开云体育

Thanks, Shal and Dano, for your comments. We've already throttled back the photo sizes to 488x488 for emails, and 1024 for other image uploads. Our focus is now on managing other kinds of document

Jim, There is for photos, sort-of, but not for attachments. That's probably because for photos the limit is expressed in pixel dimensions and photos over the limit can be automatically resized to fit.

> We're just getting our group started. There is some Yes, there are several controls you can set. Under Administration > Settings, under the first 'Settings' button, scroll way down to "Photos". You

We're just getting our group started. There is some discussion about attachments. I see we can set a group policy for the maximum size of attachments that a member will receive by email, which

Exactly. Spot on. Gin

I am for an unlike or dislike button. Facebook, better media? That's your subjective judgment. Here's a list of the news organizations that allow up/downvoting, via Disqus:

Like or both ;-) Or, as at Reddit: upvote/downvote -- Jim Poston@... << See ya! >>

I don't know where they all are, but many news sites have it. ABC News, San Jose Mercury News, and the Las Vegas Sun are examples. Disqus is widely used by newpapers and allows downvoting. Reddit,

BTW, notice I Liked your last post. Possibly it is operating in the black. But I'll wager he doesn't include his labor, not to mention a wage commensurate with the level of his capabilities and

Perhaps group owners could have an option to disable the Unlike button if they don't think it fits the character of their group. Or disable the Like button for that matter... A less charged term could

J, I don't recall. In any case Facebook has moved on to offering icons to express one's reaction: They to are not anonymous. You can hover on them to see who has clicked which. Shal

And I think it should. My point is that the civilized sites eliminated dislikes long ago, and for good reason. I think it was Shal who posted the link explaining why even Facebook eliminated it. ? --

IMO non-anonymous dislikes would create even more hostility than anonymous ones. I'm with Arno on this. ? -- J

I don't think that has, or should have, anything to do with what may be on Groups.io This is a whole new concept in a groups site, so shouldn't be limited by what is or isn't present elsewhere. If

Thank you, Shal, The 'anonymous' was added as an after thought just before sending. I am against saying NO without giving a reason. Better still, offer an alternative. Arno

Cathy, If you are not currently logged in to the site you cannot add entries to a group's calender even if you can see it (calendars can be publicly viewable). If you are not an owner/mod of the group

Arno, Likes are not anonymous in Groups.io - you can click on a link to see a list of who liked the post. I would expect that unlikes would not be anonymous either. I don't know if that affects your

I think a better venue for this conversation/debate would be the beta group, so that Mark can see the responses. I am very strongly against an Unlike button. All of the better media either never had

I feel an "Unlike" option should not be there. I don't think posts should be treated as polls. If one disagrees with an idea, one should post and reply why ones thoughts are different. Just being an

Can someone name some platforms (besides the odious, troll-ridden craigslist forums) that have an unlike as well as a like button? Facebook got rid of it a long time ago. The news outlets don't have