开云体育

Date

Re: Plastic snap-in bottom feet

 

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 09:25 AM, <radioconnection@...> wrote:
The older HP gear test gear feet were black, part number 5060-0767. They had a metal push pin to allow side in installation or removal--found on 141T or similarly aged HP gear.
They are as rare as hen's teeth--few I have recently found were quite costly.
The excellent condition 432A power meter I just got has that style I believe, and it actually still had the feet. This makes me even happier.

Sean


Re: 141T varying CRT intensity?

 

On 04/12/2019 12:03 PM, radioconnection@... wrote:
I've tried to troubleshoot this problem in the past, but whenever I have the unit opened up it has been well behaved.

The CRT intensity will vary (jump erratically) after the unit has been running for a few hours. I do not see any change in display size, blooming or in focus.

I have a new CRT on hand, and I am thinking about replacing most of the electrolytic capacitors and other parts that have a known history for failure
when I have a chance to work on the unit. Since it is on a high
shelf on the bench, getting it down is a bit of effort due to my age... so i want to do this once... any suggestions as to what to look for would be appreciated, since
just shotgunning and hoping for a repair isn't the best approach.

Thanks for any advice.

Pete
It is almost certainly a heat problem, since it works OK when open to air. If you have a heat gun or a hair dryer, you might try to
isolate an area where the problem is, but don't overdo it--those things get pretty hot! If you can isolate an area, then you might
be able to pinpoint the bad part with a soldering iron. But remember, the soldering iron is probably grounded, so don't actually
touch any circuit while the scope is running. Older soldering guns (Weller) were not grounded; I do not know if modern ones are.
Check with your ohm-meter.

--doug, WA2SAY


Re: Plastic snap-in bottom feet

 

If you have access to a 3d printer go to thingiverse dot com and look up HP foot, you may find what you are looking for.? I designed and printed some Tektronix pull tabs and got 50% yield using PLA and an Exact-O knife to trim them.? I used an Ultimaker 3+ to print them.

TinkerCAD and FreeCAD are no cost design tools. ?

Is anyone here machining circuit boards with a cheap RAMPS based controller?? I need to dead bug or circuit board a HP 8640 amplifier replacement.

Jim
On ?Friday?, ?April? ?12?, ?2019? ?12?:?26?:?01? ?PM? ?EDT, <radioconnection@...> wrote:


The older HP gear test gear feet were black, part number 5060-0767. They had a metal push pin to allow side in installation or removal--found on 141T or similarly aged HP gear.
They are as rare as hen's teeth--few I have recently found were quite costly.

The part numbers you mentioned will bring up images using Google search.? One looks like a screw mounted rear apron foot.? The other looks like a snap in gray bottom foot.

Peter


Re: Plastic snap-in bottom feet

 

The older HP gear test gear feet were black, part number 5060-0767. They had a metal push pin to allow side in installation or removal--found on 141T or similarly aged HP gear.
They are as rare as hen's teeth--few I have recently found were quite costly.

The part numbers you mentioned will bring up images using Google search.? One looks like a screw mounted rear apron foot.? The other looks like a snap in gray bottom foot.

Peter


141T varying CRT intensity?

 

I've tried to troubleshoot this problem in the past, but whenever I have the unit opened up it has been well behaved.?

The CRT intensity will vary (jump erratically) after the unit has been running for a few hours.? I do not see any change in display size, blooming or in focus.??

I have a new CRT on hand, and I am thinking about replacing most of the electrolytic capacitors and other parts that have a known history for failure
when I have a chance to work on the unit.? Since it is on a high
shelf on the bench, getting it down is a bit of effort due to my age...? so i want to do this once...? any suggestions as to what to look for would be appreciated, since
just shotgunning and hoping for a repair isn't the best approach.??

Thanks for any advice.

Pete


Re: HP8560E Low Level

 

I still doubt that there is anything wrong with the ref osc and 600MHz lo, really. it could be just a measurement trap.
how are you measuring those 9dBm and 17dBm in-circuit amplitudes? remember that only and only a proper RF active probe?
with careful grounding can give you the correct value. Any passive probe even the best 500MHz passive probe will give you totally out of whack values. I have been there...
even with an active probe (cap <1-2pF) still the precise point at which you measure it, is very critical. If the 100MHz is like 10dB low I am sure
you would be getting errors because the PFD will probably fail to work and the loop becomes unlocked.?

Moreover, as you explained, even when you inject 600MHz Lo from the outside your second IF is still 24dB low. That has nothing to do?
with the ref osc anymore.

another thing that puzzled me is that when you inject 310.7MHz to the third converter you get a trace at -32dBm? it should be much higher, close to -10dBm I think.
(adjust your atten to 10dB and ref level to 0dBm) How is the level of 300MHz third converter LO drive??

your 'default' noise floor is too low (it must be around -65 to -70dB as I recall from the units that I had in the past)
usually that means a mixer is not working but it can have other reasons further down the signal path





On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:08 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:
John
?
Just some feed back. Tracked down the manufacturer of the crystal, Croven Crystals in Canada who are very helpful, and found the replacement crystal is the exact unit and even has the the HP number 0410-4065 lasered on the side where I didn't notice it.
?
Might just go away now and brush up on my oscillator theory to try to get more level so I can drive U700 with +9dBm instead of the -2dBm I have now.
?
Thanks for you assistance.
?
Dave
?
On 12/04/2019 5:27 pm, Dave Ireland wrote:
John
?
I am still back at U700 which seems to be working but I can't get enough drive into it.
?
The oscillator circuit is not tuning properly and I suspect it is the crystal. It has been changed sometime in the past and I not sure characteristics of the crystal are the same. I will see if I can trace? details of what has been put in it.
?
Thanks
?
Dave
?
?
?
On 12/04/2019 1:55 pm, johncharlesgord via Groups.Io wrote:
Dave,
I think I had an HP856x with a similar 600 MHz problem.? It turned out to be a failed RF amp on A15. (U501?? U701?? U702?)
--John Gord

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 06:16 PM, Dave Ireland wrote:
Amir
?
A lesson in the need for methodical fault finding techniques methinks.
?
Checking out the RF section block diagram, trying to follow your advice, I noticed the 600Mhz drive into the Second Converter. The 600Mhz is derived from the 100MHz VCXO that the regulator transistor had failed on. The 600MHz out of A15 is about 15dB low and when I injected 600Mhz at the right level into the second converter the level has come right up. Still about 20dB down but more promising.
?
I will go back now and go through the A15 board and get the outputs correct and then after that maybe check out A14 for the mixer and converter bias volts.
?
Thanks
?
Dave
?
?
On 11/04/2019 10:29 pm, amirb wrote:
I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers?
if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal)
then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual

I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides
90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)

since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero)
and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter.
if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14
In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.

Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span)
and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:

I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.

The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.

Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.

Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.

I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.

I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.

Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.

My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.

Any though while I wait for a better spec an?

Dave

?

?

?

?


Re: HP8560E Low Level

 

开云体育

John

Just some feed back. Tracked down the manufacturer of the crystal, Croven Crystals in Canada who are very helpful, and found the replacement crystal is the exact unit and even has the the HP number 0410-4065 lasered on the side where I didn't notice it.

Might just go away now and brush up on my oscillator theory to try to get more level so I can drive U700 with +9dBm instead of the -2dBm I have now.

Thanks for you assistance.

Dave

On 12/04/2019 5:27 pm, Dave Ireland wrote:

John

I am still back at U700 which seems to be working but I can't get enough drive into it.

The oscillator circuit is not tuning properly and I suspect it is the crystal. It has been changed sometime in the past and I not sure characteristics of the crystal are the same. I will see if I can trace? details of what has been put in it.

Thanks

Dave



On 12/04/2019 1:55 pm, johncharlesgord via Groups.Io wrote:
Dave,
I think I had an HP856x with a similar 600 MHz problem.? It turned out to be a failed RF amp on A15. (U501?? U701?? U702?)
--John Gord

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 06:16 PM, Dave Ireland wrote:
Amir
?
A lesson in the need for methodical fault finding techniques methinks.
?
Checking out the RF section block diagram, trying to follow your advice, I noticed the 600Mhz drive into the Second Converter. The 600Mhz is derived from the 100MHz VCXO that the regulator transistor had failed on. The 600MHz out of A15 is about 15dB low and when I injected 600Mhz at the right level into the second converter the level has come right up. Still about 20dB down but more promising.
?
I will go back now and go through the A15 board and get the outputs correct and then after that maybe check out A14 for the mixer and converter bias volts.
?
Thanks
?
Dave
?
?
On 11/04/2019 10:29 pm, amirb wrote:
I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers?
if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal)
then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual

I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides
90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)

since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero)
and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter.
if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14
In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.

Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span)
and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:

I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.

The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.

Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.

Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.

I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.

I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.

Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.

My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.

Any though while I wait for a better spec an?

Dave

?

?




Re: HP8560E Low Level

 

开云体育

John

I am still back at U700 which seems to be working but I can't get enough drive into it.

The oscillator circuit is not tuning properly and I suspect it is the crystal. It has been changed sometime in the past and I not sure characteristics of the crystal are the same. I will see if I can trace? details of what has been put in it.

Thanks

Dave



On 12/04/2019 1:55 pm, johncharlesgord via Groups.Io wrote:

Dave,
I think I had an HP856x with a similar 600 MHz problem.? It turned out to be a failed RF amp on A15. (U501?? U701?? U702?)
--John Gord

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 06:16 PM, Dave Ireland wrote:
Amir
?
A lesson in the need for methodical fault finding techniques methinks.
?
Checking out the RF section block diagram, trying to follow your advice, I noticed the 600Mhz drive into the Second Converter. The 600Mhz is derived from the 100MHz VCXO that the regulator transistor had failed on. The 600MHz out of A15 is about 15dB low and when I injected 600Mhz at the right level into the second converter the level has come right up. Still about 20dB down but more promising.
?
I will go back now and go through the A15 board and get the outputs correct and then after that maybe check out A14 for the mixer and converter bias volts.
?
Thanks
?
Dave
?
?
On 11/04/2019 10:29 pm, amirb wrote:
I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers?
if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal)
then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual

I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides
90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)

since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero)
and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter.
if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14
In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.

Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span)
and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:

I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.

The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.

Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.

Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.

I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.

I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.

Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.

My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.

Any though while I wait for a better spec an?

Dave

?

?



Re: HP8560E Low Level

 

开云体育

Amir

If I input 100Mhz at -10dbm with 10dB attenuator and zero span selected (setup for level measurements on the RF path drawing) while injecting 600MHz at 0dBm (spec -3 to +4.8)? into the LO of the second converter, I see 310.7Mhz at -56dBm (diagram says -32dBm) out of second converter. If I use the SA generated 600MHZ I see nothing at this same point.

If I inject 310.7MHz at -31dBm into the RF of the third converter I get at a trace across the screen at -32dBm.

I assume that means that there is a 20 odd dB loss some where in the Low Band Mixer or the Second Converter. I assume that if the Yig or LO distribution amp was 20dB low, the Low Band Mixer wouldn't work through lack of drive or I would get an alarm. The levels on the bias of the first mixer are not exactly right and while the second converter 5v supplies are not as accuarate as they could be the bias volts as stamped on the unit are pretty close.

I think I will focus on the 600Mhz first. The crystal in the 100Mhz oscillator has been changed at some stage and when trying to peak the output level the maximum is reached with the minimum capacitance of the trimmer. There is a note on the circuit that the line tech should choose a inductance to shunt the standard one across the crystal. There is no additional inductor so I might play with this even though the shunt is small, to see if I can get the trimmer to peak properly. Yes mine is one of the later A15 boards with the 600Mhz derived from the 100Mhz and while it gave me an alarm when the 100Mhz was not there all, it says nothing when the level of the 100MHz and hence the 600MHz is too low. Interestingly enough the 300MHz Cal signal which is derived from the 100MHz also, is perfect but I see there is a amp with AGC driving this output.?

With respect to the noise floor at full span when I let it select every thing (1Mhz RBW) is -85dBm.

Thanks

Dave?

On 12/04/2019 12:12 pm, amirb wrote:

sounds good :-)
so that means the second IF output (310.7MHz) must be almost dead. Is it? It's a coaxial cable that goes to A15 board?

if the 600MHz is too low it cannot drive the x6 multiplier and since there is a highly selective cavity filter at 3.6GHz
then the actual LO at the second mixer is pretty much non existent which explains it.?

You must have one of the later models of A15 board. In older models that I have also repaired, there was a 600MHz oscillator
which was in a PLL and when divided by 60 it was used as reference? for the sampler circuit. So if the 600MHz was too low
you would get tons of errors both from sampler unlock and 600MHz unlock. In later models, they have a 100MHz VCO in a PLL
so as long as that 100MHz is ok, you don't get any error for the 600MHz not being present or being too low.

since you are still 20dB too low, I would still suggest injecting a clean 310.7MHz signal to the third converter at correct amplitude (I think around -32dB or so)
and see what you get on screen

what is your noise floor at full span?




On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:16 PM, Dave Ireland wrote:
Amir
?
A lesson in the need for methodical fault finding techniques methinks.
?
Checking out the RF section block diagram, trying to follow your advice, I noticed the 600Mhz drive into the Second Converter. The 600Mhz is derived from the 100MHz VCXO that the regulator transistor had failed on. The 600MHz out of A15 is about 15dB low and when I injected 600Mhz at the right level into the second converter the level has come right up. Still about 20dB down but more promising.
?
I will go back now and go through the A15 board and get the outputs correct and then after that maybe check out A14 for the mixer and converter bias volts.
?
Thanks
?
Dave
?
?
On 11/04/2019 10:29 pm, amirb wrote:
I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers?
if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal)
then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual

I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides
90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)

since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero)
and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter.
if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14
In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.

Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span)
and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:

I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.

The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.

Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.

Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.

I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.

I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.

Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.

My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.

Any though while I wait for a better spec an?

Dave

?

?



Re: HP8560E Low Level

 

Dave,
I think I had an HP856x with a similar 600 MHz problem.? It turned out to be a failed RF amp on A15. (U501?? U701?? U702?)
--John Gord


On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 06:16 PM, Dave Ireland wrote:
Amir
?
A lesson in the need for methodical fault finding techniques methinks.
?
Checking out the RF section block diagram, trying to follow your advice, I noticed the 600Mhz drive into the Second Converter. The 600Mhz is derived from the 100MHz VCXO that the regulator transistor had failed on. The 600MHz out of A15 is about 15dB low and when I injected 600Mhz at the right level into the second converter the level has come right up. Still about 20dB down but more promising.
?
I will go back now and go through the A15 board and get the outputs correct and then after that maybe check out A14 for the mixer and converter bias volts.
?
Thanks
?
Dave
?
?
On 11/04/2019 10:29 pm, amirb wrote:
I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers?
if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal)
then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual

I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides
90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)

since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero)
and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter.
if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14
In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.

Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span)
and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:

I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.

The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.

Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.

Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.

I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.

I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.

Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.

My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.

Any though while I wait for a better spec an?

Dave

?

?


Re: HP8560E Low Level

 

sounds good :-)
so that means the second IF output (310.7MHz) must be almost dead. Is it? It's a coaxial cable that goes to A15 board?

if the 600MHz is too low it cannot drive the x6 multiplier and since there is a highly selective cavity filter at 3.6GHz
then the actual LO at the second mixer is pretty much non existent which explains it.?

You must have one of the later models of A15 board. In older models that I have also repaired, there was a 600MHz oscillator
which was in a PLL and when divided by 60 it was used as reference? for the sampler circuit. So if the 600MHz was too low
you would get tons of errors both from sampler unlock and 600MHz unlock. In later models, they have a 100MHz VCO in a PLL
so as long as that 100MHz is ok, you don't get any error for the 600MHz not being present or being too low.

since you are still 20dB too low, I would still suggest injecting a clean 310.7MHz signal to the third converter at correct amplitude (I think around -32dB or so)
and see what you get on screen

what is your noise floor at full span?




On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:16 PM, Dave Ireland wrote:
Amir
?
A lesson in the need for methodical fault finding techniques methinks.
?
Checking out the RF section block diagram, trying to follow your advice, I noticed the 600Mhz drive into the Second Converter. The 600Mhz is derived from the 100MHz VCXO that the regulator transistor had failed on. The 600MHz out of A15 is about 15dB low and when I injected 600Mhz at the right level into the second converter the level has come right up. Still about 20dB down but more promising.
?
I will go back now and go through the A15 board and get the outputs correct and then after that maybe check out A14 for the mixer and converter bias volts.
?
Thanks
?
Dave
?
?
On 11/04/2019 10:29 pm, amirb wrote:
I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers?
if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal)
then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual

I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides
90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)

since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero)
and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter.
if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14
In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.

Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span)
and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:

I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.

The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.

Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.

Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.

I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.

I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.

Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.

My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.

Any though while I wait for a better spec an?

Dave

?

?


Re: Correct rack mount bracket?

 

开云体育

Steve,

The part numbers for the handles should be in the service manuals for each instrument. There may be more than one part number for the same instrument, based on the production series, each with a different colored plastic insert.
There’s a document on the Keysight website called ?“Rackmount Accessory Products Cross Reference Guide -Selection Guide” ?that has a lot of good information.?

I’m looking for a single 2U (3.5”) flange for use without handles. Had a pair but used one with a half-rack adapter to mount a 437B power meter and now need to rackmount a 3455A. Everyone wants to sell them in pairs...

Steve
WB0DBS



On Apr 11, 2019, at 7:33 PM, Steve <steve65@...> wrote:

Hi Steve. Thank you. The brackets do have notches.

I have a few paired sets of 2U and 3U rack units. Do you happen to know the HP part numbers for the handles and brackets? Or where I could find them?

Steve, K8JQ

On 4/11/2019 4:49 PM, Steve - Home wrote:
Both types of rack mount brackets are available. It appears someone took the time to tie wrap the handles to the brackets to keep them together so I’d venture a guess you have the “use with handles” type. Look closely at the brackets and if they have notches at the top and bottom of the outward-facing side, on the inside towards the instrument, they are definitely for use with handles installed. They’ll mesh together nicely if they are a proper mating set.

Steve
WB0DBS



On Apr 11, 2019, at 2:48 PM, Steve <steve65@...> wrote:

Are the mounting brackets made to be or intended to be used with front equipment handles? Or are the front equipment handles used alone?

Reason I ask . . . somewhere along the line I acquired a box with a handful of mounting brackets and front equipment handles. They are paired with plastic tiewraps . . . a mounting bracket is tiewrapped to a front equipment handle, as if they go together. Do they?

Thanks.

Steve, K8JQ

On 4/10/2019 6:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols wrote:
Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack mounting bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with handles" and "without handles" descriptions are confusing (if the sellers are even correct).

Jeremy




Re: Correct rack mount bracket?

 

On Apr 11, 2019, at 01:12, Dave Daniel <kc0wjn@...> wrote:

AC Infinity Vented Cantilever 2U Universal Rack Shelf
So where do I get these in Europe?

Amazon does ship to Europe, but at a prohibitive rate.

Grü?e, Carsten


Re: HP8560E Low Level

 

开云体育

Amir

A lesson in the need for methodical fault finding techniques methinks.

Checking out the RF section block diagram, trying to follow your advice, I noticed the 600Mhz drive into the Second Converter. The 600Mhz is derived from the 100MHz VCXO that the regulator transistor had failed on. The 600MHz out of A15 is about 15dB low and when I injected 600Mhz at the right level into the second converter the level has come right up. Still about 20dB down but more promising.

I will go back now and go through the A15 board and get the outputs correct and then after that maybe check out A14 for the mixer and converter bias volts.

Thanks

Dave


On 11/04/2019 10:29 pm, amirb wrote:

I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers?
if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal)
then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual

I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides
90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)

since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero)
and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter.
if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14
In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.

Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span)
and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:

I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.

The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.

Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.

Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.

I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.

I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.

Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.

My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.

Any though while I wait for a better spec an?

Dave

?



Re: Correct rack mount bracket?

Steve
 

开云体育

Hi Steve. Thank you. The brackets do have notches.

I have a few paired sets of 2U and 3U rack units. Do you happen to know the HP part numbers for the handles and brackets? Or where I could find them?

Steve, K8JQ

On 4/11/2019 4:49 PM, Steve - Home wrote:

Both types of rack mount brackets are available. It appears someone took the time to tie wrap the handles to the brackets to keep them together so I’d venture a guess you have the “use with handles” type. Look closely at the brackets and if they have notches at the top and bottom of the outward-facing side, on the inside towards the instrument, they are definitely for use with handles installed. They’ll mesh together nicely if they are a proper mating set.

Steve
WB0DBS



On Apr 11, 2019, at 2:48 PM, Steve <steve65@...> wrote:

Are the mounting brackets made to be or intended to be used with front equipment handles? Or are the front equipment handles used alone?

Reason I ask . . . somewhere along the line I acquired a box with a handful of mounting brackets and front equipment handles. They are paired with plastic tiewraps . . . a mounting bracket is tiewrapped to a front equipment handle, as if they go together. Do they?

Thanks.

Steve, K8JQ

On 4/10/2019 6:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols wrote:
Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack mounting bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with handles" and "without handles" descriptions are confusing (if the sellers are even correct).

Jeremy




Re: HP8560E Low Level

 

开云体育

John

Thanks for that. I imagine the exact replacements would be expensive if even possible to get, so will let you know how I go.

Dave

Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S5


-------- Original message --------
From: "johncharlesgord via Groups.Io" <johngord@...>
Date: 12/04/2019 03:40 (GMT+08:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP8560E Low Level

Dave,
A totally blown mixer would explain things.? Even if all the diodes go open (or short) there will be plenty of LO feedthrough.? If you can't find an exact replacement at a reasonable cost, let me know.? I may have an "ordinary" mixer that will do the job.

--John Gord
email: johngord (at) verizon (dot) net

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:05 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:
Thanks for those great advice. I have packed it in for the night but will try them out tomorrow.
?
I have a specan in my FM testset that goes to a gig so should be able to check the IFs.
?
It is one of the later of this model so you are right the first mixer does have bias as well and these look close but while is supposed to be 5v and is 5 the other is supposed to be 4.5v and it is 5 as well. Will have a closer look at these as well.
?
Thanks
?
Dave
?
?
?
Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S5


-------- Original message --------
From: amirb <amir.borji@...>
Date: 11/04/2019 22:29 (GMT+08:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP8560E Low Level

I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers?
if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal)
then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual

I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides
90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)

since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero)
and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter.
if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14
In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.

Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span)
and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:

I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.

The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.

Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.

Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.

I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.

I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.

Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.

My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.

Any though while I wait for a better spec an?

Dave

?


Re: Correct rack mount bracket?

 

开云体育

Both types of rack mount brackets are available. It appears someone took the time to tie wrap the handles to the brackets to keep them together so I’d venture a guess you have the “use with handles” type. Look closely at the brackets and if they have notches at the top and bottom of the outward-facing side, on the inside towards the instrument, they are definitely for use with handles installed. They’ll mesh together nicely if they are a proper mating set.

Steve
WB0DBS



On Apr 11, 2019, at 2:48 PM, Steve <steve65@...> wrote:

Are the mounting brackets made to be or intended to be used with front equipment handles? Or are the front equipment handles used alone?

Reason I ask . . . somewhere along the line I acquired a box with a handful of mounting brackets and front equipment handles. They are paired with plastic tiewraps . . . a mounting bracket is tiewrapped to a front equipment handle, as if they go together. Do they?

Thanks.

Steve, K8JQ

On 4/10/2019 6:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols wrote:
Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack mounting bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with handles" and "without handles" descriptions are confusing (if the sellers are even correct).

Jeremy



Re: Correct rack mount bracket?

Steve
 

开云体育

Are the mounting brackets made to be or intended to be used with front equipment handles? Or are the front equipment handles used alone?

Reason I ask . . . somewhere along the line I acquired a box with a handful of mounting brackets and front equipment handles. They are paired with plastic tiewraps . . . a mounting bracket is tiewrapped to a front equipment handle, as if they go together. Do they?

Thanks.

Steve, K8JQ

On 4/10/2019 6:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols wrote:

Is eBay item number:173844545405 the correct rack mounting bracket for my HP-3456A DVM? All these "with handles" and "without handles" descriptions are confusing (if the sellers are even correct).

Jeremy



Re: HP8560E Low Level

 

Dave,
A totally blown mixer would explain things.? Even if all the diodes go open (or short) there will be plenty of LO feedthrough.? If you can't find an exact replacement at a reasonable cost, let me know.? I may have an "ordinary" mixer that will do the job.

--John Gord
email: johngord (at) verizon (dot) net


On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:05 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:
Thanks for those great advice. I have packed it in for the night but will try them out tomorrow.
?
I have a specan in my FM testset that goes to a gig so should be able to check the IFs.
?
It is one of the later of this model so you are right the first mixer does have bias as well and these look close but while is supposed to be 5v and is 5 the other is supposed to be 4.5v and it is 5 as well. Will have a closer look at these as well.
?
Thanks
?
Dave
?
?
?
Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S5


-------- Original message --------
From: amirb <amir.borji@...>
Date: 11/04/2019 22:29 (GMT+08:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP8560E Low Level

I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers?
if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal)
then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual

I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides
90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)

since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero)
and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter.
if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14
In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.

Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span)
and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:

I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.

The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.

Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.

Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.

I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.

I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.

Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.

My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.

Any though while I wait for a better spec an?

Dave

?


Re: HP8560E Low Level

 

开云体育

Thanks for those great advice. I have packed it in for the night but will try them out tomorrow.

I have a specan in my FM testset that goes to a gig so should be able to check the IFs.

It is one of the later of this model so you are right the first mixer does have bias as well and these look close but while is supposed to be 5v and is 5 the other is supposed to be 4.5v and it is 5 as well. Will have a closer look at these as well.

Thanks

Dave



Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S5


-------- Original message --------
From: amirb <amir.borji@...>
Date: 11/04/2019 22:29 (GMT+08:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP8560E Low Level

I forgot to ask, what is your noise floor level at full span?



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27 AM, amirb wrote:
I assume there are no error messages appearing anymore, right? Any error message about Log amp or step gain amplifiers?
if there is no error and you are sure the attenuator and the input AC/DC coupling are ok (you can even check with oscilloscope by injecting a signal)
then the best and perhaps only way to isolate the problem is by injecting signal at various points and measuring power levels according to the service manual

I dont think this is due to low LO amplitude in any of the converters. otherwise you would get an error message and besides
90dB down is way too much for that. I suspect this is due to a fault in one of the 3 converters or in the Log amp (but not in any of the LO drives)

since you dont have a second spectrum analyzer, I suggest you inject a signal at say -20 or -21dB to the first mixer (make sure span is set to zero)
and then measure the 310.7MHz second IF with an oscilloscope (I hope you have a 400-500MHz scope?) or even a power meter.
if the amplitude is way off then the problem is either the first mixer or the second converter. By the way, you can check the mixer bias voltages coming from A14
In some versions even the first mixer has bias voltage.

Next you can inject a clean 310.7MHz at around -35 or -36dBm to the third IF input (you might have it on the front panel) (you must choose it first in the menus and also choose zero span)
and then you can measure the 10.7 Mhz final IF with an oscilloscope it must be around -15 to -17dBm I think.



On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:44 AM, Dave Ireland wrote:

I am repairing a HP8560E and until now have been doing well.

The unit on delivery had the classic distorted display and no apparent response to any input though it did sweep it was very slow. 12 Alarms were reported.

Choose the "600 MHz Reference Oscillator Unlocked" first and replacing failed 2N2222A regulator on the 100MHz oscillator which bought the display back and all the alarms disappeared. Best 40c I've ever spent.

Was it completely fixed? No unfortunately not, the input reads about 90dB low. Every thing else looks fine, the resolution band width, span and frequency accuracy all look good. Checked the attenuator and the filter and even went straight into the RF port on the first low band mixer but still 90dB down.

I am at an impass now until I can borrow a decent SA as I do not have anything to measure 3-6GHz.

I did the LO feed through test in the service manual ie centre freq 0Hz, Span 1MHz, input attenuator 0dB and it says the feed through should be between -6 and -30dBm. It says if it is inside this range the RF path following the Low band mixer is operating properly.

Mine is -26dBm, so in the range.

My question is does that test mean that the the Yig, the LO distribution amp, the first mixer LO and IF ports and all the following mixers are operating correctly albeit not 90dB out? If so, the only thing I can think is a faulty RF port on the mixer (sounds unlikely). Also, I suppose if the LO drive was low, maybe 10 dB or so, there would still be feed through but may be not enough level to bias the mixer to mix.

Any though while I wait for a better spec an?

Dave

?