enjoyment never goes away. Keep up the good work! 73's de Paul K2LMQ
On Thursday, October 3, 2024 at 07:46:49 PM MST, Michael Waldrop <mikew5rkl@...> wrote:
I have the following items up for sale.
Heathkit AT-1 Transmitter with AC1 Tuner $85 + shipping Hallicrafters S-107 5 Band Shortwave Receiver $75 + shipping Please click the link below and read the page for further details on the above listed items. 73 Mike W5RKL |
Hallicrafters Items For Sale
开云体育I have the following items up for sale.Heathkit AT-1 Transmitter with AC1 Tuner $85 + shipping Hallicrafters S-107 5 Band Shortwave Receiver $75 + shipping Please click the link below and read the page for further details on the above listed items. 73 Mike W5RKL |
SR-160/500
开云体育
To all the fans of the SR-160 and the SR-500. I have upgraded the "DRIVER & PA OPTOMIZATION" document on my website. I have added more information and rewritten it to be more friendly to the new, developing technicians. You can download the new document
at: ?.
Click on "DRIVER & PA OPTOMIZATION. 73
Walt Cates, WD0GOF
?
|
Locked
Re: HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
Hi Don,
Thanks for doing the computational analysis I was too lazy (and unskilled) to do!? It seems we reached similar conclusions and we're both learning the fun way about how power transformers work and fail.? I hope to get some time to start reassembly in a couple days.
Cheers
Halden VE7UTS |
Locked
Re: HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
开云体育Halden your writings in black, my comments in green The peak current amplitude fell a little bit?????? (750-650 mApp)? but the shoulder amplitude rose substantially (500 vs 200 mApp).? --yes- ? The phase lag dropped from about 2ms to 1.5 ms.? –--yes- about expected- The current waveform peak concurs with the voltage crossing, so this doesn't represent a difference in dissipated power.?–Yes quite close?? - ?But at the time of the voltage peak, the current is about 2.5 times what it was without the short. ---yes expected- To estimate the power dissipation represented in the second image (#20), I ignored the peak that occurs when no current flows and approximated the rest of the waveform as a sinusoid with amplitude 540 mApp, 190 mA rms.?????? Multiplying by 113 Vrms and cos(30 deg) gives 19 W of power dissipation. If spread throughout the transformer, this would cause the transformer to get noticeably warm.? Well Halden I wonder if all this watts stuff really matters, but in my way of thinking #16 does indicate power too, likely in the core and some in the primary turns resistance; I’m guessing that it is mostly core loss since we see it running into some saturation, but we can’t be sure.? As I see it, in #20 the total heat is the heat from #16 plus the heat going into the shorted area. So the shorted turn area takes 540 mApp? minus about 200 mApp looking at Vmax which still means that the short is taking a considerable and dominant current and… power [since losses in the primary must be very low at this current]. I stole your images and generated this At the lower part you can see the difference, which shows pretty much what you said but one can see the waveform If I did it right you can see the difference [shorted turn] is somewhat sinusoidal ? But its probably mostly dissipated at the site of the short—yyy ??? - or in the shorted winding itself, --yyy-? either of which would get quite hot after some time.?–yyy mostly-? well, I need to revisit this transformer stuff, especially for this rather lopsided multi-winding unit. Stating some obvious things; if there is a high resistance there will be little heat generated at the short or in the turn, but if the short is solid? there will be lots of heat in the turn and none at the short, and depending mostly on the resistance of the wire the worst case might be when the ohms-[short]? = about ohms-[1 turn] and so about half the heat will be in the short and half in the winding turn, and in time all nearby insulation will deteriorate until doomsday comes, all to say it might start at the point of the T-T short and migrate mostly to the Whole turn. That becomes interesting because the longer the heat is generated at the point the more likely that local area will really overheat and destroy insulation ? That heat might damage adjacent windings and possibly cause additional shorts and progressing failures until a fuse blows, interrupting the process. Yyy From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of HF via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 1:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY ? Hi Don, Yep, I concur …………… ?? -- don??? va3drl |
Re: Hallicrafters SX17 modifier noise limiter
Now that the repair of the radio is complete I can post an update. I worked through the remaining IF and RF stages replacing waxies and resistors that had gone substantially high. After component replacements had been completed, I went over everything to check all functions and confirm nothing had been missed. A couple of errors were corrected including adding a missed capacitor.
?
An EF39 had been used in one of the IF amplifier stages and although this does work, it was replaced with a NOS 6K7 as per circuit diagram, it does seem to have slightly more gain than the EF39.
?
One of the bands (band 2) did not work and the culprit turned out to be the antenna input coil for that band. After repairing the coil, the receiver was ready for alignment. IF alignment was fairly straightforward. RF alignment was not quite so straightforward and quite a way out on some bands. On band 4 a 10pF capacitor had to be taken out of circuit because the tuning had shifted (I understand that the coild former inductance can change over time) and there was no longer enough adjustment range. Band 2 is still a bit quiet compared to the other bands, but all have been aligned successfully. Band 6 is kind of interesting as the alignment points cover only part of the range of the dial and the tracking does go adrift outside of the bottom marker. Nevertheless all bands are now aligned to the dial.
?
All functions of the radio were tested before and again after alignment and all work just fine, including the noise limiter which, to my surprise, actually works and does considerably reduce pulsing noise. The broad and narrow filter work nicely as well and after alignment function exactly as the manual described. Prior to alignment this did not work correctly.
?
I have also acquired an external speaker that has the capability of having its impedance tuned in several steps to match that of the radio. The quality of the audio from my temporary speaker was clear but a bit weak and tinny. However, from this Stentorian, the sound is positively booming. The tonal quality is very good and the audio is nice clear.
?
I am currently in the process of re-spraying the case and cleaning up the trim, but am wondering how I might go about rejuvenating the front fascia? I have cleaned it as much as possible and its appearance is much improved, but it will likely look dirty next to the re-sprayed case. Can the white lettering be rejuvenated with something? Or could it be re-created somehow if the panel was re-sprayed?
? |
Locked
Re: HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
开云体育Halden ?good that the HV T-T seems ok to your eye. To my eye #16 looks like magnetizing current only. I have wondered about letting it run for some hours while your nose is not to far away. One thing I have wanted is a thermal camera; it might be useful here. ???? ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of HF via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2024 8:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY ? Hi Don, I agree that the shorted turn's resistance was limited by the resistance of the contact between the wires.? I noticed that when I squeezed the wires together with pliers, the current went up when I squeezed harder. Yes, the purpose of this test was to assess the consequence of a worst-case T-T short in the HV secondary.? I don't think it could actually be this bad. I can't see between the wires in the HV winding at the hole to assess the status of the insulation there.? I don't see any reason for the insulation between the windings to have failed, as that's not where the arc would have been.? The exposed surface of 2 or 3 turns does seem to have burned off and I probably removed the oxides when I cleaned out the residue from the hole.? The (w)hole area has varnish on it now. :-) I think you're right that we cannot be sure that image #16 represents magnetizing current only.? I'd be more confident if I were to repeat that measurement with a known-good transformer, such as the one in my HT-37. Cheers, Halden VE7UTS -- don??? va3drl |
Locked
Re: HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
Hi Don,
I agree that the shorted turn's resistance was limited by the resistance of the contact between the wires.? I noticed that when I squeezed the wires together with pliers, the current went up when I squeezed harder.
Yes, the purpose of this test was to assess the consequence of a worst-case T-T short in the HV secondary.? I don't think it could actually be this bad.
I can't see between the wires in the HV winding at the hole to assess the status of the insulation there.? I don't see any reason for the insulation between the windings to have failed, as that's not where the arc would have been.? The exposed surface of 2 or 3 turns does seem to have burned off and I probably removed the oxides when I cleaned out the residue from the hole.? The (w)hole area has varnish on it now. :-)
I think you're right that we cannot be sure that image #16 represents magnetizing current only.? I'd be more confident if I were to repeat that measurement with a known-good transformer, such as the one in my HT-37.
Cheers,
Halden VE7UTS |
Locked
Re: HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
Halden, ? ? revised? oops this very draft post somehow flew off the table ?too soon, I never learn? !? some parts were to be revised or deleted, and others added I am leaving the original as just sent? except for this oops note. ? I was/am surprised that the primary current shown in the img 20 test is so low. The first thought is that an alligator or even crock might not have the pressure/force to make a good “electrical connection joint”; ?especially at say 30 Amps. Just to get a ball park idea of the resistance , I made a real guess that the 5volt wdg has 1 foot of #16 per turn = 0.004 ohms. I think you mentioned .5 volts per turn for this transformer? so? .5/.004 ??=125 amps. I should rethink that guess-work but ?for starters a, simple light pressure contact of round wire to round wire using an alligator clip will probably develop too much resistance. Just as an example, advertising indicates 5 to 10 milli-Ohms for a brand new alligator clip [I stored some examples in my docs].? But if indeed your shorted turn test on this transformer design is true, I will have to rethink my thoughts about failures in the secondary’s. Since this T-T failure “load” will allow the transformer to cook internally until the heat in that spot creates another fault that manages to blow the fuse, of maybe set-off a smoke detector etc. ??You might say this transformer is four transformers in one, and the 5 volt VA winding is a small fraction of the primary, so when it comes to the 5V scdy’s [rated at 15VA by Hammond] a solid T-T short ?may well roast the whole area to carbon while the primary [somewhere about 300 VA] sees only a smallish current, because of the small scdy wire ?So… ??? ? Looking at the results so far, I wonder if ?these shorted turn tests will be of much value. It is good to experiment and see what happens, but a T-T short is a well known killer, and a transformer with a T-T will be useless sooner or later. ?All you can hope to do is establish that you are seeing normal magnetizing current. Your img 16 looks like typical magnetizing current only, but you can never be sure that there is nothing else. ? At this point, it seems to me that what is wanted/needed is insurance that the HV winding has no T-T failure at “that” spot, but THAT is a major challenge, even for the industry. However if it has failed badly, a HV T-T should resemble this 5v ?alligatorized T-T test {img 20]. Since the primary and secondary has R and an unknown X , power/heating calculations would be beyond me; but I would still look at the current. ?? ? Hovever, a real good ?magnifier looking at that spot might reveal if the previous arcing “mucked-up” the enamel between turns, as mentioned long ago by somebody.? And Halden, I am thinking that the big hole in the insulation is due to corona’s ozone and the arc? diameter was thin ? ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of HF via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 9:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY ? Hi Don, Yes, both the voltage and current are measured at the transformer's primary.? The voltage does not include the voltage across the dim bulb.? A transformer transforms voltage according to the secondary/primary turns ratio and current by the inverse ratio.? The primary on this transformer has about 250 turns and the shorted secondary only one turn.? Without the shorted turn, the primary current in phase with the voltage is about 200 mApp which is about 70 mA rms.? Subtracting that from the 190 mA rms yields about 120 mA rms attributable to the shorted turn.? Multiplying that by 250 gives 30 A, which is quite a hefty but not unreasonable current to flow in that turn.? Hi Jim, I use pp values for my convenience, not because I have to.? They're easy for me to read from the graph.? The transformer is not inside my transmitter; it's a damaged transformer from another HT-37. ?There was a leak between HV and filament windings, but that is under repair now, not investigation.? The purpose of investigating the symptoms of a short between adjacent windings is so that once reassembled, I'll be able to assess electrically whether this transformer has developed such a short during the repair effort.? Cheers, Halden VE7UTS ? -- don??? va3drl |
Locked
Re: HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
开云体育Halden, ?Jim, ?now a bit late.. ??? Measuring values on a scope can easily return a peak value, and depending on how you measure, P-P might be more accurate. I certainly never managed to see an RMS or Average value on a scope screen; except for pure DC. And it is tough to read an accurate value at each microsecond, and calculate RMS, but I guess it can be done. ?I use which-ever is available at the time; and does the wanted job . ? ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of HF via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 12:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY ? Hi Jim, I stated quantities in peak-to-peak units.? That's what the little "pp" in mApp means.? It's more commonly used to represent a voltage: Vpp denoting peak-to-peak volts is probably more familiar.? ----------.---------------- _._,_._,_ -- don??? va3drl |
Locked
Re: HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
Hi Don,
Yes, both the voltage and current are measured at the transformer's primary.? The voltage does not include the voltage across the dim bulb.? A transformer transforms voltage according to the secondary/primary turns ratio and current by the inverse ratio.? The primary on this transformer has about 250 turns and the shorted secondary only one turn.? Without the shorted turn, the primary current in phase with the voltage is about 200 mApp which is about 70 mA rms.? Subtracting that from the 190 mA rms yields about 120 mA rms attributable to the shorted turn.? Multiplying that by 250 gives 30 A, which is quite a hefty but not unreasonable current to flow in that turn.?
Hi Jim,
I use pp values for my convenience, not because I have to.? They're easy for me to read from the graph.? The transformer is not inside my transmitter; it's a damaged transformer from another HT-37. ?There was a leak between HV and filament windings, but that is under repair now, not investigation.? The purpose of investigating the symptoms of a short between adjacent windings is so that once reassembled, I'll be able to assess electrically whether this transformer has developed such a short during the repair effort.?
Cheers,
Halden VE7UTS |
Locked
Re: HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
开云体育Halden, I will bypass most of your writings for now and just say the first? img {16} looks as expected. The second img {20} with the shorted turn has a current waveform as expected, but it is strange that the current amplitude is so low. Just to be sure is the voltage measured at the transformer primary? And not into the dim-bulb? ?I am missing something. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of HF via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 1:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY ? Hi Don, ………--------- Today, I made some measurements to explore the significance of a single-turn short and how to detect it before it causes further damage.? I was unable to reliably cause adjacent turns in the HV winding to contact each other with low resistance, so I created one in the 5V filament winding above it.? I scraped insulation off and used a crocodile clip to hold the wires together.? This represents a worst or worse than worst case configuration, as a real short would probably not include such a low-resistance contact. The images below show …….---------------------------------- -- don??? va3drl |
Locked
Re: HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
Halden I don't understand why you need peak to peak values.? The average voltage or current in a full cycle of AC is zero.? That is why only the peak of half cycles of voltage and current and their phase difference are of any use in calculating?either rms or instantaneous?power.? The power stored in a reactive circuit is during the positive half of the cycle, the power during the negative half cycle is returned to the source. See:?? A shorted turn becomes a secondary winding in which the load is the resistance of the wire that makes up the shorted turn.? Here power is consumed and not returned to the source.? Since your o'scope figures show that the current in the shorted turn is lower then the current needed to form the magnetic coupling of the primary to secondary windings, there is little power dissipated but it is a real power so the transformer will be warmed.? The question is how hot will the transformer get due to a single shorted turn? The heat generated in a single shorted turn may then, over time, cause insulation failure in the area of the short and cause additional turns to also short which will dissipate even more real power.? This condition will continue until the circuit opens either when a safety fuse opens or the winding opens. The short to an adjacent winding is not that much of a problem but a short to the winding below is a much bigger problem.? Here there are many turns of wire feeding the short so the voltage seen is approximately the number of turns in the shorted winding times about half a volt per turn.? This is evidently what has happened in your HT-37 transformer. Jim Logic: Method used to arrive at the wrong conclusion, with confidence.? Murphy
On Tuesday, September 24, 2024 at 11:46:23 AM CDT, HF via groups.io <incorridge@...> wrote:
Hi Jim,
I stated quantities in peak-to-peak units.? That's what the little "pp" in mApp means.? It's more commonly used to represent a voltage: Vpp denoting peak-to-peak volts is probably more familiar.? For sinusoidal waveforms, one can divide Vpp by 2*sqrt(2) to get Vrms.?
Perhaps I should explain the cos(30 deg) in my original post.? This is the power factor due to the phase lag.? 360 degrees * 1.5 ms / 16.7 ms is 32 degrees but I rounded it to 30 degrees for simplicity.
Cheers,
Halden
|
Locked
Re: HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
Hi Jim,
I stated quantities in peak-to-peak units.? That's what the little "pp" in mApp means.? It's more commonly used to represent a voltage: Vpp denoting peak-to-peak volts is probably more familiar.? For sinusoidal waveforms, one can divide Vpp by 2*sqrt(2) to get Vrms.?
Perhaps I should explain the cos(30 deg) in my original post.? This is the power factor due to the phase lag.? 360 degrees * 1.5 ms / 16.7 ms is 32 degrees but I rounded it to 30 degrees for simplicity.
Cheers,
Halden |
Locked
Re: HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
I applaud your dedication in trying to understand what is going on with the HT-37 transformer but I am not sure about your conclusions.??The current per division in the first figure is 0.2 amps per division but it is 0.1 amps per division in the second.? Therefore, your 750 vs. 650 mA peak current readings are in error.? The peak current in the first figure is 400 mA and the peak current in the second is about 340 mA.? The difference is, as you say, most likely due to the dim bulb tester reducing the applied voltage. In the first figure, the peak current that is at about the time of the voltage zero crossing is the current needed to set up the magnetic field in the power transformer core.? It will always be there.? The little slope in current just below the peak voltage is most likely due to wire resistance and is proportional to the primary voltage.? The only current drawn from the AC line is what is needed to sustain the magnetic field which couples the primary to the secondary.? In the first figure, the transformer is not loaded.? No power is drawn from the the secondary windings.?? In the second figure, the shorted turn is drawing some power BUT the current that supports this power is still below the the current needed to magnetize the transformer core.? The HT-37 power transformer is capable of some 375 watts or at 115 volt line, some 3.2 amps rms.? Converting this to peak current, that would be about 4.5 amps.? In your experiment, you are drawing about a tenth of the current that the power transformer is capable of supplying. As you load the transformer secondaries and draw more reasonable currents, the 0.4 amp peak current caused by the magnetizing current will be swamped by the total current supplied to the transformer.? This total current peak will move to the left so that the peak voltage and peak current will be closer together in time.? This indicates that real power is supplied to the secondary windings. You calculated about 19 watts (it should be below 10 VA due to the misreading of the current as mentioned above) are supplied to the shorted turn.? The peak current needed to supply this power is still below the current needed to support the magnetic field linking primary to secondary.?? 10 VA would be about 2.5% of the 375 VA rating that the HT-37 transformer is capable of supplying.? If you allow the transformer with the shorted turn condition to operate for a few hours, with no other load on the secondaries, I doubt that you would feel much of a temperature rise in the transformer. Jim Logic: Method used to arrive at the wrong conclusion, with confidence.? Murphy
On Tuesday, September 24, 2024 at 12:38:12 AM CDT, HF via groups.io <incorridge@...> wrote:
Hi Don,
Yep, I concur that the hole was caused by decomposition of the insulating material due to the arcing that occurred at the site.? The Kapton I intend to use was new 10 or 20 years ago, and used specifically because of its dielectric strength.
Today, I made some measurements to explore the significance of a single-turn short and how to detect it before it causes further damage.? I was unable to reliably cause adjacent turns in the HV winding to contact each other with low resistance, so I created one in the 5V filament winding above it.? I scraped insulation off and used a crocodile clip to hold the wires together.? This represents a worst or worse than worst case configuration, as a real short would probably not include such a low-resistance contact.
The images below show voltage across (yellow) and current through (blue; 1 ohm resistor) the primary for the cases of #16. normal and #20. single turn short in filament secondary.
For this measurement, I used a dim bulb tester to reduce chance of smoke release in case something surprising happened.? The series light bulb probably caused the small voltage drop (340-320 Vpp) that one can discern when comparing the yellow wavefoms.
?
?
(Note the difference blue trace scaling)
The peak current amplitude fell a little bit (750-650 mApp) but the shoulder amplitude rose substantially (500 vs 200 mApp).? The phase lag dropped from about 2ms to 1.5 ms.? The current waveform peak concurs with the voltage crossing, so this doesn't represent a difference in dissipated power.? But at the time of the voltage peak, the current is about 2.5 times what it was without the short.
To estimate the power dissipation represented in the second image (#20), I ignored the peak that occurs when no current flows and approximated the rest of the waveform as a sinusoid with amplitude 540 mApp, 190 mA rms.? Multiplying by 113 Vrms and cos(30 deg) gives 19 W of power dissipation.
If spread throughout the transformer, this would cause the transformer to get noticeably warm.? But its probably mostly dissipated at the site of the short or in the shorted winding itself, either of which would get quite hot after some time.? That heat might damage adjacent windings and possibly cause additional shorts and progressing failures until a fuse blows, interrupting the process.
So it's probably a good idea to avoid a shorted winding in a transformer like this one.
A vacuum oven can be used when varnishing a winding to ensure that bubbles in the saturating fluid are tiny or non-existant, and to prevent air that's in gaps between wires from preventing varnish from filling such gaps.? Since I'm only seeking to varnish visible wires and not the whole transformer, I decided not to go through the trouble of hooking up the vacuum pump and stuffing this into the oven.? Instead, I just sprayed the varnish at the hole and the filament windings.
Next session, I'll apply the RTV and Kapton(tm) tape, reassemble the transformer, verify that the primary's waveforms resemble those in the first photo, and check that it can withstand 2500V between windings.
Cheers,
Halden VE7UTS
?
|
Locked
Re: HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY
Hi Don,
Yep, I concur that the hole was caused by decomposition of the insulating material due to the arcing that occurred at the site.? The Kapton I intend to use was new 10 or 20 years ago, and used specifically because of its dielectric strength.
Today, I made some measurements to explore the significance of a single-turn short and how to detect it before it causes further damage.? I was unable to reliably cause adjacent turns in the HV winding to contact each other with low resistance, so I created one in the 5V filament winding above it.? I scraped insulation off and used a crocodile clip to hold the wires together.? This represents a worst or worse than worst case configuration, as a real short would probably not include such a low-resistance contact.
The images below show voltage across (yellow) and current through (blue; 1 ohm resistor) the primary for the cases of #16. normal and #20. single turn short in filament secondary.
For this measurement, I used a dim bulb tester to reduce chance of smoke release in case something surprising happened.? The series light bulb probably caused the small voltage drop (340-320 Vpp) that one can discern when comparing the yellow wavefoms.
?
?
(Note the difference blue trace scaling)
The peak current amplitude fell a little bit (750-650 mApp) but the shoulder amplitude rose substantially (500 vs 200 mApp).? The phase lag dropped from about 2ms to 1.5 ms.? The current waveform peak concurs with the voltage crossing, so this doesn't represent a difference in dissipated power.? But at the time of the voltage peak, the current is about 2.5 times what it was without the short.
To estimate the power dissipation represented in the second image (#20), I ignored the peak that occurs when no current flows and approximated the rest of the waveform as a sinusoid with amplitude 540 mApp, 190 mA rms.? Multiplying by 113 Vrms and cos(30 deg) gives 19 W of power dissipation.
If spread throughout the transformer, this would cause the transformer to get noticeably warm.? But its probably mostly dissipated at the site of the short or in the shorted winding itself, either of which would get quite hot after some time.? That heat might damage adjacent windings and possibly cause additional shorts and progressing failures until a fuse blows, interrupting the process.
So it's probably a good idea to avoid a shorted winding in a transformer like this one.
A vacuum oven can be used when varnishing a winding to ensure that bubbles in the saturating fluid are tiny or non-existant, and to prevent air that's in gaps between wires from preventing varnish from filling such gaps.? Since I'm only seeking to varnish visible wires and not the whole transformer, I decided not to go through the trouble of hooking up the vacuum pump and stuffing this into the oven.? Instead, I just sprayed the varnish at the hole and the filament windings.
Next session, I'll apply the RTV and Kapton(tm) tape, reassemble the transformer, verify that the primary's waveforms resemble those in the first photo, and check that it can withstand 2500V between windings.
Cheers,
Halden VE7UTS
?
|