Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- DXLab
- Messages
Search
Re: Graphics cards and Monitors for the shack/ DXLabs
开云体育Hi, The Intel UHD 730 chipset supports 4k resolution. (Max 4096x2160@60Hz). Depending on the motherboard you might not need an additional graphics card. I use a 32 inch 4K monitor. Make sure it has all possible inputs: HDMI, Displayport and USB-C. Then you can use it for future computers. 73 Henk PA5KT Op 25-3-2025 om 01:24 schreef Richard
Hill via groups.io:
|
Re: LoTW Application query
+ AA6YQ comments below
Thanks for the detailed explanation.? Having to do all that makes my+ Understood. It's only appropriate if you don't want to wait for one DXCC award application to be processed by the ARRL's DXCC desk before generating the next one. ? ? ?73, ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ |
Re: Graphics cards and Monitors for the shack/ DXLabs
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ I use a 32" HP Z32 display, whose resolution in 3840 x 2160, driven by an Nvidia GTX760. As you can see in this screenshot, it can simultaneously display SpotCollector's, DXKeeper's, DXView's, and Commander's Main windows, DXKeeper's Capture window, DXView's World Map window, Commander's Bandspread and Spectrum-Waterfall windows, the WSJT-X Main and "Wide Graph" windows, and my email client: ?
+ Amazon sells the Z32 for $1100, but they also sell a 32" Samsung display with same resolution for $300. Check objective evaluation sites like "Tom's Hardware" and ZDNet to understand the differences.
?
+ Perplexity reports that "The Nvidia GTX 760, a mid-range GPU from 2013, is roughly equivalent in performance to modern entry-level GPUs like the GTX 1650 or RTX 3050. These cards provide better efficiency, updated features (e.g., ray tracing), and support for modern games, making them suitable replacements". Amazon sells the GTX 1650 for $175. Again, check objective evaluation sites. + When I first began developing DXLab back in 1990, a 1280 x 1024 Eizo monitor cost $5000. My assumption about the long-term cost of screen space was accurate. ? ? ? 73, ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ |
Re: LoTW Application query
Hi Dave,
On 3/24/25 21:52, Dave AA6YQ wrote: # AA6YQ comments belowThanks for the detailed explanation.? Having to do all that makes my head hurt.? I'll pass and stay with the way I've been doing it. 73 Stan KM4HQE |
Re: LoTW Application query
# AA6YQ comments below
It would be handy if ADIF/Dave were to defined a 'P' (pending) status for those of us who prefer to manually prepare submissions as the confirmations arrive. # You can setup a user-defined item named "Pending" and use whatever codes you like to represent the states of your manually-managed award submissions. Using these instructions? # No. This has nothing to do with user-defined award progress reports. # Here's the scenario: 1. You've used DXKeeper to generate a DXCC award application, so you have QSOs whose "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" items are set to 'S' ( for "submitted"). 2. You're waiting for the ARRL's DXCC desk to process that application which can take months. When they notify you that your submitted QSOs have been granted DXCC Award Credit, you'd direct DXKeeper to "Verify" your submission to reflect the granting of DXCC award credit by change each 'S' in a "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" item to 'V'. 3. However, before you receive notice that your application has been processed, several more confirmations for previously unconfirmed DXCC entities, entity-bands, or entity-modes arrive. Instead of waiting until the DXCC desk finishes processing the application you've already submitted to complete step 2 and then direct DXKeeper to generate a new submission, the request to make it possible to manually generate a second application that includes then new LoTW confirmation. This can be done by defining a user-defined item called "Pending", and setting it to 'C' in each of those QSOs newly confirmed by QSL card, and to 'L' in each of those QSOs newly confirmed by LoTW. 4. At that point, you would 4a. make a copy of your log file 4b. direct DXKeeper to "Verify" the current submission 4c. direct DXKeeper to generate a new DXCC submission, which would automatically include those new confirmations (the ones their Pending items set to 'C' and 'L') and produce the documents needed to submit a second application 4d. revert to the Log file created in step 4a 4e. when you receive notice that your first DXCC application has been processed, you would direct DXKeeper to Verify it, changing each 'S' in a "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" item to 'V' 4f. then you would 4.f.1 filter the Log Page Display to contain all QSOs whose Pending item is set to 'C' and use the "Modify QSOs" function to set their "QSL Rcvd" items to 'S' and clear their Pending items 4.f.2 filter the Log Page Display to contain all QSOs whose Pending item is set to 'L' and use the "Modify QSOs" function to set their "LoTW QSL Rcvd" items to 'S' and clear their Pending items 5. when your receive notice that your second DXCC application has been processed, , you would direct DXKeeper to Verify it, changing each 'S' in a "QSL Rcvd" and "LoTW QSL Rcvd" item to 'V' Thus you will have worked around the limitation in DXKeeper's automation of DXCC award applications that only one submission can be outstanding at a time. 73, Dave, AA6YQ |
Re: LoTW Application query
开云体育Hi Dave,On 3/24/25 12:54, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
Using these instructions?? 73 Stan KM4HQE |
Re: LotW/eQSL
+ AA6YQ comments below
That's ticked, Any other suggestions? + Yes: click the Colors button in the same pane and confirm that the Log Page Display background colors are set correctly. + Also visit DXView's Databases tab to confirm that you have the eQSL and LoTW databases loaded. 73, Dave, AA6YQ |
Re: LotW/eQSL
开云体育Thanks for reply Dave.
That's ticked,? Any other suggestions?
-Kurt, KR2C On 3/24/2025 8:16 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
|
Graphics cards and Monitors for the shack/ DXLabs
I hope this is not too far off topic.? I'm researching graphics cards and monitors to upgrade my shack to have more DXLabs and WSJT-X?windows.? My current monitor is a TV/Monitor that just does not offer enough room for much more than WSJT-X or DXKeeper.? I do understand that I do not need all windows open at once to be able to use DXLabs.? I gave my daughter my old monitor and it allowed so much more on the screen while maintaining good detail. My problem is I have not yet been able to define the use case so I can decide which combination of capabilities is best for ham radio.? There is a good general reference on this subject in the DXLab references.? Written by? Dave, W6DE, it is:? ? My computer?has an Intel UHD 730 graphics card (max resolution is 1920 x 1080p but 1360 x 760p is recommended).? It may well be too basic for a UHD or 4K monitor (3840 x 2160p), and I'm not yet convinced that a QHD 1440p monitor will meet my needs.? I'm seeing UHD graphics cards designed for gaming or photo editing that seem to cost as much as a monitor.? I'm doubting that hams need all that graphics power but I don't actually know what capability I need to have.? My real goal is to be able to place most of the DXLabs windows up at once with enough sharpness to read all the details. I'm looking to understand what is needed in a new graphics card to match a 4K/UHD or a 1440p monitor without breaking the bank, grin. Any advice will be appreciated. Thanks Rich, NU6T Richard Hill |
Re: LotW/eQSL
+ AA6YQ comments below
I moved into a new Win11 PC.? In DXK it showed be what QSL service they belonged to by color.? Now all the contacts appear as white.? What config option am I missing? + In the Log Page Display panel on the Configuration window's Log tab, check the "Indicate LotW & eQSL AG status" box. ? ? ? ?73, ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ |
Re: LoTW Application query
+ AA6YQ comments below
How does one set up a user defined code within QSL_RCVD and+ I didn't suggest setting up user-defined codes for QSL_RCVD and LotW_QSL_RCVD because that's not supported. Providing a practical means by which a user could specify how every aspect of DXLab's Realtime Award Tracking for 7 award families should respond to each new user-defined code for QSL_RCVD and LotW_QSL_RCVD is not technically feasible, at least for this developer.? A separate database field is overkill for this application.+ The separate database fields that support user-defined items are already in place; their use with single-character codes would not result in any significant additional overhead.? ? ? ? ?73, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Dave, AA6YQ |
Re: LoTW Application query
How does one set up a user defined code within QSL_RCVD and
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
APP_DXKEEPER_LotW_QSL_RCVD that is treated as 'Y' for filling the Progress (RAT) Tables? A separate database field is overkill for this application. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2025-03-24 1:54 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
+ AA6YQ comments below+ You can setup a user-defined item named "Pending" and use whatever codes you like to represent the states of your manually-managed award submissions. |
Re: LoTW Application query
+ AA6YQ comments below
It would be handy if ADIF/Dave were to defined a 'P' (pending) status+ You can setup a user-defined item named "Pending" and use whatever codes you like to represent the states of your manually-managed award submissions. ? ? ?73, ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ |
Re: LoTW Application query
Hi Phil,
Yes, you are correct. It should be 'Y' in the LOTW status box. I was thinking of the DXCC progress display, where that entity would show as confirmed using the 'C'. So the new QSOs should show a LOTW received status of 'Y', which is set automatically when you update your QSL status from LOTW. When you use DXK to assemble your next submission, the confirmed QSOs you you select will have their LOTW status set to 'S' - you don't have to do it manually. 73, Chuck KM3V |
Re: LoTW Application query
Thanks for the answer, but there isn't an option to set the LoTW recvd to 'C'. I only have R, Y, S, V, I or X to choose from, so theyWhich, at present, is the correct answer for - both LotW and Card - confirmations received while an application is pending (about two months these days). Then one must use the DXKeeper submission generator to find those "new" confirmations in the future. It would be handy if ADIF/Dave were to defined a 'P' (pending) status for those of us who prefer to manually prepare submissions as the confirmations arrive. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2025-03-24 12:24 PM, Phil Cooper via groups.io wrote: Hi Chuck, |
Re: LoTW Application query
Hi Chuck, ? Thanks for the answer, but there isn't an option to set the LoTW recvd to 'C'. I only have R, Y, S, V, I or X to choose from, so they are currently set at Y. ? 73 de Phil GU0SUP ? ? -----Original Message-----
From: "Chuck, KM3V via groups.io" <chuck.hartley@...> Sent: Monday, 24 March, 2025 15:50 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DXLab] LoTW Application query Hi Phil, |
Re: LoTW Application query
Hi Phil,
The newly confirmed QSOs should be left set to 'C' until you generate a new submission. Just because they were confirmed while you have an application pending, the new QSOs will not be processed in addition to the original 88. I'm guessing you assumed they would be added and that is why you want to set them to 'S'? So, no sticky note needed, DXK will handle the new confirmations as part of your next submission. 73, Chuck KM3V |
LoTW Application query
Hi Dave and the group, ? Last week, I made an LoTW application (88 slots), but since then, I have had some new slots confirmed via LoTW. Because I have an application pending, I am unable to add these via LoTW, and also, I can't set these to "S" in the LoTW rcvd box, as when my application is granted, those with the S set since would be changed to V when I verify the current submission. ? Is there a way within DXKeeper to handle this? I currently just have a "Sticky Notes" on screen with notes about these QSO's. ? 73 de Phil GU0SUP |
Tom NY4I is the new steward of the N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway
I am happy to announce that Tom NY4I has agreed to provide ongoing support and development for the N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway. I've updated the entry in with the Gateway's new Online Help: which Tom has already updated to reflect new functionality that he has added. Requests for help, defect reports, and enhancement requests are all still welcome here. Thanks, Tom!!! ? ? ? ? 73, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Dave, AA6YQ |