开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Agenda for Palominas School Board Meeting, April 13, 2021


 

开云体育

The agenda for the School Board Meeting must be published 24 hours before the meeting, and a copy is attached as a Word document. I don’t see the school district attorney’s name, Roger Decker, on the agenda nor anything about a request from the Road District.

Jimmy, please contact Decker and make sure our request will be considered tonight, and ask him when we should hear the decision.

Thanks,

Ken


 

开云体育

I've haven't heard from Jimmy but I just finished watching the School District meeting on Goggle Meet.? Our request came up at the very end under G.1. on the agenda, that is, "Request for Future Agenda Items". The request isn't going to be considered until next month. I've got some ideas on how it should be handled.? I think we should meet with the President of the Board in the next week or two, explain the evolution of the easement, ask what their plans are for the property, present what we want in a formal written request with photos etc., ask for about 30'x50' adjacent to Fairfield Cir, and offer to give them a fair compensation for the permission to install the boxes.?

This is kind-of what we did with site #2. The Vista del Oro President said he thought there would be little interest in granting our request. I suspect the school district will say the same but it's worth a try.

If the Road District is serious about having mailboxes installed (frankly, I have some doubts based on the progress, or lack there of, since the first of the year), we must get the surveyors out here ASAP and also move forward on site 3 west.

I welcome your comments.
Ken





On 4/13/2021 8:45 AM, Ken Cameron via groups.io wrote:

The agenda for the School Board Meeting must be published 24 hours before the meeting, and a copy is attached as a Word document. I don’t see the school district attorney’s name, Roger Decker, on the agenda nor anything about a request from the Road District.

Jimmy, please contact Decker and make sure our request will be considered tonight, and ask him when we should hear the decision.

Thanks,

Ken



 

开云体育

We really need comments on how to move ahead, if the community is seriously interested in moving ahead. To dates there have been few emails and comments other than those of Jimmy and myself.

On 4/13/2021 8:02 PM, Ken Cameron via groups.io wrote:

I've haven't heard from Jimmy but I just finished watching the School District meeting on Goggle Meet.? Our request came up at the very end under G.1. on the agenda, that is, "Request for Future Agenda Items". The request isn't going to be considered until next month. I've got some ideas on how it should be handled.? I think we should meet with the President of the Board in the next week or two, explain the evolution of the easement, ask what their plans are for the property, present what we want in a formal written request with photos etc., ask for about 30'x50' adjacent to Fairfield Cir, and offer to give them a fair compensation for the permission to install the boxes.?

This is kind-of what we did with site #2. The Vista del Oro President said he thought there would be little interest in granting our request. I suspect the school district will say the same but it's worth a try.

If the Road District is serious about having mailboxes installed (frankly, I have some doubts based on the progress, or lack there of, since the first of the year), we must get the surveyors out here ASAP and also move forward on site 3 west.

I welcome your comments.
Ken





On 4/13/2021 8:45 AM, Ken Cameron via groups.io wrote:

The agenda for the School Board Meeting must be published 24 hours before the meeting, and a copy is attached as a Word document. I don’t see the school district attorney’s name, Roger Decker, on the agenda nor anything about a request from the Road District.

Jimmy, please contact Decker and make sure our request will be considered tonight, and ask him when we should hear the decision.

Thanks,

Ken




 

开云体育

I am in favor of moving forward with site 3.

Amanda Paddock

On Apr 13, 2021, at 20:38, Ken Cameron via groups.io <rocks@...> wrote:

?
We really need comments on how to move ahead, if the community is seriously interested in moving ahead. To dates there have been few emails and comments other than those of Jimmy and myself.

On 4/13/2021 8:02 PM, Ken Cameron via groups.io wrote:
I've haven't heard from Jimmy but I just finished watching the School District meeting on Goggle Meet.? Our request came up at the very end under G.1. on the agenda, that is, "Request for Future Agenda Items". The request isn't going to be considered until next month. I've got some ideas on how it should be handled.? I think we should meet with the President of the Board in the next week or two, explain the evolution of the easement, ask what their plans are for the property, present what we want in a formal written request with photos etc., ask for about 30'x50' adjacent to Fairfield Cir, and offer to give them a fair compensation for the permission to install the boxes.?

This is kind-of what we did with site #2. The Vista del Oro President said he thought there would be little interest in granting our request. I suspect the school district will say the same but it's worth a try.

If the Road District is serious about having mailboxes installed (frankly, I have some doubts based on the progress, or lack there of, since the first of the year), we must get the surveyors out here ASAP and also move forward on site 3 west.

I welcome your comments.
Ken





On 4/13/2021 8:45 AM, Ken Cameron via groups.io wrote:

The agenda for the School Board Meeting must be published 24 hours before the meeting, and a copy is attached as a Word document. I don’t see the school district attorney’s name, Roger Decker, on the agenda nor anything about a request from the Road District.

Jimmy, please contact Decker and make sure our request will be considered tonight, and ask him when we should hear the decision.

Thanks,

Ken




 

Ken,

I concur that there had been little progress. I believe that most of us feel we are really stuck on the sidelines as we have little access to anything other than what our board will tell us and or do and this email forum. I believe we were supposed to have the surveyors out per our last meeting but as yet there has not been any movement. For our board, can we get a timeline on the Surveyor or at least a contact number one of us can reach out to? I also feel your (Ken’s) input on discussing our request with the Palominas School Board President is a good idea. I would be more than willing to assist if needed. Again, I understand we need to work through our board and need to have the board provide input. If the Board wishes to proceed with site 1 only then what steps are we taking to ensure success? I would suggest?we continue to pursue site 1 and also?work on site 3 in parallel by getting a surveyor and the sending a letter to the land owner. I also understand that will incur some expense, but I believe we have the funds available pending a confirmation of the districts budget. Thank you all for your efforts and hopefully we can make some progress.?


Matthew Paddock