They all talk to each other fine. If I enter a call in WSJT-X DX Call Box, DXKeeper instantly performs a lookup of prior contacts with that station?and lists them.?
On my Win 10 Computer I? have :
DXKeeper (only when Win11 copy is Closed!)
JTAlert
WSJT-X
If, as I should, I close DXK on Win11, and bring up DXK on the WIN10, all the contacts are there. JTAlert displays the decoded wsjt-x contacts?just fine.?
However, when I type a callsign in the DX Callbox in WSJT-X, DXKeeper does not perform a lookup of all the previous contacts.?
I'm stumped? What?do I need to do when running?the Networked copy of DXK (on Win10 machine), to act like the Win 11 does and perform?a lookup of all prior contacts.
It should be mentioned that the Win10 copy of DXK and WSJT-X is NOT configured for transmit. I don't even have a transmitter on the Win10 machine, just an SDR. JTAlert seems to be happy with this setup but the missing piece is WSJT-X won't force a Lookup of prior qsos with a call in DXKeeper.
It is working, but most of the spots what is showing is USA? (dont need that any more)
I am sure I am doing somthing wrong, just need to figure out What?]
+ Right-click one a "needed" Spot Database Entry whose callsign is in the US, and select "Display award tracking for ..." from the pop-up menu. Spotcollector will display a "Realtime Award Tracking" window that shows why it considers that Spot Database Entry to be "needed".
Not control-click ... simply click "Need" assuming you have enabled the proper awards, modes, bands on the Config -> Award tab in DXKeeper and clicked "Recompute" to build the necessary Realtime Award Tracking tables.
I would like to "filter" Spotcollector in a way that it will give me the stationes (calls, (Band) Countiers) I need.
I am very close to the magic ARRL 3000 mark and would like to "see" only (Unconfirmed) what I need.
+ Assuming that you're pursuing the ARRL's DXCC Challenge,
?
"YES"
1. In the "DXCC Bands & Modes" panel on the Awards tab on DXKeeper's, check the 160m, 80m, 40m, 30m, 20m, 10m, 17m, 15m, 12m, 10m, and 6m boxes
?
"DONE"
2. If in step 1 any of those band boxes were previously unchecked, then on the "Spot Database" tab of SpotCollector's Configuration window, click the Recompute button along the right margin
?
"DONE"
3. In the "Need Filter" section of the Filters panel on the "Spot Database" tab of SpotCollector's Configuration window, select "Unworked"
?
"DONE"
4. Click the Need button in the Filter panel at the bottom of SpotCollector's Main window
?
"DONE"
?
It is working, but most of the spots what is showing is USA? (dont need that any more)
I am sure I am doing somthing wrong, just need to figure out What?
Not control-click ... simply click "Need" assuming you have enabled the proper awards, modes, bands on the Config -> Award tab in DXKeeper and clicked "Recompute" to build the necessary Realtime Award Tracking tables.
On 2025-03-02 3:15 PM, TOM-KQ5S via groups.io wrote:
Did you try to control click on the need button at the bottom of SpotCollector? Tom - KQ5S
On Mar 2, 2025, at 13:58, Will Angenent via groups.io <k6nd@...> wrote:
I would like to "filter" Spotcollector in a way that it will give me the stationes (calls, (Band) Countiers) I need. I am very close to the magic ARRL 3000 mark and would like to "see" only (Unconfirmed) what I need. Thanks, Will K6ND
I would like to "filter" Spotcollector in a way that it will give me the stationes (calls, (Band) Countiers) I need.
I am very close to the magic ARRL 3000 mark and would like to "see" only (Unconfirmed) what I need.
+ Assuming that you're pursuing the ARRL's DXCC Challenge,
1. In the "DXCC Bands & Modes" panel on the Awards tab on DXKeeper's, check the 160m, 80m, 40m, 30m, 20m, 10m, 17m, 15m, 12m, 10m, and 6m boxes
2. If in step 1 any of those band boxes were previously unchecked, then on the "Spot Database" tab of SpotCollector's Configuration window, click the Recompute button along the right margin
3. In the "Need Filter" section of the Filters panel on the "Spot Database" tab of SpotCollector's Configuration window, select "Unworked"
4. Click the Need button in the Filter panel at the bottom of SpotCollector's Main window
Thanks for the explanation, Dave I did crosscheck against the DX Spotting network on QRZ and it did not appear to be affected. Probably isolated to certain Networks and I just happen to have one or more of them as a Source for Spotcollector.
On 03/02/2025 2:13 PM EST Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...> wrote:
Has anyone else had my recent experience with multiple "spots" from a single callsign showing up in Spotcollector at the same time. In one instance a Polish station nearly filled the entire Spotcollector screen This just happened again with two or three callsigns showing up, filling the page. I do not think it is a Spotcollector issue per se but likely something from each of the Networks. Weird behavior, never experienced it before.
+ Yes: large number of spots of a single callsign on multiple frequencies - more than 10 - simultaneously, repeated for several different callsigns.
+ A persistent implementation of this would constitute a denial-of-service attack that would render the DX Cluster network useless. This vulnerability will persist until DXCluster operators gain the ability to revoke a client's ability to generate outgoing spots.
When using? "QRZ.com via Pathfinder", which requires only a free QRZ account, lookups are rate-limited to one every 4 seconds. For DXers, this limit is only relevant when importing an ADIF or tab-delimited file with the "Import QSOs" tab's "Query callbook…" option enabled. The fact that Pathfinder downloads and displays QRZ's advertising does make lookups slower than using QRZ's "XML Data" service, which requires a paid subscription.
?
You can specify a secondary callbook to use when the primary callbook is inaccessible or doesn't have an entry for the requested callsign.
Has anyone else had my recent experience with multiple "spots" from a single callsign showing up in Spotcollector at the same time. In one instance a Polish station nearly filled the entire Spotcollector screen This just happened again with two or three callsigns showing up, filling the page. I do not think it is a Spotcollector issue per se but likely something from each of the Networks. Weird behavior, never experienced it before.
+ Yes: large number of spots of a single callsign on multiple frequencies - more than 10 - simultaneously, repeated for several different callsigns.
+ A persistent implementation of this would constitute a denial-of-service attack that would render the DX Cluster network useless. This vulnerability will persist until DXCluster operators gain the ability to revoke a client's ability to generate outgoing spots.
On 2025-03-02 9:37 AM, Joe WB9SBD via groups.io wrote:
But I am not sure if DXLabs can be set up to work with HamQTH.
Both DXLab Suite and JT Alert can be configured to use HamQTH. However, I have found HamQTH much less complete and less accurate than QRZ.com (even in the "free", non-XML version).
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2025-03-02 9:37 AM, Joe WB9SBD via groups.io wrote:
I think HamQTH can do all the same functions. And it's unlimited use is free. But I am not sure if DXLabs can be set up to work with HamQTH. Joe WB9SBD On 3/2/2025 8:18 AM, Gilbert Baron W0MN via groups.io wrote:
You can look up a very limited number of calls free but if you are keeping a computer log and want to get more than a few at any one time and other functions of the application interface then you must subscribe or you can get only a few at a time and I think deliberately is slower. They have a lot of nice things like your own page and such but it is getting pretty expensive, ever year it is ore. If I were back at 15 years old rather than 85 I probably? would consider a life subscription, as I luckily did to ARRL. What a bargain that turned out to be.
Maybe we will hook up some day o CW. If only I were a better typer I oud copy at 35WPM perhaps BUT I HAVE TO WATCJ TE KEYBOARD FOR TOUCJ TUPING. Probably need to? practice that .
You can look
up a very limited number of calls free but if you are
keeping a computer log and want to get more than a few at
any one time and other functions of the application
interface then you must subscribe or you can get only a few
at a time and I think deliberately is slower. They have a
lot of nice things like your own page and such but it is
getting pretty expensive, ever year it is ore. If I were
back at 15 years old rather than 85 I probably? would
consider a life subscription, as I luckily did to ARRL. What
a bargain that turned out to be.
?
Maybe we
will hook up some day o CW. If only I were a better typer I
oud copy at 35WPM perhaps BUT I HAVE TO WATCJ TE KEYBOARD
FOR TOUCJ TUPING. Probably need to? practice that .
I read
your post about inflation. I have never subscribed to
QRZ, so I had no idea it was that costly. I am curious
though, you said "No choice but to subscribe though." Am
I missing something by NOT subscribing?
?
Thanks,
73, and you can often find me on CW at less than 30 WPM
if you want some on-air practice.
?
Dave -
K9FN
?
On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 7:33?AM
Gilbert Baron W0MN via <w0mn00=[email protected]>
wrote:
QRZ prices
are getting out of hand. No choice but to subscribe
though. I remember it went from free to 15 to 25 and
now 45+.?
?
XML is a
requirement for reasonable usage of DXLABAS and I
have to PRAISE Dave for this program. How he does a
LOT more than QRZ and much better support is beyond
my comprehension but THAKS DAVE.
Works fine but you miss a lot of worthy things on your QRZ page function and get a very limited number of lookups and they are slower. If you have a moderate size or larger log or want to log a lot of calls or a contest or other operation such as a pile of FT8 QSOes then the cheapest but unlimited XML is the way you have to go.
?
I think to get full usage of DXLabs and likely other logging software (YOU MEAN SUCH A THING EXISTS !!) you really need the XML functions.
?
You can get the XML Lookup service alone for $35.95 but the next level at $45.95 is worth the extra 10.
Dxlab works just fine without having a qrz subscription. There is also a xml subscription that you can get for less then what Gil said.
On 3/2/2025 7:00 AM, David Bunte via groups.io wrote:
Gil -
?
I read your post about inflation. I have never subscribed to QRZ, so I had no idea it was that costly. I am curious though, you said "No choice but to subscribe though." Am I missing something by NOT subscribing?
?
Thanks, 73, and you can often find me on CW at less than 30 WPM if you want some on-air practice.
?
Dave - K9FN
?
On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 7:33?AM Gilbert Baron W0MN via <w0mn00=[email protected]> wrote:
QRZ prices are getting out of hand. No choice but to subscribe though. I remember it went from free to 15 to 25 and now 45+.?
?
XML is a requirement for reasonable usage of DXLABAS and I have to PRAISE Dave for this program. How he does a LOT more than QRZ and much better support is beyond my comprehension but THAKS DAVE.
You can look up a very limited number of calls free but if you are keeping a computer log and want to get more than a few at any one time and other functions of the application interface then you must subscribe or you can get only a few at a time and I think deliberately is slower. They have a lot of nice things like your own page and such but it is getting pretty expensive, ever year it is ore. If I were back at 15 years old rather than 85 I probably? would consider a life subscription, as I luckily did to ARRL. What a bargain that turned out to be.
?
Maybe we will hook up some day o CW. If only I were a better typer I oud copy at 35WPM perhaps BUT I HAVE TO WATCJ TE KEYBOARD FOR TOUCJ TUPING. Probably need to? practice that .
I read your post about inflation. I have never subscribed to QRZ, so I had no idea it was that costly. I am curious though, you said "No choice but to subscribe though." Am I missing something by NOT subscribing?
?
Thanks, 73, and you can often find me on CW at less than 30 WPM if you want some on-air practice.
?
Dave - K9FN
?
On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 7:33?AM Gilbert Baron W0MN via <w0mn00=[email protected]> wrote:
QRZ prices are getting out of hand. No choice but to subscribe though. I remember it went from free to 15 to 25 and now 45+.?
?
XML is a requirement for reasonable usage of DXLABAS and I have to PRAISE Dave for this program. How he does a LOT more than QRZ and much better support is beyond my comprehension but THAKS DAVE.
Dxlab works just fine without having a qrz subscription.
There is also a xml subscription that you can get for less then what
Gil said.
On 3/2/2025 7:00 AM, David Bunte via
groups.io wrote:
Gil -
I read your
post about inflation. I have never subscribed to QRZ, so I had
no idea it was that costly. I am curious though, you said "No
choice but to subscribe though." Am I missing something by NOT
subscribing?
Thanks, 73,
and you can often find me on CW at less than 30 WPM if you
want some on-air practice.
Dave - K9FN
On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 7:33?AM
Gilbert Baron W0MN via <w0mn00=[email protected]>
wrote:
QRZ prices are getting out of hand.
No choice but to subscribe though. I remember it went
from free to 15 to 25 and now 45+.?
?
XML is a requirement for reasonable
usage of DXLABAS and I have to PRAISE Dave for this
program. How he does a LOT more than QRZ and much
better support is beyond my comprehension but THAKS
DAVE.
I read your post about inflation. I have never subscribed to QRZ, so I had no idea it was that costly. I am curious though, you said "No choice but to subscribe though." Am I missing something by NOT subscribing?
Thanks, 73, and you can often find me on CW at less than 30 WPM if you want some on-air practice.
On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 7:33?AM Gilbert Baron W0MN via <w0mn00=[email protected]> wrote:
QRZ prices are getting out of hand. No choice but to subscribe though. I remember it went from free to 15 to 25 and now 45+.?
?
XML is a requirement for reasonable usage of DXLABAS and I have to PRAISE Dave for this program. How he does a LOT more than QRZ and much better support is beyond my comprehension but THAKS DAVE.