Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Fluke Calibration Tutorial (brochure) via Tequipment
Boiling point of water in Fahrenheit??? Not a SI unit.
Using a "calibrated" thermometer to check another??? Who "Calibrates" the "calibrated" standard, and what are it's uncertainties. Speed of light constant??? In a vacuum perhaps, rarely in any other medium. In truth, all that is a performance check.? A "Calibration" is when an instrument is adjusted to read/indicate as close to what is assumed to be a standard, and then results are taken.? (I used to do just that, some decades ago, at a major test equipment makers UK service center.) Not as common (or needed as frequently now) as it used to be, as the stability of technology has improved over the years, except were American makers still insist on using carbon composition resistors in not uncritical parts of a circuit!? (Sadly, one I work for, and others we represent.)?? (5% marked parts, are usually over 10 or 15% off the marked value!) We've had instruments "Formally Calibrated" by a certain UK cal' house, that when we checked on their return, the "Calibration" figures are out of spec' for that instrument!?? How can that be??? (Resolved now, as they used a moving coil meter display "Standard", not even a mirrored scale, to "Calibrate" a digital indicating, to at least two significant digits, instrument...) We've also had brand new equipment, that come with a "Calibration Certificate".? But when we check (with multiple different instruments/devices) and find that the "new" equipment is out of specification as made, sometimes by quite some way. We query it with the manufacturer, they issue an updated specification and certificate that then encompasses the original discrepancy.? (Not only Far East makers, but one or two US makers too!) RF Connector "Gauging" in particular is often missed as a cal' check on items such as attenuators, couplers and cables.?? As well as "calibrating" directional couplers, using instruments that don't have sufficient dynamic range to determine directivity accurately.? (From the list of used equipment, if that is reported.) One cal' house even "lost" an interconnecting lead.? They said they had never received it from us, but it's reference number etc, were included on the resulting cal' cert...?? They still insisted they never had it.? We lost the will to live, and bought another lead ourselves, as we needed a working instrument. I'm sure there are a lot of "Good" Calibration Houses out there, but the majority of manufactures own, and plenty of third party houses are not worth the cost of the paperwork.? Especially where equipment is manufactured "offshore", and they just shift boxes without unpacking, running up and checking the product actually works to specification before sending to the customer. Frankly.? If you "Need" to accurately measure something.? Do it with at least two different methods, or instruments of different types.? Especially where RF power is concerned, and significant harmonics are present! And first verify the instruments against again at least two known good references. Regards to All. Dave (G8KBV)? Recalibrating the house, by moving all the furniture around today.? By order of "Management"... -- Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using free and open source software: |
Yes, but get him a third watch and he can perform the 3-cornered hat
method; thus allowing him to not know the time, with better certainty. -Chuck Harris On Sat, 30 Oct 2021 02:55:42 -0700 G?ran Krusell <mc1648pp@...> wrote: The guy who has a watch knows what time it is. The guy with two |
Dave R
dr On Sat, Oct 30, 2021, 02:21 Dave_G0WBX via <g8kbvdave=[email protected]> wrote: Boiling point of water in Fahrenheit??? Not a SI unit. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss