Re: question regarding Commander
Still trying to get Commander up and running with the Icom 7800. Am using a straight through DB-9 cable. have set the 7800 ci-v to on, ci-v address to 6A in both commander and the 7800 but still appears the radio/computer link is not there. Anybody got any ideas? Thanks,
Steve, WD8NPL
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 3/23/2025 11:50 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
Should the stright through cable work or do I need a null
modem cable? Computer is generally DTE.? Does the 7800 have a female DE9
RS-232 connector and the computer a male DE9 connector?? If
so, a straight through (pin for pin) connection is appropriate.
It should work with connections for only pins 2,3 and 5 ...
make sure Commander and the IC-7800 are set for the same
CI-V address (6Ah default) and the same data communication
rate. DO NOT use the default AUTO in the 7800 - either
9600 or 19200 should work fine.? Since only 2,3,5 are used,
Commander's Primary CAT Serial Port (and MultiRadio port if
used) should be 8,N,1, OFF/N, OFF/N ...
73,
?? ... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-03-23 11:07 AM, steve baughn via groups.io wrote:
Good Morning All,
Still trying to get the 7800 wired up right to the pc to get DX Lab working. What I am using from the 7800 to the pc is a db9 straight through cable. In the 7800 manual it says the rs232 jack is wired as a modem (dce). Should the stright through cable work or do I need a null modem cable? Thanks,
Steve, WD8NPL
On 3/22/2025 1:30 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
+ AA6YQ comments below
??? I am running an Icom 7800 which I had hooked up to DX Lab until
??? about a year ago when we moved. I cannot remember for the life of
??? me how I had it hooked up but am thinking a ran an RS-232 cable
??? from the rig to the pc. I cannot get it to run now and am thinking
??? perhaps I do not have the right cable. Can someone please advise
??? this OM?
+ You must connect a COM port on your computer to an Icom CI-V interface, which is in turn connected to the Remote jack on the backpanel of your IC-7800. You can build or buy the CI-V interface; see
+ If you have additional questions, don't hesitate to post them here.
? ? ? ? 73,
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: Tom NY4I is the new steward of the N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway
Thanks Dave.
?
What started this is I was looking for a feature that the gateway did not provide so I discussed it with Dave and he asked if I wanted to take a look again at taking over maintenance. We had talked about in the past but other time commitments got in the way. The benefit is I could add the feature I wanted myself--which had already been implemented.
?
That feature--and I realize this is really an edge use case--is to allow SDR-Control, a Mac application from Marcus DL8MRE, which can control the Flex products as well as various radios from Icom, Yaesu and Kenwood. Additionally, there is also the latest app that controls the Elecraft K4 remotely.
?
When running with the SDR-Control applications, these apps can log to a central iCloud-hosted log. Then one has to occasionally do an ADIF export to import those QSOs into DXKeeper. That process works fine but was too manual for me :) I like to automate things where I can. SDR-Control has the ability to send a log record over UDP but it sends it in the WSJT-X standard format where it is an ADIF record wrapped in a <command> record. The change I made to the Gateway is to allow receiving this UDP message as well as the standard "N1MM UDP" messages. If SDR-Control sends that record, I will also log the record into DXKeeper.
?
The net of all of this is I can leave DXKeeper running on my shack's Windows computer, then using SDR-Control from a laptop elsewhere in the house QSOs made are automatically placed in the DXKeeper log. No ADIF export necessary. It still has all of the drawbacks of UDP of course where delivery is not guaranteed but it serves my purpose.
?
One point on the Gateway itself. It is historically named the N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway but that does not mean it can only be used by N1MM. I work on the team (along with N4AF) that maintains the TR4W contest logger. ?Many years ago after N1MM released its UDP standard for sharing contacts data, I implemented similar messages from TR4W so in my case, I use the N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway to send messages in real-time from TR4W to DXKeeper (I have since implemented a full TCP/IP interface in TR4W to send to DXKeeper without UDP but that is a different topic). Other programs also support this standard too. So if you want to send real-time QSOs from a logger to DXKeeper, check if it supports the N1MM UDP-style broadcasts and you can use the Gateway.
?
As many of you will no doubt ask, why not just export the log at the end of the contest? The main use-case for the Gateway is for the DX'er that wants to use a contest as a way to collect DX. In my case, I can rarely do a full-time competitive effort but I have time to make a few hundred contacts. I participate in the DX Marathon every year and this gives me a way to use SpotCollector to see what I need when there is a DX Contest on the air. As I work the stations in TR4W, the UDP message for the contact goes through the Gateway to DXKeeper and it updated SpotCollector's display so it no longer shows that country as needed.
?
All feature requests are welcome. I did setup an Issue tracker in the GitHub repository for the web page (the code is not in a public repository though). The issue tracker is accessible here:
?
73,
?
Tom NY4I
|
Thanks Dave
It was the databases in DXView the caused the problem.
-Kurt, KR2C
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 3/24/2025 9:04 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote: + AA6YQ comments below
That's ticked, Any other suggestions?
+ Yes: click the Colors button in the same pane and confirm that the Log Page Display background colors are set correctly.
+ Also visit DXView's Databases tab to confirm that you have the eQSL and LoTW databases loaded.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: LoTW Application query
Hi to Dave and Stan,
?
Like Stan, that process is OK, but I think I will stick to my "Sticky Notes" on screen, where I keep a list of new ones worked until they are confirmed.
For the (now) two new ones that have confirmed since my LoTW application, I have marked them as "rcvd" and made them bold and in Italics.
?
Now I will just wait until my application is processed, and I will know which ones I need to check in the awards application.
?
73 de Phil GU0SUP
?
?
-----Original Message----- From: "Stan Gammons via groups.io" <buttercup11421@...> Sent: Tuesday, 25 March, 2025 03:06 To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [DXLab] LoTW Application query
Hi Dave,
On 3/24/25 21:52, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
> # AA6YQ comments below
>
> It would be handy if ADIF/Dave were to defined a 'P' (pending) status
> for those of us who prefer to manually prepare submissions as the
> confirmations arrive.
>
> # You can setup a user-defined item named "Pending" and use whatever codes you like to represent the states of your manually-managed award submissions.
>
> Using these instructions? https://dxlabsuite.com/dxlabwiki/UserAwardProgressreports
>
> # No. This has nothing to do with user-defined award progress reports.
>
> # Here's the scenario:
>
> 1. You've used DXKeeper to generate a DXCC award application, so you have QSOs whose "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" items are set to 'S' ( for "submitted").
>
> 2. You're waiting for the ARRL's DXCC desk to process that application which can take months. When they notify you that your submitted QSOs have been granted DXCC Award Credit, you'd direct DXKeeper to "Verify" your submission to reflect the granting of DXCC award credit by change each 'S' in a "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" item to 'V'.
>
> 3. However, before you receive notice that your application has been processed, several more confirmations for previously unconfirmed DXCC entities, entity-bands, or entity-modes arrive. Instead of waiting until the DXCC desk finishes processing the application you've already submitted to complete step 2 and then direct DXKeeper to generate a new submission, the request to make it possible to manually generate a second application that includes then new LoTW confirmation. This can be done by defining a user-defined item called "Pending", and setting it to 'C' in each of those QSOs newly confirmed by QSL card, and to 'L' in each of those QSOs newly confirmed by LoTW.
>
> 4. At that point, you would
>
> 4a. make a copy of your log file
>
> 4b. direct DXKeeper to "Verify" the current submission
>
> 4c. direct DXKeeper to generate a new DXCC submission, which would automatically include those new confirmations (the ones their Pending items set to 'C' and 'L') and produce the documents needed to submit a second application
>
> 4d. revert to the Log file created in step 4a
>
> 4e. when you receive notice that your first DXCC application has been processed, you would direct DXKeeper to Verify it, changing each 'S' in a "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" item to 'V'
>
> 4f. then you would
>
> 4.f.1 filter the Log Page Display to contain all QSOs whose Pending item is set to 'C' and use the "Modify QSOs" function to set their "QSL Rcvd" items to 'S' and clear their Pending items
>
> 4.f.2 filter the Log Page Display to contain all QSOs whose Pending item is set to 'L' and use the "Modify QSOs" function to set their "LoTW QSL Rcvd" items to 'S' and clear their Pending items
>
> 5. when your receive notice that your second DXCC application has been processed, , you would direct DXKeeper to Verify it, changing each 'S' in a "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" item to 'V'
>
> Thus you will have worked around the limitation in DXKeeper's automation of DXCC award applications that only one submission can be outstanding at a time.
Thanks for the detailed explanation.? Having to do all that makes my
head hurt.? I'll pass and stay with the way I've been doing it.
73
Stan
KM4HQE
|
Re: Graphics cards and Monitors for the shack/ DXLabs
Hi,
The Intel UHD 730 chipset supports 4k resolution. (Max
4096x2160@60Hz).
Depending on the motherboard you might not need an additional
graphics card.
I use a 32 inch 4K monitor.
Make sure it has all possible inputs: HDMI, Displayport and
USB-C. Then you can use it for future computers.
73 Henk PA5KT
Op 25-3-2025 om 01:24 schreef Richard
Hill via groups.io:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I hope this is not too far off topic.? I'm researching
graphics cards and monitors to upgrade my shack to have more
DXLabs and WSJT-X?windows.? My current monitor is a TV/Monitor
that just does not offer enough room for much more than WSJT-X
or DXKeeper.? I do understand that I do not need all windows
open at once to be able to use DXLabs.? I gave my daughter my
old monitor and it allowed so much more on the screen while
maintaining good detail.
My problem is I have not yet been able to define the use
case so I can decide which combination of capabilities is best
for ham radio.? There is a good general reference on this
subject in the DXLab references.? Written by? Dave, W6DE, it
is:? ?
My computer?has an Intel UHD 730 graphics card (max
resolution is 1920 x 1080p but 1360 x 760p is recommended).?
It may well be too basic for a UHD or 4K monitor (3840 x
2160p), and I'm not yet convinced that a QHD 1440p monitor
will meet my needs.? I'm seeing UHD graphics cards designed
for gaming or photo editing that seem to cost as much as a
monitor.? I'm doubting that hams need all that graphics power
but I don't actually know what capability I need to have.? My
real goal is to be able to place most of the DXLabs windows up
at once with enough sharpness to read all the details.
I'm looking to understand what is needed in a new graphics
card to match a 4K/UHD or a 1440p monitor without breaking the
bank, grin.
Any advice will be appreciated.
Thanks
Rich, NU6T
--
|
Re: LoTW Application query
+ AA6YQ comments below
Thanks for the detailed explanation.? Having to do all that makes my
head hurt.? I'll pass and stay with the way I've been doing it.
+ Understood. It's only appropriate if you don't want to wait for one DXCC award application to be processed by the ARRL's DXCC desk before generating the next one. ? ? ?73, ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: Graphics cards and Monitors for the shack/ DXLabs
+ AA6YQ comments below
I'm looking to understand what is needed in a new graphics card to match a 4K/UHD or a 1440p monitor without breaking the bank, grin.
?
Any advice will be appreciated.
+ I use a 32" HP Z32 display, whose resolution in 3840 x 2160, driven by an Nvidia GTX760. As you can see in this screenshot, it can simultaneously display SpotCollector's, DXKeeper's, DXView's, and Commander's Main windows, DXKeeper's Capture window, DXView's World Map window, Commander's Bandspread and Spectrum-Waterfall windows, the WSJT-X Main and "Wide Graph" windows, and my email client:
?
+ Amazon sells the Z32 for $1100, but they also sell a 32" Samsung display with same resolution for $300. Check objective evaluation sites like "Tom's Hardware" and ZDNet to understand the differences.
?
+ Perplexity reports that "The Nvidia GTX 760, a mid-range GPU from 2013, is roughly equivalent in performance to modern entry-level GPUs like the GTX 1650 or RTX 3050. These cards provide better efficiency, updated features (e.g., ray tracing), and support for modern games, making them suitable replacements". Amazon sells the GTX 1650 for $175. Again, check objective evaluation sites.
+ When I first began developing DXLab back in 1990, a 1280 x 1024 Eizo monitor cost $5000. My assumption about the long-term cost of screen space was accurate.
? ? ? 73,
? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: LoTW Application query
Hi Dave, On 3/24/25 21:52, Dave AA6YQ wrote: # AA6YQ comments below
It would be handy if ADIF/Dave were to defined a 'P' (pending) status
for those of us who prefer to manually prepare submissions as the
confirmations arrive.
# You can setup a user-defined item named "Pending" and use whatever codes you like to represent the states of your manually-managed award submissions.
Using these instructions?
# No. This has nothing to do with user-defined award progress reports.
# Here's the scenario:
1. You've used DXKeeper to generate a DXCC award application, so you have QSOs whose "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" items are set to 'S' ( for "submitted").
2. You're waiting for the ARRL's DXCC desk to process that application which can take months. When they notify you that your submitted QSOs have been granted DXCC Award Credit, you'd direct DXKeeper to "Verify" your submission to reflect the granting of DXCC award credit by change each 'S' in a "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" item to 'V'.
3. However, before you receive notice that your application has been processed, several more confirmations for previously unconfirmed DXCC entities, entity-bands, or entity-modes arrive. Instead of waiting until the DXCC desk finishes processing the application you've already submitted to complete step 2 and then direct DXKeeper to generate a new submission, the request to make it possible to manually generate a second application that includes then new LoTW confirmation. This can be done by defining a user-defined item called "Pending", and setting it to 'C' in each of those QSOs newly confirmed by QSL card, and to 'L' in each of those QSOs newly confirmed by LoTW.
4. At that point, you would
4a. make a copy of your log file
4b. direct DXKeeper to "Verify" the current submission
4c. direct DXKeeper to generate a new DXCC submission, which would automatically include those new confirmations (the ones their Pending items set to 'C' and 'L') and produce the documents needed to submit a second application
4d. revert to the Log file created in step 4a
4e. when you receive notice that your first DXCC application has been processed, you would direct DXKeeper to Verify it, changing each 'S' in a "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" item to 'V'
4f. then you would
4.f.1 filter the Log Page Display to contain all QSOs whose Pending item is set to 'C' and use the "Modify QSOs" function to set their "QSL Rcvd" items to 'S' and clear their Pending items
4.f.2 filter the Log Page Display to contain all QSOs whose Pending item is set to 'L' and use the "Modify QSOs" function to set their "LoTW QSL Rcvd" items to 'S' and clear their Pending items
5. when your receive notice that your second DXCC application has been processed, , you would direct DXKeeper to Verify it, changing each 'S' in a "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" item to 'V'
Thus you will have worked around the limitation in DXKeeper's automation of DXCC award applications that only one submission can be outstanding at a time. Thanks for the detailed explanation.? Having to do all that makes my head hurt.? I'll pass and stay with the way I've been doing it. 73 Stan KM4HQE
|
Re: LoTW Application query
# AA6YQ comments below
It would be handy if ADIF/Dave were to defined a 'P' (pending) status
for those of us who prefer to manually prepare submissions as the
confirmations arrive.
# You can setup a user-defined item named "Pending" and use whatever codes you like to represent the states of your manually-managed award submissions.
Using these instructions?
# No. This has nothing to do with user-defined award progress reports.
# Here's the scenario:
1. You've used DXKeeper to generate a DXCC award application, so you have QSOs whose "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" items are set to 'S' ( for "submitted").
2. You're waiting for the ARRL's DXCC desk to process that application which can take months. When they notify you that your submitted QSOs have been granted DXCC Award Credit, you'd direct DXKeeper to "Verify" your submission to reflect the granting of DXCC award credit by change each 'S' in a "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" item to 'V'.
3. However, before you receive notice that your application has been processed, several more confirmations for previously unconfirmed DXCC entities, entity-bands, or entity-modes arrive. Instead of waiting until the DXCC desk finishes processing the application you've already submitted to complete step 2 and then direct DXKeeper to generate a new submission, the request to make it possible to manually generate a second application that includes then new LoTW confirmation. This can be done by defining a user-defined item called "Pending", and setting it to 'C' in each of those QSOs newly confirmed by QSL card, and to 'L' in each of those QSOs newly confirmed by LoTW.
4. At that point, you would
4a. make a copy of your log file
4b. direct DXKeeper to "Verify" the current submission
4c. direct DXKeeper to generate a new DXCC submission, which would automatically include those new confirmations (the ones their Pending items set to 'C' and 'L') and produce the documents needed to submit a second application
4d. revert to the Log file created in step 4a
4e. when you receive notice that your first DXCC application has been processed, you would direct DXKeeper to Verify it, changing each 'S' in a "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" item to 'V'
4f. then you would
4.f.1 filter the Log Page Display to contain all QSOs whose Pending item is set to 'C' and use the "Modify QSOs" function to set their "QSL Rcvd" items to 'S' and clear their Pending items
4.f.2 filter the Log Page Display to contain all QSOs whose Pending item is set to 'L' and use the "Modify QSOs" function to set their "LoTW QSL Rcvd" items to 'S' and clear their Pending items
5. when your receive notice that your second DXCC application has been processed, , you would direct DXKeeper to Verify it, changing each 'S' in a "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" item to 'V'
Thus you will have worked around the limitation in DXKeeper's automation of DXCC award applications that only one submission can be outstanding at a time.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: LoTW Application query
Hi Dave,
On 3/24/25 12:54, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
+ AA6YQ comments below
It would be handy if ADIF/Dave were to defined a 'P'
(pending) status
for those of us who prefer to manually prepare submissions as
the
confirmations arrive.
+ You can setup a user-defined item named "Pending" and use
whatever codes you like to represent the states of your
manually-managed award submissions.
Using these instructions??
73
Stan
KM4HQE
|
+ AA6YQ comments below
That's ticked, Any other suggestions?
+ Yes: click the Colors button in the same pane and confirm that the Log Page Display background colors are set correctly.
+ Also visit DXView's Databases tab to confirm that you have the eQSL and LoTW databases loaded.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
|
Thanks for reply Dave.
That's ticked,? Any other suggestions?
-Kurt, KR2C
On 3/24/2025 8:16 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
+ AA6YQ comments below
I moved into a new Win11 PC.? In DXK it showed be
what QSL service they belonged to by color.? Now all the
contacts appear as white.? What config option am I missing?
+ In the Log Page Display panel on the Configuration window's
Log tab, check the "Indicate LotW & eQSL AG status" box.
? ? ? ?73,
? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
|
Graphics cards and Monitors for the shack/ DXLabs
I hope this is not too far off topic.? I'm researching graphics cards and monitors to upgrade my shack to have more DXLabs and WSJT-X?windows.? My current monitor is a TV/Monitor that just does not offer enough room for much more than WSJT-X or DXKeeper.? I do understand that I do not need all windows open at once to be able to use DXLabs.? I gave my daughter my old monitor and it allowed so much more on the screen while maintaining good detail.
My problem is I have not yet been able to define the use case so I can decide which combination of capabilities is best for ham radio.? There is a good general reference on this subject in the DXLab references.? Written by? Dave, W6DE, it is:? ?
My computer?has an Intel UHD 730 graphics card (max resolution is 1920 x 1080p but 1360 x 760p is recommended).? It may well be too basic for a UHD or 4K monitor (3840 x 2160p), and I'm not yet convinced that a QHD 1440p monitor will meet my needs.? I'm seeing UHD graphics cards designed for gaming or photo editing that seem to cost as much as a monitor.? I'm doubting that hams need all that graphics power but I don't actually know what capability I need to have.? My real goal is to be able to place most of the DXLabs windows up at once with enough sharpness to read all the details.
I'm looking to understand what is needed in a new graphics card to match a 4K/UHD or a 1440p monitor without breaking the bank, grin.
Any advice will be appreciated.
Thanks Rich, NU6T
--
|
+ AA6YQ comments below
I moved into a new Win11 PC.? In DXK it showed be what QSL service they belonged to by color.? Now all the contacts appear as white.? What config option am I missing?
+ In the Log Page Display panel on the Configuration window's Log tab, check the "Indicate LotW & eQSL AG status" box.
? ? ? ?73,
? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
|
I moved into a new Win11 PC.? In DXK it showed be what QSL service they belonged to by color.? Now all the contacts appear as white.? What config option am I missing?
-Kurt, KR2C
|
Re: LoTW Application query
+ AA6YQ comments below
How does one set up a user defined code within QSL_RCVD and
APP_DXKEEPER_LotW_QSL_RCVD that is treated as 'Y' for filling
the Progress (RAT) Tables?
+ I didn't suggest setting up user-defined codes for QSL_RCVD and LotW_QSL_RCVD because that's not supported. Providing a practical means by which a user could specify how every aspect of DXLab's Realtime Award Tracking for 7 award families should respond to each new user-defined code for QSL_RCVD and LotW_QSL_RCVD is not technically feasible, at least for this developer.?
A separate database field is overkill for this application.
+ The separate database fields that support user-defined items are already in place; their use with single-character codes would not result in any significant additional overhead.? ? ? ? ?73, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: LoTW Application query
How does one set up a user defined code within QSL_RCVD and
APP_DXKEEPER_LotW_QSL_RCVD that is treated as 'Y' for filling
the Progress (RAT) Tables?
A separate database field is overkill for this application.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2025-03-24 1:54 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote: + AA6YQ comments below
It would be handy if ADIF/Dave were to defined a 'P' (pending) status
for those of us who prefer to manually prepare submissions as the
confirmations arrive.
+ You can setup a user-defined item named "Pending" and use whatever codes you like to represent the states of your manually-managed award submissions.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: LoTW Application query
+ AA6YQ comments below
It would be handy if ADIF/Dave were to defined a 'P' (pending) status
for those of us who prefer to manually prepare submissions as the
confirmations arrive.
+ You can setup a user-defined item named "Pending" and use whatever codes you like to represent the states of your manually-managed award submissions. ? ? ?73, ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ
|
Re: LoTW Application query
Hi Phil,
Yes, you are correct. It should be 'Y' in the LOTW status box. I was thinking of the DXCC progress display, where that entity would show as confirmed using the 'C'. So the new QSOs should show a LOTW received status of 'Y', which is set automatically when you update your QSL status from LOTW. When you use DXK to assemble your next submission, the confirmed QSOs you you select will have their LOTW status set to 'S' - you don't have to do it manually.
73, Chuck KM3V
|
Re: LoTW Application query
Thanks for the answer, but there isn't an option to set the LoTW recvd to 'C'. I only have R, Y, S, V, I or X to choose from, so they
are currently set at Y. Which, at present, is the correct answer for - both LotW and Card - confirmations received while an application is pending (about two months these days). Then one must use the DXKeeper submission generator to find those "new" confirmations in the future. It would be handy if ADIF/Dave were to defined a 'P' (pending) status for those of us who prefer to manually prepare submissions as the confirmations arrive. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2025-03-24 12:24 PM, Phil Cooper via groups.io wrote: Hi Chuck,
Thanks for the answer, but there isn't an option to set the LoTW recvd to 'C'. I only have R, Y, S, V, I or X to choose from, so they are currently set at Y.
73 de Phil GU0SUP
-----Original Message-----
From: "Chuck, KM3V via groups.io" <chuck.hartley@...>
Sent: Monday, 24 March, 2025 15:50
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DXLab] LoTW Application query
Hi Phil,
The newly confirmed QSOs should be left set to 'C' until you generate a new submission. Just because they were confirmed while you have an application pending, the new QSOs will not be processed in addition to the original 88. I'm guessing you assumed they would be added and that is why you want to set them to 'S'? So, no sticky note needed, DXK will handle the new confirmations as part of your next submission.
73, Chuck KM3V
|
Tom Schaefer - NY4I
Phil Cooper