Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- HP-Agilent-Keysight-Equipment
- Messages
Search
CHECK OUT THE WIKI The purpose of the wiki is mainly to allow you to find information on instruments, either from either
- The model number
- The function(s) listed below. Some instruments have multiple functions - for example, the 4195A is a VNA, spectrum analyzer and an impedance analyzer. Therefore the 4195A is listed in multiple categories
Please also check out HPWiki available here:
- Accessory kits - various types
- AC power analyzers - PA2201A and PA2203A
- AC power supplies 6811C, 6812C, 6813C
- Airlines
- Arbitrary waveform generators M8194A
- Amplifiers?493A, 495A?
- Attenuators (optical) 8156A, 8157A, 8158B, 81566A, 81576A,?
- Attenuators (RF) 8494A
- Attenuator set (500 Ω) 350C
- Attenuator set (600 Ω) 350D
- Attenuator switch driver
- Audio analyzers? 8903A, 8903B, 8903E,? ?
- Base station test sets
- Bit error rate testers (BERTs)
- Cables
- Capacitance meters U1701A, U1701B, 4272A, 4278A, 4279A
- Capacitor Bridge 4270A,
- Capacitor standards 16380A, 16380C,?
- Carrier noise test setsi
- Cesium frequency standards
- Clamp ammeters
- Close field probes
- Crystal Impedance E4915A, E4916A
- Data Acquisition Systems (DAQs)
- DC power analyzers
- DC power supplies 6030A , 6031A , 6032A, 6033A, 6035A, 6131C, 6621A, 6622A, 6623A, 6624A, 6627A, 6255A, 6645A, 6671A, 6672A, 6673A, 6674A, 6675A, 62003A, 62003C, 62003E, 62004A, 62004B, 62004E, 62005A, 62005B, 62005E, 62006A, 62006B, 62006E, 62010A, 62010C, 62010E, 62012A, 62012C, 62012E, 62015A, 62015C, 62015E, 62018A, 62018C, 62018E, 62024A, 62024C, 62024E, 62028A, 62028C, 62028E, 62048A, 62048C, 62048E
- Delay lines
- Detectors
- Device current waveform analyzers
- Digital communications analyzers
- Directional couplers
- Distortion analyzers 330B, 330C, 330D, 331A, 332A, 333A, 334A, 339A, 8903A, 8903B, 8903E,???
- Dynamic measurement DC source
- Electrometers
- Fading simulators
- Femto ammeters
- Filters
- Frequency counters 522B, 5342A 5343A 5352B
- Frequency standards?
- Function Generators ? 3310A,? 8165A,
- GPIB controllers, extenders, cables etc.
- GPS frequency standards
- Harmonic mixers
- High resistance meters 4339B
- High resistance meter fixtures 16008B
- HEV EV Grid Emulators and Test Systems
- In-circuit test systems
- Impedance analyzers 4195A, 4291A, 4291B, 4395A, 4396A, 4396B, 4294A, E4990A, E4991A
- Impedance Analyzer Accessories
- Impedance / Gain Phase analyzer 4194A
- Impedance Meter 4193A,
- Isolators
- LCR meters? U1701A, U1701B, U1731A,? U1731B, U1731C, U1732A, U1732B, U1732C, U1733C, 4191A , 4192A, 4194A, 4195A, E4196A,? 4216A, 4260A, 4261A, 4262A? 4263A, 4263B, 4271B, 4274A, 4275A, 4276A , 4277A, 4284A, 4285A, 4286A, 4287A, 4291A, 4291B, 4294A, 4332A, 4342A, 4395A, 4396A, 4396B, E4980A and E4980AL
- LCR meter calibration devices? 16380A 42030A? 42090A, 42091A and 42100A
- LCR meter accessories
- 2-Terminal BNCs.
- 4-Terminal Pair (BNC connectors)
- Cable extension 16048A, 16048D, 16048E, 16048G, 16048H
- DC current bias accessories 42841A, 42842A, 42842B, 42842C, 42843A
- DC voltage bias accessories 16065A, 16065C,
- Kelvin clips 16089A, 16089B, 16089C,16089E
- Lead Components 16047A,16047B, 16047D, 16047E
- Material 16451B, 16452A
- Probes 42941A
- SMD 16034E, 16034G, 16034H
- 2-port 16096A
- 7 mm (APC7)
- 2-Terminal BNCs.
- LCZ meters? 4276A, 4277A,
- Lightwave clock / data receivers
- Lightwave converter
- Lightwave component analyzer
- Lightwave measurement system mainframes
- Lightwave polarization analyzers 8509B
- Logic analyzers
- Nemo wireless network solutions.
- Noise and interference test set
- Noise figure analyzers
- Noise sources 346A, 346B. 346C ,
- Matching pads (50 ohm to 75 ohm or similar)
- Materials test equipment
- Microwave repeaters
- Microwave downconverters 70427A
- Microwave / THz sources
- Milliammeter 428B
- Milliohm meter
- Mobile communications DC source
- Modular instruments
- AXIe
- Data acquisition (DAQ)
- USB
- PXIe
- Modulation analyzers
- Multimeters 427A, 970A
- Optical attenuators
- Optical heads
- Optical sources
- Optical spectrum analyzers
- Oscilloscopes 120A, 120AR, 120B, 122A, 130A, 130B, 130BR, 130C, 140A, 140B, 141A, 150A, 150AR, 160B, 180A, 180AR, 180CD, 181A, 181AR, 181T, 181TR, 182C, 182T, 183A, 183B, 184A, 184B, 185A, 185B, 1200A, 1200B, 1220A, 1221A, 1703A, 1707A, 1707B, 1710A, 1710B, 1715A, 1722A, 1725A, 1726A, 1740A, 1741A, 1742A, 1743A, 1744A, 1746A, 1980A, 1980B, 5403A, 6000A, 6000L, 16533A, 16534A, 54100A, 5410B, 54100C, 5100D, 54111D, 54120A, 54120B, 54200A, 54501A, 54502A, 54503A, 54504A, 54520A, 54520C, 54540A, 54540C, 54542A, 54542C, 54600B, 54601A, 54601B, 54602B, 54603B,? 54645A, 54654N, 54710A, 54720A, 54750A, 54825N, E1428,?
- Oven controlled crystal oscillators (OCXOs)
- Pattern generators
- PCM terminal test set
- Phase noise measurement
- Pico ammeters
- Printers 2225
- Plotters 7470A, 7475A?
- Probes
- Protocol analyzers and exercisers.
- Power booster test sets
- Power meters 431A, 431B, 431C, 432A, 435A, 435B, 437B, 438A
- Power splitters
- Power supplies
- Pulse generators
- Q-meters 4342A?
- Q-meter calibration inductors 16470A
- Reflection transmission test set
- Return loss module (optical)
- Relays / switches / switch matrices (optical)
- Relays / switches / switch matrices (RF)
- Resistor standards 42030A?and 42100A
- S-parameter test sets
- Scalar network analyzers
- SCSI bus preprocessor interface E2324A
- Selective level meters 3746A
- Semiconductors
- Semiconductor parameter analyzers 4145A, 4155B, 4156B,
- Signal analyzers
- Signal generators / sweep generators / signal sources / oscillators 200CD, 201B, 209A, 204D,? 608A,? 8165A
- Software
- Source measure units
- Spectrum analyzers 4195A,???
- Switch control units
- SWR meter 415E?
- Time interval? counters
- Time mark generator 226A
- Timing and data state modules
- Torque wrenches
- Transmitter testers
- Trigger modules
- Ultrasound transducers
- Universal bridge? 4260A, 4265A, 4265B?
- Vacuum tube voltmeter 410C
- Vector Impedance Meter 4193A, 4800A, 4815A
- Vector Network Analyzers (VNAs) 4195A,? 8510A, 8510B, 8510C, 8753A, 8753B, 8753C, 8753D, 8753E, 8753ES, 8752ET, 8719A, 8719B, 8719C, 8719D, 8720A, 8720B, 8720C, 8720D, 8720ES, 8722A, 8722B, 8722C, 8722D, 8722ES,
- Vector Network Analyzers (VNA) calibration kits 85032B, 85032E, 85033C, 85033D, 85033E, 85050B, 85050C, 85050D, 85052B, 85052C, 85052D, 85054A, 85054B, 85054D, 85056A
- Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) verification kits
- Vector Signal Analyzer 89650S, 89600S
- Vector voltmeters 8405A, 8508A,
- VXI mainframes 70000B, 70000C
- Waveform and function generators
- Waveguide to waveguide and waveguide to coaxial transitions.
- Wireless 58 OTA chambers
- Wireless channel emulators
- Wireless network emulators
- Wireless communication test sets
?
Re: 8642B
John Miles
The only trace I can find of that one is at Manuals Plus ($155 for a paper
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
copy). I have a .PDF of 08642-90224 with about half of the schematics from 08642-90226, if it'd help. This is a 20 MB file. The only complete set of service manuals I have for the 8642B are the paper editions of 08642-90226 from Manuals Plus. I keep meaning to scan those, but haven't had time (it'll be a huge job). Do you know if there's any content in 08642-90020 that isn't also in 08642-90226? -- john, KE5FX I am looking for the On Site Service Manual for an 8642B. The part |
Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
This probably wouldn't work due to shrinkage, but if there isn't much load on the gears, couldn't you cast a replacement with a very short fiber filled epoxy? Assuming you had a set of good gears to start with.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-Dave -------------- Original message --------------
From: lothar baier <microwaveengineer1968@...> the gear shown on this page would be quite expensive, reason beein that this gear has two parts, the straight part is easy and can be hobbed, the other part that is slanted is not as easy, it cant be hobbed at least not on the hobber i have so the manufacturing steps would start making the blanks then using a dividing head and mill to cut the teeth on the slanted part one by one and then hob the other part a gear like this would definatlt satisfy the 5hr estimate chuck gave, performing the indexing calculations for the dividing head alone is a b.... from first look i thought that the gears are made out of PVC and not delrin, usually PVC has softeners that evaporate over the years and then the part becomes brittle and cracks so seein actually cracked gears made me think of PVC. I actually thinking about getting a 8640 Sometimes, altough its a old box it still has pretty darn good phasenoise which sometimes you needm its also very clean. The priority has just shifted a bit because i recently got a SMHU58 and this one has a phasenoise floor thats almost as good maybe even better and goes to 4GHz Metalworking to me is primarily a hobby so i dont look for financial gratification, yes normally you wouldnt make a part you can buy for $2 BUT as usual there are situations you will, one of them is when you want to make the part better, if you have a $2 gear thats made out of lousy chinese crap metal and is bound to break again in two month and you know by making one out of good high carbon steel you can have one that lasts 10years then you may think about it again, another thing is that what costs $2 today may not be available at all tomorrow ! The other reason is learning, if you want to learn certain operations or teach somebody else skills then you may not look at the pricetag or hours you spend ! Last but not least there is gratification, nothing is more gratifying then looking at something you have build with your own hands and equipment ! I deeply despise this "why do it if you can buy it cheaper" attitude, this has gotten us into the whole chinese mess to begin with ! i rather spend $50 in material and tools and know the money goes to US companies to make a gear then to spend $2 that go straight overseas supporting foreign jobs and encourage US companies to move even more jobs there ! pdxoregonpete <pdxoregonpete@...> wrote: I'm sorry this has gone this way, I just offered to buy the junker and if someone lived in Reno could pick it up strip it keep the rest of it if they wanted to, and send someone like Chuck or a retired mechanical engineer I know draw up a set of plans then give them to someone with a hobber, Then post the details on mfg.com and maybe a Chinese shop would surprise us with the cost. There's just one gear thats not a simple one, Fig 5 near the bottom of the page -pete --- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "pdxoregonpete" <pdxoregonpete@...> wrote: __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around |
Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
John Miles
I'm sorry this has gone this way, I just offered to buySometimes it's not a matter of people being too cheap to offer to pay a reasonable amount for things, or to contribute items for reverse-engineering, but concern about the people who originally offered to do the work losing interest, becoming overcommitted, or just plain flaking out. I have been a victim -- and frankly, a perpetrator -- of all three crimes against the hobby. I'm sure that if someone actually does the work and offers a full set of good-quality 8640 gears for $50 or less, the customers will be there. At least one, anyway! (raises hand) At $100 or more you are competing with parts-mule prices, so it doesn't make as much sense to create new gears if that's what it would cost. There's just one gear thats not a simple one, Fig 5 nearThat's a really nice page. I hadn't heard the warning about not storing the 8640s face-up before. -- john, KE5FX |
Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
lothar baier wrote:
i agree on the fact that hobbs are expensive but i have about 120 hobs that came with the machine,That was a very lucky purchase. The hobs alone, if they are sharp and any good, are worth easily 10 to 50 times what you paid for your machine. Now, do you have any 48 dp hobs in your collection? If not, you will be making, or buying some before you finish this project. ... Any lathe has threading capabilitiesBegging your pardon, but that is not true. Most lathes used in industry are second operation machines, and they can only cut a thread if you have a die already made. A hob is way out of their league. The only other lathes used these days are CNC lathe centers. Manual machines show up only in small model shops, and hobby machine shops. ... and you need a lathe anyways to make the disks you cut your gears out of, I included that in my guesstimate of the time to make a single gear. Did you? ... you wont need any heat treating of the hob since you are only cutting plastic,Plastics, such as delrin and nylon seem soft and buttery, but they are never-the-less abrasive when you cut them. An unhardened tool steel hob will make quite a few gears, but the sharp edge will be gone very early on. Plastics such as nylon and delrin cut with a very ragged edge unless the tool is scary sharp. If you are only going to make a couple for yourself, sure, you can take short cuts. If you are going to make them for others, you don't dare. a good quality toolsteel will do for that Apparantly you havent been much around machining, i really dont know where you get the 5hours from,Ever tried making a hob? I have made a few, and 5 hours is a good estimate for one hardened and ground tool steel hob made on manual machines. If you have ten identical hobs to make, you can take advantage of some economy of scale, but to make one hob, will take you about 5 hours. setup of your hobber takes about 1hr max and that includes calculating your index and feed gears, the cutting process in itself is depending on theReally now? So, you have a stock feeder that puts the new blank into your hobber, and removes the old? You just walk away, and the bucket gets filled with gears? No? Then you have a manually operated hobber. Someone has to be in attendance during the entire operation. -Chuck Harris |
Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
hp used molded to spec gears
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
this was done i believe because of the high cost of machined metal gears they used cheap nylon and probablky assumed that they would be availible as a cheap replacement part it they failed that could be easily replaced by the service dept. the gears dont have to be exceptionly strong just turning some rotary switches. that assxembly is the achiliies heal of the 8640b loose switch wipersc can be locked down with a drop of epoxy "ive done it" tektronix always has better mechanical quality then hp hp use to have very good mechanical quality tek was superior in my estimation ----- Original Message -----
From: lothar baier To: hp_agilent_equipment@... Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:05 AM Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1 the gear shown on this page would be quite expensive, reason beein that this gear has two parts, the straight part is easy and can be hobbed, the other part that is slanted is not as easy, it cant be hobbed at least not on the hobber i have so the manufacturing steps would start making the blanks then using a dividing head and mill to cut the teeth on the slanted part one by one and then hob the other part a gear like this would definatlt satisfy the 5hr estimate chuck gave, performing the indexing calculations for the dividing head alone is a b.... from first look i thought that the gears are made out of PVC and not delrin, usually PVC has softeners that evaporate over the years and then the part becomes brittle and cracks so seein actually cracked gears made me think of PVC. I actually thinking about getting a 8640 Sometimes, altough its a old box it still has pretty darn good phasenoise which sometimes you needm its also very clean. The priority has just shifted a bit because i recently got a SMHU58 and this one has a phasenoise floor thats almost as good maybe even better and goes to 4GHz Metalworking to me is primarily a hobby so i dont look for financial gratification, yes normally you wouldnt make a part you can buy for $2 BUT as usual there are situations you will, one of them is when you want to make the part better, if you have a $2 gear thats made out of lousy chinese crap metal and is bound to break again in two month and you know by making one out of good high carbon steel you can have one that lasts 10years then you may think about it again, another thing is that what costs $2 today may not be available at all tomorrow ! The other reason is learning, if you want to learn certain operations or teach somebody else skills then you may not look at the pricetag or hours you spend ! Last but not least there is gratification, nothing is more gratifying then looking at something you have build with your own hands and equipment ! I deeply despise this "why do it if you can buy it cheaper" attitude, this has gotten us into the whole chinese mess to begin with ! i rather spend $50 in material and tools and know the money goes to US companies to make a gear then to spend $2 that go straight overseas supporting foreign jobs and encourage US companies to move even more jobs there ! pdxoregonpete <pdxoregonpete@...> wrote: I'm sorry this has gone this way, I just offered to buy the junker and if someone lived in Reno could pick it up strip it keep the rest of it if they wanted to, and send someone like Chuck or a retired mechanical engineer I know draw up a set of plans then give them to someone with a hobber, Then post the details on mfg.com and maybe a Chinese shop would surprise us with the cost. There's just one gear thats not a simple one, Fig 5 near the bottom of the page -pete --- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "pdxoregonpete" <pdxoregonpete@...> wrote: > > Any in or near Reno ? there is a 8640B in really bad shape > on E-B*** starting bid $1, I'd toss in a couple $'s, if someone > got it and didn't have to pay shipping, and get a good set of > drawings for the gears, and let Lothar have them to see what > it would take to make a few sets. > > -pete > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around |
Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
lothar baier
the gear shown on this page would be quite expensive, reason beein that this gear has two parts, the straight part is easy and can be hobbed, the other part that is slanted is not as easy, it cant be hobbed at least not on the hobber i have so the manufacturing steps would start making the blanks then using a dividing head and mill to cut the teeth on the slanted part one by one and then hob the other part
a gear like this would definatlt satisfy the 5hr estimate chuck gave, performing the indexing calculations for the dividing head alone is a b.... from first look i thought that the gears are made out of PVC and not delrin, usually PVC has softeners that evaporate over the years and then the part becomes brittle and cracks so seein actually cracked gears made me think of PVC. I actually thinking about getting a 8640 Sometimes, altough its a old box it still has pretty darn good phasenoise which sometimes you needm its also very clean. The priority has just shifted a bit because i recently got a SMHU58 and this one has a phasenoise floor thats almost as good maybe even better and goes to 4GHz Metalworking to me is primarily a hobby so i dont look for financial gratification, yes normally you wouldnt make a part you can buy for $2 BUT as usual there are situations you will, one of them is when you want to make the part better, if you have a $2 gear thats made out of lousy chinese crap metal and is bound to break again in two month and you know by making one out of good high carbon steel you can have one that lasts 10years then you may think about it again, another thing is that what costs $2 today may not be available at all tomorrow ! The other reason is learning, if you want to learn certain operations or teach somebody else skills then you may not look at the pricetag or hours you spend ! Last but not least there is gratification, nothing is more gratifying then looking at something you have build with your own hands and equipment ! I deeply despise this "why do it if you can buy it cheaper" attitude, this has gotten us into the whole chinese mess to begin with ! i rather spend $50 in material and tools and know the money goes to US companies to make a gear then to spend $2 that go straight overseas supporting foreign jobs and encourage US companies to move even more jobs there ! pdxoregonpete <pdxoregonpete@...> wrote: I'm sorry this has gone this way, I just offered to buy the junker and if someone lived in Reno could pick it up strip it keep the rest of it if they wanted to, and send someone like Chuck or a retired mechanical engineer I know draw up a set of plans then give them to someone with a hobber, Then post the details on mfg.com and maybe a Chinese shop would surprise us with the cost. There's just one gear thats not a simple one, Fig 5 near the bottom of the page -pete --- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "pdxoregonpete" <pdxoregonpete@...> wrote:
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around |
Re: 8566B YTM
lothar baier
i dont know of anyone right of the batt but if you want to i can take a look, i have a good lab and bonding capabilities, if i can get the mixer to work you pay me for the diodes and an hour of labor ( about $70)
Tom Dawson <wb3akd@...> wrote: Is anyone refurbishing the YTM's from 8566b's these days? Looks like mine is smoked, about -27 dB amplitude error above 2 GHz. regards Tom __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around |
Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
lothar baier
i agree on the fact that hobbs are expensive but i have about 120 hobs that came with the machine,
Any lathe has threading capabilities and you need a lathe anyways to make the disks you cut your gears out of, you wont need any heat treating of the hob since you are only cutting plastic, a good quality toolsteel will do for that Apparantly you havent been much around machining, i really dont know where you get the 5hours from, setup of your hobber takes about 1hr max and that includes calculating your index and feed gears, the cutting process in itself is depending on the ammount of teeths on your gear and the feedrate you can run, if you use forced air cooling on delrin or PVC you can generally run a good rate so the overall time to cut is about 10minutes 30minutes the most ! i have cut gears on hobbing machines in the past helping out in my brothers shop, those were gears used in CASE harvesters and they only took about 1hr/piece to hob, keep min mind that they were much larger in size ! There is no such thing as a manual hobber either, all hobbers are automatic, after setting it up you pull a lever and the machine automatically does its thing, after the gear is cut it returns to its starting position. On low precision gears like this you can take a rod thats several inches long and cut the teeth on it, after you get done you pack it on the lathe and cut it in the individual gears. Chuck Harris <cfharris@...> wrote: Bob Groschen wrote: .... Cheaper, it is not. Hobbing machines require hobbs to work. HobbsWhy would youBecause it's cheaper than the alternatives? Because it's his/her are very expensive to buy, and difficult to make. At a minimum, you need a lathe with threading capability, and a milling machine. If you are planning on making more than a couple gears, you will need heat treating capability, and a very fancy grinder to sharpen the hobb. Oh, and about 5-6 hours of time if you are using manual machines, and you know what you are doing. I rebuild test equipment because I want to. If need had anything toThat's great. I rebuild for need and want too. So, let's see, at the time I made this offer, there were at least a half dozenIf you recall, 5 or 6 months ago, I offered to spec all of theApparently I'm not the only one who believes that this effort you propose of you guys scrabbling about for gears, or gear fixes. That works out to what about $30 each? I have no problem giving away that many sets of gears. An 8640B is about 50 lbs in its birthday suit and UPS is famous forIf you pack test equipment like it is trash, then that is what you will get when it passes through the shipping system. I have shipped numerous big items, like 141T's, and 8640B's UPS, and they have never broken even one. It really isn't all that hard to pack this stuff properly. UPS will even tell you how to do it. So you propose exchanging a couple hundred dollar generator for theThen do so. You have the gears, and the desire. What's stopping you? I for one don't give a rat's ass for the drawings.The drawings were for the future. HP gave you all of the HP part numbers, but they are no longer any good. McMaster-Carr part numbers will one day change too, but a drawing specifying the diametral pitches, tooth counts, width, and any modifications that may be necessary to the hubs would be good forever. All I would need is a generic mechanical description of the part(s). McMaster-Carr P/N'sThat's cool Bob, but I don't have an 8640B, and I don't particularly want one. You apparently do, so don't be selfish, tear it apart, and spec the gears. You won't see one dime for your effort, you might break your 8640B in the process, but you will be making a whole bunch of guys happy. -Chuck Harris __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around |
Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
pdxoregonpete
I'm sorry this has gone this way, I just offered to buy
the junker and if someone lived in Reno could pick it up strip it keep the rest of it if they wanted to, and send someone like Chuck or a retired mechanical engineer I know draw up a set of plans then give them to someone with a hobber, Then post the details on mfg.com and maybe a Chinese shop would surprise us with the cost. There's just one gear thats not a simple one, Fig 5 near the bottom of the page -pete --- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "pdxoregonpete" <pdxoregonpete@...> wrote:
|
Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
lothar baier wrote:
Some things or actually a lot of things we do for a hobby have nothing to do with logic, sometimes you just do thingsI wouldn't argue against that, I have tens of thousands of dollars in my machine shop. But I still won't waste my time hobbing a gear that I can buy for $2. I would rather spend my shop time on things that would be too expensive to purchase, if I could buy them at all. Why would somebody want to fix testequipment or build a ham radio rig ? it cheaper to buy especially if you put in all the timeYou are in luck, the HP gears are already delrin on brass hubs. Like nylon, delrin shrinks continually. Unfortunately, the brass hubs do not, so given time, the gear will break at one of its roots. PVC is a pain because it leaves a I am not sure what PVC has to do with anything proposed. bunch of burrs that need to be removed, the other side of PVC is that it becomes brittle over the years, normally theAnd that information is what I was going to provide to the group. If you hobb the gears, and make them available for sale, you will quickly discover that you have to charge something for your time, tooling and materials. Suddenly, you will see why metal gears are so damned expensive... custom gears even more so. If you are using manually operated machines (at $350, I think you are), between blanking the gears, and hobbing the teeth, you will have several hours in each gear you make. US microwave engineers with experience are making what these days? $90K to $130K? That works out to $40 to $60/hour paid to the engineer. They cost their companies 2 to 3 times that much. I don't think the guys that hang out on this group are going to be willing to pay you $200 per gear. If you charge $5 per gear, your wife will divorce you. I offered several gear *sets* at the cost of one broken 8640B OPT/1/2/3. My price exceeded what the market would bear... even though I would essentially be working for free. -Chuck Harris |
Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
Bob Groschen wrote:
... Cheaper, it is not. Hobbing machines require hobbs to work. HobbsWhy would youBecause it's cheaper than the alternatives? Because it's his/her are very expensive to buy, and difficult to make. At a minimum, you need a lathe with threading capability, and a milling machine. If you are planning on making more than a couple gears, you will need heat treating capability, and a very fancy grinder to sharpen the hobb. Oh, and about 5-6 hours of time if you are using manual machines, and you know what you are doing. I rebuild test equipment because I want to. If need had anything toThat's great. I rebuild for need and want too. So, let's see, at the time I made this offer, there were at least a half dozenIf you recall, 5 or 6 months ago, I offered to spec all of theApparently I'm not the only one who believes that this effort you propose of you guys scrabbling about for gears, or gear fixes. That works out to what about $30 each? I have no problem giving away that many sets of gears. An 8640B is about 50 lbs in its birthday suit and UPS is famous forIf you pack test equipment like it is trash, then that is what you will get when it passes through the shipping system. I have shipped numerous big items, like 141T's, and 8640B's UPS, and they have never broken even one. It really isn't all that hard to pack this stuff properly. UPS will even tell you how to do it. So you propose exchanging a couple hundred dollar generator for theThen do so. You have the gears, and the desire. What's stopping you? I for one don't give a rat's ass for the drawings.The drawings were for the future. HP gave you all of the HP part numbers, but they are no longer any good. McMaster-Carr part numbers will one day change too, but a drawing specifying the diametral pitches, tooth counts, width, and any modifications that may be necessary to the hubs would be good forever. All I would need is a generic mechanical description of the part(s). McMaster-Carr P/N'sThat's cool Bob, but I don't have an 8640B, and I don't particularly want one. You apparently do, so don't be selfish, tear it apart, and spec the gears. You won't see one dime for your effort, you might break your 8640B in the process, but you will be making a whole bunch of guys happy. -Chuck Harris |
Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
lothar baier
Some things or actually a lot of things we do for a hobby have nothing to do with logic, sometimes you just do things for fun, i have about $350 in the hobber including all acessories, i bought it not to make money but i figured that its a nice complement to my metal hobby shop and $350 is a ammount that i can justify spending on a hobby !
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Why would somebody want to fix testequipment or build a ham radio rig ? it cheaper to buy especially if you put in all the time you spend - you do it for fun and to learn something, you gain alot of valuable skills by practicing - as it says practice makes perfect, the other reason is that you have control over your parts and even if they are not available anymore down the road you can still make them and fix your equipment, also you can make them better by using more advanced materials. Plastic gears normally are not hobbed except if you use delrin, PVC is a pain because it leaves a bunch of burrs that need to be removed, the other side of PVC is that it becomes brittle over the years, normally the gears HP used were made in a very crude way - injection molding which has a high yield and is cheaper in Qty. My idea is to either use delrin or aluminum, the forces on the flanks of those gears are not very high and the rotating speed is very slow so by far the specs are no challenge. All you need to know to make them is the number of teeth , the diameter and the pressure angle, height and id of the gear. Bob Groschen <rpgroschen@...> wrote: ----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Harris" <cfharris@...> To: <hp_agilent_equipment@...> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 8:27 PM Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1 All of the gears are available off the shelf.Yes, this is correct. Why would youBecause it's cheaper than the alternatives? Because it's his/her hobby? Because they want to? I rebuild test equipment because I want to. If need had anything to do with it, my collection would be reduced to a tiny fraction of its size. If you recall, 5 or 6 months ago, I offered to spec all of theApparently I'm not the only one who believes that this effort you propose is not worth the expense in acquiring and shipping a 8640B, particularily one with the most desirable options. If stripped of options, an 8640B can be had for about $100- $150. Adding in those options easily doubles the price, for a dead or cirppled one. Shipping alone would cost $60 - $75 on top of the acquisition price. An 8640B is about 50 lbs in its birthday suit and UPS is famous for pulverizing anything this heavy. I have limited experience with FedEx and items this heavy, but they appear to be better than UPS for a slightly higher shipping charge. So you propose exchanging a couple hundred dollar generator for the info on what, a half dozen off-the-shelf gears? I'm sorry Chuck, but for me that's a stretch. For the same effort, I could ship just the gears to any of a half dozen mechanical engineering friends, get the same info and still get the gears back. I for one don't give a rat's ass for the drawings. All I would need is a generic mechanical description of the part(s). McMaster-Carr P/N's would be nice (assuming they have them) but not necessary, as I can use catalogs & the internet as well as the next person. Best Regards, Bob Groschen Monument, CO __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around |
Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Harris" <cfharris@...> To: <hp_agilent_equipment@...> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 8:27 PM Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1 All of the gears are available off the shelf.Yes, this is correct. Why would youBecause it's cheaper than the alternatives? Because it's his/her hobby? Because they want to? I rebuild test equipment because I want to. If need had anything to do with it, my collection would be reduced to a tiny fraction of its size. If you recall, 5 or 6 months ago, I offered to spec all of theApparently I'm not the only one who believes that this effort you propose is not worth the expense in acquiring and shipping a 8640B, particularily one with the most desirable options. If stripped of options, an 8640B can be had for about $100- $150. Adding in those options easily doubles the price, for a dead or cirppled one. Shipping alone would cost $60 - $75 on top of the acquisition price. An 8640B is about 50 lbs in its birthday suit and UPS is famous for pulverizing anything this heavy. I have limited experience with FedEx and items this heavy, but they appear to be better than UPS for a slightly higher shipping charge. So you propose exchanging a couple hundred dollar generator for the info on what, a half dozen off-the-shelf gears? I'm sorry Chuck, but for me that's a stretch. For the same effort, I could ship just the gears to any of a half dozen mechanical engineering friends, get the same info and still get the gears back. I for one don't give a rat's ass for the drawings. All I would need is a generic mechanical description of the part(s). McMaster-Carr P/N's would be nice (assuming they have them) but not necessary, as I can use catalogs & the internet as well as the next person. Best Regards, Bob Groschen Monument, CO |
Re: opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
All of the gears are available off the shelf. Why would you
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
want to hobb them? If you recall, 5 or 6 months ago, I offered to spec all of the 8640B gears, put the detailed drawings and part numbers in the files section of this group, for anyone to use, and to make gear sets available, for a reasonable (read cheap) price. All I asked in return was for someone to buy/give me an 8640B option 1,2,3... complete, but in unknown electrical condition to use in making the measurements. Nobody was interested. So, not having an 8640B to work from, I did nothing. Has something changed? -Chuck Harris pdxoregonpete wrote: Any in or near Reno ? there is a 8640B in really bad shape |
opertunity to have uWaveEngineer1968 test his gear hobber - 8640B for $1
pdxoregonpete
Any in or near Reno ? there is a 8640B in really bad shape
on E-B*** starting bid $1, I'd toss in a couple $'s, if someone got it and didn't have to pay shipping, and get a good set of drawings for the gears, and let Lothar have them to see what it would take to make a few sets. -pete |
mechanical parts
microwaveengineer1968
Well i always believe in sharing when i find something good, usually im
not for promoting any company on a newsgroup but im using this one for quite awhile and i think some of you guys may find it usefull ! In my line of work you require a lot of mechanical parts mostly housings, horn antennas or filters all of them requiring a fair ammount of machining mostly lathe and milling, altough i like pittling around with machines -and im quite profficient in using them- it is sometimes too time consuming or your home machines dont have the accuracy. There is a website i discovered called MFG.COM basically you upload a drawing and the qty desired and then shops from around the country bid on the job, you can then select the cheapest one and award the job, they have a feedback system similar to ebay so you can look at what other people had to say about the guy I know this is not testequipment related but i think its a good website, i got most of my housings machined for $10 or less, the registration is free. |
Re: 8510B software update
lothar baier
the tape is matched to the serial# of the unit, you can swap the board but not the tape, you would have to find the area where the serial# information resides on the board and then change the serial# to match the other card , essentially "clone" the card, then it would work , usually HP put this info in a EEPROM usually a XICOR part, but i dont know what part they used on the 8510B
jfphp <jfphp@...> wrote: I have recently got a 8510B software 4.0 with option time domain and would like to upgrade (the display)to a more recent version. A friend has the latest, 6.35 with the same option : we have swapped the EEPROM boards and, no problem, I am running his latest version : conclusion, the CPU and ROM boards are not matched. He downloaded his latest op system on 2 cassettes but impossible to download the cassettes to upgrade my display. What is the trick ? All the CPU and EEPROM boards have some PAL and EPROM with exactly the same part number.The brute solution would be to desolder all the EEPROMS (2X2X9 chips) and copy each separately, a lot of pins and time consuming, perhaps with a flame thrower but I am not sure if the friend will agree...... Is there a more intelligent solution to overcome the protection ? Thanks __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around |
8510B software update
I have recently got a 8510B software 4.0 with option time domain and
would like to upgrade (the display)to a more recent version. A friend has the latest, 6.35 with the same option : we have swapped the EEPROM boards and, no problem, I am running his latest version : conclusion, the CPU and ROM boards are not matched. He downloaded his latest op system on 2 cassettes but impossible to download the cassettes to upgrade my display. What is the trick ? All the CPU and EEPROM boards have some PAL and EPROM with exactly the same part number.The brute solution would be to desolder all the EEPROMS (2X2X9 chips) and copy each separately, a lot of pins and time consuming, perhaps with a flame thrower but I am not sure if the friend will agree...... Is there a more intelligent solution to overcome the protection ? Thanks |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss