Hi,
Red Herring alert!
FWIW I use Prologix interfaces (with the 'auto-read-after-write'
feature disabled) and program using mostly AutoIT or EZGpib/Pascal
s but I don't have to treat the 436 or 438 any different from any
other HP or Tek instrument as far as reading data is concerned.
Adrian
On 11/20/2018 7:15 AM, Staffan wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hello,
Is this working with the 82357, it would be a great starting
point. Although I just don’t understand why interactive IO
doesn’t work.?
Has anyone experienced differences between interactive IO and
using the libraries - I guess interactive IO just is an
interface to the libs?
My best bet right now is that REN should be controlled
(pulled inactive) for reading data from the 436. I just don’t
know how to test this with the 82357/VISA libraries.?
Regards,
?Staffan
On Monday, November 19, 2018, Daun Yeagley <
daun@...>
wrote:
Hi Staffan
The physical layer for IEE-488 itself is essentially
unchanged from the original.? 488.2 deals more with the
messaging protocol.
This is where all the "universal" commands originated (all
the * commands like *IDN?, etc.).
If you saw my PM to you a bit ago, you saw an example of a
"non-488.2" communication using the Agilent IO libraries.?
In other words, those nifty commands are not available to
the old "R2D2" command structure instruments.? I guess I'll
include that listing here, for others to see as well.? This
code sets up and gets readings from an HP3478A voltmeter,
which is pre-488.2 (R2D2 "language")
Daun
Daun E. Yeagley II, N8ASB
On 11/19/2018 4:01 PM, Staffan wrote:
Hello,
Many thanks. Notice that I replied to your direct mail. I
don't think the problem lies in the 436, but rather in how
the USB dongle 82357 performs communication. Don't know if
the GPIB standard was updated - 488.2 seems to be from
1992, whereas the instrument predates 1980. It would be
great to have a configuration within VISA to support
different standards for different instruments - or is this
perhaps not needed? Sounds strange that there shouldn't be
sufficient backwards compatibility for a data bus!
Regards,
? Staffan