开云体育

Paul, No need for low-level CCWs Look in IBM publication: GC33-5373-2 File No. 5370-30 DOS/VS Systems Supervisor and 1/0 Macros page 42: DTFCN defines an input or output file that is processed on a

Check your ASSGNs. They are messed up. // ASSGN SYS000,SYSLNK ASSGN SYSPCH,SYS000 ASSGN SYSPCH,SYS000 ASSGN SYSLNK,SYS000 ASSGN SYSIPT,SYS000 ASSGN SYSPCH,SYS000 how many times are you going to

I don't need an answer to the return code anymore, as I found out that I already had code to do the equivalent of a WTO and was able to use that to get func1 to print "start", call func2 which says

Thanks all for your replies. Good news is that the pdld (linker) author (from Slovakia) has agreed to support the VSE format of an unloaded (using CSERV) executable (phase). He has already done MVS

From memory in earlier dos versions it was pretty simple to use single ccws, a ccb pointing to syslog, and excp/wait. Just use one ccw for read and one for write

might get a few hints from the MVS source for SYS1.MACLIB https://github.com/moshix/MVS38j.SYS1.MACLIB/blob/master/WTO [email protected]> wrote: -- Dr. Lee Smith Chief Scientist

That is a z/VSE only macro. With z/VSE IBM did a complete rewrite on the console. [email protected]> wrote: -- Sincerely, John Imholte

There is a WTO macro documented in the z/VSE manuals. But when I tried using WTO in my assembler code on DOS/VS it said there was no such macro. Does it exist, and if it does, is there something I

I think that if we provide a DLBL/EXTENT for one of those files, say FILE02, VTP won't complain about it at startup, because it will be able to open it. Of course, the file must exist. However I am

Professor Ferland, VOILA! I still get open errors for FILE02 thru FILE14 but I'm up and running! I logged on with HERC01/CUL8TR and was presented with the attached screen. Finally, F3 reports VTP

Hey Jim, I finally got it! Check the attached picture. :-) What seems to have done the trick is adding the DLBL/EXTENT of the two files (U000.SECURITY.FILE and U000.CONTROL.FILE) to the VTP job. Can

Understood.? Having never seen VTP, I can't comment.? However, being an avid ICCF user, I can only hope VTP can be a reasonable substitute. Now my task is to find VTP 3.7!? Any idea where?

Hello Jim and Rene I still had the directory on my PC containing the DOS/VS system I was playing around with back in 2022 so I thought I would have a look and see if I could bring it up again and try

I just tried to run VTP 3.8 with supervisor $$A$SUPV and POWERV with no more success. :-( For sure, it is easier to install, and it runs with DOS/VS as a guest under VM/370 (despite the opposite

Mark, To be honest, I was fascinated by PS/44.? I only recently learned about it when I was preparing for a presentation, I’m going to be giving at the VM Workshop later this week.? Part of my

Greetings Professor, It is so nice to hear from you again. Jim, you are exactly where I was yesterday after spending an entire afternoon trying to make this VTP 3.8 work. I was assuming you were

Jim, you are exactly where I was yesterday after spending an entire afternoon trying to make this VTP 3.8 work. I don't know why it behaves like that. However I noticed that the system storage map

OK! What an interesting trip down memory lane. . . 1. I reassembled the POWER module changing 'ACCOUNT=NO' to 'ACCOUNT=YES' and called it POWERA. 2. I copied POWER SYSIN to POWERA SYSIN and changed

John, So, what is your interest?in PS/44?? Did you ever work with the model 44, back in the day? When I attended Clarkson College of Technology (now Clarkson U.) in Potsdam, NY from 1971 through

The following files and folders have been uploaded to the Files area of the [email protected] group. * /44-MPS.BAL ( /g/H390-DOSVS/files/44-MPS.BAL ) *By:* Mark Waterbury