All - I am trying to calibrate one of these generators and I can't seem to make it past step 29 in the calibration procedure. The procedure reads:
Flatness 23. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 2.99 MHz. 24. Connect the HP 8116A's main output to the oscilloscope via a 6 dB attenuator and set the channel attenuation-factor to 2. 25. Connect the HP 8116A's trigger output to the oscilloscope's trigger input via a 20 dB attenuator. 26. Set the oscilloscope to 160 mV/div and 100 ns/div. 27. Record the ampltude of the output signal. 28. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 9.99 MHz. 29. Check that the output amplitude has decreased by between 2% and 4% of the amplitude at 2.99 MHz. If not, you must change the values of both A1R220 and A1R223 (both must have the same value). Refer to Table 9-1.
However, my amplitude decreases by more then 5%. I have tried three different slope ICs (out of various generators I have) and some produced better flatness then others, but none met spec. I also tried the same procedure on a different generator (also in need of calibration) and it too failed, but not as badly. I have tried the test on two oscilloscopes with the same results. Finally, I tried increasing the value of R220 and R223, but that, too, didn't seem to help, at least not enough. Any other ideas?
As a final note, at these high-frequencies the triangle wave gets rounded-off at the peaks. I have been measuring the amplitude to the actual peak of the waveform, not where the triangle wave would peak if it was not rounded. I assume this is correct...
Thanks in advance! Matthew
|
On 19 Dec 2012 at 13:52, hp_agilent_equipment@... wrote: ______________________________________________________________________ 7. Triangle Wave Flatness HP 8116A Posted by: "medasaro" medasaro@... medasaro Date: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:10 pm ((PST))
All - I am trying to calibrate one of these generators and I can't seem to make it past step 29 in the calibration procedure. The procedure reads:
Flatness 23. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 2.99 MHz. 24. Connect the HP 8116A's main output to the oscilloscope via a 6 dB attenuator and set the channel attenuation-factor to 2. 25. Connect the HP 8116A's trigger output to the oscilloscope's trigger input via a 20 dB attenuator. 26. Set the oscilloscope to 160 mV/div and 100 ns/div. 27. Record the ampltude of the output signal. 28. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 9.99 MHz. 29. Check that the output amplitude has decreased by between 2% and 4% of the amplitude at 2.99 MHz. If not, you must change the values of both A1R220 and A1R223 (both must have the same value). Refer to Table 9-1.
However, my amplitude decreases by more then 5%. I have tried three different slope ICs (out of various generators I have) and some produced better flatness then others, but none met spec. I also tried the same procedure on a different generator (also in need of calibration) and it too failed, but not as badly. I have tried the test on two oscilloscopes with the same results. Finally, I tried increasing the value of R220 and R223, but that, too, didn't seem to help, at least not enough. Any other ideas?
As a final note, at these high-frequencies the triangle wave gets rounded-off at the peaks. I have been measuring the amplitude to the actual peak of the waveform, not where the triangle wave would peak if it was not rounded. I assume this is correct...
Thanks in advance! Matthew Hi. Cant' help but wonder, what 'scope are you using, and has it enough realtime bandwidth to not distort (filter some harmonic content of) the Triangle wave, so that it begins to aproximate a sine shape. You're (at a guess) going to need a truly flat response on your 'scope out way past 50 or more MHz I suspect. Just musing. Dave B.
|
Thanks for the response. I thought of the same thing so I tried three different oscilloscopes:
1) Tektronix 2465 - 300MHz 2) Tektronix TDS3034B - 300MHz 3) HP 54502A - 400MHz
All produced roughly the same results. I even tried turning on the 150MHz bandwidth limit on the TDS to see if it made any difference but it didn't, implying that there are not harmonics that high.
-Matthew
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "Dave B" <dave@...> wrote: On 19 Dec 2012 at 13:52, hp_agilent_equipment@... wrote:
______________________________________________________________________ 7. Triangle Wave Flatness HP 8116A Posted by: "medasaro" medasaro@... medasaro Date: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:10 pm ((PST))
All - I am trying to calibrate one of these generators and I can't seem to make it past step 29 in the calibration procedure. The procedure reads:
Flatness 23. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 2.99 MHz. 24. Connect the HP 8116A's main output to the oscilloscope via a 6 dB attenuator and set the channel attenuation-factor to 2. 25. Connect the HP 8116A's trigger output to the oscilloscope's trigger input via a 20 dB attenuator. 26. Set the oscilloscope to 160 mV/div and 100 ns/div. 27. Record the ampltude of the output signal. 28. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 9.99 MHz. 29. Check that the output amplitude has decreased by between 2% and 4% of the amplitude at 2.99 MHz. If not, you must change the values of both A1R220 and A1R223 (both must have the same value). Refer to Table 9-1.
However, my amplitude decreases by more then 5%. I have tried three different slope ICs (out of various generators I have) and some produced better flatness then others, but none met spec. I also tried the same procedure on a different generator (also in need of calibration) and it too failed, but not as badly. I have tried the test on two oscilloscopes with the same results. Finally, I tried increasing the value of R220 and R223, but that, too, didn't seem to help, at least not enough. Any other ideas?
As a final note, at these high-frequencies the triangle wave gets rounded-off at the peaks. I have been measuring the amplitude to the actual peak of the waveform, not where the triangle wave would peak if it was not rounded. I assume this is correct...
Thanks in advance! Matthew Hi.
Cant' help but wonder, what 'scope are you using, and has it enough realtime bandwidth to not distort (filter some harmonic content of) the Triangle wave, so that it begins to aproximate a sine shape.
You're (at a guess) going to need a truly flat response on your 'scope out way past 50 or more MHz I suspect.
Just musing.
Dave B.
|
Are you terminating the attenuator? Most attenuators are designed to operate with a 50 Ohm source and load.
-John
==============
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks for the response. I thought of the same thing so I tried three different oscilloscopes:
1) Tektronix 2465 - 300MHz 2) Tektronix TDS3034B - 300MHz 3) HP 54502A - 400MHz
All produced roughly the same results. I even tried turning on the 150MHz bandwidth limit on the TDS to see if it made any difference but it didn't, implying that there are not harmonics that high.
-Matthew
--- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "Dave B" <dave@...> wrote:
On 19 Dec 2012 at 13:52, hp_agilent_equipment@... wrote:
______________________________________________________________________ 7. Triangle Wave Flatness HP 8116A Posted by: "medasaro" medasaro@... medasaro Date: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:10 pm ((PST))
All - I am trying to calibrate one of these generators and I can't seem to make it past step 29 in the calibration procedure. The procedure reads:
Flatness 23. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 2.99 MHz. 24. Connect the HP 8116A's main output to the oscilloscope via a 6 dB attenuator and set the channel attenuation-factor to 2. 25. Connect the HP 8116A's trigger output to the oscilloscope's trigger input via a 20 dB attenuator. 26. Set the oscilloscope to 160 mV/div and 100 ns/div. 27. Record the ampltude of the output signal. 28. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 9.99 MHz. 29. Check that the output amplitude has decreased by between 2% and 4% of the amplitude at 2.99 MHz. If not, you must change the values of both A1R220 and A1R223 (both must have the same value). Refer to Table 9-1.
However, my amplitude decreases by more then 5%. I have tried three different slope ICs (out of various generators I have) and some produced better flatness then others, but none met spec. I also tried the same procedure on a different generator (also in need of calibration) and it too failed, but not as badly. I have tried the test on two oscilloscopes with the same results. Finally, I tried increasing the value of R220 and R223, but that, too, didn't seem to help, at least not enough. Any other ideas?
As a final note, at these high-frequencies the triangle wave gets rounded-off at the peaks. I have been measuring the amplitude to the actual peak of the waveform, not where the triangle wave would peak if it was not rounded. I assume this is correct...
Thanks in advance! Matthew Hi.
Cant' help but wonder, what 'scope are you using, and has it enough realtime bandwidth to not distort (filter some harmonic content of) the Triangle wave, so that it begins to aproximate a sine shape.
You're (at a guess) going to need a truly flat response on your 'scope out way past 50 or more MHz I suspect.
Just musing.
Dave B.
|
Thanks. I didn't use an attenuator. I just set the oscilloscope on 50-ohm input impedance and connected the function generator directly to it. I couldn't figure out why they called for an attenuator, to be honest...
-Matthew
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "J. Forster" <jfor@...> wrote: Are you terminating the attenuator? Most attenuators are designed to operate with a 50 Ohm source and load.
-John
==============
Thanks for the response. I thought of the same thing so I tried three different oscilloscopes:
1) Tektronix 2465 - 300MHz 2) Tektronix TDS3034B - 300MHz 3) HP 54502A - 400MHz
All produced roughly the same results. I even tried turning on the 150MHz bandwidth limit on the TDS to see if it made any difference but it didn't, implying that there are not harmonics that high.
-Matthew
--- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "Dave B" <dave@> wrote:
On 19 Dec 2012 at 13:52, hp_agilent_equipment@... wrote:
______________________________________________________________________ 7. Triangle Wave Flatness HP 8116A Posted by: "medasaro" medasaro@ medasaro Date: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:10 pm ((PST))
All - I am trying to calibrate one of these generators and I can't seem to make it past step 29 in the calibration procedure. The procedure reads:
Flatness 23. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 2.99 MHz. 24. Connect the HP 8116A's main output to the oscilloscope via a 6 dB attenuator and set the channel attenuation-factor to 2. 25. Connect the HP 8116A's trigger output to the oscilloscope's trigger input via a 20 dB attenuator. 26. Set the oscilloscope to 160 mV/div and 100 ns/div. 27. Record the ampltude of the output signal. 28. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 9.99 MHz. 29. Check that the output amplitude has decreased by between 2% and 4% of the amplitude at 2.99 MHz. If not, you must change the values of both A1R220 and A1R223 (both must have the same value). Refer to Table 9-1.
However, my amplitude decreases by more then 5%. I have tried three different slope ICs (out of various generators I have) and some produced better flatness then others, but none met spec. I also tried the same procedure on a different generator (also in need of calibration) and it too failed, but not as badly. I have tried the test on two oscilloscopes with the same results. Finally, I tried increasing the value of R220 and R223, but that, too, didn't seem to help, at least not enough. Any other ideas?
As a final note, at these high-frequencies the triangle wave gets rounded-off at the peaks. I have been measuring the amplitude to the actual peak of the waveform, not where the triangle wave would peak if it was not rounded. I assume this is correct...
Thanks in advance! Matthew Hi.
Cant' help but wonder, what 'scope are you using, and has it enough realtime bandwidth to not distort (filter some harmonic content of) the Triangle wave, so that it begins to aproximate a sine shape.
You're (at a guess) going to need a truly flat response on your 'scope out way past 50 or more MHz I suspect.
Just musing.
Dave B.
|
Probably to increase the return loss of the 'scope input.
-John
==================
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks. I didn't use an attenuator. I just set the oscilloscope on 50-ohm input impedance and connected the function generator directly to it. I couldn't figure out why they called for an attenuator, to be honest...
-Matthew
--- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "J. Forster" <jfor@...> wrote:
Are you terminating the attenuator? Most attenuators are designed to operate with a 50 Ohm source and load.
-John
==============
Thanks for the response. I thought of the same thing so I tried three different oscilloscopes:
1) Tektronix 2465 - 300MHz 2) Tektronix TDS3034B - 300MHz 3) HP 54502A - 400MHz
All produced roughly the same results. I even tried turning on the 150MHz
bandwidth limit on the TDS to see if it made any difference but it didn't,
implying that there are not harmonics that high.
-Matthew
--- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "Dave B" <dave@> wrote:
On 19 Dec 2012 at 13:52, hp_agilent_equipment@... wrote:
______________________________________________________________________ 7. Triangle Wave Flatness HP 8116A Posted by: "medasaro" medasaro@ medasaro Date: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:10 pm ((PST))
All - I am trying to calibrate one of these generators and I can't
seem
to make it past step 29 in the calibration procedure. The procedure reads:
Flatness 23. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 2.99 MHz. 24. Connect the HP 8116A's main output to the oscilloscope via a 6 dB attenuator and set the channel attenuation-factor to 2. 25. Connect the HP 8116A's trigger output to the oscilloscope's trigger input via a 20 dB attenuator. 26. Set the oscilloscope to 160 mV/div and 100 ns/div. 27. Record the ampltude of the output signal. 28. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 9.99 MHz. 29. Check that the output amplitude has decreased by between 2% and 4% of the amplitude at 2.99 MHz. If not, you must change the values of both A1R220 and A1R223 (both must have the same value). Refer to Table 9-1.
However, my amplitude decreases by more then 5%. I have tried three different slope ICs (out of various generators I have) and some produced better flatness then others, but none met spec. I also
tried
the same procedure on a different generator (also in need of calibration) and it too failed, but not as badly. I have tried the test on two oscilloscopes with the same results. Finally, I tried increasing the value of R220 and R223, but that, too, didn't seem
to
help, at least not enough. Any other ideas?
As a final note, at these high-frequencies the triangle wave gets rounded-off at the peaks. I have been measuring the amplitude to
the
actual peak of the waveform, not where the triangle wave would peak
if
it was not rounded. I assume this is correct...
Thanks in advance! Matthew Hi.
Cant' help but wonder, what 'scope are you using, and has it enough realtime bandwidth to not distort (filter some harmonic content of)
the
Triangle wave, so that it begins to aproximate a sine shape.
You're (at a guess) going to need a truly flat response on your 'scope
out way past 50 or more MHz I suspect.
Just musing.
Dave B.
|
Alright. I think I figured this out (finally). There are two factors.
First, the output amplifier bias adjustment (A1R535) is a tradeoff between triangle wave distortion and amplitude flatness. That is, if the bias is adjusted to produce more triangle wave distortion it will increase amplitude flatness.
Second, I believe that there is a misprint in the service manual. In table 9-1 entitled 'Adjustment Procedures - Changeable Components' it states that, referring to A1R220/223, "Increasing the value increases amplitude flatness". However, at least in my unit, quite the opposite is true and the table should read "Increasing the value decreases amplitude flatness".
-Matthew
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "J. Forster" wrote: Probably to increase the return loss of the 'scope input.
-John
==================
Thanks. I didn't use an attenuator. I just set the oscilloscope on 50-ohm input impedance and connected the function generator directly to it. I couldn't figure out why they called for an attenuator, to be honest...
-Matthew
--- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "J. Forster" wrote:
Are you terminating the attenuator? Most attenuators are designed to operate with a 50 Ohm source and load.
-John
==============
Thanks for the response. I thought of the same thing so I tried three different oscilloscopes:
1) Tektronix 2465 - 300MHz 2) Tektronix TDS3034B - 300MHz 3) HP 54502A - 400MHz
All produced roughly the same results. I even tried turning on the 150MHz
bandwidth limit on the TDS to see if it made any difference but it didn't,
implying that there are not harmonics that high.
-Matthew
--- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "Dave B" wrote:
On 19 Dec 2012 at 13:52, hp_agilent_equipment@... wrote:
______________________________________________________________________ 7. Triangle Wave Flatness HP 8116A Posted by: "medasaro" medasaro@ medasaro Date: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:10 pm ((PST))
All - I am trying to calibrate one of these generators and I can't
seem
to make it past step 29 in the calibration procedure. The procedure reads:
Flatness 23. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 2.99 MHz. 24. Connect the HP 8116A's main output to the oscilloscope via a 6 dB attenuator and set the channel attenuation-factor to 2. 25. Connect the HP 8116A's trigger output to the oscilloscope's trigger input via a 20 dB attenuator. 26. Set the oscilloscope to 160 mV/div and 100 ns/div. 27. Record the ampltude of the output signal. 28. Set the HP 8116A frequency to 9.99 MHz. 29. Check that the output amplitude has decreased by between 2% and 4% of the amplitude at 2.99 MHz. If not, you must change the values of both A1R220 and A1R223 (both must have the same value). Refer to Table 9-1.
However, my amplitude decreases by more then 5%. I have tried three different slope ICs (out of various generators I have) and some produced better flatness then others, but none met spec. I also
tried
the same procedure on a different generator (also in need of calibration) and it too failed, but not as badly. I have tried the test on two oscilloscopes with the same results. Finally, I tried increasing the value of R220 and R223, but that, too, didn't seem
to
help, at least not enough. Any other ideas?
As a final note, at these high-frequencies the triangle wave gets rounded-off at the peaks. I have been measuring the amplitude to
the
actual peak of the waveform, not where the triangle wave would peak
if
it was not rounded. I assume this is correct...
Thanks in advance! Matthew Hi.
Cant' help but wonder, what 'scope are you using, and has it enough realtime bandwidth to not distort (filter some harmonic content of)
the
Triangle wave, so that it begins to aproximate a sine shape.
You're (at a guess) going to need a truly flat response on your 'scope
out way past 50 or more MHz I suspect.
Just musing.
Dave B.
|