Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- HP-Agilent-Keysight-Equipment
- Messages
Search
Re: HP 85047A (S-param test set) with loose Port1
kkyahoo
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Charles,
?
One of the ports on my 8503 S param test set moved, and yes it
was the one with the plastic washers on it. It drove me mad so I simply turned
the washers upside down and tightened the screws carefully.
?
73
?
Kevin
?
?
|
Re: HP 85047A (S-param test set) with loose Port1
Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 10 October 2015 at 08:56, chbrain@... [hp_agilent_equipment] <hp_agilent_equipment@...> wrote:
Obviously being bent is not correct, but slight movement is by design. There are some accessories that fit directly onto the test sets, which have fixed spacing on the plugs. To allow for mechanical tolerances, the port 1 connector on the 85047A moves a little.
Well there is a way. You take out the washers, and take about 0.2 mm off the thinner surface, but as I say, they are designed to move.?
If you need calibration kits, contact me. You can buy our kits on eBay, but obviously it is cheaper if you don't. See link in my signature. Dr. David Kirkby Ph.D CEng MIET Kirkby Microwave Ltd Registered office: Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Althorne, Essex, CM3 6DT, UK. Registered in England and Wales, company number 08914892. Tel: 07910 441670 / +44 7910 441670 (0900 to 2100 GMT only please) |
Re: HP 83592B hangs 8350B sweeper
Cliff Barber
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi,
Try a burst of aerosol Contact Cleaner on the
contacts on the back of the plugin also on the mating connector inside the
mainframe.
In my experience that seems to suppress the error
messages that you have described.
It might need several iterations of the process.
The act of pushing the plugin into the mainframe will help by wiping the mating
contacts, so that should help.
Good luck
Cliff? G4BGP
?
|
HP 85047A (S-param test set) with loose Port1
Hi,
A while ago I managed to acquire a? HP 85047A, unfortunately it has had an accident sometime in it's life and Port1 is loose and slightly bent. I have measured the directivity of the port and it seems to be in the right ballpark as far as performance is concerned. However the whole sensor moves. Opening up? the unit I see that whereas port2 is direct metal to metal contact where the mounting screws are located, port1 has plastic washers between the two surfaces. No matter what I try I cannot stop it moving. Anyone have any ideas? Next week I should get an HP8753E opt 011 unit and I will then be able to see if the Port1 sensor needs replacing or not.? - Charles G4GUO |
Re: HP 83592B hangs 8350B sweeper
As an addition, you have removed your nicad battery pack, right?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The nicad pack in the 8350B main frame, when overcharged (which is always) vents caustic fumes and they fume all over the plugin, and the main frame board next to the battery. They cause a nightmare of problems. The battery is next to worthless as it is, it should be removed on sight, and all of the mess cleaned up. -Chuck Harris Dave McGuire Mcguire@... [hp_agilent_equipment] wrote:
|
Re: HP 83592B hangs 8350B sweeper
Suspect A3 in your 83592B
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Look at manual 83592-90074 8-57 Troubleshooting the A3 Digital Interface Assembly Dennis -------------------------------------------- On Fri, 10/9/15, bunge@... [hp_agilent_equipment] <hp_agilent_equipment@...> wrote:
Subject: [hp_agilent_equipment] HP 83592B hangs 8350B sweeper To: hp_agilent_equipment@... Date: Friday, October 9, 2015, 9:36 PM My 8350B with 83592B plug-in turns on?with flickering displays that go blank?and hangs the 8350B with no error message,?and no response to any switches on either the plug-in or mainframe. While flickering for a few seconds the 8350B displays show -310 MHz start and 20 GHz stop. It does the same to a second known working 8350B. All data and address lines are active when hung so I don't understand why the 8350B does not respond. If I press CW while the displays are flickering it responds. I may have to power down and up again to then enter a CW frequency, it comes up showing CW. Once in this state I can run tests and all front panel entries work. I ran all the A3 tests which show the ROMs and address decoders are OK. The frequency in CW is high by 13 to 47 MHz going from?50 MHz to 18 GHz (it covers 0.01 to 20 GHz). The power is way off. The display shows -2 to +23 dBm. Is this normal? (no opt 002 attenuator).?-2 is actually -17 dbM?and power does not increase until about +2.5 dBm. At +10 dbM?it is actually +9.5 dBm. Tomorrow I will start a full calibration. Suggestions and tips would be appreciated. Is there a battery backed memory in the 8350B? It seems to remember the setup for quite?a while after being turned off. Is the save-n non-volatile? Does anyone have a spare cover for the PCBs for sale? The plate that goes on top of the 83592B and has many screws. it also holds the big heat sink in place. It is obvious that someone else's fingers have been inside this plug-in. |
Re: HP 83592B hangs 8350B sweeper
I'd immediately suspect a shorted tantalum capacitor on one of the supply
lines. I had one with nearly-identical symptoms a few years ago, and that was the cause. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA On October 9, 2015 9:36:34 PM "bunge@... [hp_agilent_equipment]" <hp_agilent_equipment@...> wrote: My 8350B with 83592B plug-in turns on with flickering displays that go |
HP 83592B hangs 8350B sweeper
My 8350B with 83592B plug-in turns on?with flickering displays that go blank?and hangs the 8350B with no error message,?and no response to any switches on either the plug-in or mainframe. While flickering for a few seconds the 8350B displays show -310 MHz start and 20 GHz stop. It does the same to a second known working 8350B. All data and address lines are active when hung so I don't understand why the 8350B does not respond. If I press CW while the displays are flickering it responds. I may have to power down and up again to then enter a CW frequency, it comes up showing CW. Once in this state I can run tests and all front panel entries work. I ran all the A3 tests which show the ROMs and address decoders are OK. The frequency in CW is high by 13 to 47 MHz going from?50 MHz to 18 GHz (it covers 0.01 to 20 GHz). The power is way off. The display shows -2 to +23 dBm. Is this normal? (no opt 002 attenuator). ?-2 is actually -17 dbM?and power does not increase until about +2.5 dBm. At +10 dbM?it is actually +9.5 dBm. Tomorrow I will start a full calibration. Suggestions and tips would be appreciated. Is there a battery backed memory in the 8350B? It seems to remember the setup for quite?a while after being turned off. Is the save-n non-volatile? Does anyone have a spare cover for the PCBs for sale? The plate that goes on top of the 83592B and has many screws. it also holds the big heat sink in place. It is obvious that someone else's fingers have been inside this plug-in. |
Re: I need a SINT value!
In addition to what Alan writes:
- have a look at the program and see if the array that V(N,2) is an element of, is declared as an integer array. If so, any fractions added to x(1,1) will be lost by equating V(N,2) to your expression. - make sure your scale factor is correctly used (you're still sending in SINT format, i.e. only a "mantissa"). Since you're at least getting the correct x(1,1) values, I guess it's ok. - I still don't understand what you're trying to achieve, especially since you're using the reciprocal of a measurement in a calculation to generate the next value, or so it seems. Raymond |
Re: alternatives to 54120b test set
On 10/09/2015 05:00 PM, Chris Tofu dreyfusshudson@...
[hp_agilent_equipment] wrote: I think that's accurate. I've seen test sets, not saying which oneWow, sounds like the guy had too much blood in his caffeine stream. It would be nicer to have a self contained unit like the 54110/11/12,Yeah. Just keep in mind that the 54120B is *not* a general-purpose oscilloscope. It's a pretty specialized instrument. Those NMD connectors on the test set should give that away. Hang onto that 2215A! -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA |
Re: alternatives to 54120b test set
54123a - 34 ghz 54121a - 20 ghz 54121a - 12.5 ghz ?I think that's accurate. I've seen test sets, not saying which one (likely the 54121a though) for around 100$. An anomaly? Perhaps, but deals can be had. I only payed 100$ + shipping for what I got, was in fairly good shape (though missing the top cover). The guy, seemingly a bona fide test equipment reseller, had the voltage swtich on 220vac. Maybe he had some kid look it over. I didn't have the heart to tell him. Probably in his best interests though. The umbilical cable alone can run 150$. ?It would be nicer to have a self contained unit like the 54110/11/12, but the specs are so anemic by comparison. It's not the last scope I'm going to own anyway I'm sure. Down the road I'll either splurge for the test set and/or one of the earlier color HPs. There's always the 2215a I payed 4$ for. Has a beam that's all I can say for now. |
Re: alternatives to 54120b test set
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Dennis Czelusniak <czelusniakd@...> wrote:
That's an achievable price for a 54121A. Here's one that went for $105 + ship: |
Re: alternatives to 54120b test set
Looking at Block Diagram of 4 Channel Test Set for 54120 Mainframe shows it contains Horizontal (A1) and Vertical (A2) Assembly.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Where did you see a 4 Channel test set for under $100? Dennis -------------------------------------------- On Fri, 10/9/15, Chris Tofu dreyfusshudson@... [hp_agilent_equipment] <hp_agilent_equipment@...> wrote:
Subject: [hp_agilent_equipment] alternatives to 54120b test set To: "Hp_agilent_equipment" <hp_agilent_equipment@...> Date: Friday, October 9, 2015, 2:50 PM Hello group, just acquired a 54120b, seems to "work" fine (was told by seller it didn't power up). Is the designated test set the only one that will work? Are there workarounds/juryrigs? Sounds stupid I know. My needs aren't particularly demanding at the moment, basically staring at square waves under 10mhz. ?I seemed to see a message on this screen when I powered the unit on for the first time, something to do with calibration I think. Does this mean calibration info was lost (being the test set wasn't present and connected)? I saw something in a pdf service manual, stating the unit shouldn't be powered on w/o a test set connected, but up to that point didn't say why. It's not that I need dead specific calibration currently, just wondering what's the scoop. ?I'm not spending any or much more money. This thing was a bargain, and I'll leave it alone and use a beat up old Tek 2215a for the time being. Would love to start playing with it though. I realize you can sometimes find these test sets (54123a, but don't quote me) for 100$ on ebay. Just that I need a car at the moment . . . ?Would love to hear of unorthodox methods of connecting a probe, if they exist. The umbilical cord was supplied. My guess is some kind of pre-amp is necessary, as this unit isn't configured like the 54110 or equivalent models. Didn't do a lot of research (or even look at the pictures!) when choosing this item. I used a 54100 or something many years ago in a testing lab. This unit, with the proper test set, is so high in bandwidth, and so inexpensive I'm hardly experiencing buyer's remorse. ?In theory could the front end of a 54110, 54111, 54112 be retrofitted to this scope? I'm really interested in learning everything I can about these models. Was warned against HP scopes, as they use proprietary micros and whatnot (mind features an extremely proprietary Motorola 68000!!!). I LOVE THE DAMEND THINGS. ?Thanks in advance for any help or info. |
Re: I need a SINT value!
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
You are getting it! but in integer arithmetic. If
you convert to floating point at that part of the program you will will most
probably get the same result. You need to do division arithmetic before any
scaling and conversion to integers.
?
The fractional result of?1/X(1,1) is obviously
less than 1. It is also less than 1 when you use 3/X(1,1). this?can be only
scaled?before being?converted to a single precision integer. We
suspect you are probably trying to modify the wrong part of the program. But
without sight of the whole code we are working blind.
?
as a trial try...3000/X(1,1) and see what you
get.
?
Alan
G3NYK
?
|
Re: I need a SINT value!
To add to? Alan's answer and assuming X(1,1) is always an integer (which I'm not sure of, without knowing your program)? and V(N,2) is an integer (because it's sent as SINT):
If X(1,1)=0, 3/X(1,1) will throw a divide by zero error Other results of 3/X(1,1) will either be 0, 1 or 3; all X(1,1) > 3 will give a result 0 So, if V(N,2) is what you send, any value of X(1,1) > 3 will send x(1,1). Raymond |
Re: alternatives to 54120b test set
On 10/09/2015 02:50 PM, Chris Tofu dreyfusshudson@...
[hp_agilent_equipment] wrote: Hello group, just acquired a 54120b, seems to "work" fine (was told by10MHz?! The 54120B is a 20GHz sampling oscilloscope/TDR system with risetimes in the low double-digits of picoseconds. The test set is the input sampler. "Can't get there from here"...you need the test set or the oscilloscope is a brick. I'm not spending any or much more money. This thing was a bargain, andCertainly understandable prioritization, but it's probably best to put it on a shelf until you can score a test set. Would love to hear of unorthodox methods of connecting a probe, if theyNot even close. I'm really interested in learning everything I can aboutI hate to sound contrarian...but "proprietary"? They were used in hundreds of models of computers, no more proprietary than x86...but not suicide-inducing to program or try to get performance out of. ;) All this said, though, I have a 54120B, and I absolutely love it. It is a BEAST for TDR work...absolutely amazing capability and performance. With the faster test sets (which are not terribly common, unfortunately) it goes up to 34GHz. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA |
alternatives to 54120b test set
Hello group, just acquired a 54120b, seems to "work" fine (was told by seller it didn't power up). Is the designated test set the only one that will work? Are there workarounds/juryrigs? Sounds stupid I know. My needs aren't particularly demanding at the moment, basically staring at square waves under 10mhz. ?I
seemed to see a message on this screen when I powered the unit on for
the first time, something to do with calibration I think. Does this mean
calibration info was lost (being the test set wasn't present and
connected)? I saw something in a pdf service manual, stating the unit
shouldn't be powered on w/o a test set connected, but up to that point
didn't say why. It's not that I need dead specific calibration currently, just wondering what's the scoop. ?I'm
not spending any or much more money. This thing was a bargain, and I'll
leave it alone and use a beat up old Tek 2215a for the time being.
Would love to start playing with it though. I realize you can sometimes
find these test sets (54123a, but don't quote me) for 100$ on ebay. Just
that I need a car at the moment . . . ?Would love to hear of unorthodox methods of connecting a probe, if they exist. The umbilical cord was supplied. My guess is some kind of pre-amp is necessary, as this unit isn't configured like the 54110 or equivalent models. Didn't do a lot of research (or even look at the pictures!) when choosing this item. I used a 54100 or something many years ago in a testing lab. This unit, with the proper test set, is so high in bandwidth, and so inexpensive I'm hardly experiencing buyer's remorse. ?In theory could the front end of a 54110, 54111, 54112 be retrofitted to this scope? I'm really interested in learning everything I can about these models. Was warned against HP scopes, as they use proprietary micros and whatnot (mind features an extremely proprietary Motorola 68000!!!). I LOVE THE DAMEND THINGS. ?Thanks in advance for any help or info. |