开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Date

CW and Clusters

D. Scott MacKenzie
 

Danny said.....

"But then of course you would have the same thing happen that
I was hit with the other day. Im setting an sending CQ at 20 wpm, and
someone came back at me at 5 wpm. (ON THE EXTRA CLASS BAND). Sigh! I
know- I know - there is no test, even for 5 wpm anymore - at least in most
nations. We novices wouldn't have even dared to do that. That was also an
unwritten rule."

I would be pleased that someone came back to me with my call at 5wpm. I
would immediately QRS - regardless of the position on the band. I wouldn't
want to get into the position of - "I am a REAL EXTRA and earned my 20WPM =>
so I am going to show him the audacity of playing in my sandbox....." This
is not trying to flame anyone, but I would work him, QRS, and repeat as
necessary for him.

In a DXpedition - the situation is different....you are there a limited time
and trying to work as may as possible. This is one of the problems with the
great spotting programs we have - the spot cluster announces it - we click
to move rig there, click a macro to call and to answer - Viola - Instant DX.
It has created a large portion of "cluster-monkeys"....

Just my 2 cents from an old man

Scott


Re: Pitcairn Island on 14070 CW or RTTY?

Danny Douglas
 

Over the years, the CW speed in contests has gotten faster and faster. I
can only believe it is because of the availability of keyboards and MACROS .
Back when we were all using Vibroplexes we had some people that sent 20-25
wpm, but most couldnt. At the same time, we had one hand busy with paper
logs/dupe sheets/coffee cups, etc. We had separate tansmitter/receivers and
antenna tuners that had to be manually tuned. All of that tended to keep
the speeds reasonable.

As keyboards first came on line (I built my first one in 70) we had a few
people that couldnt avoid cranking up the speed, but there were few of them
out there. Computers came around, and guys with VIC20s managed to get them
to key a rig and things got a little faster. Now - every Tom, Dick, and
Harry, as well as Jose, Deiter, and Viktor have computers and are keying CW
with them. They crank them up, probably higher than they themselves can
comfortably copy code (some dont see to be able to copy at 5wpm) and we have
a mess. We have DX stations going QRT from CW because the crowd cant seem
to read his pleas to simply QRS a bit. He is not the only one. I just
wish there was a way to ensure the guys sending at 35 wpm could copy that
speed.

When I came into radio, the hams told me: Dont send any faster than you can
copy, or someone may come back at that speed -----Its happening isnt it?
I got into military/government communications and the rule was : Send only
as fast as the slowest operator on the net. Apparently none of these guys
have been trained either by knowledgeable hams, or government operators.
Its apparent that more and more of them cant even read half the speed they
are keying with their computers.

Hey, I would love to see a big internantional contest allow only bugs and
straight keys. But then of course you would have the same thing happen that
I was hit with the other day. Im setting an sending CQ at 20 wpm, and
someone came back at me at 5 wpm. (ON THE EXTRA CLASS BAND). Sigh! I
know- I know - there is no test, even for 5 wpm anymore - at least in most
nations. We novices wouldnt have even dared to do that. That was also an
unwritten rule.

Lastly, I hear people saying they are using xyz program to COPY code.
Baloney. Even the best computer programs out there cannot copy code as well
as the human ear. Yeah, perfect machine sent code, 80 wpm, no QRM, or other
propagation problems and the good ones can copy better than I can, but I
only copy 50 wpm, under those conditions. Lets put a little QRN, QRM, QSB
on the signal and see how those computers do that. Lets not pretend to be a
morse operator, if we have to depend on computers. Swith over to PSK or
RTTY and have fun. Leave the driving to us.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Art Searle W2NRA" <w2nra@...>
To: <dxlab@...>
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [dxlab] RE: Pitcairn Island on 14070 CW or RTTY?


Hi Rich,

You wrote:
-- snip --
The crazy thing about that is that I can't believe there is anything
to be gained by going any faster than 25-30 WPM in a contest. In fact
it probably leads to a great may requests for repeats and winds up
slowing them down. Some people just don't to get it!
-- snip --

And contesters don't slow down for band conditions either. I had a lot of
QRN when I was running stations in the WAE contest a couple of weeks ago.
I
set my Keyer at 23 WPM (sometimes 21 WPM) because I was getting too many
repeat exchange and QTC repeat requests. Slowing down cut down on the
repeat requests. Yet guys were still calling me and sending exchanges as
high as 35 WPM. I often had to ask for repeats due to static crashes in
the
middle of their exchanges. I don't think you'll ever get contesters to
slow
down (except 160m contests - those guys know better).

The thing to do is work on improving your CW speed. Morse Runner is a
great
free program for improving your speed. BTW you can set your CW speed in
Morse Runner but the speed of the stations that calling you still varies
just like in a real contest.

73 Art W2NRA
"Keep to the Code!"
w2nra.com




Yahoo! Groups Links





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.8/973 - Release Date: 8/25/2007
5:00 PM


cw and WinWarbler

Danny Douglas
 

I have everything working in the new computer, except CW. For some reason I
havent hit the right combination to get the rig to key. I use Comport 1 for
CAT, and comport 2 for Rigblaster Plus. PSK, RTTY both work fine, but when
I attempt to key CW, I see the green blinking light on WW working. Just no
keying thru the RigBlaster to the rig (ts570s).. The rig blaster is plugged
into the Key jack at the back of the rig, and a Iambic key plugged into the
Paddle jack on the back of the rig.

When I check the WW configuration cw tab I have it set up :
Keyboard- auto start and auto stop (that works as far as the green blinking
light is concerned:
Under PTT assert PTT checked
Keying - Im not sure what to do here. If I check either serial port RTS or
serial port DTR
and the port 2 is selected: I get a pop up saying port 2 is
being used for PTT; keying CW keying will be accomplished through via its
rts signal.-- and if I click on the serial port dtr I get anothe3r tab
saying port 2 is being used for PTT; keying CW keying will be accomplished
through via its DTR signal. When I leave it on PTT port (com2)RTS =- and
key the keyboard - the green light blinks and the rigs PTT turns it on
(parallel with the blinking) and off but there is no cw keying. When I set
it for DTR, the green light blinks, ptt asserts the rig, but it stays on TX
until the green light quits blinking on and off, then the rig goes back to
receive. ----That is what happens when the Rigblaster switch is set to
"automatic". If that switch is set to VOX -- I get only the green blinking
light on WW - no switch to transmit at all on the rig, with either the PTT
PORT DTS or PTT PORT RTS selected.

Am not sure what the lower right panel : output port selector is for - but
have tried both number 1 and number 2 - and see no changes. Simply do not
get the rig to key CW from keyboard or MACROS.


Re: Pitcairn Island on 14070 CW or RTTY?

Art Searle W2NRA
 

Hi Rich,

You wrote:
-- snip --
The crazy thing about that is that I can't believe there is anything
to be gained by going any faster than 25-30 WPM in a contest. In fact
it probably leads to a great may requests for repeats and winds up
slowing them down. Some people just don't to get it!
-- snip --

And contesters don't slow down for band conditions either. I had a lot of QRN when I was running stations in the WAE contest a couple of weeks ago. I set my Keyer at 23 WPM (sometimes 21 WPM) because I was getting too many repeat exchange and QTC repeat requests. Slowing down cut down on the repeat requests. Yet guys were still calling me and sending exchanges as high as 35 WPM. I often had to ask for repeats due to static crashes in the middle of their exchanges. I don't think you'll ever get contesters to slow down (except 160m contests - those guys know better).

The thing to do is work on improving your CW speed. Morse Runner is a great free program for improving your speed. BTW you can set your CW speed in Morse Runner but the speed of the stations that calling you still varies just like in a real contest.

73 Art W2NRA
"Keep to the Code!"
w2nra.com


Re: further simplifications to DXKeeper 6.0's Online QSL panel

Art Searle W2NRA
 

Hi Joe,

Sorry for the delayed response. I just got back from a trip.

Joe, you make an excellent point and I see that the CFM button must be retained. Retaining QSL cards in the Queue does make Online QSLing impossible. Your method of using the CFM button for LotW confirmations would never work for me, i.e. 176 LotW QSLs in August - a typical month. I like to take my time with QSL cards to fully research QSL routes and prepare QSLs. I may take a week. I never leave the cards in the QSL Queue. I mark all of the QSOs as QSL_Sent = R and work on them filtered in the Log QSOs tab.

As a suggestion that would allow us to retain the QSOs in the QSL Queue, would it be possible to have selecting Add Needed or Add Requested also filter the Log to those QSOs? And/or could there be a prompt to ask "Do you want to set QSL_Sent to R?" when you select Add Needed?

If there are objections to this could it be a configurations selection - a radio button "Add QSL_Sent = R to prompt to Add Needed?

73 Art W2NRA
"Keep to the Code!"
w2nra.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@...>

If you use the CFM button in the LotW sub-panel with any
regularity, please sketch out the usage scenario.
My "live" log generally has cards/labels in the queue. However,
since I want to keep my status current, I often make a quick
on-line (web browser) check of LotW confirmations and when I
find one (like the FW0MO/FW0YL confirmations last night) I use
the LotW CFM button to update the log without doing a "sync
Lotw QSLs" operation since it is not available with cards/labels
in the queue.

I don't want to empty the queue on a regular basis since I use
it for manual entries (right click -> Add to QSL Queue) - quite
often when I notice an alternative for a missing band/mode entity.
If I emptied the queue to do an on-line sync, I would probably
lose track of some of the QSOs.

Now, if you wanted to make the LotW functions available without
first clearing the cards/labels queue, I would have no objection
to that!

73,

... Joe, W4TV

Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...] On
Behalf Of Dave Bernstein
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:54 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] Re: further simplifications to DXKeeper
6.0's Online QSL panel

I believe you're referring to the CFM button in the QSL panel, which
I am not proposing to remove. Its pretty much my favorite button in
DXKeeper...

I am proposing to remove the CFM buttons in the "Online QSL" panel's
eQSL.cc and LotW sub-panels. If you use the CFM button in the LotW
sub-panel with any regularity, please sketch out the usage scenario.
Thanks!

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

--- In dxlab@..., "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@...> wrote:

Dave,

Objections?
Yes. I use the CFM buttons regularly to update status and
date at the same time. In DXKeeper I don't care if a station
is a LotW/eQSL user (SpotCollector handles that for the only
service that matters) since I will send a traditional card
if I need the band/mode credit for Challenge and have not
received LotW confirmation within a couple weeks - even if
the station is listed in the LotW database.

I would rather lose the "member" button than the CFM selector.

73,

... Joe, W4TV

-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...] On
Behalf Of Dave Bernstein
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:50 AM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] further simplifications to DXKeeper 6.0's
Online QSL panel

Art's comments have me looking more critically at the "Log QSOs"
tab's "Online QSL" panel. I suggest that the CFM buttons in the
Online QSL panel's eQSL.cc and LotW sub-panels are unnecessary.
99.9%
of the time, a QSO's EQSL_QSL_RCVD or LOTW_QSL_RCVD gets set
to 'Y'
(for "confirmed") by the "Sync eQSL QSLs" or "Sync LOTW QSLs"
operations respectively. If there's an occasional need to
manually
set a QSO's EQSL_QSL_RCVD or LOTW_QSL_RCVD to 'Y', that can
easily be
done with the selector.

Referring to the screen shot in



this would allow me to move the "member" selectors up a row,
reducing
the overall height of the "Online QSL" panel.

Objections?

73,

Dave, AA6YQ


Re: Pitcairn Island on 14070 CW or RTTY?

Ron Rosson
 

Hi Art it is going OK.
I will explain more in private email.

Yes it is the best logger of them all.
I'm still getting familiar with it.
I'm switching over from DXbase 6k.

73 Ron

Art K6XT wrote:


Hi Ron hows it going OB?

Great to read you've found the best logger of em all!

73 Art

Ron Rosson wrote:
Hi Tom,
Try CWget it help through the fast guys and pick up you speed
copying too.
Nice Job.

73 Ron N6XT

Tom Dixon wrote:

Gentlemen
This does have DXlab Content....at the end.
I am currently on Pitcairn Island as VP6TD. My last day of operating
was yesterday 24/08/07 (Pitcairn Time) First off.....I do not claim to
be a morse operator....however I can struggle alone at 10-12
words..... I was aware that Pitcairn was a sort after contact in the
digital modes as well as CW, which was one of the main reasons I
posted in my QRZ.com info that "I would be operating mainly PSK and
some CW".......I attempted a number of times to operate morse....and
no matter how often I asked other op's to QRS (slow down!!!)....they
did not.........Hence......I packed my keyer and posted it back to
NZ.....I tried!!!......I attempted to use the CW function in WW, no
luck.......I have no doubt that it was operator fault and not computer
or radio fault.....may be I was not reading the help file enough?
Apart from that, I think I gave all the other modes a fair crack and
tried to meet the needs of myself and other amateurs.

Life on the Island is good....the DX is even better!!!

All this was done using the fantastic collection of programs bundled
into the DXLab suit. Every-time I open and use this collection, it
impresses me more and more.

Tom
VP6TD
ZL2HGR

--

Best DX,
Ron Rosson(N6XT, formerly WB6ORX)
N6XT's Ham Shack Online <>
n6xt@...
Virus scanned by Norton AV 2K6


Re: Pitcairn Island on 14070 CW or RTTY?

 

At 09:59 AM 8/26/2007, you wrote:
Unfortunately many of us have had to struggle through this phase of
CW ops -- I've come to the point that if I can't copy at my speed of
25 - 30 wpm I just don't put the guys in the log. And that's mostly
in contest operations -- I'm thinking about abandoning the SS
contest because there certainly seems to be more emphasis on speed
than anything else. Fine for those who can, but if too many ops
like me bail out there won't be so many big scores for the
speed-merchants. I'm content to let them buzz each other.
The crazy thing about that is that I can't believe there is anything to be gained by going any faster than 25-30 WPM in a contest. In fact it probably leads to a great may requests for repeats and winds up slowing them down. Some people just don't to get it!

The really good contest OPS, (K3ZO and W3LPL for example) the ones you always see with the top scores and who hold world records, generally set their CW speed around 25 WPM or even a little slower.

73, Rich - W3ZJ


Browser Integration (Pathfinder)

JT Croteau
 

Dave,

Firefox is my default web browser. Additionally, it was set as
default before I installed DXLab.

DXLab's online help pages launch Firefox properly for all related
applications. However, I have a problem with Pathfinder. When I
launch a site from within Pathfinder, say someones homepage linked on
their QRZ bio, it always launches IE and not Firefox.

Is IE hardwired into Pathfinder or might there be a separate registry
entry for Pathfinders browser?

Thanks

--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH


Re: No RTTY Xmit

 

At 06:14 PM 8/25/2007, you wrote:

Just noticed that I can only get WW to transmit in RTTY by
using VOX, although PSK31 is working fine without VOX. What have I
messed up with this? I really don't care for VOX operation if I can avoid it.

Thanks,
Earl
In WinWarblers Config screen, RTTY tab, click "MTTY Setup" then select the TX tab. Is the PTT Com port set to the same port you use for PSK31?

73, Rich - W3ZJ


Re: Pitcairn Island on 14070 CW or RTTY?

 

Hi, Tom. Thanks for making the DXLab effort on CW. Yes, what you experienced is all too often the attitude of many in the DX/contest community -- they really don't listen and honor the DX operators request. That may be because so many of them are calling so much they don't even hear the little bit of signal that they MIGHT otherwise hear.

Unfortunately many of us have had to struggle through this phase of CW ops -- I've come to the point that if I can't copy at my speed of 25 - 30 wpm I just don't put the guys in the log. And that's mostly in contest operations -- I'm thinking about abandoning the SS contest because there certainly seems to be more emphasis on speed than anything else. Fine for those who can, but if too many ops like me bail out there won't be so many big scores for the speed-merchants. I'm content to let them buzz each other.

Stick with the DXLab/WW programs -- they are very much worth the effort to get them right. And keep working out on the key(er) -- it too is worth the effort. The DXLab and WW interfaces very well with the MicroKeyer and lets you concentrate on listening/hearing and not the mechanics of the program itself. Apologies for the speedy guys who drove you off -- someday they may see the light -- but don't hold your breath. 73, Vic, W4VIC




Re: Pitcairn Island on 14070 CW or RTTY?
Posted by: "Ron Rosson" n6xt@... n6xtus
Sat Aug 25, 2007 3:38 pm (PST)
Hi Tom,
Try CWget it help through the fast guys and pick up you speed
copying too.
Nice Job.

73 Ron N6XT

Tom Dixon wrote:

Gentlemen
This does have DXlab Content....at the end.
I am currently on Pitcairn Island as VP6TD. My last day of operating
was yesterday 24/08/07 (Pitcairn Time) First off.....I do not
claim to
be a morse operator....however I can struggle alone at 10-12
words..... I was aware that Pitcairn was a sort after contact in the
digital modes as well as CW, which was one of the main reasons I
posted in my QRZ.com info that "I would be operating mainly PSK and
some CW".......I attempted a number of times to operate morse....and
no matter how often I asked other op's to QRS (slow down!!!)....they
did not.........Hence......I packed my keyer and posted it back to
NZ.....I tried!!!......I attempted to use the CW function in WW, no
luck.......I have no doubt that it was operator fault and not
computer
or radio fault.....may be I was not reading the help file enough?
Apart from that, I think I gave all the other modes a fair crack and
tried to meet the needs of myself and other amateurs.

Life on the Island is good....the DX is even better!!!

All this was done using the fantastic collection of programs bundled
into the DXLab suit. Every-time I open and use this collection, it
impresses me more and more.

Tom
VP6TD
ZL2HGR


Re: PSK31

Danny Douglas
 

Only if I have my glasses on.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Earl Needham" <needhame1@...>
To: <dxlab@...>
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: [dxlab] PSK31


At 01:46 PM 8/25/2007, Danny Douglas wrote:
Sounds like a lot of good advice you have been getting from the gang. One
thing I havent seen any one mention yet is the AGC control. At least one
has
mentiioned mike gain, though.
AGC? ALC?

Speaking of which -- should I use the FAST AGC setting on my 706?

Thanks,
Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham
Clovis, New Mexico DM84jk

Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT





Yahoo! Groups Links





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.6/971 - Release Date: 8/24/2007
2:59 PM


Re: spotcollector sources-- KS4Q -- VE7CC

Danny Douglas
 

OK Thanks. Hd you on the other (zapped) computer, but of course didnt
remember the address.

----- Original Message -----
From: "ve7cc" <ve7cc@...>
To: <dxlab@...>
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 2:56 PM
Subject: [dxlab] Re: spotcollector sources-- KS4Q -- VE7CC


The preferred address for VE7CC-1 is
VE7CC-1 ve7cc.net port 23
Port 7373 does work, but is used mainly for node to node linking.

An alternative for KS4Q is
KS4Q-1 dx.ks4q.net port 7373

Lee

--- In dxlab@..., "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@...> wrote:

I am connected - and have been having no problems. Sometimes slow,
but
always able to connect. I always log into to several at different
locations
north and south (and west) of me to optimize my chances....

Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On
Behalf Of
Danny Douglas
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:12 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] spotcollector sources-- KS4Q -- VE7CC


Anyone know what is happening to KS4Q today> Tried to sign in and
got :
QRX....NR 30 in line, and that counted down to #1, then started
at 30
again,
went down to 1, up to 3 down to 1, connected, stayed connected 2
minutes
and
then had a time out. It has just connected again, but who knows
how long
it
will last.

Also what are the Host address, port, names for ve7cc as a spot
source for
spotcollector?











Yahoo! Groups Links





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.6/971 - Release Date: 8/24/2007
2:59 PM


746 Pro and Commander

kg0ft1
 

Is there anyway to get Commander to automatically put this rig into SSB
- digital mode? Instead of doing it manually? (And forgetting to do so
most of the time and wondering why I'm not heard? Age-related problem
I'm afraid.)

Fred


Re: PSK31, RTTY, etc...

Earl Needham
 

At 10:45 PM 8/24/2007, Danny Douglas wrote:
Im headed off to bed as its midnight 30 plus right now. Tomorow evening,
lets get together on 40 or 20 and see if we can give that thing a workout.
You will probably really enjoy the digi modes now.
Danny, I suspect you're already in bed, but if you're up, would you like to try 40 meters? Otherwise we'll put it off until Monday evening at the earliest.

7 3
Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham
Clovis, New Mexico DM84jk

Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT


Re: PSK31 Displayand Receive problem

 

Glad you've got it going again, Dave. I should have suggested
clicking the "Set Default Colors" button on the Config window's
Display tab; it brings all the font, background, and line colors back
to factory settings.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ



--- In dxlab@..., DESloan@... wrote:



Dave I was able to get all three panes back (I am the only one on
this
computer and it worked great Mon-Wed. Thursday I had a doctors
appointment and
Friday was tied up). Before I was able to see a line for the
frequency for each
pane and it was in color, I just checked and all of the color
selections were
set to black. Changed them and everything seems to be working.
Don't have any
idea what could have caused this to happen. But, glad it is all
working
again.

73,
Dave N0EOP

In a message dated 8/25/2007 12:57:42 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
aa6yq@... writes:




If you're only seeing receive pane 0, then the two dividers that
normally separate the three panes have been pulled down so that
all
space is allocated to pane 0 (which some operators prefer). To
change
this, slowly move the mouse cursor from receive pane 0 down
towards
the transmit panel; when the mouse cursor changes to a double-
headed
arrow, click-drag upwards with the left mouse button, and a
divider
will appear that separates pane 0 from an expanding pane 1. Now
slowly move the mouse cursor from receive pane 1 down towards the
transmit panel; when the mouse cursor changes to a double-headed
arrow, click-drag upwards with the left mouse button, and a
divider
will appear that separates pane 1 from an expanding pane 2.

To indentify transmit and receive frequencies on the Waterfall
display with traces, set"Channel ID" to Traces in the "tuning
display" sub-panel in the Receive panel on the Config window's PSK
tab.

If this doesn't get you going, Dave, please let me know...

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

--- In _dxlab@..._ (mailto:dxlab@...) , DESloan@
wrote:

When in PSK31 mode only seeing pane 0 and nothing is decoding on
that pane.
I am able to go into xmit mode. Tried restore on version 5.2.9
but
same
results. Stations Heard is working and decoding signals alright.
RTTY will not
decode signals either. In both cases I can see signals on the
waterfall but
don't see the line that shows me what frequency I'm on. When I
click on the
waterfall the frequency changes (verified by transmitting) but
again I don't see
the line that shows the frequency that I'm on. Hope that someone
has some
ideas that I can try. I haven't shut down the computer and
restarted. I'll try
that right after I send this.

TNX & 73,
Dave N0EOP




** **** **** **<WBR>****<WBR>
new AOL at
_
()













*** Get a sneak peek of the all-
new AOL at





Re: 14070 CW or RTTY?

 

Earl,
Just a comment. Many PSKers set their radio on14070 and use the audio in the PSK pgm for selecting the PSK stn. If their program is not as smart as Dave's, all their PSK spots will be sent as 14070. You could set your limit to 14069.5 quite safely, I think. (I set my radio to 14069.5 and lock the dial when running PSK, as that puts the signals close to 070 at a more reasonable audio frequency).

I agree with your reaction to Dav'es comment on band plans; I doubt I would be so "polite"!
73
Pete K5GM

Earl Needham wrote:

At 07:17 PM 8/24/2007, Dave Bernstein wrote:


If you're hearing CW on 14069.9, you'll likely also hear it on 14070.
I'm just thinking that PSK31 is around 14070, and so I might like to see if I can get Spot Collector to show those spots as RTTY or PSK instead of CW. It's kinda disheartening to see a spot for Pitcairn Island on CW and get there only to find data.

Thanks,
Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham
Clovis, New Mexico DM84jk

Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT



Yahoo! Groups Links




Re: 5BWAS FROM NEW QTH

 

Welcome to 1-land, Jose! Will you be visiting the eastern side of our
state anytime soon? An eyeball QSO would be great.

You can filter your Log by operator callsign or "my QTH" before
running the WAS report.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

--- In dxlab@..., N1BAA - Jose Castillo <n1baa@...> wrote:

Good Afternoon All,

I know there are some major upgrades when DXK 6.0 comes
out....but have a 5BWAS question anyway...

Is there or will there be a function in place for those who
move and desire to "RE-WORK" 5BWAS from their NEW QTH???

Having just moved from VA to MA (Smiling>..
and desiring to track 5BWAS efforts from here.
I was fortunate enough to have worked 5BWAS 4 times from VA
and only missed KH6 and KL7 on 6M to have WAS from there.

Would be nice to be able to RESET the 5BWAS counter once
moved, or be able to select which call to calculate 5BWAS for.

73
Jose - N1BAA
ex N4BAA


Re: No RTTY Xmit

Earl Needham
 

At 07:27 PM 8/25/2007, Dave Bernstein wrote:

Earl and I fixed this; WinWarbler's PTT mode must be set to "RTS+DTR"
for use with soundcard RTTY.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ
Thanks for the help, Dave, and it appears we also fixed my IMD "thing" at the same time.

7 3
Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham
Clovis, New Mexico DM84jk

Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT


Re: No RTTY Xmit

 

Earl and I fixed this; WinWarbler's PTT mode must be set to "RTS+DTR"
for use with soundcard RTTY.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

--- In dxlab@..., Earl Needham <needhame1@...> wrote:


Just noticed that I can only get WW to transmit in RTTY by
using VOX, although PSK31 is working fine without VOX. What have I
messed up with this? I really don't care for VOX operation if I
can avoid it.

Thanks,
Earl

KD5XB -- Earl Needham
Clovis, New Mexico DM84jk

Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT


Re: Pitcairn Island on 14070 CW or RTTY?

Art K6XT
 

Hi Ron hows it going OB?

Great to read you've found the best logger of em all!

73 Art

Ron Rosson wrote:

Hi Tom,
Try CWget it help through the fast guys and pick up you speed copying too.
Nice Job.

73 Ron N6XT

Tom Dixon wrote:

Gentlemen
This does have DXlab Content....at the end.
I am currently on Pitcairn Island as VP6TD. My last day of operating was yesterday 24/08/07 (Pitcairn Time) First off.....I do not claim to be a morse operator....however I can struggle alone at 10-12 words..... I was aware that Pitcairn was a sort after contact in the digital modes as well as CW, which was one of the main reasons I posted in my QRZ.com info that "I would be operating mainly PSK and some CW".......I attempted a number of times to operate morse....and no matter how often I asked other op's to QRS (slow down!!!)....they did not.........Hence......I packed my keyer and posted it back to NZ.....I tried!!!......I attempted to use the CW function in WW, no luck.......I have no doubt that it was operator fault and not computer or radio fault.....may be I was not reading the help file enough?
Apart from that, I think I gave all the other modes a fair crack and tried to meet the needs of myself and other amateurs.

Life on the Island is good....the DX is even better!!!

All this was done using the fantastic collection of programs bundled into the DXLab suit. Every-time I open and use this collection, it impresses me more and more.

Tom
VP6TD
ZL2HGR