Matthew McConaughey's Tweet
开云体育So what’s he proposing? ?I don’t see any real practical solutions named. Maybe he should take time out from his lucrative Hollywood career and actually run for office himself, or do something, anything to try and stop the madness. ?Rather than just posting what amounts to basically a glorified version of thoughts and prayers.And I’m sure plenty of people look at themselves in the mirror every day and wonder when they started living in what’s fast becoming a third-world hellhole, or a pretty good simulation of one. And I don’t see anyone making excuses except the sociopaths. Oh not the ones doing the killing, they’re either dead or in prison. I mean the ones in Congress. Sal? On May 25, 2022, at 8:06 AM, Emily Mae via <emily.mae50@...> wrote: <Screen Shot 2022-05-25 at 5.50.45 AM.png> -- Em |
|
We're being held hostage.? Perhaps, finally, a majority of the country has had enough.? A few red flag laws and background checks won't do it.? The police are so scared, they won't even do their job.? It's completely nuts that they would ask teachers to arm themselves and make them responsible for what lawmakers fail to do, time and time again.? Schumer will probably end up putting a vote to the floor and it will go down...or some watered down BS useless piece of legislation will pass....he's just acknowledging the truth.? We must stop forgetting and fight to ban assault rifles at a minimum.??
We have a progressive AG.? These are the laws on our books in WA State.? Texas is screwed with Abbot.? This isn't enough though.? We need a federal ban.?? When do the provisions of Initiative 1639 take effect?Effective January 1, 2019 the new?
All of the other provisions in the??take effect on July 1, 2019 including:
? Do I still need to comply with the requirements of Initiative 1639 even though there’s a lawsuit challenging the law?Yes. Initiative 1639 was adopted by nearly 60% of Washington voters in November 2018. This law, like any other, is presumed constitutional and in force unless a court rules otherwise. No court has held any part of Initiative 1639 unconstitutional. Although there is a lawsuit challenging certain provisions of the law, the court has not yet ruled on any issues in the case. A ruling is not expected for some time. Consequently, a failure to comply with the law could result in criminal and/or civil liability. ?
-- Em |
开云体育On May 28, 2022, at 2:02 PM, Emily Mae via <emily.mae50@...> wrote: We're being held hostage. Bingo, the whole country is starting to feel like an effing prison. ?Or lunatic asylum. ?? Perhaps, finally, a majority of the country has had enough.? A few red flag laws and background checks won't do it. No we’re way past that. ? The police are so scared, they won't even do their job.? It’s not even clear anymore what their job even IS. Now we’re hearing that they have no actual requirement to protect people. Well, what is their purpose then? ?I’m genuinely wondering. ? ?It's completely nuts that they would ask teachers to arm themselves and make them responsible for what lawmakers fail to do, time and time again. I’d like to know how that works anyway… an AR-15 in every classroom? Locked doors and locked windows? ?Armed guards on every floor (And no way to know if *they’re* even obligated to protect the students). ?What could possibly go wrong? Schumer will probably end up putting a vote to the floor and it will go down...or some watered down BS useless piece of legislation will pass....he's just acknowledging the truth.? We must stop forgetting and fight to ban assault rifles at a minimum. ? Shumer is a useless POS pretending to give a damn so he can get re-elected. The first thing he does after this latest horrific nightmare is declare a recess. They’re all in on it, the entire country is being scammed big-time. We have a progressive AG.? These are the laws on our books in WA State.? Texas is screwed with Abbot.? This isn't enough though.? We need a federal ban.?? When do the provisions of Initiative 1639 take effect?Effective January 1, 2019 the new?
All of the other provisions in the??take effect on July 1, 2019 including:
?
Do I still need to comply with the requirements of Initiative 1639 even though there’s a lawsuit challenging the law?Yes. Initiative 1639 was adopted by nearly 60% of Washington voters in November 2018. This law, like any other, is presumed constitutional and in force unless a court rules otherwise. No court has held any part of Initiative 1639 unconstitutional. Although there is a lawsuit challenging certain provisions of the law, the court has not yet ruled on any issues in the case. A ruling is not expected for some time. Consequently, a failure to comply with the law could result in criminal and/or civil liability. ?
-- Em |
Emily Mae
Sal Sunshine