开云体育

<sa_grippe@y...> wrote: book too?? Black" from who nasty reports are Or maybe start reading it, with the idea of seeing it ane

<sa_grippe@y...> wrote: book too?? Black" from who nasty reports are Or maybe start reading it, with the idea of seeing it ane

<sa_grippe@y...> wrote: to aspects

Note to Patrick: Please send Ossie another copy NOW!

or talked Also, you have to get one of those flash-thingies from "Men in Black" that wipes out your memory of the book entirely. Gary and I know from experience that the most vituperative criticism

Jeanette wrote: "The truth is that while metaphysics may be interesting, I'm an activist following the lead of applied forgiveness. I don't pretend to always do it perfectly at first. Sometimes it

the I think you misunderstood me, Carrie. I'm not suggesting that controversy here or anywhere else sells the book; the book sells itself. My Australian distributor just reported to me that he's

Gene Bogart wrote: Gary was referring in his recent post. I am rarely repetitious -- although I am, occasionally, tendentious. Gene B. (the "other" Gene) Hey, at least I knew it wasn't you, Gene!

<gwsmith@s...> wrote: Disappearance_of_the_Universe@..., "starchild1124" Nov 24... So far I've only read up to the part about the orgasms and sex. I like the nice white paper and clear

<gwsmith@s...> wrote: Disappearance_of_the_Universe@..., "starchild1124" coke A coke rush... and you know this how...? (LOL) Would anyone be happy, or even survive, in a continual coke

<gene@g...> wrote: Gary was You are the Gene who emailed me asking where you could read the "newsgroup from hell" you were hearing so much about here. Actually, this board is a lot smaller and they

<garyrrenard@y...> wrote: hands the I have a question, I don't know if you will consider it serious or not. If you aren't reading posts by Gene, Stephen and me, how will you know if we ask any serious

Gary wrote: "The truth is that while metaphysics may be interesting, I'm an activist following the lead of applied forgiveness. I don't pretend to always do it perfectly at first. Sometimes it takes

<cracker.jack@n...> wrote: being nice so far... Carrie is a last week, that Helen got the Blue wrong. And of course, implying that she knew better. knowledge she's not an Urtext or JCIM student.

<cracker.jack@n...> wrote: Wapnick my am I made any of

<starchild1124@y...> wrote: they I've not concerned myself with the Wapnick aspect, beyond remarking that the albatross is around Ken's neck.

<starchild1124@y...> wrote: Nov. 28. Val sent me my copy. It's badly written.

<starchild1124@y...> wrote: decrease... It's the sort of analogy someone with no real experience in such matters might come up with. No worse than comparing Heaven to a coke rush, but both miss the

<lklanglois@y...> wrote: had to say, I would not reach Atonement... No, I said not wishing to do this was a defense against the Atonement, but I also said this defense will not work. Hence, I said

Let me state here for the record, that I am not the "Gene" to whom Gary was referring in his recent post. I am rarely repetitious -- although I am, occasionally, tendentious. Gene B. (the "other"