¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: 8566B attenuator fix

 

I think that is most likely true. I haven't seen your circuit, but the one I'm familiar with wuse 24v to switch the couls, but uses 5v for control. If that is the same in your case, that is the probable cause. Not sure, but that is a reasonable guess.

Cheers ??

Bruce

Quoting bagojfalvibagoj@...:

I'm starting to have a pretty good understanding of how the electronics supposed to work, at least most of it, but unfortunately I believe all 4 of the logic chips on mine are dead.
I suspect the damage, at least to this extent was done by me when I started messing with it and randomly connected 24V to any orifice I could find.

I put the mechanics back together and as far as I can tell that works just fine.



I ordered replacement logic chips, I'll replace them when they come in next week.



E4407B Step Attenuator

 

I am just about done resurrecting a E4407B that I just acquired. The last issue is the RF step attenuator. Stepping from 0dB to 25dB in 5 dB steps works fine. All steps above 25dB fail. I suspect that this attenuator has 4 pads:

5dB,10dB,20dB and 30dB

I suspect that the 30dB pad is bad. Does anyone have 30dB pads for these or have an attenuator where the 30dB pad is good? This is a DC-26.5GHz attenuator.

Thanks!

Sam
W3OHM


Re: 8566B attenuator fix

 

I'm starting to have a pretty good understanding of how the electronics supposed to work, at least most of it, but unfortunately I believe all 4 of the logic chips on mine are dead.
I suspect the damage, at least to this extent was done by me when I started messing with it and randomly connected 24V to any orifice I could find.

I put the mechanics back together and as far as I can tell that works just fine.



I ordered replacement logic chips, I'll replace them when they come in next week.


Re: low amplitude readings below 10MHz on a 8591E

 

Hi

This has all the signs of a bad solder joint or connector,

G Edmonds


low amplitude readings below 10MHz on a 8591E

 

Hi All,
I came into the possession of a 8591E and after calibration,
I found out that when I connect my marconi 2019A to the SP and set it to 1Mhz and 0dBm
the peak is hardly to see amongst the noise, while around 20Mhz it about 24dBm below the reference level and
50Mhz it is as it should be.?
Does anybody know what is happening here and what to do about it?

Gr. Kees


Re: E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Mark,

?

This would mean that my AYX card probably has a problem. I'll look into it further. Thank You.

?

Yves

De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de Mark Bielman
·¡²Ô±¹´Ç²â¨¦?: 17 mars 2023 16:44
??: [email protected]
Objet?: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

?

Hi Yves,

?

I'd have to move a bunch of stuff around to do this properly so I rigged up something with my HP8350 sweeper (set to CW)

and a 10kHz signal applied to the EXT FM input...

?

I can see "something" at 20us sweep time. Not a full sinusoid but just a piece of it. But there is a trace there.

(the sinusoid is visible at 4ms)

?

Mark

?


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Yves Tardif <yves_tardif@...>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 12:53 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

?

Hi Mark,

?

I used a 10 kHz to 182 MHz FM signal here.

I put myself in zero span, and the sweep time at 4msec.

You can see the modulating signal, because I shifted the frequency of the E4407B to do slope demodulation (I don't have the demod FM option).

So, we see a sinusoidal signal. At 4msec of sweep time, the signal is visible, but from 3msec to 20 usec nothing is seen.

The range of 3ms to 20usec of sweep time is the range that the AYX option normally gives for 401 points.

?

I guess you have different behavior with your AYX option.

?

Yves

De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de Mark Bielman
·¡²Ô±¹´Ç²â¨¦?: 17 mars 2023 14:38
??: [email protected]
Objet?: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

?

Yves,

?

My unit has this option, apparently no license required.

I can set the sweep time to 20us but I am not sure what test you are doing.

?

Are you saying that 20us sweep time is NOT displayed on the SA screen?

?

Mark

?


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Yves Tardif <yves_tardif@...>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 10:26 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

?

Hi,

?

I was lucky enough to find an E4407B, it was defective but I managed to repair it.

Currently, I'm doing performance tests to see if everything is working properly.

I am at the stage where I have to test the sweep time.

This Spectrum has the AYX Fast sweep time domain option.

It is written in the Specifications Guide:

?

Basic configuration

sweep time for span = 0 Hz => (sweep points-1)/100kHz to 4000 sec or 10us to 4000sec for 2 points, and 4msec to 4000sec for 401 points.

?

option AYX Fast Time Domain

sweep time for span = 0 Hz => (sweep points-1)/20MHz to 4000 sec or 50ns to 4000sec for 2 points, and 20usec to 4000sec for 401 points.

?

The AYX card is detected, and it appears in the HARDWARE or SYSTEM menu.

Moreover, when I do the sweep time test, the signals appear on the BNC connectors at the back of the unit and are normal, so this card seems to work properly, but the sweep time is functional with a trace displayed on the screen, up to 4msec for 401 point, as if the AYX option was not installed. However, if I remove the card, for 401 points, the sweep time refuses to go lower than 4ms, with the card, the same test shows a minimum sweep time is 20usec as written in the technical document about this AYX option.

?

In the installation manual, it seems that just inserting the card, activates this function, there is nothing else to do...there is really little detail.

The card is in slot #3, I tried in slot #4 for the same behavior.

?

Anyone have an idea, is the card defective?

?

-Yves


Re: E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi Yves,

I'd have to move a bunch of stuff around to do this properly so I rigged up something with my HP8350 sweeper (set to CW)
and a 10kHz signal applied to the EXT FM input...

I can see "something" at 20us sweep time. Not a full sinusoid but just a piece of it. But there is a trace there.
(the sinusoid is visible at 4ms)

Mark


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Yves Tardif <yves_tardif@...>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 12:53 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain
?

Hi Mark,

?

I used a 10 kHz to 182 MHz FM signal here.

I put myself in zero span, and the sweep time at 4msec.

You can see the modulating signal, because I shifted the frequency of the E4407B to do slope demodulation (I don't have the demod FM option).

So, we see a sinusoidal signal. At 4msec of sweep time, the signal is visible, but from 3msec to 20 usec nothing is seen.

The range of 3ms to 20usec of sweep time is the range that the AYX option normally gives for 401 points.

?

I guess you have different behavior with your AYX option.

?

Yves

De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de Mark Bielman
·¡²Ô±¹´Ç²â¨¦?: 17 mars 2023 14:38
??: [email protected]
Objet?: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

?

Yves,

?

My unit has this option, apparently no license required.

I can set the sweep time to 20us but I am not sure what test you are doing.

?

Are you saying that 20us sweep time is NOT displayed on the SA screen?

?

Mark

?


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Yves Tardif <yves_tardif@...>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 10:26 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

?

Hi,

?

I was lucky enough to find an E4407B, it was defective but I managed to repair it.

Currently, I'm doing performance tests to see if everything is working properly.

I am at the stage where I have to test the sweep time.

This Spectrum has the AYX Fast sweep time domain option.

It is written in the Specifications Guide:

?

Basic configuration

sweep time for span = 0 Hz => (sweep points-1)/100kHz to 4000 sec or 10us to 4000sec for 2 points, and 4msec to 4000sec for 401 points.

?

option AYX Fast Time Domain

sweep time for span = 0 Hz => (sweep points-1)/20MHz to 4000 sec or 50ns to 4000sec for 2 points, and 20usec to 4000sec for 401 points.

?

The AYX card is detected, and it appears in the HARDWARE or SYSTEM menu.

Moreover, when I do the sweep time test, the signals appear on the BNC connectors at the back of the unit and are normal, so this card seems to work properly, but the sweep time is functional with a trace displayed on the screen, up to 4msec for 401 point, as if the AYX option was not installed. However, if I remove the card, for 401 points, the sweep time refuses to go lower than 4ms, with the card, the same test shows a minimum sweep time is 20usec as written in the technical document about this AYX option.

?

In the installation manual, it seems that just inserting the card, activates this function, there is nothing else to do...there is really little detail.

The card is in slot #3, I tried in slot #4 for the same behavior.

?

Anyone have an idea, is the card defective?

?

-Yves


Re: E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi Mark,

?

I used a 10 kHz to 182 MHz FM signal here.

I put myself in zero span, and the sweep time at 4msec.

You can see the modulating signal, because I shifted the frequency of the E4407B to do slope demodulation (I don't have the demod FM option).

So, we see a sinusoidal signal. At 4msec of sweep time, the signal is visible, but from 3msec to 20 usec nothing is seen.

The range of 3ms to 20usec of sweep time is the range that the AYX option normally gives for 401 points.

?

I guess you have different behavior with your AYX option.

?

Yves

De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de Mark Bielman
·¡²Ô±¹´Ç²â¨¦?: 17 mars 2023 14:38
??: [email protected]
Objet?: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

?

Yves,

?

My unit has this option, apparently no license required.

I can set the sweep time to 20us but I am not sure what test you are doing.

?

Are you saying that 20us sweep time is NOT displayed on the SA screen?

?

Mark

?


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Yves Tardif <yves_tardif@...>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 10:26 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

?

Hi,

?

I was lucky enough to find an E4407B, it was defective but I managed to repair it.

Currently, I'm doing performance tests to see if everything is working properly.

I am at the stage where I have to test the sweep time.

This Spectrum has the AYX Fast sweep time domain option.

It is written in the Specifications Guide:

?

Basic configuration

sweep time for span = 0 Hz => (sweep points-1)/100kHz to 4000 sec or 10us to 4000sec for 2 points, and 4msec to 4000sec for 401 points.

?

option AYX Fast Time Domain

sweep time for span = 0 Hz => (sweep points-1)/20MHz to 4000 sec or 50ns to 4000sec for 2 points, and 20usec to 4000sec for 401 points.

?

The AYX card is detected, and it appears in the HARDWARE or SYSTEM menu.

Moreover, when I do the sweep time test, the signals appear on the BNC connectors at the back of the unit and are normal, so this card seems to work properly, but the sweep time is functional with a trace displayed on the screen, up to 4msec for 401 point, as if the AYX option was not installed. However, if I remove the card, for 401 points, the sweep time refuses to go lower than 4ms, with the card, the same test shows a minimum sweep time is 20usec as written in the technical document about this AYX option.

?

In the installation manual, it seems that just inserting the card, activates this function, there is nothing else to do...there is really little detail.

The card is in slot #3, I tried in slot #4 for the same behavior.

?

Anyone have an idea, is the card defective?

?

-Yves


Re: E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Yves,

My unit has this option, apparently no license required.
I can set the sweep time to 20us but I am not sure what test you are doing.

Are you saying that 20us sweep time is NOT displayed on the SA screen?

Mark


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Yves Tardif <yves_tardif@...>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 10:26 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain
?

Hi,

?

I was lucky enough to find an E4407B, it was defective but I managed to repair it.

Currently, I'm doing performance tests to see if everything is working properly.

I am at the stage where I have to test the sweep time.

This Spectrum has the AYX Fast sweep time domain option.

It is written in the Specifications Guide:

?

Basic configuration

sweep time for span = 0 Hz => (sweep points-1)/100kHz to 4000 sec or 10us to 4000sec for 2 points, and 4msec to 4000sec for 401 points.

?

option AYX Fast Time Domain

sweep time for span = 0 Hz => (sweep points-1)/20MHz to 4000 sec or 50ns to 4000sec for 2 points, and 20usec to 4000sec for 401 points.

?

The AYX card is detected, and it appears in the HARDWARE or SYSTEM menu.

Moreover, when I do the sweep time test, the signals appear on the BNC connectors at the back of the unit and are normal, so this card seems to work properly, but the sweep time is functional with a trace displayed on the screen, up to 4msec for 401 point, as if the AYX option was not installed. However, if I remove the card, for 401 points, the sweep time refuses to go lower than 4ms, with the card, the same test shows a minimum sweep time is 20usec as written in the technical document about this AYX option.

?

In the installation manual, it seems that just inserting the card, activates this function, there is nothing else to do...there is really little detail.

The card is in slot #3, I tried in slot #4 for the same behavior.

?

Anyone have an idea, is the card defective?

?

-Yves


E4407B option AYX Fast Sweep Time Domain

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi,

?

I was lucky enough to find an E4407B, it was defective but I managed to repair it.

Currently, I'm doing performance tests to see if everything is working properly.

I am at the stage where I have to test the sweep time.

This Spectrum has the AYX Fast sweep time domain option.

It is written in the Specifications Guide:

?

Basic configuration

sweep time for span = 0 Hz => (sweep points-1)/100kHz to 4000 sec or 10us to 4000sec for 2 points, and 4msec to 4000sec for 401 points.

?

option AYX Fast Time Domain

sweep time for span = 0 Hz => (sweep points-1)/20MHz to 4000 sec or 50ns to 4000sec for 2 points, and 20usec to 4000sec for 401 points.

?

The AYX card is detected, and it appears in the HARDWARE or SYSTEM menu.

Moreover, when I do the sweep time test, the signals appear on the BNC connectors at the back of the unit and are normal, so this card seems to work properly, but the sweep time is functional with a trace displayed on the screen, up to 4msec for 401 point, as if the AYX option was not installed. However, if I remove the card, for 401 points, the sweep time refuses to go lower than 4ms, with the card, the same test shows a minimum sweep time is 20usec as written in the technical document about this AYX option.

?

In the installation manual, it seems that just inserting the card, activates this function, there is nothing else to do...there is really little detail.

The card is in slot #3, I tried in slot #4 for the same behavior.

?

Anyone have an idea, is the card defective?

?

-Yves


Re: HP 312A wave analyser

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Some people would dearly love the nixies, if nothing else.? 2N404 are extremely old, but perhaps someone, somewhere, might like to restore it.

Not surprised about Nightfire.? Turns out that you can get almost (if not all) that they sell from Amazon, I think.

Harvey



On 3/16/2023 11:07 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

After zooming in quite a bit I see that the counter modules are powered by -15 and +20V rails. They use 2N404 Germanium transistors.
My HP5233 counter appears to use identical boards.It is basically worthless, other than as a collector's item but it has all six boards and the Nixies. It is only a 2MHz counter. I've never powered it up, it was part of a large lot of old test equipment that I bought over 20 years ago.I also have a 5223 (300KHz) counter from that same lot. I would need help to dig them out of storage.

Boards from the 5245L and 5248 use the same basic circuit, as well.

BTW, Nightfire is planning on closing their store fairly soon.

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 8:18?PM Harvey White <madyn@...> wrote:

74 series logic is standard TTL, so 0 to 0.6 volts is a good logic zero, and anything above 2.4 volts (preferably 3.2 to back bias an internal diode) is a logic one.? IIRC, 7447 outputs are simply saturating transistors to ground, with the anode of the display switched on or off to enable the digit if scanning.

Harvey


On 3/16/2023 5:27 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
What about the 7441/74LS41 BCD to decimal decoder designed to drive Nixies?
I have a 312B, which uses LED displays, with a much simpler counter design.which uses the 74LS75 Latch and the 74L47 BCD to seven segment decoders. The 312A manual that I have is so speckled tht I can't read it to determine the logic levels.

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:57?PM Greg Muir via <big_sky_explorer=[email protected]> wrote:

Brad,

?

If I can recall the neon-photocell approach was very similar to that used in the HP 5245L counter series display boards.? If you can find an old board (base P/N 05212-6016) you might have some luck in finding similar photocell devices.? The suffix to the part number (¡°Series 6xx¡±) changed reflecting the board functionality.? There was also changes in the design of these boards where they either contained an enclosed module termed ¡°Decoder¡± (One HP part number is 1820-1683¡±)? or a ¡°Photoconductor Plate¡± where the photocells directly drive the Nixie tubes.

?

It appears that HP changed to the ¡°Decoder¡± module in later model counters.? It is a black plastic enclosure on the board with a removable cover but I have never opened one up to see what is inside.? Given its construction I am assuming that it, too contains photocells.

?

Greg


Re: HP 312A wave analyser

 

After zooming in quite a bit I see that the counter modules are powered by -15 and +20V rails. They use 2N404 Germanium transistors.
My HP5233 counter appears to use identical boards.It is basically worthless, other than as a collector's item but it has all six boards and the Nixies. It is only a 2MHz counter. I've never powered it up, it was part of a large lot of old test equipment that I bought over 20 years ago.I also have a 5223 (300KHz) counter from that same lot. I would need help to dig them out of storage.

Boards from the 5245L and 5248 use the same basic circuit, as well.

BTW, Nightfire is planning on closing their store fairly soon.


On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 8:18?PM Harvey White <madyn@...> wrote:

74 series logic is standard TTL, so 0 to 0.6 volts is a good logic zero, and anything above 2.4 volts (preferably 3.2 to back bias an internal diode) is a logic one.? IIRC, 7447 outputs are simply saturating transistors to ground, with the anode of the display switched on or off to enable the digit if scanning.

Harvey


On 3/16/2023 5:27 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
What about the 7441/74LS41 BCD to decimal decoder designed to drive Nixies?
I have a 312B, which uses LED displays, with a much simpler counter design.which uses the 74LS75 Latch and the 74L47 BCD to seven segment decoders. The 312A manual that I have is so speckled tht I can't read it to determine the logic levels.

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:57?PM Greg Muir via <big_sky_explorer=[email protected]> wrote:

Brad,

?

If I can recall the neon-photocell approach was very similar to that used in the HP 5245L counter series display boards.? If you can find an old board (base P/N 05212-6016) you might have some luck in finding similar photocell devices.? The suffix to the part number (¡°Series 6xx¡±) changed reflecting the board functionality.? There was also changes in the design of these boards where they either contained an enclosed module termed ¡°Decoder¡± (One HP part number is 1820-1683¡±)? or a ¡°Photoconductor Plate¡± where the photocells directly drive the Nixie tubes.

?

It appears that HP changed to the ¡°Decoder¡± module in later model counters.? It is a black plastic enclosure on the board with a removable cover but I have never opened one up to see what is inside.? Given its construction I am assuming that it, too contains photocells.

?

Greg


Re: HP 312A wave analyser

 

KI found a clue in the circuit description, par. 4-195, " A lighted photo conductor has a resistance of about 20k ohms, & an unlighted element has a resistance of several megohms." Sounds like a CDS photo cell. Of course, these elements are all driven by neons, which are called "lamps" in the manual. They are saying the firing voltage of the neon lamps around 70v, which means the neons would have had to be matched for this circuit to work.?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Regards Brad?


Re: 5086-7337 *Yig Oscillator issue*

 

I believe some of the 2-20GHz had about 1 ampere tuning current at 20GHz¡­


Re: HP 312A wave analyser

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

74 series logic is standard TTL, so 0 to 0.6 volts is a good logic zero, and anything above 2.4 volts (preferably 3.2 to back bias an internal diode) is a logic one.? IIRC, 7447 outputs are simply saturating transistors to ground, with the anode of the display switched on or off to enable the digit if scanning.

Harvey


On 3/16/2023 5:27 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

What about the 7441/74LS41 BCD to decimal decoder designed to drive Nixies?
I have a 312B, which uses LED displays, with a much simpler counter design.which uses the 74LS75 Latch and the 74L47 BCD to seven segment decoders. The 312A manual that I have is so speckled tht I can't read it to determine the logic levels.

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:57?PM Greg Muir via <big_sky_explorer=[email protected]> wrote:

Brad,

?

If I can recall the neon-photocell approach was very similar to that used in the HP 5245L counter series display boards.? If you can find an old board (base P/N 05212-6016) you might have some luck in finding similar photocell devices.? The suffix to the part number (¡°Series 6xx¡±) changed reflecting the board functionality.? There was also changes in the design of these boards where they either contained an enclosed module termed ¡°Decoder¡± (One HP part number is 1820-1683¡±)? or a ¡°Photoconductor Plate¡± where the photocells directly drive the Nixie tubes.

?

It appears that HP changed to the ¡°Decoder¡± module in later model counters.? It is a black plastic enclosure on the board with a removable cover but I have never opened one up to see what is inside.? Given its construction I am assuming that it, too contains photocells.

?

Greg


Re: HP 312A wave analyser

 

What about the 7441/74LS41 BCD to decimal decoder designed to drive Nixies?
I have a 312B, which uses LED displays, with a much simpler counter design.which uses the 74LS75 Latch and the 74L47 BCD to seven segment decoders. The 312A manual that I have is so speckled tht I can't read it to determine the logic levels.

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:57?PM Greg Muir via <big_sky_explorer=[email protected]> wrote:

Brad,

?

If I can recall the neon-photocell approach was very similar to that used in the HP 5245L counter series display boards.? If you can find an old board (base P/N 05212-6016) you might have some luck in finding similar photocell devices.? The suffix to the part number (¡°Series 6xx¡±) changed reflecting the board functionality.? There was also changes in the design of these boards where they either contained an enclosed module termed ¡°Decoder¡± (One HP part number is 1820-1683¡±)? or a ¡°Photoconductor Plate¡± where the photocells directly drive the Nixie tubes.

?

It appears that HP changed to the ¡°Decoder¡± module in later model counters.? It is a black plastic enclosure on the board with a removable cover but I have never opened one up to see what is inside.? Given its construction I am assuming that it, too contains photocells.

?

Greg


Config/disassembler files for the HP1000 for the HP1630/1631 logic analysers?

 

Anyone happen to have those files? I have the disassemblers for HPIB and other stuff, but not HP1000. Docs for the two breakout boards would be nice as well!


HP 3335A power supply failure(?)

Bob Stewart
 

I had been seeing some phase jumps from my DMTD and after swapping out both the DMTD and the 7350A, I had come to the conclusion that it was probably the 3335A.? I had started another 24 hour run, and the outputs to the 5370A stopped cycling.? Then I noticed the display panel on the 3335A flashing nonsense.? So, after pulling the 3335A apart, I found that U3 on the pass-transistor board must have conducted at high gain for some reason, as J2 pin 5 on the A15 board (pass transistor board) was charred clear through the board.? The back of the board is very dark under U3, as well.? And yet, diode tests on the darlington with a DVM don't look bad.? Other than the burned PCB the only anomaly I've found so far is that this darlington transistor has been previously replaced with an NTE-247.? The other +V darlington has the number PMD12K60 on the case.? The big electrolytics test OK on my little multi-tester, both for capacitance and ESR.

So, before I go any further, I thought I'd ask the group if anyone had run into this type of failure before?? I was thinking of looking at the opamps on A14 next.

Bob - AE6RV


Re: HP 312A wave analyser

 

Brad,

?

If I can recall the neon-photocell approach was very similar to that used in the HP 5245L counter series display boards.? If you can find an old board (base P/N 05212-6016) you might have some luck in finding similar photocell devices.? The suffix to the part number (¡°Series 6xx¡±) changed reflecting the board functionality.? There was also changes in the design of these boards where they either contained an enclosed module termed ¡°Decoder¡± (One HP part number is 1820-1683¡±)? or a ¡°Photoconductor Plate¡± where the photocells directly drive the Nixie tubes.

?

It appears that HP changed to the ¡°Decoder¡± module in later model counters.? It is a black plastic enclosure on the board with a removable cover but I have never opened one up to see what is inside.? Given its construction I am assuming that it, too contains photocells.

?

Greg


Re: 5086-7337 *Yig Oscillator issue*

 

Don -
Thanks - that is what I thought.

Cheers!

Bruce

Quoting "Don Bitters via groups.io" <donbitters@...>:

Most of your assumptions are true, but if the end point voltages are not reasonably close you won¡¯t see output at either end. You might find that if you supplied a tuning voltage to the YIG somewhere in the middle of its tuning range you would possible find output from the YIG but off in frequency by as much as 1GHz or more. If the endpoints are not close and beyond the tune range of the YIG +/-, there will be little to no output from the YIG. Many of HP YIG choice were either 3Vdc/GHz tune voltage, there is also another spec. of mA/GHz, but I cannot recall that now. There also exist 1Vdc/GHz tuning voltage YIG¡¯s.
Don Bitters