Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Photo Notifications
#photo-notice
Group Notification
The following photos have been uploaded to the DRAKE TR-7 DIGITAL VFO photo album of the [email protected] group. By: Dale Parfitt <PARINC1@...> The following photos have been uploaded to the DRAKE TR-7 DIGITAL VFO photo album of the [email protected] group. By: Dale Parfitt <PARINC1@...> |
Group Notification
Paul Lukosius <plukosius@...> added the photo album Drake 2-NT Digital VFO : An EU station complained about my HA-5 drifting on 10M so I decided to put together a digital VFO. This is the QRP Labs VFO kit that uses the Si5351A synthesizer. Added a 5V reed relay to switch the output ON/OFF and use a 1N4007 blocking diode so it can be keyed by the 2-NT VFO Key line. Powered by a cell phone charger, it drives the 2-NT to full output on all bands. The following photos have been uploaded to the Drake 2-NT Digital VFO photo album of the [email protected] group. By: Paul Lukosius <plukosius@...> |
Paul,
I'm curious as to the RF output voltage you're obtaining from your Si5351A VFO.? I suspect you're amplifying for use into the Drake 2NT?? I'm using the same Si board with a homebrew RF voltage amp (images below).? With a bifilar output transformer, it produces 30Vp-p from a +12V source.? That's enough to drive most boatanchor transmitters. My only issue from these PLL and DDS VFOs is close-in spurs next to the carrier frequency.? They're not nearly as clean as a classic PTO circuit.? I typically see worst-case spurs at -35 dBc.? They're down quite a bit, but it's possible to detect the spurs from stations when propagation is good.? Paul, W9AC ? |
Paul,
That looks like a really nice VFO! I am curious about amplitude too.? The Si5351 puts out 3.3vpp square wave.? Normally people say you need higher amplitude for a tube rig. DDS means Direct Digital Synthesis.? The signal is generated by building a sine wave via a DAC (Digital to Analog Converter).? Small aberrations to the sine wave create the close in spurs.? The better the chip, the less the spurs.? The low end AD9850/51 are pretty bad if used in a receiver (I tried) but are probably ok for a transmitter. The Si chips use a GHz PLL divided down.? They don't have close in spurs but do have phase noise but it not bad. 73, Gary WB6OGD |
Gary,
I thought I had replied to W9AC's message. Not sure where it went, so here it is again. The Si5351A output is adequate to drive the 2-NT to full output on all bands. As shown in the pdf you attached, when operating straight through, the 2-NT oscillator stage only requires 1V RMS to drive it. So on 20 and 15 meters I drive it with 14 or 21 MHz input and the 3.3V square wave is adequate. On 10M both the oscillator and driver operate as? doublers with a 7 MHz XTAL, but with 14 MHz input, the? oscillator operates straight through and 3.3V P-P is enough drive for full output. Not nearly as slick as W9AC's vfo shown above, but it seems to be getting the job done.? 73 Paul, N9PL |
Paul,
I'm sure I responded to your post, but don't see it here, so am responding again. The Si5351A output is adequate to drive the 2-NT to full output on all bands. When operating straight through, the 2-NT oscillator stage only requires 1V RMS to drive it. So on 20 and 15 meters I drive it with 14 or 21 MHz input and the 3.3V square wave is adequate. On 10M both the oscillator and driver operate as? doublers with a 7 MHz XTAL, but with 14 MHz input, the? oscillator operates straight through and 3.3V P-P is enough drive for full output. After seeing your VFO post here, I took a quick look at your QRZ page. Most impressive. I think most of us wished our home brew projects looked this good! 73 Paul, N9PL |
Paul, ? Thanks for the feedback ¨C and to Dale, W4OP for posting his Si5351A spectrum result.? ? I¡¯ll have another look at the PLL VFO¡¯s output.? My memory may be mixed up with the result of a companion DDS VFO I built that uses an AD9850 which is known for its close-in, low-level spurs.? ?That VFO is shown below.? It¡¯s a more complex design since it uses two microcontrollers, one of which is responsible only for T/R sequencing.? Because a PIC microcontroller manages several VFO functions, it¡¯s output results in 1-3 ms of random timing jitter.? A tiny Adafruit microcontroller solves the timing problem.? An on-board RF amp boosts output to +20 dBm with a separate adjustable Hi-Z output of 30Vp-p.? ? ? ? Paul, W9AC? |