开云体育

<garyrrenard@y...> wrote: another of they hate Ken Wapnick and received version

Hello sa_grippe@..., In reference to your comment: è Oh, actually we care very much. That's why Gary and I è are both active in public discussion forums when we è certainly don't have to be;

Stephen wrote: they have ego's like us or what? Is it just we humans who are 'projecting' the Universe or do pigeons and donkeys need to achieve Atonement as well in order that the "Sonship" will

Gene, didn't you say once you are also a Sagittarius, like I am? Two of us together here, writing about the book (and what happened on the ng in regard to it) might be interesting. (LOL) I've heard

Hi Gene, I wonder if you will still be seen as "being nice". Weren't you just giving your opinions and asking questions about the book when you were seen as NOT being nice? I just started it and keep

To: Disappearance_of_the_Universe@... Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:52 PM Subject: Re: [Disappearance_of_the_Universe] Re: Actually, Gene's being nice so far... Blue Book student -

To: <Disappearance_of_the_Universe@...> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:50 PM Subject: [Disappearance_of_the_Universe] Re: Forgiveness Question Personally, I wonder what all the

From: "ideaofgod" <gwsmith@...> I'm glad you mentioned this Gene - you've made me realise that Gary made another mistake I should have commented upon. I am not involved in any of the current

To: Disappearance_of_the_Universe@... Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:03 PM Subject: Re: [Disappearance_of_the_Universe] Re: Wishing you a mind at peace I don't feel resentful about it,

You know; a thought might be, for any who'd like to discuss the Urtext versus the "Blue Book" versions of the Course, and debate the relative qualities and accuracies thereof... perhaps starting a

I guess there is truth in the saying "No such thing as bad publicity" :-) "Ideas Leave Not Their Source"

I am not trying to be argumentative. I am glad you say it is not true. One of you said that I would never learn the truth from the Blue Book. You said that if I didn't want to hear the what the Course

<gwsmith@s...> wrote: intelligence, Hmm... I seem to remember "hoaxer," "liar," and "fraud," just for starters. "Idiotic" and "stupid", or words to that effect, were in there somewhere. On the other

Carrie wrote: discussion on the ng and they mainly get ignored.<< Oh, and Carrie never does this, do you Carrie??? Just whatever and whenever it suits your purpose, right? ~ Martha

--- In Disappearance_of_the_Universe@..., LindaL <lklanglois@y...> wrote: And this seems contrary to what you and or Gene Smith say - that the Atonement is impossible using the Blue Book.

<garyrrenard@y...> wrote: at said it - I read excerpts from it before drawing any conclusions. It is very easy to see you perpetrated a hoax, and I said so and say so.

<starchild1124@y...> wrote: It's not what started it, but the numerous factual errors and outright absurdities in it are enough by themselves to show the book is a hoax. Nelson is King Log. I think

Blue Book student - just like you guys.<< Hi Stephen: I think you better check this out with Carrie. She was claiming last week, that Helen got the Blue wrong. And of course, implying that she knew

<garyrrenard@y...> wrote: war or Are you saying there is a single mind-thing called "The Ego", which made the apparent world and everything in it? If so, is this A&P, or do you claim you can support

<sa_grippe@y...> wrote: about Gary's I did no such thing. I questioned your integrity, your intelligence, your education, and your editing ability--all with good reason. In response, I have