Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Troubleshooting a 8591e with opt 130
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýWithout option 130, the last resBW is 1kHz. With option 130: 300,200,100, and 30 Hz ? There a problem with standard resBW. ? De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de jansen.marco90 via groups.io ? Yves, ? I just did a quick test of all the filters in Lin and Log mode
? So I guess of the regular RBW's only 300Hz is ok in log mode. Most suspicious would probably be BW6 from the picture you sent?? ? I'll reseat the modules later this evening.? ? Marco ? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Since the picture you send about BW5 etc went down to 300Hz, I assumed those were the standard RBW settings. But it sounds more plausible anyway that all the standard RBW have the issue and the ones through opt 130 are ok.?
I checked by removing the opt 130 card, you're right. So it's all the RBW settings in Log mode and all the RBW's in Lin mode are ok.?
?
Marco
? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So considering all the RBWs with the Log path are off, should I search for a fault in the A14 Log amplifier Assy? Or do you still think it's somewhere in the filters??
I could try to do the 7. Log and Linear Amplifier adjustments in the service manual.?
It mentions a "IF test board" though, I'm guessing that's this board in the group files /g/HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment/files/All%20HP,%20Agilent%20and%20Keysight%20instruments%20in%20folders%20by%20part%20numbers/8000%20to%208999/859X/859X%20IF%20and%20Extender%20board/IF%20Test_Extender_board.pdf ??
I could have that made, it will take some time though. Feels a bit overdone just to get a signal from a header too.?
?
One other remark, i'm assuming it doesn't matter but I had a look at the firmware version, my unit seems to be on rev 950914, the newest seems to be 991130, normally i'd say If it's not broken don't update it...
?
Marco |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HI Marco ? I have two HP8591E spectrum analysers one has several options installed including opt 130 the other had no option installed. I found opt 130 and opt 004 on eBay I just copied the wiring from the other HP8591E with the 130 installed so it was easy it worked ok no problem and option 130 calibrated ok and works well. I also replaced the battery as well as updating the firmware. One of the 8591E had the battery on the main board the other must be a newer 8591E has the battery on a daughter board with the ram and a super cap so a lot easier to change. I don¡¯t think you will find the 991130 it only changes from HP to Agilent logo so I am told but I did update to 980615 it has some bug fixes. ? Gordon GM1THS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýMarco, ? Obviously, it seems that it is the LOG section that is lacking, since the LIN mode works with the correct RF level. It may be one of the gain controls in module A. I will look at the behavior according to the level of the control signals. But before touching an adjustment, it is necessary to have analyzed the circuit, because the alignment of a LOG amplifier is very complex. ? It is necessary to check the gains of the stages according to the signals IFG4,5 and 6, VLOG12 and3 and finally VLIN and VLOG. Maybe one of the potentiometers has a bad contact. ? Yves ? De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de jansen.marco90 via groups.io ? So considering all the RBWs with the Log path are off, should I search for a fault in the A14 Log amplifier Assy? Or do you still think it's somewhere in the filters?? I could try to do the 7. Log and Linear Amplifier adjustments in the service manual.? It mentions a "IF test board" though, I'm guessing that's this board in the group files /g/HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment/files/All%20HP,%20Agilent%20and%20Keysight%20instruments%20in%20folders%20by%20part%20numbers/8000%20to%208999/859X/859X%20IF%20and%20Extender%20board/IF%20Test_Extender_board.pdf ?? I could have that made, it will take some time though. Feels a bit overdone just to get a signal from a header too.? ? One other remark, i'm assuming it doesn't matter but I had a look at the firmware version, my unit seems to be on rev 950914, the newest seems to be 991130, normally i'd say If it's not broken don't update it... ? Marco |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yves,
?
Agreed, I won't touch any adjustment yet. Wouldn't surprise me though if a previous owner already did.?
Anyway it seems we are locking in on the issue thanks to all your help which is great. I hope we can fully tackle it.
?
Wouldn't it be easier to debug this without the opt130 installed to reduce the rf path?
?
Marco |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýMarco, ? Indeed, removing option 130 removes a variable. You will have to put jumper A14W1 back if you do this. But I don't know if it will change much, because the signals are not mixed, it is a multiplexer that chooses to take the signal coming from option 130, or that of the LIN/LOG output A14. Option 130 has its own LIN/LOG amplifier with an IF of 8.56kHz instead of 21.4MHz. ? If you vary the level of the external RF signal by 10dB jumps, if the jumps also appear by 10dB jumps on the 8591E screen (without changing the REF level), then the log amplifier curve is normal. Now if the level is too high, there is an offset. According to the tests, this offset only affects the LOG mode and not the LIN mode. So, is this offset created by digital compensation (after ADC), or does it appear in the A14 module. ? What I will do: there are test points, so I will measure them all in LIN and LOG mode from the calibrator @ -20dBm, and you can compare. ? I have already repaired a log amplifier for an 8562A. There were three defective potentiometers. Adjusting all that was quite painful (several hours), but I managed it. The problem is that each adjustment affected all the other stages. Here, all the stages are DC coupled except the first one. ? Yves ? De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de jansen.marco90 via groups.io ? Yves, ? Agreed, I won't touch any adjustment yet. Wouldn't surprise me though if a previous owner already did.? Anyway it seems we are locking in on the issue thanks to all your help which is great. I hope we can fully tackle it. ? Wouldn't it be easier to debug this without the opt130 installed to reduce the rf path? ? Marco |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yves,
?
I had some spare time so started with some measurements myself.?
Checked the testpoints on top of the Log amplifier, TP1, TP3 and TP4.
TP1: Log mode: -6.22V / LIN mode : 14.25V TP3: -9.315V Tp4: -8.542V ? The -9.3 on Tp3 seems on par with the schematics. The -8.5 on TP4 is supposed to be a temperature dependent voltage, could be ok, would say I expected it a bit lower.? Tp1 is switched in the Lin/Log mode. Since it's depending on 3 Potentiometers i'm not too sure what's to be expected there. ? Apart from that I did some more RF measurements/checks. I figured that the 300MHz -20dBm cal signal wasn't exactly -20dBm as i measured before. I wondered if any deviation would be observable when changing the cal signal level.? I started in Factory default calibration. Using the cal signal in, Measured: 300MHz-16.7dBm in log mode, -30.8dBm in Lin mode. Did a full self cal. Using the cal signal in, Measured: 300MHz -5.2dBm in log mode, -20.2 dBm in Lin mode, so both roughly 11dB increased, Lin at expected level. ? 300MHz cal signal measured to be -22.1 dBm with TinySA, used R19 on third converter to adjust to -19.8/-20.5dBm on TinySa. Roughly +2dB Connected to 8591E measured as: Using the cal signal in, Measured: 300MHz -3.3 dBm in log mode, -17.8 dBm in Lin mode, roughly 2 db gain as expected Back to factory Cal: Using the cal signal in, Measured: 300MHz -14.3dBm in log mode, -28.5 dBm in Lin mode, 2dB increase present again Did a full self cal again: Using the cal signal in, Measured: 300MHz -5.2dBm in log mode, -20.2dBm in Lin mode. Both roughly 9dB increased, Lin at expected level.? So with a higher level Cal signal in the measured levels after cal are still the same.? I was hoping to be able to draw some form of a conclusion whether it's too much gain in Log path or too little gain in Lin path that's being overcompensated during selfcal but i'm not sure I can.? ? Marco |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýMarco, ? ? PRESET CF 300MHz SPAN 1MHz ZERO SPAN ? For TP1 to TP 4 ? ? ? For TP 5 to 10, there is the signal at 21.4MHz. I measured this signal with the oscilloscope at first, but for the last stages we can easily measure, but after a few stages, the signals are too weak. Still using the oscilloscope probe, but connected to another Spectrum at 21.4 MHz, even if the readings are not valid in absolute value, it is possible in relative mode to see the difference between LOG mode and LIN mode. ? The most important TP for the moment is TP5, which is stage 7: I measure 1.975Vpp on the oscilloscope in LOG mode, and 142mVpp for LIN mode. By calculation I would have 22.9dB, the measurement on the Spectrum also gave me 22.9dB. ? So do an oscilloscope measurement at TP5 to know the absolute value for LOG and LIN, and by calculation, you will know the ratio in dB. If your values ??are compatible with mine, then the problem is not on A14. The detector and video driver are the same for both modes. So, if there was a problem there, both modes would be affected. ? Yves De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de jansen.marco90 via groups.io ? Yves, ? I had some spare time so started with some measurements myself.? Checked the testpoints on top of the Log amplifier, TP1, TP3 and TP4. TP1: Log mode: -6.22V / LIN mode : 14.25V TP3: -9.315V Tp4: -8.542V ? The -9.3 on Tp3 seems on par with the schematics. The -8.5 on TP4 is supposed to be a temperature dependent voltage, could be ok, would say I expected it a bit lower.? Tp1 is switched in the Lin/Log mode. Since it's depending on 3 Potentiometers i'm not too sure what's to be expected there. ? Apart from that I did some more RF measurements/checks. I figured that the 300MHz -20dBm cal signal wasn't exactly -20dBm as i measured before. I wondered if any deviation would be observable when changing the cal signal level.? I started in Factory default calibration. Using the cal signal in, Measured: 300MHz-16.7dBm in log mode, -30.8dBm in Lin mode. Did a full self cal. Using the cal signal in, Measured: 300MHz -5.2dBm in log mode, -20.2 dBm in Lin mode, so both roughly 11dB increased, Lin at expected level. ? 300MHz cal signal measured to be -22.1 dBm with TinySA, used R19 on third converter to adjust to -19.8/-20.5dBm on TinySa. Roughly +2dB Connected to 8591E measured as: Using the cal signal in, Measured: 300MHz -3.3 dBm in log mode, -17.8 dBm in Lin mode, roughly 2 db gain as expected Back to factory Cal: Using the cal signal in, Measured: 300MHz -14.3dBm in log mode, -28.5 dBm in Lin mode, 2dB increase present again Did a full self cal again: Using the cal signal in, Measured: 300MHz -5.2dBm in log mode, -20.2dBm in Lin mode. Both roughly 9dB increased, Lin at expected level.? So with a higher level Cal signal in the measured levels after cal are still the same.? I was hoping to be able to draw some form of a conclusion whether it's too much gain in Log path or too little gain in Lin path that's being overcompensated during selfcal but i'm not sure I can.? ? Marco |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yves,?
?
Thanks, I wanted to do the measurements, took the coverplate off because I figured that was needed to reach the testpoints.
While removing the coverplate I figured I might aswell have a look at the board. Doing that didn't make me very happy.
?
In at least 3 spots somebody has been tinkering with this board, can't imagine HP shipping it with these resistor "fixes"
?
Close ups (right lower corner)
Looks like someone tried to replace R25 and R26 with one resistor
?
That would connect 2 gain control lines together:? (This is from the 8590A clip but the PCB layouts look equivalent)
?
middle two:
R101 and R93, both 5.62k¦¸are replaced with a a 4.7k¦¸. The 5.62k is different from the CLIP value anyway, might be the A vs E version.
?
Those are in the Vlin voltage line to the 6th and 7th gain stage.
?
It looks like all original resistors are still present. I'll check the original resistors, if they measure according to the colorcodes I'll restore the board back to original.?
Afterwards i'll do the measurements.?
?
Marco
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yves,?
?
I've been doing the measurements.?
1 funny thing caught my eye, when going to 0hz span, the marker level is dependent on the span before that.?
Center 300MHz > span 5MHz > Span 0Hz > -5dBm marker level
Center 300MHz > Span 10kHz > Span 0Hz > -20dBm marker level?
Apparently the RBW doesn't change going to 0hz span so the RBW fitting the previous span is used.?
?
I noticed a difference in Marker level on the spectrum analyzer caused by the probe loading TP5, this might influence our measurements.
Annoyingly the influence is bigger in Log mode.
?
Then I did the DC measurements:
?
And the TP5
?
With 2.06 and 0.15 the ratio would be 22.7dB, with the tinySa measuring around 25dB.?
With 2.31 and 0.17 the ratio would be 22.6dB with the tinySa measuring around 24dB.?
?
So I guess that's all in the same ballpark..?
?
Marco
?
? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýMarco, ? Comparison between your board, my board and part list version E ? Part list E version For R93 ??5.62k 1%? For R101 5.62k 1% ? Your board without modif (8591E) For R93 ??5.62k 1%? For R101 5.62k 1% ? My board (8595E) For R93 ??4.22k 1%? For R101 4.22k 1% ? On schematic version E, R93 and R101 are 5.62K On schematic version A, R93 and R101 are 4.64K But I think that these values are pre-selected. ------- ? Part list E version For R24 1.21k 1%? For R25 1.21k 1% For R26 1.21k 1% ? Your board without modif (8591E) For R24 1.21k 1%? For R25 1.21k 1% For R26 1.21k 1% ? My board ?(8595E) For R24 1.21k 1%? For R25 1.21k 1% For R26 1.21k 1% ? Resetting to its original state is the obvious thing to do. After your series of tests, you will be able to better understand if there is a problem. ? Yves ? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yves,
?
Since I missed the notification of your last post, just a quick update to clarify.
I restored the board, just using the original resistors.
No change in function of the SA was observed though.?
I did the measurements with the restored board, the results are in post Re: Troubleshooting a 8591e with opt 130
Guess it seems the error is not in the Log amplifier board, would you agree?
?
Marco
? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yves,
?
In the meantime did some additional checking. I figured the biggest difference seemed to be in the TP1 temperature voltage.
I did a simulation of the circuitry but both our tp1 voltages seem to be reasonable. The main influence on the voltage level is the IVT potentiometer, R88. This one is glued to R33 on my board with some grey gunk. So I can't check if the value is reasonable compared to the pot setting. I didn't see any glue on your board, wondering if that was done in the factory.
Does look somebody has been fiddling with the potmeters in the past:
?
After checking TP5 I figured the next interesting point might be J1 which has the output signal of the log amplifier board
The output ratio seems to be slightly off from TP5, being 17dB.?
?
During these measurements I found something which surprised me. To measure the signal I removed the cable from the Log amp to the Opt 130 and connected the TinySa to J1 of the Log amp, as expected the signal on the 8591E disappeared. When I reduced the RBW to below 1khz, the signal reappeared on the 8591e. Note, the jumper wasn't placed on the LogAmp.?
I was expecting the signal always to come from the logamp to opt130 but on futher check of the schematics it seems the AUX IF is used to feed the signal to the opt130. There is no schematic of the 130 in the CLIP sadly.
?
I also spent some time whipping up a python script together with ChatGPT to render the rs232 HPGL output, getting there, just some issues remaining with the select indicators under the labels in the right side menu. If there is any interest for this script in the group i'll gladly share it
?
Marco
?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThe RF signal goes through the 3 converters and then goes to the A11 filter module, then to A12 Amplitude control, A13 filter. At this point we have the AUX IF signal available at the back of the instrument at 21.4MHz. From this point, the signal can take two different paths: the one from A14 LOG-LIN amplifier/detector for the standard resBW from 5MHz to 1kHz, and finally the second path, option 130 which contains narrowband filters (300Hz,100Hz,30Hz...). Option 130 has its own LOG-LIN amplifier/detector. The output of A14 and option 130, is the AUX VIDEO signal available at the back of the instrument. Depending on the selection of the resBW, a multiplexer will choose one or the other. ? So, the question arises, since the signal for option 130 follows the same path to the input of A14 (AUX, IF) and option 130 does not have a level problem, then logically the problem would be with A14 LOG amplifier/detector. This would be true, if no other conditions change from the previous circuits when switching between option 130 and normal mode with A14. ? I checked all the data we took, and the data at TP5 gave us some similarities and some not. But our probes did not have the same impact on TP5 (hot spot). I would say that TP5 may not be the best point of comparison. ? The probe effect: Your probe mkr level with probe on tp5 mkr level no probe Log -14.2 -4.3 Lin -21.6 -20.2 You get 9.9 dB with or without probe for LOG mode, and 1.4 for LIN mode. ? In my case mkr level with probe on tp5 mkr level no probe Log -25.9 -20.0 Lin -23.1 -21.2 I get 5.9dB with or without probe for LOG mode, and 1.9dB for LIN mode. The probe used TEK P6138 10MOhms 10pF. ? ------------------------------ I studied your comments about the two SELFCAL videos. On my Spectrum, the video display limiter was enabled, that's why the limiting level is different. But in the following image, I have disabled it. ? I take the example here of the 1MHz resBW, but the remarks apply to all filters between 5MHz and 1kHz. During the amplitude calibration, the filters are aligned to have the correct filter width. We see that the signal is limited at the top of the screen, but this is not the real limit, by putting a marker we can find the limiting point. With this configuration for the 1MHz filter, in my case it is -6.57dBm. I used an external signal to find this limitation. When the 1MHz filter is aligned, the measured level is -11.63 dBm, so the filter is aligned 5dB before the compression point. The firmware searches for the peak, then the two points at -3dB. The filter is readjusted in width to have a value within the specifications, then switches to linear mode for the level adjusted to -20dBm. With your 8591E, the level reaches -4.74dBm, it's high, but it seems that the filter is reaching an alignment. Starting check 1.06MHz tests#1 560kHz tests#1 780kHz tests#1 880kHz tests#1 960kHz tests#1 1.01MHz goes to LIN mode for the level at -20dBm So, the level at 21.4MHz would be stronger on your Spectrum, as well as the limiting point since you have -4.74dBm, without knowing where the real limiting level is. ? So, as you pointed out, is this an imbalance between LIN and LOG MODE. You start from -4.74dBm to -20dBm, or 15.3dB. But on my Spectrum, I go from -11.63 to -20dBm or 8.4dB. ? But there is no error message, and you are left with an error of 15dB after the SELFCAL, while in my case everything is correct with a level of -20dBm as expected. ? ? ? ? ? ? Here are the measurements from the input to the AUX IF, and AUX VIDEO signal for all filters passing through A14 or option 130. I made a gain calculation between AUX IF and the input which is actually -20dBm. ? With AMP CORR ON, there is 24dB between the display and the measurement at AUX IF, 34dB for option 130. ? If AMP CORR = OFF, I still have 24 dB, but 28dB for option 130. ? This would mean that the correction applied is in the A12 stage, before the LOG amp. Maybe the error comes from there, the correction would not be applied correctly? Maybe the control signals should be measured on A12. ? I will check all these controls and see the behavior between CORR ON and OFF ? Yves |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yves,?
?
Thanks for the elaboration, you clearly know a lot about these machines!
?
The probe I used was an old Agilent N2862A 10M // 15pF probe, so that's rather high capacitance compared to yours, that might cause some additional influence.
?
One thing caught my eye from your post and it's giving me an eerie feeling. My amplitude peaks don't change when I switch Correct on or off.?
See the two plots below, sorry the indicator line is slightly misaligned but left is Correct ON, right is correct OFF. The main difference is in the noise floor.
Somehow the machine doesn't see this as a correction? Perhaps that's also why there is no fault in the selfcal and conf check while being 15dB off.
?
All my previous measurements I just did a full reset to factory default cal because I already noticed that the difference wasn't there with just correction on and off.
Apparently your spectrum analyzer does properly switch correct on and off.?
?
I can do the same measurements this evening, filling that table to see if we get some more clarification.
?
Marco
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýMarco, ? The gain and attenuator control lines are A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5 for the attenuators in the A12 module. G1, G1 and G3 in the A12 module for the gains, and G4, G5 and G6 in the A14 LOG amplifier. ? Between CORR ON and OFF, in my case, there is a 6 dB difference, and it is in A12 that there was the change for 6dB. ? If the REF Level changes, then the attenuators and gains will vary in A12. For A14, nothing changes. ? The behavior of your 8591E is very strange. If the A12 module had only a 1dB attenuator enabled in CORR mode, then in CORR=OFF mode, there would be only a 1dB difference. But this would mean that the level arriving at A12 would be low normally, but you have -5dBm, you should have a 10dB attenuator enabled, and this does not seem to be the case. And in no corr mode, the noise increased by 10dB...weird. ? ? Yves |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yves,?
?
I had a look at measuring the gain control lines to A12. I saw the control is coming from U107 and U111 on the analog interface and running over the mainboard to A12. It would be best to measure the control lines on A12 to include potential issues with the connectors and motherboard. Without any expander cards I figured it would be dificult to reach the U9 and U10 on the control board. How did you manage to measure those? I might be able to attach logic clips to the IC pins and place the board back in the cage.?
?
I tried to fill the table for as far as I could. To begin with my 8591E doesn't seem to have a 5MHz RBW.?
I wasn't sure what you meant with the db-REF-20dBm column, nor with the -2.5446 300kHz/-20.00dBm.
?
?
In the 30Hz RBW the Aux video was fluctuating quite a bit.?
Next, since correct off didn't change the level, I did a factory default cal. With that it's hard to have the frequency centered, so I did a freq cal only.
?
?
The limited gain resolution of the TinySA used to measure the AuxIF is causing some more fluctuation in the Delta, this can probably be disregarded. I noticed that for your analyzer the delta remains equal. For my analyzer there is a 2dB difference.?
Apart from that the Aux Video voltage seems close to that of your analyzer for the same Mkr levels.?
?
Marco
?
?
?
?
|