Amir
A lesson in the need for methodical
fault finding techniques methinks.
Checking out the RF section block
diagram, trying to follow your advice, I noticed the 600Mhz drive
into the Second Converter. The 600Mhz is derived from the 100MHz
VCXO that the regulator transistor had failed on. The 600MHz out
of A15 is about 15dB low and when I injected 600Mhz at the right
level into the second converter the level has come right up. Still
about 20dB down but more promising.
I will go back now and go through the
A15 board and get the outputs correct and then after that maybe
check out A14 for the mixer and converter bias volts.
Thanks
Dave
On 11/04/2019 10:29 pm, amirb wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing
anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain
amplifiers?
if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the
input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with
oscilloscope by injecting a signal)
then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by
injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels
according to the service manual
I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the
converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides
90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a
fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in
any of the LO drives)
since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you
inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make
sure span is set to zero)
and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I
hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter.
if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first
mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the
mixer bias voltages coming from A14
In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.
Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to
the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you
must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span)
and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an
oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:
I am repairing a HP8560E
and until now have been doing well.
The unit on delivery had
the classic distorted display and no apparent response to
any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms
were reported.
Choose the "600 MHz
Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed
2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought
the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c
I've ever spent.
Was it completely fixed?
No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low.
Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width,
span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the
attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the
RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.
I am at an impass now
until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything
to measure 3-6GHz.
I did the LO feed through
test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz,
input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should
be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this
range the RF path following the Low band mixer is
operating properly.
Mine is -26dBm, so in the
range.
My question is does that
test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the
first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers
are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the
only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer
(sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was
low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through
but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.
Any though while I wait
for a better spec an?
Dave
?
|
Re: Correct rack mount bracket?
Hi Steve. Thank you. The brackets do have notches.
I have a few paired sets of 2U and 3U rack units. Do you happen to
know the HP part numbers for the handles and brackets? Or where I
could find them?
Steve, K8JQ
On 4/11/2019 4:49 PM, Steve - Home
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Both types of rack mount brackets are available. It appears
someone took the time to tie wrap the handles to the brackets to
keep them together so I’d venture a guess you have the “use with
handles” type. Look closely at the brackets and if they have
notches at the top and bottom of the outward-facing side, on the
inside towards the instrument, they are definitely for use with
handles installed. They’ll mesh together nicely if they are a
proper mating set.
On Apr 11, 2019, at 2:48 PM, Steve < steve65@...>
wrote:
Are the mounting brackets made to be or intended to be used
with front equipment handles? Or are the front equipment
handles used alone?
Reason I ask . . . somewhere along the line I acquired a box
with a handful of mounting brackets and front equipment
handles. They are paired with plastic tiewraps . . . a
mounting bracket is tiewrapped to a front equipment handle, as
if they go together. Do they?
Thanks.
Steve, K8JQ
On 4/10/2019 6:13 PM, Jeremy
Nichols wrote:
Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack
mounting bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with
handles" and "without handles" descriptions are
confusing (if the sellers are even correct).
Jeremy
|
John
Thanks for that. I imagine the exact replacements would be expensive if even possible to get, so will let you know how I go.
Dave
Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S5
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-------- Original message -------- From: "johncharlesgord via Groups.Io" <johngord@...> Date: 12/04/2019 03:40 (GMT+08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP8560E Low Level Dave, A totally blown mixer would explain things.? Even if all the diodes go open (or short) there will be plenty of LO feedthrough.? If you can't find an exact replacement at a reasonable cost, let me know.? I may have an "ordinary" mixer that will do the job. --John Gord email: johngord (at) verizon (dot) net On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:05 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:
Thanks for those great advice. I have packed it in for the night but will try them out tomorrow.
?
I have a specan in my FM testset that goes to a gig so should be able to check the IFs.
?
It is one of the later of this model so you are right the first mixer does have bias as well and these look close but while is supposed to be 5v and is 5 the other is supposed to be 4.5v and it is 5 as well. Will have a closer look at these as well.
?
Thanks
?
Dave
?
?
?
Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S5
-------- Original message -------- From: amirb <amir.borji@...> Date: 11/04/2019 22:29 (GMT+08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP8560E Low Level
I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers? if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal) then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual
I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides 90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)
since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero) and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter. if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14 In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.
Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span) and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:
I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.
The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.
Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.
Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.
I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.
I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.
Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.
My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.
Any though while I wait for a better spec an?
Dave
?
|
Re: Correct rack mount bracket?
Both types of rack mount brackets are available. It appears someone took the time to tie wrap the handles to the brackets to keep them together so I’d venture a guess you have the “use with handles” type. Look closely at the brackets and if they have notches at the top and bottom of the outward-facing side, on the inside towards the instrument, they are definitely for use with handles installed. They’ll mesh together nicely if they are a proper mating set.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Apr 11, 2019, at 2:48 PM, Steve < steve65@...> wrote:
Are the mounting brackets made to be or intended to be used with
front equipment handles? Or are the front equipment handles used
alone?
Reason I ask . . . somewhere along the line I acquired a box with a
handful of mounting brackets and front equipment handles. They are
paired with plastic tiewraps . . . a mounting bracket is tiewrapped
to a front equipment handle, as if they go together. Do they?
Thanks.
Steve, K8JQ
On 4/10/2019 6:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols
wrote:
Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack mounting
bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with handles" and
"without handles" descriptions are confusing (if the sellers
are even correct).
Jeremy
|
Re: Correct rack mount bracket?
Are the mounting brackets made to be or intended to be used with
front equipment handles? Or are the front equipment handles used
alone?
Reason I ask . . . somewhere along the line I acquired a box with a
handful of mounting brackets and front equipment handles. They are
paired with plastic tiewraps . . . a mounting bracket is tiewrapped
to a front equipment handle, as if they go together. Do they?
Thanks.
Steve, K8JQ
On 4/10/2019 6:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack mounting
bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with handles" and
"without handles" descriptions are confusing (if the sellers
are even correct).
Jeremy
|
Dave, A totally blown mixer would explain things.? Even if all the diodes go open (or short) there will be plenty of LO feedthrough.? If you can't find an exact replacement at a reasonable cost, let me know.? I may have an "ordinary" mixer that will do the job.
--John Gord email: johngord (at) verizon (dot) net
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:05 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:
Thanks for those great advice. I have packed it in for the night but will try them out tomorrow.
?
I have a specan in my FM testset that goes to a gig so should be able to check the IFs.
?
It is one of the later of this model so you are right the first mixer does have bias as well and these look close but while is supposed to be 5v and is 5 the other is supposed to be 4.5v and it is 5 as well. Will have a closer look at these as well.
?
Thanks
?
Dave
?
?
?
Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S5
-------- Original message -------- From: amirb <amir.borji@...> Date: 11/04/2019 22:29 (GMT+08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP8560E Low Level
I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers? if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal) then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual
I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides 90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)
since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero) and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter. if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14 In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.
Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span) and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:
I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.
The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.
Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.
Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.
I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.
I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.
Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.
My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.
Any though while I wait for a better spec an?
Dave
?
|
Thanks for those great advice. I have packed it in for the night but will try them out tomorrow.
I have a specan in my FM testset that goes to a gig so should be able to check the IFs.
It is one of the later of this model so you are right the first mixer does have bias as well and these look close but while is supposed to be 5v and is 5 the other is supposed to be 4.5v and it is 5 as well. Will have a closer look at these as well.
Thanks
Dave
Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S5
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-------- Original message -------- From: amirb <amir.borji@...> Date: 11/04/2019 22:29 (GMT+08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP8560E Low Level I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span? On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers? if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal) then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual
I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides 90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)
since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero) and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter. if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14 In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.
Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span) and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:
I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.
The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.
Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.
Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.
I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.
I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.
Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.
My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.
Any though while I wait for a better spec an?
Dave
?
|
I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers? if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal) then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual
I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides 90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)
since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero) and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter. if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14 In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.
Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span) and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:
I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.
The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.
Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.
Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.
I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.
I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.
Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.
My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.
Any though while I wait for a better spec an?
Dave
?
|
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers? if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal) then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual
I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides 90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)
since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero) and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter. if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14 In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.
Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span) and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:
I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.
The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.
Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.
Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.
I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.
I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.
Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.
My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.
Any though while I wait for a better spec an?
Dave
?
|
I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have
been doing well.
The unit on delivery had the classic distorted
display and no apparent response to any input though it did
sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.
Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator
Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the
100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the
alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.
Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not,
the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the
resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look
good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went
straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still
90dB down.
I am at an impass now until I can borrow a
decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.
I did the LO feed through test in the service
manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and
it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It
says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low
band mixer is operating properly.
Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.
My question is does that test mean that the
the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF
ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly
albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a
faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose
if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be
feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to
mix.
Any though while I wait for a better spec an?
Dave
|
Re: Anyone have the 4278A CLIP?
Update:
I would still like to get the CLIP, but found two problems:
The option switch on the CPU board was set wrong, and the wires to the LCD contrast pot were broken.? The instrument now seems to be operating just fine.? The LED on the processor board (in the group of 8) is still lit so it may be normal?
Reading a standard capacitor perfectly, and a few others seem good too.
Gotta love repairs like this.
Peter
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 4/10/2019 9:23 PM, Peter Gottlieb via Groups.Io wrote: I have the poor quality scan from the Keysight site, but it doesn't include the processor board.
I have a lit up screen with no display.? Power supplies are good.
My unit is serial 2936J09603 which is way later than the range in the manual I have.? The processor board is a much newer design from the layout in the manual.
On power up I get all LEDs on the processor board light up, then they light sequentially, then stop in a pattern of 10000000.? This is the initialization of the LCD, and the troubleshooting guide says the A7 (processor) data acknowledge circuit is faulty.? A CLIP of the processor board sure would help.? I do hear a bunch or relays clicking so the processor is at least talking to other parts of the instrument.
Anyone know where I can find or purchase a CLIP which includes this info?
Peter
|
Anyone have the 4278A CLIP?
I have the poor quality scan from the Keysight site, but it doesn't include the processor board.
I have a lit up screen with no display.? Power supplies are good.
My unit is serial 2936J09603 which is way later than the range in the manual I have.? The processor board is a much newer design from the layout in the manual.
On power up I get all LEDs on the processor board light up, then they light sequentially, then stop in a pattern of 10000000.? This is the initialization of the LCD, and the troubleshooting guide says the A7 (processor) data acknowledge circuit is faulty.? A CLIP of the processor board sure would help.? I do hear a bunch or relays clicking so the processor is at least talking to other parts of the instrument.
Anyone know where I can find or purchase a CLIP which includes this info?
Peter
|
Re: Correct rack mount bracket?
Steve, your last two sentences are the critical ones—I was not aware! Looking at the weight and depth of the 3456A however, it should have been obvious. I'll use a shelf or other larger instrument underneath to take the stress off of the ears. Jeremy
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Jeremy, Yes, those ears will fit a 3456A. They are definitely for use without handles. The ones for use with handles remaining attached have a notch at top and bottom to clear the handles. You will have to remove the handles to use the ones on offer. Note that the screws to mount the ears to the unit don’t appear to be included. The flathead screws that mount the handles are not long enough to use to mount the ears. You’ll also need either a shelf for the unit to sit on or the side mounted slides. The rack mount ears and front frame of the DVM are not designed to support the weight of the unit.? On Apr 10, 2019, at 5:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols < jn6wfo@...> wrote: Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack mounting bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with handles" and "without handles" descriptions are confusing (if the sellers are even correct).
Jeremy
|
Re: Correct rack mount bracket?
Yes, I kept moving instruments around in the rack and between the rack and the bench. When I noticed some distortion in the rack mounting rails (where I had a heavy HP power supply and a couple of other heavy instruments), I bought a bunch of the shelves and have been very pleased with them.
DaveD Sent from a small flat thingy
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Apr 10, 2019, at 19:56, Steve - Home < steve-krull@...> wrote: Those look nice, Dave! For most of my units I ended up mounting aluminum angle in the racks and aluminum bar stock on the sides of the units, with Teflon tape so everything slides easily. Since the Teflon effectively isolates the chassis’s from the rack I’m in the process of adding individual ground straps for each unit rather than rely on the power cord grounds. On Apr 10, 2019, at 6:12 PM, Dave Daniel < kc0wjn@...> wrote: I’ve ended up using these “ AC Infinity Vented Cantilever 2U Universal Rack Shelf” items purchase through Amazon instead of HP or Tektronix OEM rack ears. The shelves are a lot easier to install, and they allow easier rack reconfiguration.
DaveD Sent from a small flat thingy Jeremy, Yes, those ears will fit a 3456A. They are definitely for use without handles. The ones for use with handles remaining attached have a notch at top and bottom to clear the handles. You will have to remove the handles to use the ones on offer. Note that the screws to mount the ears to the unit don’t appear to be included. The flathead screws that mount the handles are not long enough to use to mount the ears. You’ll also need either a shelf for the unit to sit on or the side mounted slides. The rack mount ears and front frame of the DVM are not designed to support the weight of the unit.? On Apr 10, 2019, at 5:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols < jn6wfo@...> wrote: Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack mounting bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with handles" and "without handles" descriptions are confusing (if the sellers are even correct).
Jeremy
|
Re: Correct rack mount bracket?
Those look nice, Dave! For most of my units I ended up mounting aluminum angle in the racks and aluminum bar stock on the sides of the units, with Teflon tape so everything slides easily. Since the Teflon effectively isolates the chassis’s from the rack I’m in the process of adding individual ground straps for each unit rather than rely on the power cord grounds.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Apr 10, 2019, at 6:12 PM, Dave Daniel < kc0wjn@...> wrote: I’ve ended up using these “ AC Infinity Vented Cantilever 2U Universal Rack Shelf” items purchase through Amazon instead of HP or Tektronix OEM rack ears. The shelves are a lot easier to install, and they allow easier rack reconfiguration.
DaveD Sent from a small flat thingy Jeremy, Yes, those ears will fit a 3456A. They are definitely for use without handles. The ones for use with handles remaining attached have a notch at top and bottom to clear the handles. You will have to remove the handles to use the ones on offer. Note that the screws to mount the ears to the unit don’t appear to be included. The flathead screws that mount the handles are not long enough to use to mount the ears. You’ll also need either a shelf for the unit to sit on or the side mounted slides. The rack mount ears and front frame of the DVM are not designed to support the weight of the unit.? On Apr 10, 2019, at 5:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols < jn6wfo@...> wrote: Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack mounting bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with handles" and "without handles" descriptions are confusing (if the sellers are even correct).
Jeremy
|
Re: Correct rack mount bracket?
I’ve ended up using these “ AC Infinity Vented Cantilever 2U Universal Rack Shelf” items purchase through Amazon instead of HP or Tektronix OEM rack ears. The shelves are a lot easier to install, and they allow easier rack reconfiguration.
DaveD Sent from a small flat thingy
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Apr 10, 2019, at 18:54, Steve - Home < steve-krull@...> wrote: Jeremy, Yes, those ears will fit a 3456A. They are definitely for use without handles. The ones for use with handles remaining attached have a notch at top and bottom to clear the handles. You will have to remove the handles to use the ones on offer. Note that the screws to mount the ears to the unit don’t appear to be included. The flathead screws that mount the handles are not long enough to use to mount the ears. You’ll also need either a shelf for the unit to sit on or the side mounted slides. The rack mount ears and front frame of the DVM are not designed to support the weight of the unit.? On Apr 10, 2019, at 5:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols < jn6wfo@...> wrote: Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack mounting bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with handles" and "without handles" descriptions are confusing (if the sellers are even correct).
Jeremy
|
I ended up finding a 432A for sale on ebay that included a 478A coaxial thermistor mount. It's in great shape (even still has both feet), but appears to have lost the little screw for mechanically zeroing the meter.
|
Re: Correct rack mount bracket?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 03:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols wrote:
Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack mounting bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with handles" and "without handles" descriptions are confusing (if the sellers are even correct).
?
Jeremy
?
As I understand it, the thinner instruments such as the 3455/56 voltmeters are 2U, with two screws. Most others are 3U. Really large ones such as the 8664 sig gen and the 8569 spectrum analyzer are 4U. I think what's pictured are indeed 2U rack ears, but you should confirm the measurements. Sean
|
Re: Correct rack mount bracket?
Jeremy, Yes, those ears will fit a 3456A. They are definitely for use without handles. The ones for use with handles remaining attached have a notch at top and bottom to clear the handles. You will have to remove the handles to use the ones on offer. Note that the screws to mount the ears to the unit don’t appear to be included. The flathead screws that mount the handles are not long enough to use to mount the ears. You’ll also need either a shelf for the unit to sit on or the side mounted slides. The rack mount ears and front frame of the DVM are not designed to support the weight of the unit.?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Apr 10, 2019, at 5:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols < jn6wfo@...> wrote: Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack mounting bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with handles" and "without handles" descriptions are confusing (if the sellers are even correct).
Jeremy
|
Re: Plastic snap-in bottom feet
Not sure about part numbers, but some of them were all plastic?+ metal legs, and others were plastic?+ rubber surface grip + metal legs.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 7:26 AM Paul Bicknell < paul@...> wrote: Hi
The larger unites used 5 of the small feet
Another type for the 1/3 units? such as a 432 power
Another type for the 1/2 units? such as a 431 power
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: 09 April 2019 14:39
To: [email protected]
Subject: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] Plastic snap-in bottom feet
As I look around the internet at the plastic snap-in bottom feet used on
older HP test equipment, I run into two HP part numbers: 5041-8821 and
5041-9167.
How do the feet differ between the two part numbers? Perhaps color? Or
something else?
Thanks.
Steve, K8JQ
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG -
Version: 2016.0.8048 / Virus Database: 4793/15884 - Release Date: 08/14/18
Internal Virus Database is out of date.
|