开云体育

<mastreet@t...> wrote: doesn't seem like an option. Fry's here in Silicon Valley is selling new computers today for $170. They work well.

<mastreet@t...> wrote: in his book, and he can correct me. But he said ... (and I am going by memory now) ... That everything that is eternal should should taken literally. Non duality is the only

Hello garyrrenard@..., In reference to your comment: è Hi Carrie. I think you give a good example here of è how to be appropriate when practicing the Course. è Forgiveness is done at

Jim Dunn

Jim wrote: Hi Jim: That is my interpretation of what the Course says in several places. I will paste a couple below. (T-2.IV.3.8-13) "The body is merely part of your experience in the physical world.

I keep sayin', "I'm READY already!" Another one I'm going to print out (in reverse) and nail to my forehead, so I can stop forgetting all the crap the ego throws at me! I've got to say that from my

Martha posted some interesting comments about what is real. harm/hurt to anyone else".<< In truth we can't. Because in truth we are still as God created us. But bodies sure as hell can harm/hurt

Hi Martha, you wrote: in his book, and he can correct me. But he said ... (and I am going by memory now) ... That everything that is eternal should should taken literally. Non duality is the only

Hi Gene: I was just going back and checking to see if I had indeed set myself up as some kind of authority on the Course. And if I had, it was certainly a mistake. <g> I just usually tell it the way

Hey Gene. First, I think God should shake the hell out of us and wake us up now! So what if we crap a brick? LOL. But O.K. Maybe He knows what She's doing. Also, the ascended guys said, "In the

Wow, talk about a smorgasbord of replies

The contradiction thing is interesting. The Course says that reasoning always ends where it begins. So, if you believe J condradicts himself, you will find evidence for this belief. If you believe

Hi Martha, Here's my thought on this, as to why I don't see this as a contradiction: If my wife is asleep, and is having a nightmare, I "do not know" of what her nightmare is (similar to "God does

Simon wrote: Today as i was mowing the lawn and thinking about your book,it came to mind how utterly astonishing it must have been to your friends,family and especially Karen when you finally got

Carrie wrote: else, right?<< Can't ever recall saying that, or even thinking that. No not really. as "right" as anyone else, and ego can see and try and correct ego in anyone else.<< I don't think

teaches. :-) And, of course, YOU know what ACIM teaches better than anyone else, right? And you are promoting your belief in what it teaches. You seem to have missed the chapter that says

Hello jldunn8@..., In reference to your comment: è As far as I can find, there is no where in ACIM è where it states that "Bodies sure as hell can harm/hurt è one another, and to deny it is

Hey Gary (and Thomas, and everybody else too, for that matter...) This thread has piqued my "SciFi/Time-Travel/Paradox" curiosity -- and I've always loved this area of speculation! How would this

I was getting Thessalonius mixed up with Thaddeus. I realized it as soon as I read your e-mail. I will do a search in Strong's Concordance and also Unger's Bible Dictionary. Doubt if I'll find much.

Carrie wrote: Wasn't it called "On Course" or something? I think you're right, Carrie. I think Jon had a magazine for many years, which I heard about but didn't subscribe to, called "On Course."