开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: A + P used to mean something

 

I think the world does exsist, because we are creating it with our
minds. And choosing to be part of it.

Personal reality and combined/mass consciousness reality overall.

Just that we can remember on a Higher Level it's not Truth, which
is that we are all One and One with God.

And not take what seems to be real and happening "in the world" too
seriously.

As Jesus said "in the world but not of it".

Detached from ego issues, that don't really matter in the overall
scope of things.

"Does this really matter"? and such... And *I* am the one who is
hurt and/or benefits by which teacher I choose to listen to at any
given time.

Something to aim for anyway.

~ Carrie





--- In Disappearance_of_the_Universe@..., "mstreet"
<mastreet@t...> wrote:
Jeanette wrote:

I do feel the world exists, and so does my brother. I feel it is
my responses to my brother which are erroneous, and illusional, and
how I see my brother is greatly misperceived.<<

Hi Jeanette:

I guess I have to agree with you in that I too believe the world
exists. As Ossie pointed out, when I look in the mirror I still see
me, looking back at me. So obviously I think I exist.

Not that I believe that is the truth in the ultimate sense. As it
says in the Introduction to the Course.

"Nothing real can be threatened.
Nothing unreal exists.
Herein lies the peace of God."

I am still working on accepting that.

Peace Martha :-)


Re: Re-posting: FYI: I have no control over this board

 

Hi Gary,

Sorry about last night, I kind of overreacted (I have all fire and
air signs and tend to combust)

But it all worked out, and I feel it's resolved (in a really good
way) with Patrick and Karen.

"All things are lessong God would have us learn", and such.

I don't know about you, I don't think you and I had a problem to
start with (LOL)

btw, are you originally from MA? You mentioned going there and one
of your emails (that Karen used) seems to indicate that. But then I
think your name is french, and Lewiston was a predominately french
area, at least at one time. We used to get the paper from there (long
ago) and considered it as a place to move to.

For some reason I always think of it as sunny (don't know why, I
haven't seen it all that much)

Just wondering about MA because I grew up in Revere, North(Shore)
of Boston.

~ Carrie




--- In Disappearance_of_the_Universe@..., "garyrrenard"
<garyrrenard@y...> wrote:
Does this group have stated rules?
I didn't notice.

I know it apparently has unstated ones.

And I know I always have the choice of participating or not.

~ Carrie

Hi Carrie, As far as I know the group has no rules, and as you
should
be able to see for yourself by now, people are free to say anything
they want. I believe in freedom of speech, and when you get the
book
in the mail you'll see that Pursah says very early, "You will find
we
are very free with our speech indeed." I like to follow their
example. Also, I don't feel superior to you and I don't have any
problem with you saying how you feel. Sometimes the reason I don't
respond to posts is just because I have a lot of other things on my
plate right now. Love and peace, Gary.


Re: Re-Posting: FYI: I have no control over this board

 

Hi Martha,

Nice to see you again.

I had joined this group, but didn't plan on participating until I
read the book (which is on it's way to me at this time)

Got a little sidetracked from stuff on the newsgroup, but that has
all been resolved. I can't speak for anyone else, but I feel the air
has been cleared.

Some see this as "negative" and "inappropriate behavior" but I see
it as working things out.

If we have issues and stuff them, and don't talk about them they'll
probably never get resolved and worked through and those involved
reach a peaceful understanding.

Which I believe has happened since last night.

As to having guidelines about a board/group being ACIM related, to
me all of my life is ACIM related.

I can't separate it and define what is or isn't course related.

Some people seem to have a life and find ACIM and try and fit it
in. I found ACIM and now try and have a life that fits into that.

Not saying one way is any better or more desirable than another.

~ Carrie


--- In Disappearance_of_the_Universe@..., "mstreet"
<mastreet@t...> wrote:
Carrie wrote:
Does this group have stated rules?<<
Hi Carrie:

The purpose of the group is stated on the home page.

This group is for spiritual seekers familiar with ACIM and have
read the book "The Disappearance of the Universe" by Gary R. Renard.
The topics of discussion should be focused on the teachings of ACIM
and the experiences of living the Course. A Course in Miracles? and
ACIM? are registered trademarks of FACIM(www.facim.org), the
copyright holder.<<

And from my understanding of the Course, purpose is everything. And
I need only be concerned with my purpose. (Something that I easily
forget. <g>) And that would be for remembering why <I> am here. And I
am not just meaning this board.

Peace Martha :-)


Can't Resist A Re-Post

 

God's Higher Court Just Handed Out Some CITATIONS:

I'd like to share some CITATIONS from the Course for you
newcomers.
First, about, "I made you. It is in the Course.": "...What if you
recognized this world is an hallucination? What if you really
understood you made it up?" (T443) About God making the world and
people, not!: "The reality of death is firmly rooted in the belief
that God's Son is a body. And if God created bodies, death would
indeed be real. But God would not be loving." (M66-67) "The world you
see is an illusion of a world. God did not create it, for what He
creates must be eternal as Himself." (CL85) About God creating any
part of the world, not!: "There is no world! This is the central
thought the Course attempts to teach." (W243) About the unseen,
unconscious mind controlling bodies, as if they were ROBOTS, but
cleverly masking this control through the forces of the
universe: "The body appears to be largely self-motivated and
independent, yet it actually responds only to the intentions of the
mind." (PRxii) About unconscious guilt being the driving force behind
this world: "Guilt asks for punishment, and its request is granted.
Not in truth, but in the world of shadows and illusions built on
sin." (T554) About non-duality. Duality = 2. (This is for you
mathematicians out there.) Non-duality = 1, which is non-twoness.
Thus oneness means no division. Duality (2) = DIVISION. Thus oneness
= NON-DUALITY. Two or more (division) = ego. "The ego is the part of
your mind that believes in division. How could a part of God detach
itself without believing it is attacking Him?" (T84) The
solution? "Forgiveness is the central theme that runs throughout
salvation, holding all its parts in meaningful relationships, the
course it runs directed and its outcome sure." (W324) Love and peace,
Gary.


Re: A question

 

It seems to me there are an awful lot of people having an awful lot
of FUN around here. What's the matter with you guys? Don't you know
the Course is for SERIOUS spiritual students? LOL.


Re: A question

mstreet
 

开云体育

>>sometimes it seems like such a long way yet to go.<<
?
Linda wrote:
>>Oh, Jesus. You're right. ;-)<<
?
Yes, I think it takes a miracle, for it to happen. (LOL)
?
~ Martha ;-)


Re: A question

 

Oh, Jesus. You're right. ;-)
?
Linda

mstreet wrote:
Linda wrote:
>>By the way - LOL - I was NOT cussing! I meant Well, I guess Jesus and ascended masters and awakened people. E-mail is NOT the best communicative device.<<
?
(LOL) are you sure Linda? Nah... I understood. As Ossie would say "::::sigh::::" sometimes it seems like such a long way yet to go.
?
~ Martha :-)

?


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Disappearance_of_the_Universe-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Do you Yahoo!?
- Now only $29.95 per month!


Re: A question

 

LOLOLOL Ain't it a ball, though?

Gene Bogart wrote:
Oh, Jesus, Linda... ?I knew what you meant!

;^) ?GB


From: LindaL

By the way - LOL - I was NOT cussing! I meant Well, I guess Jesus and ascended masters and awakened people. E-mail is NOT the best communicative device.

LindaL wrote:
Well, Jesus. I guess any ?ascended masters and live awakened people? ?

mstreet wrote:
But is there anyone that is so constantly right minded that they see it this way all of the time?
Just wondering? Martha



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Disappearance_of_the_Universe-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Do you Yahoo!?
- Now only $29.95 per month!


Re: Re-Posting: FYI: I have no control over t...

 

Glad to see you back from lurking, Jim. Not tepid, no!! I thought it was good and thoughtful. I'll be lurking next week for the most part. I'm on vacation this week. Normally, I don't have much time for discussions.

red pill wrote:

?(Sorry, Red Pill. You didn't want a lot of quotes. We can each read the book ourselves. Close your eyes. LOL)

?

My bad!? I read them anyway. Since my attempted intro and its tepid reception

Ive just been lurking and trying to get a better feel for the group.

?

It appears to in some kind of transition.

?

I do like quotations with thoughtful commentary and as long

as theres MORE commentary than quotes I usually pick up

something valuable.

?

Great contribution!

?

Jim

?




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Disappearance_of_the_Universe-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Do you Yahoo!?
- Now only $29.95 per month!


Re: A question

mstreet
 

开云体育

Linda wrote:
>>By the way - LOL - I was NOT cussing! I meant Well, I guess Jesus and ascended masters and awakened people. E-mail is NOT the best communicative device.<<
?
(LOL) are you sure Linda? Nah... I understood. As Ossie would say "::::sigh::::" sometimes it seems like such a long way yet to go.
?
~ Martha :-)

?


Re: A question

 

Oh, Jesus, Linda... ?I knew what you meant!

;^) ?GB


From: LindaL

By the way - LOL - I was NOT cussing! I meant Well, I guess Jesus and ascended masters and awakened people. E-mail is NOT the best communicative device.

LindaL wrote:
Well, Jesus. I guess any ?ascended masters and live awakened people? ?

mstreet wrote:
But is there anyone that is so constantly right minded that they see it this way all of the time?
Just wondering? Martha


Re: Re-Posting: FYI: I have no control over t...

red pill
 

开云体育

?(Sorry, Red Pill. You didn't want a lot of quotes. We can each read the book ourselves. Close your eyes. LOL)

?

My bad!? I read them anyway. Since my attempted intro and it’s tepid reception

I’ve just been lurking and trying to get a better feel for the group.

?

It appears to in some kind of transition.

?

I do like quotations with thoughtful commentary and as long

as there’s MORE commentary than quotes I usually pick up

something valuable.

?

Great contribution!

?

Jim

?



Re: A question

 

By the way - LOL - I was NOT cussing! I meant Well, I guess Jesus and ascended masters and awakened people. E-mail is NOT the best communicative device.

LindaL wrote:
Well, Jesus. I guess any? ascended masters and live awakened people???

mstreet wrote:
I am listening to Ken's workbook lesson tapes. In lesson 26, "My attack thoughts are attacking my invulnerability" in chapter 3, in the first paragraph it says: "The idea for today introduces the thought that you always attack yourself first."
?
Then Ken said: "If I perceive you as attacking me, and I react in that way as if it were true, it is only because I attacked first. In my mind. This has nothing to do with behavior. That is what that line at the end of "The Dynamics of the Ego" in chapter 11 says: "If he speaks not of Christ to you, you spoke not of Christ to him."
?
"Again we are not talking about what other people are doing. We are talking about our perception of what other people are doing. And by this, we mean our interpretation, that they are attacking us. It doesn't mean that you don't see attack thoughts in other people. Jesus is seeing attack thoughts in all of his students. It's when you judge against them, your making them real."
?
To me, it seems like you would have to be a saint or like Jesus himself, not to judge against people you perceive as attacking. I know the Course itself, says, the ego always speaks first, and it is always wrong. And that everything is basically reducible to love or fear. Love or a call for love. But is there anyone that is so constantly right minded that they see it this way all of the time?
?
Just wondering? Martha


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Disappearance_of_the_Universe-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Do you Yahoo!?
- Now only $29.95 per month!

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Disappearance_of_the_Universe-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Do you Yahoo!?
- Now only $29.95 per month!


Re: A question

 

Well, Jesus. I guess any? ascended masters and live awakened people???

mstreet wrote:
I am listening to Ken's workbook lesson tapes. In lesson 26, "My attack thoughts are attacking my invulnerability" in chapter 3, in the first paragraph it says: "The idea for today introduces the thought that you always attack yourself first."
?
Then Ken said: "If I perceive you as attacking me, and I react in that way as if it were true, it is only because I attacked first. In my mind. This has nothing to do with behavior. That is what that line at the end of "The Dynamics of the Ego" in chapter 11 says: "If he speaks not of Christ to you, you spoke not of Christ to him."
?
"Again we are not talking about what other people are doing. We are talking about our perception of what other people are doing. And by this, we mean our interpretation, that they are attacking us. It doesn't mean that you don't see attack thoughts in other people. Jesus is seeing attack thoughts in all of his students. It's when you judge against them, your making them real."
?
To me, it seems like you would have to be a saint or like Jesus himself, not to judge against people you perceive as attacking. I know the Course itself, says, the ego always speaks first, and it is always wrong. And that everything is basically reducible to love or fear. Love or a call for love. But is there anyone that is so constantly right minded that they see it this way all of the time?
?
Just wondering? Martha


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Disappearance_of_the_Universe-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Do you Yahoo!?
- Now only $29.95 per month!


Re: What is so fear producing...

 

> Jeanette:
> Just talking with her, exchanges of personal philosophy, and speaking of some
> psychology, and life experience as well, made us much closer. I reckon such
> relationship will also be extended to our patients, as well.
> ... God only knows what the outcome of such relationship can do... Closer is
> always better.

Absolutely right... ?What is it the Course says, about how healing is extended in ways we are not even aware of, to people we don't even think we know..? (or something to that effect; forgive my "off-the-cuff" attempt at accuracy;)

I believe your closer relationship will definitely extend itself to your patients for their greater good -- as well as yours!

Gene


A question

mstreet
 

开云体育

I am listening to Ken's workbook lesson tapes. In lesson 26, "My attack thoughts are attacking my invulnerability" in chapter 3, in the first paragraph it says: "The idea for today introduces the thought that you always attack yourself first."
?
Then Ken said: "If I perceive you as attacking me, and I react in that way as if it were true, it is only because I attacked first. In my mind. This has nothing to do with behavior. That is what that line at the end of "The Dynamics of the Ego" in chapter 11 says: "If he speaks not of Christ to you, you spoke not of Christ to him."
?
"Again we are not talking about what other people are doing. We are talking about our perception of what other people are doing. And by this, we mean our interpretation, that they are attacking us. It doesn't mean that you don't see attack thoughts in other people. Jesus is seeing attack thoughts in all of his students. It's when you judge against them, your making them real."
?
To me, it seems like you would have to be a saint or like Jesus himself, not to judge against people you perceive as attacking. I know the Course itself, says, the ego always speaks first, and it is always wrong. And that everything is basically reducible to love or fear. Love or a call for love. But is there anyone that is so constantly right minded that they see it this way all of the time?
?
Just wondering? Martha


Re: What is so fear producing...

Jeanette
 

开云体育

Gene Bogart wrote:
?
"a very "down to earth" manner; sort of "sit down, have a drink and we'll discuss it" --
?
And a story:
?
There is a physician I work with in the ER, she is an older woman who also is a well respected ER doc in an ER in New York City. She is a woman of fire.
?
We have been trying to get together, on a more personal level.
?
The other night, one late night, she said to me:
?
"Jeanette, let's go outside for a while, so I can have a cigarette."
?
I couldn't at that moment, but, I did later, later.
?
Just talking with her, exchanges of?personal philosophy, and speaking of some psychology, and life experience as well, made us much closer. I reckon such relationship will also be extended to our patients, as well.
?
Some day I hope to have lunch with her, outside of the medical confines of mandated tasks, and emergent stressful experiences. God only knows what the outcome of such relationship can do.
?
Closer is always better.
?
?
Jeanette
?
?


Re: What is so fear producing...

Jeanette
 

开云体育

Gene Bogart wrote:
?
"a very "down to earth" manner; sort of "sit down, have a drink and we'll discuss it" --
?
My kind of world.
?
?
Jeanette


Re: Re-Posting: FYI: I have no control over this board

 

In a message dated 7/10/2003 11:36:01 AM Eastern Standard Time, starchild1124@... writes:

But then I've also read Abraham Lincoln (supposedly) said "Just
because you can shut someone up doesn't mean you've changed
how they
feel".
Is that the goal, to change how another person feels?

starchild1124@... writes:

when asked about a song he wrote about a young girl who kills her
father who has been raping her-("Janey Got a Gun") and if this is a
proper subject for a song..."it what we DON'T talk about
that causes
the problems."
When my son passed away, part of the grieving process was to talk about it, and to discuss it with folks who knew what I was going through and I would discuss it only in a place where it felt safe to do so.

It has now coming close to three years since his passing and now I am I getting in touch with and observing the specialness of my situation. So now I am especially mindful of what I really want to put out there when I discuss this particular aspect of my life. Is it an attempt to be special (awwwww, I am so sorry to hear that that your son passed away etc., etc.), or do I want to share with the hopes of being of assistance to others who have are going through the same thing? I vacillate between the two ... but unlike other folks who are completely identified by their role as a greiving parent, spouse, etc., I have a choice to see things differently ... and at this particular time in my life ... that is a tremendous gift.

Peace

Ossie

"Ideas Leave Not Their Source"


Re: What is so fear producing...

 

I have to wonder, though, what is it that is so fear producing about
the various perspectives of the Course, and "Disappearance" in particular?
- Sheila
I think it's as Jesus says in the Course, "the ego is afraid of you",
because it "realizes" that when you discover the Truth about yourself, it
will be dispelled... will vanish into the "simply nothing" that it really
is. Pretty scary for the poor ego...... ;^)

As far as "Disappearance" in particular, I think it may be because the book
presents Course-oriented material in a very "down to earth" manner; sort of
"sit down, have a drink and we'll discuss it" -- and this makes the concepts
SO accessible (and perhaps particularly so to those for whom the Course has
not fully resonated yet), that the ego sees this as an exceptional threat.

That ol' Ego is a twicky widdle fewwah!!

Gene