¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Amos Ku
 

Stuart,

Sorry, forgot to tell you. I am also an design engineer working in an R&D company. On my job, I need to develop all level of electronics. I would like to have some decent equipment that I can do some measurements. I do not want to always wait until I come to work everyday. I want to be able to do some at the leisure of my home.

On top of my job, I am also an ambitious hobbyist who wishes to build and test things at home. I think spectrum analyzer is a good tool to have.

Yes, you are right. I do not need to have it. However, I just came across a broken one on ebay and I thought getting one may help me to do more interesting research of my own and help to boost my growth in my job related knowledge.

Everyone has different needs and some are satisfied with low end equipment. Some may be a little ambitious and want to always go a little further than most other people.

Amos



________________________________
From: "stuartl73@..." <stuartl73@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...


?
Amos, in all honesty I don't know why you want a spectrum analyzer. They do two things; measure frequency (to some accuracy up to and including frequency counter resolution) and measure RF power or voltage, across a known low return loss impedance, again to some accuracy depending on the age and cost of the analyzer. In all but the newest and most expensive analyzers, time is not displayed against frequency and amplitude.

You now state that you are willing to give up the ability to accurately measure the signal level. You might as well buy an inexpensive frequency counter and RF power meter. That costs less and takes up a lot less bench space .For my needs, I would rather have my Spectrum Analyzer.

Stuart K6YAZ

Los Angeles, California

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Ku <amosku@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 1:12 pm
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Stuart,

I think before I can afford that attenuator, probably I may just calculate the loss and attenuation and buy appropriate attenuators when they are needed each time...

Amos

________________________________
From: "stuartl73@..." <stuartl73@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Amos, what you are dealing with is an attenuator specifically made for that one instrument. They are in short supply and are crucial for the analyzer to work properly and to display the actual input level on both the screen and readout LED.
Anything but the proper part will degrade the instrument, and possibly create a "Frankenstein's monster", with outboard "fixes". I hope you realize that you are involved in a possibly very expensive and time consuming project; and may have to settle for "good enough" rather than a 100% reliable, accurate instrument.

Stuart

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Ku <amosku@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@... <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 11:24 am
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Will,

Yeah. I have thought about this option too. But that means I have to give up the ability to internally choose attenuation.

Right now, I am facing the issue of choosing the cable that go between the RF connector and the coax switch (K2). No experience on choosing or specifying one before.....

Amos

________________________________
From: "w0eom@..." <w0eom@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Amos - you can use an external atten. to keep the input signal below +20
dbm.

Will

In a message dated 8/31/2011 1:06:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
amosku@... writes:

Hi all,

With help from friends in this group, I have found the schematics in the
manual, and I also identified the five missing parts in the HP 8565A that I
cheaply bought from ebay.

Now, I found it difficult to find a cheap source for 08565-60084
attenuator.

Does any one know the replacement part for 08565-60084 (A34, RF
attenuator) in HP 8565A? It does not seem to be easy to obtain this attenuator
($400). I wonder if anyone knows any information about this attenuator.

If obtaining one is difficult, what options do I have?

Also, I wonder if this attenuator is really needed to make the system work.

Thanks in advance.

Amos



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

 

Amos, in all honesty I don't know why you want a spectrum analyzer. They do two things; measure frequency (to some accuracy up to and including frequency counter resolution) and measure RF power or voltage, across a known low return loss impedance, again to some accuracy depending on the age and cost of the analyzer. In all but the newest and most expensive analyzers, time is not displayed against frequency and amplitude.

You now state that you are willing to give up the ability to accurately measure the signal level. You might as well buy an inexpensive frequency counter and RF power meter. That costs less and takes up a lot less bench space .For my needs, I would rather have my Spectrum Analyzer.

Stuart K6YAZ

Los Angeles, California

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Ku <amosku@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 1:12 pm
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...





Stuart,

I think before I can afford that attenuator, probably I may just calculate the loss and attenuation and buy appropriate attenuators when they are needed each time...

Amos

________________________________
From: "stuartl73@..." <stuartl73@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...


Amos, what you are dealing with is an attenuator specifically made for that one instrument. They are in short supply and are crucial for the analyzer to work properly and to display the actual input level on both the screen and readout LED.
Anything but the proper part will degrade the instrument, and possibly create a "Frankenstein's monster", with outboard "fixes". I hope you realize that you are involved in a possibly very expensive and time consuming project; and may have to settle for "good enough" rather than a 100% reliable, accurate instrument.

Stuart

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Ku <amosku@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@... <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 11:24 am
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Will,

Yeah. I have thought about this option too. But that means I have to give up the ability to internally choose attenuation.

Right now, I am facing the issue of choosing the cable that go between the RF connector and the coax switch (K2). No experience on choosing or specifying one before.....

Amos

________________________________
From: "w0eom@..." <w0eom@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Amos - you can use an external atten. to keep the input signal below +20
dbm.

Will

In a message dated 8/31/2011 1:06:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
amosku@... writes:

Hi all,

With help from friends in this group, I have found the schematics in the
manual, and I also identified the five missing parts in the HP 8565A that I
cheaply bought from ebay.

Now, I found it difficult to find a cheap source for 08565-60084
attenuator.

Does any one know the replacement part for 08565-60084 (A34, RF
attenuator) in HP 8565A? It does not seem to be easy to obtain this attenuator
($400). I wonder if anyone knows any information about this attenuator.

If obtaining one is difficult, what options do I have?

Also, I wonder if this attenuator is really needed to make the system work.

Thanks in advance.

Amos



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Amos Ku
 

Stuart,

I think before I can afford that attenuator, probably I may just calculate the loss and attenuation and buy appropriate attenuators when they are needed each time...


Amos



________________________________
From: "stuartl73@..." <stuartl73@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...


?
Amos, what you are dealing with is an attenuator specifically made for that one instrument. They are in short supply and are crucial for the analyzer to work properly and to display the actual input level on both the screen and readout LED.
Anything but the proper part will degrade the instrument, and possibly create a "Frankenstein's monster", with outboard "fixes". I hope you realize that you are involved in a possibly very expensive and time consuming project; and may have to settle for "good enough" rather than a 100% reliable, accurate instrument.

Stuart

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Ku <amosku@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@... <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 11:24 am
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Will,

Yeah. I have thought about this option too. But that means I have to give up the ability to internally choose attenuation.

Right now, I am facing the issue of choosing the cable that go between the RF connector and the coax switch (K2). No experience on choosing or specifying one before.....

Amos

________________________________
From: "w0eom@..." <w0eom@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Amos - you can use an external atten. to keep the input signal below +20
dbm.

Will

In a message dated 8/31/2011 1:06:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
amosku@... writes:

Hi all,

With help from friends in this group, I have found the schematics in the
manual, and I also identified the five missing parts in the HP 8565A that I
cheaply bought from ebay.

Now, I found it difficult to find a cheap source for 08565-60084
attenuator.

Does any one know the replacement part for 08565-60084 (A34, RF
attenuator) in HP 8565A? It does not seem to be easy to obtain this attenuator
($400). I wonder if anyone knows any information about this attenuator.

If obtaining one is difficult, what options do I have?

Also, I wonder if this attenuator is really needed to make the system work.

Thanks in advance.

Amos

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

 

Amos; You may learn a lot by working on this project, but the knowledge and results may not be what you expected. I've had to abandon similar projects when I replaced one suspect part only to find out there was another problem revealed by the replacement. When you get to the point where a part or assembly isn't available at a reasonable price, or time-frame, where do you go?
The 8656A represents the state of the art, at that time, and relies on a lot of specialized components working reliably together. HP had a real advantage because they designed and built a unique RF attenuator. They were so good that many were sold to other companies to use in their products. My Gigatronics model 600 signal generator (10 to 8000 MHz) uses a special HP programmable attenuator, and is a major factor in it's success.

Stuart
K6YAZ
Los Angeles, California

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Ku <amosku@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@... <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 12:36 pm
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...





Stuart,

Good reasoning. This is my dilemma: 1. To get the system up and working by any condition, 2. Or spend more money to get the complete system. Unless I can run into someone sells cheap on ebay, I may have to get stuck with this attenuator if I am choosing option 2.

Amos

________________________________
From: "stuartl73@..." <stuartl73@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...


Amos, what you are dealing with is an attenuator specifically made for that one instrument. They are in short supply and are crucial for the analyzer to work properly and to display the actual input level on both the screen and readout LED.
Anything but the proper part will degrade the instrument, and possibly create a "Frankenstein's monster", with outboard "fixes". I hope you realize that you are involved in a possibly very expensive and time consuming project; and may have to settle for "good enough" rather than a 100% reliable, accurate instrument.

Stuart

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Ku <amosku@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@... <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 11:24 am
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Will,

Yeah. I have thought about this option too. But that means I have to give up the ability to internally choose attenuation.

Right now, I am facing the issue of choosing the cable that go between the RF connector and the coax switch (K2). No experience on choosing or specifying one before.....

Amos

________________________________
From: "w0eom@..." <w0eom@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Amos - you can use an external atten. to keep the input signal below +20
dbm.

Will

In a message dated 8/31/2011 1:06:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
amosku@... writes:

Hi all,

With help from friends in this group, I have found the schematics in the
manual, and I also identified the five missing parts in the HP 8565A that I
cheaply bought from ebay.

Now, I found it difficult to find a cheap source for 08565-60084
attenuator.

Does any one know the replacement part for 08565-60084 (A34, RF
attenuator) in HP 8565A? It does not seem to be easy to obtain this attenuator
($400). I wonder if anyone knows any information about this attenuator.

If obtaining one is difficult, what options do I have?

Also, I wonder if this attenuator is really needed to make the system work.

Thanks in advance.

Amos



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

 


Re: Favorite bad capacitor debugging techniques?

J. Forster
 

Most people sdon't use a real (GR or HP) to measure ESR.

-John

=================



Fred, after your message, I got to thinking about my previous measurements

(of that replacement capacitor). My ESR readings looked *way* too low, so
I re-measured a NOS Sprague 1000 uF cap today, using the GR 1689 LCR
Digibridge.

Today, a good 1000 uF cap measured:

Test
Freq.........Capacitance...........D...................ESR.............
120 Hz..............999.21 uF.........0.0857..........0.11493 ohm...
1 kHz................952.74 uF..........0.4704.........0.07851 ohm...
10 kHz..............844.97 uF..........?????...........0.07212 ohm...

Because my earlier measurements were 9 months ago, I'm not entirely sure
which LCR meter I used for that project.

Anyway, I think today's measurements are more believable. Maybe I had a
"short between the headsets" so to speak 9 months ago during the original
measurement?

John, the GR 1689 LCR Digibridge automatically switches from "Capacitance"
to "Resistance" mode if your cap is shorted. In other words, it's
immediately obvious your cap is shorted. IIRC, the same would be obvious
if you're using a HP LCR meter.

-Greg


----- Original Message -----
From: Pa4tim
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Favorite bad capacitor debugging
techniques?



What model ESR meter you use ? I guess a HP bridgde. With 6.5 digits this
is not one of the ESR "indicator" kits. How low can you measure.
I use an analog meter, it goes upto 40 ohm ( but I made it non lineair for
better resolution under 1 ohm, and accurate down to 100nF. But I think I
change this and make it switchable between 1 ohm full scale and 40 ohm. (
not that this is important because if the meter corners it is good, the
last cm on the scale is 1 Ohm so about 50 mOhm resolution)

Fred PA4TIM





Re: Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Amos Ku
 

Stuart,

Good reasoning. This is my dilemma: 1. To get the system up and working by any condition, 2. Or spend more money to get the complete system. Unless I can run into someone sells cheap on ebay, I may have to get stuck with this attenuator if I am choosing option 2.


Amos



________________________________
From: "stuartl73@..." <stuartl73@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...


?
Amos, what you are dealing with is an attenuator specifically made for that one instrument. They are in short supply and are crucial for the analyzer to work properly and to display the actual input level on both the screen and readout LED.
Anything but the proper part will degrade the instrument, and possibly create a "Frankenstein's monster", with outboard "fixes". I hope you realize that you are involved in a possibly very expensive and time consuming project; and may have to settle for "good enough" rather than a 100% reliable, accurate instrument.

Stuart

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Ku <amosku@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@... <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 11:24 am
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Will,

Yeah. I have thought about this option too. But that means I have to give up the ability to internally choose attenuation.

Right now, I am facing the issue of choosing the cable that go between the RF connector and the coax switch (K2). No experience on choosing or specifying one before.....

Amos

________________________________
From: "w0eom@..." <w0eom@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Amos - you can use an external atten. to keep the input signal below +20
dbm.

Will

In a message dated 8/31/2011 1:06:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
amosku@... writes:

Hi all,

With help from friends in this group, I have found the schematics in the
manual, and I also identified the five missing parts in the HP 8565A that I
cheaply bought from ebay.

Now, I found it difficult to find a cheap source for 08565-60084
attenuator.

Does any one know the replacement part for 08565-60084 (A34, RF
attenuator) in HP 8565A? It does not seem to be easy to obtain this attenuator
($400). I wonder if anyone knows any information about this attenuator.

If obtaining one is difficult, what options do I have?

Also, I wonder if this attenuator is really needed to make the system work.

Thanks in advance.

Amos

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

 

Amos, what you are dealing with is an attenuator specifically made for that one instrument. They are in short supply and are crucial for the analyzer to work properly and to display the actual input level on both the screen and readout LED.
Anything but the proper part will degrade the instrument, and possibly create a "Frankenstein's monster", with outboard "fixes". I hope you realize that you are involved in a possibly very expensive and time consuming project; and may have to settle for "good enough" rather than a 100% reliable, accurate instrument.

Stuart

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Ku <amosku@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@... <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 11:24 am
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...





Will,

Yeah. I have thought about this option too. But that means I have to give up the ability to internally choose attenuation.

Right now, I am facing the issue of choosing the cable that go between the RF connector and the coax switch (K2). No experience on choosing or specifying one before.....

Amos

________________________________
From: "w0eom@..." <w0eom@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...


Amos - you can use an external atten. to keep the input signal below +20
dbm.

Will

In a message dated 8/31/2011 1:06:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
amosku@... writes:

Hi all,

With help from friends in this group, I have found the schematics in the
manual, and I also identified the five missing parts in the HP 8565A that I
cheaply bought from ebay.

Now, I found it difficult to find a cheap source for 08565-60084
attenuator.

Does any one know the replacement part for 08565-60084 (A34, RF
attenuator) in HP 8565A? It does not seem to be easy to obtain this attenuator
($400). I wonder if anyone knows any information about this attenuator.

If obtaining one is difficult, what options do I have?

Also, I wonder if this attenuator is really needed to make the system work.

Thanks in advance.

Amos



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

Amos Ku
 

Will,

Yeah. I have thought about this option too. But that means I have to give up the ability to internally choose attenuation.

Right now, I am facing the issue of choosing the cable that go between the RF connector and the coax switch (K2). No experience on choosing or specifying one before.....



Amos



________________________________
From: "w0eom@..." <w0eom@...>
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...


?
Amos - you can use an external atten. to keep the input signal below +20
dbm.

Will


In a message dated 8/31/2011 1:06:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
amosku@... writes:

Hi all,

With help from friends in this group, I have found the schematics in the
manual, and I also identified the five missing parts in the HP 8565A that I
cheaply bought from ebay.

Now, I found it difficult to find a cheap source for 08565-60084
attenuator.

Does any one know the replacement part for 08565-60084 (A34, RF
attenuator) in HP 8565A? It does not seem to be easy to obtain this attenuator
($400). I wonder if anyone knows any information about this attenuator.

If obtaining one is difficult, what options do I have?

Also, I wonder if this attenuator is really needed to make the system work.

Thanks in advance.

Amos

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Favorite bad capacitor debugging techniques?

 

You are right.

I have seen caps that lost allmost all capacitance with perfect ESR, i have seen caps that leaked over 15 mA at 350V, blew out a lot of dielectrium but still perfect ESR.
I have seen caps with good capacitance, no leakage but bad ESR.
I have seen a cap with a internal ripped or broken conductor. That lookes like severe dielectric absorbsion. ( is that called soakage ?) capacitance not possible to measure because you could not unload the cap. It gave 100 V on the voltmeter and even if you short it, no effect.

I use a ESR meter just for fun, i like to examine components. In switchers I use it to test caps, not to find a problem. I used to do that but not any more. I measure with scope and DMM and as a result of that I most times find the problem. After I find it, and it is a cap I use the ESR meter, C meter and test DC leakage to be sure and for fun.

Fred PA4TIM

Op 31 aug. 2011 om 19:58 heeft "J. Forster" <jfor@...> het volgende geschreven:

If a capacitor is pulling a bus down, an ESR meter is really not the right
tool. A short and a good cap both have a low ESR!

-John

===============


----- Original Message -----
From: "Pa4tim" <fredschneider@...>
To: <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Favorite bad capacitor
debugging techniques?


What model ESR meter you use ? I guess a HP bridgde. With
6.5 digits this is not one of the ESR "indicator" kits. How
low can you measure.
I use an analog meter, it goes upto 40 ohm ( but I made it
non lineair for better resolution under 1 ohm, and accurate
down to 100nF. But I think I change this and make it
switchable between 1 ohm full scale and 40 ohm. ( not that
this is important because if the meter corners it is good,
the last cm on the scale is 1 Ohm so about 50 mOhm
resolution)

Fred PA4TIM

FWIW, I usually check caps on a GR-1650-A but often
leakage is important and is not measured by the usual
impedance bridge. My usual arrangement is to use a small,
regulated DC power supply and a meter capable of indicating
quite low values of current. My Tektronix DMM goes low
enough. I've found paper caps that test good on the bridge
but have excessive leakage and won't work in some circuits.
Leakage is a primary test for electrolytics. There _are_
capacitance bridges like the GR 1617-A that will also
measure leakage and supply a variable bias internally but I
don't have one. A megohmeter will also do provided you have
one which will run at voltages suitable for the caps.



--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk@...


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Favorite bad capacitor debugging techniques?

J. Forster
 

If a capacitor is pulling a bus down, an ESR meter is really not the right
tool. A short and a good cap both have a low ESR!

-John

===============


----- Original Message -----
From: "Pa4tim" <fredschneider@...>
To: <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Favorite bad capacitor
debugging techniques?


What model ESR meter you use ? I guess a HP bridgde. With
6.5 digits this is not one of the ESR "indicator" kits. How
low can you measure.
I use an analog meter, it goes upto 40 ohm ( but I made it
non lineair for better resolution under 1 ohm, and accurate
down to 100nF. But I think I change this and make it
switchable between 1 ohm full scale and 40 ohm. ( not that
this is important because if the meter corners it is good,
the last cm on the scale is 1 Ohm so about 50 mOhm
resolution)

Fred PA4TIM

FWIW, I usually check caps on a GR-1650-A but often
leakage is important and is not measured by the usual
impedance bridge. My usual arrangement is to use a small,
regulated DC power supply and a meter capable of indicating
quite low values of current. My Tektronix DMM goes low
enough. I've found paper caps that test good on the bridge
but have excessive leakage and won't work in some circuits.
Leakage is a primary test for electrolytics. There _are_
capacitance bridges like the GR 1617-A that will also
measure leakage and supply a variable bias internally but I
don't have one. A megohmeter will also do provided you have
one which will run at voltages suitable for the caps.



--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk@...


Re: Favorite bad capacitor debugging techniques?

 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pa4tim" <fredschneider@...>
To: <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] Favorite bad capacitor debugging techniques?


What model ESR meter you use ? I guess a HP bridgde. With 6.5 digits this is not one of the ESR "indicator" kits. How low can you measure.
I use an analog meter, it goes upto 40 ohm ( but I made it non lineair for better resolution under 1 ohm, and accurate down to 100nF. But I think I change this and make it switchable between 1 ohm full scale and 40 ohm. ( not that this is important because if the meter corners it is good, the last cm on the scale is 1 Ohm so about 50 mOhm resolution)

Fred PA4TIM

FWIW, I usually check caps on a GR-1650-A but often leakage is important and is not measured by the usual impedance bridge. My usual arrangement is to use a small, regulated DC power supply and a meter capable of indicating quite low values of current. My Tektronix DMM goes low enough. I've found paper caps that test good on the bridge but have excessive leakage and won't work in some circuits. Leakage is a primary test for electrolytics. There _are_ capacitance bridges like the GR 1617-A that will also measure leakage and supply a variable bias internally but I don't have one. A megohmeter will also do provided you have one which will run at voltages suitable for the caps.



--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk@...


Re: Favorite bad capacitor debugging techniques?

 

What model ESR meter you use ? I guess a HP bridgde. With 6.5 digits this is not one of the ESR "indicator" kits. How low can you measure.
I use an analog meter, it goes upto 40 ohm ( but I made it non lineair for better resolution under 1 ohm, and accurate down to 100nF. But I think I change this and make it switchable between 1 ohm full scale and 40 ohm. ( not that this is important because if the meter corners it is good, the last cm on the scale is 1 Ohm so about 50 mOhm resolution)

Fred PA4TIM

Op 31 aug. 2011 om 18:40 heeft "tcxo" <tcxoe@...> het volgende geschreven:

I typically end-up disconnecting each high-value aluminum electrolytic capacitor in order to test it.

Here's an example of my "Before" and "After" measurements of an aluminum electrolytic cap that was used in the switch-mode power supply of an instrument:

Symptom: Unit will no longer switch from ¡°Standby¡± to ¡°On¡± mode.

Failed 1000uF 10VDC electrolytic cap on power supply board

Bad Hong (Chinese) cap, 2 years old

Test Freq.
Capacitance
D
ESR

120 Hz
391 uF
3.58
12.04 ohms

1 kHz
154.3 uF
10.6
10.88 ohms

10 kHz
23.2 uF
14.1
9.88 ohms


Replacement Cap measured

Test Freq.
Capacitance
D
ESR

120 Hz
1001 uF
0.071
0.000093 ohm

1 kHz
952 uF
0.344
0.000057 ohm

10 kHz
855 uF
0.326
0.000051 ohm


Luckily most aluminum electrolytics HP used in the "good old days" seem to have lasted for several decades - but as you know, are finally beginning to fail in some circuits, especially where near higher temperatures.

By comparison, some Chinese brands of aluminum electrolytic caps (produced during the last 10 years) are failing much sooner, e.g., something like 2 to 6 years of use.

Google "capacitor plague" for more information about that problem.

-Greg

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Favorite bad capacitor debugging techniques?

Chris Moore
 

Hi,

If they are in fact vertical mounted AXIAL caps, then you could cut one lead, test the cap, then solder the lead back together.

Chris

--- On Tue, 8/30/11, David Speck <Dave@...> wrote:

From: David Speck <Dave@...>
Subject: [hp_agilent_equipment] Favorite bad capacitor debugging techniques?
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2011, 11:55 PM







?









Looking over the list, I have noted that the majority of problems with

old equipment is failure of the electrolytic capacitors in the power

supplies over time.



I wonder if the veterans can offer any suggestions on their favorite

techniques for finding bad caps in circuit, especially those that have

not been so considerate to have blown their end caps off or otherwise

developed obvious physical failures.



I have a critical undocumented circuit board of relatively recent

construction with about 25 vertically mounted axial lead caps. It's

begun eating fuses at an increasing rate, and now, even a 2 amp fuse

blows instantly in a slot intended for a half amp fuse. No way to lift

one lead of the cap without pulling it out of the PCB, with the

attendant risk of ruining the irreplaceable board. (well, I could

replace it for another $6-7,000, but that's not in the budget this week!)



I figured I could put in another 2 amp fuse, and run it on a Variac at

reduced voltage while watching the current consumption, and see what

component heats up, but I really don't want to trash the microcomputer

on the board.



Any one have suggestions for any specific low voltage instruments for

in-circuit cap checking, or home-brew gimmicks that one can work up, to

give better information than the typical DVM and scope?



Thanks in advance,



Dave


Re: Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A...

 

Amos - you can use an external atten. to keep the input signal below +20
dbm.

Will

In a message dated 8/31/2011 1:06:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
amosku@... writes:




Hi all,

With help from friends in this group, I have found the schematics in the
manual, and I also identified the five missing parts in the HP 8565A that I
cheaply bought from ebay.

Now, I found it difficult to find a cheap source for 08565-60084
attenuator.

Does any one know the replacement part for 08565-60084 (A34, RF
attenuator) in HP 8565A? It does not seem to be easy to obtain this attenuator
($400). I wonder if anyone knows any information about this attenuator.

If obtaining one is difficult, what options do I have?

Also, I wonder if this attenuator is really needed to make the system work.

Thanks in advance.

Amos






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Favorite bad capacitor debugging techniques?

J. Forster
 

Some years ago, I had a Brother FAX with a PS that died. I was damned if I
was gonna pay well over $100 for a replacement PS.

Of course, there were no prints to be had. I got pissed and sucked off
every component and tested it. Turns out there was a 1 uF cap open. I got
my revenge because I subsequently found several more, with exactly the
same problem. A cap replacement fixed every one.

Bottom line, get a Pace sucker if you do any PCB repair work.

Best,

-John

==============

One thing I would never do is put in a bigger fuse.
A switcher might not start up using a lightbulb.
Besides things allready named like following the current and looking for
low voltages i do the following:
If the instrument is still working I use my DVM to check DC levels and
ripple uing the duall display ( but with a good DVM in the AC position is
also possible) a el-cheapo meter will get confused by the mix of AC and DC
especially if it is a switcher. And often to be ure I use a scope to look
at ripple levels.
If it is not working, I desolder caps and test them on DC leakage,
capacitance and ESR. Diodes, resistors and tranistors I test in circuit if
possible. This with a DVM and a tracker. I use a Pace Sucker, they are
really great.
But I'm no oldtimer ;-)


Fred PA4TIM


----- Original Message -----
From: David Speck
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 7:55 PM
Subject: [hp_agilent_equipment] Favorite bad capacitor debugging
techniques?

Looking over the list, I have noted that the majority of problems with
old equipment is failure of the electrolytic capacitors in the power
supplies over time.

I wonder if the veterans can offer any suggestions on their favorite
techniques for finding bad caps in circuit, especially those that have
not been so considerate to have blown their end caps off or otherwise
developed obvious physical failures.

I have a critical undocumented circuit board of relatively recent
construction with about 25 vertically mounted axial lead caps. It's
begun eating fuses at an increasing rate, and now, even a 2 amp fuse
blows instantly in a slot intended for a half amp fuse. No way to lift
one lead of the cap without pulling it out of the PCB, with the
attendant risk of ruining the irreplaceable board. (well, I could
replace it for another $6-7,000, but that's not in the budget this
week!)

I figured I could put in another 2 amp fuse, and run it on a Variac at
reduced voltage while watching the current consumption, and see what
component heats up, but I really don't want to trash the microcomputer
on the board.

Any one have suggestions for any specific low voltage instruments for
in-circuit cap checking, or home-brew gimmicks that one can work up, to
give better information than the typical DVM and scope?

Thanks in advance,

Dave







Re: HP 204B Modifications.

 

2006. It's very straightforward.

--- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., Glydeck <glydeck@...> wrote:

Jeanette,

I had heard that as well. Do you remember what year the audio express article was published?

George

On Aug 30, 2011, at 7:26 AM, "Jeanette" <jdwalton@...> wrote:

There was such a modification in June and July issues of AudioXpress (which, I am going to guess, you don't have!). Uses a pair of 1N4742 12V 1W zeners to split the supply.

There's an important utility to running the oscillator off batteries -- you're going to get a much lower noise floor and no pesky 60, 120, 180Hz power supply artifacts. You can rebuild the battery packs with Nicads, or button cells and use the existing charge circuit, or use one of the intelligent charger chips from, for instance Texas Instruments (Unitrode.)

I rebuilt the battery pack of my HP3581 wave analyzer -- and it was worth the investment.

--- In hp_agilent_equipment@..., "willcoele@" <willcoele@> wrote:

I have three 204B oscillators I'm restoring. One had a problem where C2 (the 3 section, 1% capacitor) had a shorted section. I replaced the shorted section with single 1%, .3uF. Close enough for the Government!

My problem is, I'm converting the battery units to AC. It has a transformer a bridge rectifier and some filtering but secondary of the transformer isn't center tapped and it's not referenced to ground. I used a 7812 and a 7915 regulator to provide the +/- 12volts but when I wired it to the transformer the plus side dropped to 5.6 volts and the minus side was 37.6 volts. The plus side was drawing more current than the minus side. To balance it out I used a 15v Zener diode on the minus side and the plus side increased to 25.75 volts.

It appeared to be working but when the frequency was set to 250to 1KHz, there was a small amount ripple on the + 12v. To reduce the ripple, I used a 1000uF electrolytic on the +12v side.

Has anyone done a similar modification? Is there a better way?



Replacement for 08565-60084 attenuator in HP 8565A spectrum analyzer

Amos Ku
 

Hi all,

With help from friends in this group, I have found the schematics in the manual, and I also identified the five missing parts in the HP 8565A that I cheaply bought from ebay.

Now, I found it difficult to find a cheap source for 08565-60084 attenuator.

Does any one know the replacement part for 08565-60084 (A34, RF attenuator) in HP 8565A? It does not seem to be easy to obtain this attenuator ($400). I wonder if anyone knows any information about this attenuator.

If obtaining one is difficult, what options do I have?

Also, I wonder if this attenuator is really needed to make the system work.

Thanks in advance.


Amos


Re: Problems with HP8753C networkanalyzer

Jose V. Gavila
 

Hi Peter,

I went through a similar problem (not exactly the same, but the error was the same) and was able to fix it by an internal source auto-calibration.

Please, check my WEB at for more information about what I did and the results. If you have any doubt, just ask :-)

I hope it helps!

Regards,

JOSE


At 09:54 31/08/2011, you wrote:

hi group I have a HP8753C analyzer option 6 (6Ghz) that has a HP85047 testset. I get the following error when power on. No IF found check R input levelPhase lock lost when I se my display I have not strait line under 90Mhz. There is like noise on the line there. I did some tests in CW mode and se I loose my phase lock going under 87Mhz. Looking on the Cw signal with a spectrumanalyzer I se a very unstable signal. So when going below 87Mhz the display say Phase-lock lost. Going above make a stable frequency signal. Measurering the power out of the source (level set to 0dBm out say around -11dBm but that is after a loss of 6dB in a powersplitter (hp11667). so output od source is around -5dBm measured at 1Ghz. Level is flat over the range. What can be the root course for that problem. Best regards Peter Hansen OZ1LPR
--
73 EB5AGV - JOSE V. GAVILA - IM99sm La Canyada - Valencia(SPAIN)
Radio and Test Equipment.......
RadioRepair BLOG...............


Problems with HP8753C networkanalyzer

 

hi group I have a HP8753C analyzer option 6 (6Ghz) that has a HP85047 testset. I get the following error when power on. No IF found check R input levelPhase lock lost when I se my display I have not strait line under 90Mhz. There is like noise on the line there. I did some tests in CW mode and se I loose my phase lock going under 87Mhz. Looking on the Cw signal with a spectrumanalyzer I se a very unstable signal. So when going below 87Mhz the display say Phase-lock lost. Going above make a stable frequency signal. Measurering the power out of the source (level set to 0dBm out say around -11dBm but that is after a loss of 6dB in a powersplitter (hp11667). so output od source is around -5dBm measured at 1Ghz. Level is flat over the range. What can be the root course for that problem. Best regards Peter Hansen OZ1LPR