Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
LCR Meter E4980A Power On Test Fail
Hi, I am currently trying to repair an E4980A LCR Meter that is experiencing a power-on failure. When the unit is powered on, the self-test displays the following error message: "E1000: Power On Test Failed: 100000,0,0,0,0,0,0." All keys are locked and the device appears to be hung. However, when I enter service mode by pressing the Preset + Power On button, I am able to access all the keys and perform manual operations. I also conducted a manual self-test, and all tests passed without any issues. Unfortunately, there is very little information available online about this specific issue. The data log I’ve attached shows a CPU[2] error (16), which could be a clue. If anyone has any insights or has encountered a similar problem, I would greatly appreciate any advice or suggestions regarding the power-on test failure. Thank you in advance for your help! Sysinfo log:
ID: Agilent Technologies,E4980A,MY46312198,A.04.00
OPT: 200,710,710 POWER CYCLE: 482 POWER ON HOURS: 18165 SYSCAL REV: 1.00 SYSCAL DATE: 2014/12/10 R: Rev.1.01,,, CPU[1]: 0 CPU[2]: 16 SYST[1]: 0 SYST[2]: 0 SYST[3]: 0 SYST[4]: 0 SYST[5]: 0 DATA[1]: 0 DATA[2]: 0 DATA[3]: 0 DATA[4]: 0 OPT[1]: 0 OPT[2]: 0 OPT[3]: 0 OPT[4]: 0 OPT[5]: 0 OPT[6]: 0 OPT[7]: 0 A1[1]: -1.189578915E+01 A1[2]: +1.163335800E+01 A1[3]: +5.106445313E+00 A1[4]: +3.349609375E+00 A1[5]: +2.490234375E+00 A1[6]: +5.102705002E+00 A2[1]: +6.593852455E-05 A2[2]: -4.669545332E-01 A2[3]: +4.929539280E-01 A2[4]: +4.640171965E-01 A2[5]: -4.558677030E-01 A2[6]: +5.084224205E-01 A3[1]: +5.968145488E-04 A3[2]: -8.684453465E-01 A3[3]: +8.727315869E-01 A3[4]: -7.707347339E-01 A3[5]: +5.249549693E-01 USER[1]: 0 USER[2]: 0 USER[3]: 0 USER[4]: 0 BATT[1]: +3.056640387E+00 +4.300000000E+01 +5.217538194E-01 +5.389070530E-01 ?
KC |
开云体育Sounds like that might be a firmware problem if it works when forced into an alternate mode.If there is a firmware download it might be worth checking. Regards? Nigel On 28 Mar 2025, at 12:09, KC Chong via groups.io <kcgpda@...> wrote:
|