¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: WTB RV-75

 

Nice find! You should send the info on that QC tag to WB4HFN for his serial number database.

73

-Jim
NU0C

On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 15:07:06 -0800
"K6OXN Bob" <bobk6oxn@...> wrote:

I was able to locate a NIB RV-75 at a reasonable price and it is now part of my shack. Works like it should and I don't think that it was ever installed anywhere. Still in original box and had the temporary manual and QC tag's. I am a happy camper now. Have a great 7 line system.? Late SN TR7, L7 amp, L7PS, MN2000, RV-75, and WH7. Putting out almost legal limit on 40 meters and will be checking other bands soon.

73? Bob






--

73

-Jim
NU0C


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

Just curious, but why so many?

73

-Jim
NU0C

On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 14:36:26 -0800
"Rick K8EZB" <frboswell@...> wrote:


I have some tubular ceramic capacitors that are probably either 25 or 50
volt parts
Steve,

The values I need are as follows:

C225, C250, C251, C252:? ?0.01 mfd

C224: 0.001 mfd

C223: 120 pf

These need to be about the same physical size as those shown in my RV75 pgoto above. Let me know what you have and what you'd like for them along with your mailing address; I'll put a check in the mail.(or PayPal if you can do this).

Thanks,

Rick
K8EZB






--

73

-Jim
NU0C


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

Stupid phone keyboard.? You can have whatever I have for shipping only unless the shipping is minuscule.? Then, I'll just send them.

Please let me know the values.

Steve Wedge, W1ES/4

Time flies like an arrow.? Fruit flies like a banana.

Sent with secure email.

On Friday, February 2nd, 2024 at 6:18 PM, Steve Wedge, W1ES/4 via groups.io <w1es@...> wrote:

I¡¯ll take a look. You. An have any that fit for shipping only.?

Steve Wedge, W1ES/4

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.


Sent from for iOS


On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 17:36, Rick K8EZB <frboswell@...> wrote:
I have some tubular ceramic capacitors that are probably either 25 or 50 volt parts

Steve,

The values I need are as follows:

C225, C250, C251, C252:? ?0.01 mfd

C224: 0.001 mfd

C223: 120 pf

These need to be about the same physical size as those shown in my RV75 pgoto above. Let me know what you have and what you'd like for them along with your mailing address; I'll put a check in the mail.(or PayPal if you can do this).

Thanks,

Rick
K8EZB


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 03:19 PM, Steve Wedge, W1ES/4 wrote:
I¡¯ll take a look.
Steve,

Please disregard. After substantial web surfing I have found an endless supply of Vishay ceramic axial lead caps at Mouser which I think are the modern day equivalent of those in the RV75. These dont have the same apperance but will certainly fit in the available space. Thanks for the offer.

Rick
K8EZB


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

I¡¯ll take a look. You. An have any that fit for shipping only.?

Steve Wedge, W1ES/4

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.


Sent from for iOS


On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 17:36, Rick K8EZB <frboswell@...> wrote:
I have some tubular ceramic capacitors that are probably either 25 or 50 volt parts

Steve,

The values I need are as follows:

C225, C250, C251, C252:? ?0.01 mfd

C224: 0.001 mfd

C223: 120 pf

These need to be about the same physical size as those shown in my RV75 pgoto above. Let me know what you have and what you'd like for them along with your mailing address; I'll put a check in the mail.(or PayPal if you can do this).

Thanks,

Rick
K8EZB


Re: WTB RV-75

 

I was able to locate a NIB RV-75 at a reasonable price and it is now part of my shack. Works like it should and I don't think that it was ever installed anywhere. Still in original box and had the temporary manual and QC tag's. I am a happy camper now. Have a great 7 line system.? Late SN TR7, L7 amp, L7PS, MN2000, RV-75, and WH7. Putting out almost legal limit on 40 meters and will be checking other bands soon.

73? Bob


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

I have some tubular ceramic capacitors that are probably either 25 or 50 volt parts

Steve,

The values I need are as follows:

C225, C250, C251, C252:? ?0.01 mfd

C224: 0.001 mfd

C223: 120 pf

These need to be about the same physical size as those shown in my RV75 pgoto above. Let me know what you have and what you'd like for them along with your mailing address; I'll put a check in the mail.(or PayPal if you can do this).

Thanks,

Rick
K8EZB


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

The "classic" ceramics I have have solid green bodies. They have a code on them like "103" (0.01 uF). I don't think I ever replaced a bad one.



Steve Wedge, W1ES/4

Time flies like an arrow.? Fruit flies like a banana.

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Friday, February 2nd, 2024 at 5:15 PM, Jim Shorney <jimNU0C@...> wrote:

I have not seen caps like this before, at least that I know of. I have seen some "computer grade" glass body axials that somewhat resembled signal diodes but were clearly caps (not in Drake gear). That might be what Steve has in his stash? I guess I just ignored the ones in my RV75 because they look like resistors and I had no reason to suspect there was any problem in that area. I was on the electrolytic hunt after some scope-age revealed ugliness on the power rails, and subsequent advice from KC9LAD. Seeing strange spurs in the Fldigi waterfall that should not have been there started the quest.

73

-Jim
NU0C

On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 12:39:21 -0800
"VE7PS" ve7ps@... wrote:

Rick:

Aha! OK guess that explains why I couldn't get a decent ohmeter reading on
the 10K "resistor"! Also explains why I was having trouble with the
schematic as well as you. Thanks for discovering this anomaly! I don't
recall anything like those "resistor-like" caps being used in the TR-7
anywhere - hope not - but good to know to be aware of them. I don't recall
ever coming across anything like these in the past. Maybe Drake got a deal?

Good luck with the rest of the repair. Do let us know how it ends.

73
Peter
VE7PS

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 12:10?PM Rick K8EZB frboswell@... wrote:

Jim & Peter (aka "Steve ;-) )

Thanks for your speedy and most helpful replies. Slow learner here due to
no prior experience in troubleshooting/repairing electronics of the vintage
of the RV75. I assumed that the components that looked like and were marked
similar to resistors were resistors, but they are indeed capacitors and are
accounted for in the ckt diag. And, yes, the so called "damaged 10K
resistor" is actually a damaged .01 mfd bypass capacitor. Hoping to find an
identical replacement but if not will substitute something suitable. Happy
to hear these ceramic capacitors rarely fail. Jim in a previous post
referred to tantalum capacitors and this caused some concern as I have had
my share of issues with failed tantalums. I dont yet see any caps on these
PC boards I recognize as tantalums.

Replacement electrolytics arrived from Mouser today so this will keep me
busy for a bit.

Best,

Rick
K8EZB



--

73

-Jim
NU0C



Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

I have not seen caps like this before, at least that I know of. I have seen some "computer grade" glass body axials that somewhat resembled signal diodes but were clearly caps (not in Drake gear). That might be what Steve has in his stash? I guess I just ignored the ones in my RV75 because they look like resistors and I had no reason to suspect there was any problem in that area. I was on the electrolytic hunt after some scope-age revealed ugliness on the power rails, and subsequent advice from KC9LAD. Seeing strange spurs in the Fldigi waterfall that should not have been there started the quest.

73

-Jim
NU0C

On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 12:39:21 -0800
"VE7PS" <ve7ps@...> wrote:

Rick:

Aha! OK guess that explains why I couldn't get a decent ohmeter reading on
the 10K "resistor"! Also explains why I was having trouble with the
schematic as well as you. Thanks for discovering this anomaly! I don't
recall anything like those "resistor-like" caps being used in the TR-7
anywhere - hope not - but good to know to be aware of them. I don't recall
ever coming across anything like these in the past. Maybe Drake got a deal?

Good luck with the rest of the repair. Do let us know how it ends.

73
Peter
VE7PS

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 12:10?PM Rick K8EZB <frboswell@...> wrote:

Jim & Peter (aka "Steve ;-) )

Thanks for your speedy and most helpful replies. Slow learner here due to
no prior experience in troubleshooting/repairing electronics of the vintage
of the RV75. I assumed that the components that looked like and were marked
similar to resistors were resistors, but they are indeed capacitors and are
accounted for in the ckt diag. And, yes, the so called "damaged 10K
resistor" is actually a damaged .01 mfd bypass capacitor. Hoping to find an
identical replacement but if not will substitute something suitable. Happy
to hear these ceramic capacitors rarely fail. Jim in a previous post
referred to tantalum capacitors and this caused some concern as I have had
my share of issues with failed tantalums. I dont yet see any caps on these
PC boards I recognize as tantalums.

Replacement electrolytics arrived from Mouser today so this will keep me
busy for a bit.

Best,

Rick
K8EZB







--

73

-Jim
NU0C


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

I actually don't recall if there were any Tantalums in the RV75. That was sort of a shot across the bow to the Tantalum haters. They have a bad rap due to chronic misapplication. The fact is they don't like surges. They can short or respond violently. As long as they are used within those limits they are fine. I believe that a properly cared for Tant is more reliable than a cheap electrolytic. My policy is that if they are not shorted or exploded I leave them in.

73

-Jim
NU0C

On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 12:10:04 -0800
"Rick K8EZB" <frboswell@...> wrote:

Jim & Peter (aka "Steve ;-) )

Thanks for your speedy and most helpful replies. Slow learner here due to no prior experience in troubleshooting/repairing electronics of the vintage of the RV75. I assumed that the components that looked like and were marked similar to resistors were resistors, but they are indeed capacitors and are accounted for in the ckt diag. And, yes, the so called "damaged 10K resistor" is actually a damaged .01 mfd bypass capacitor. Hoping to find an identical replacement but if not will substitute something suitable. Happy to hear these ceramic capacitors rarely fail. Jim in a previous post referred to tantalum capacitors and this caused some concern as I have had my share of issues with failed tantalums. I dont yet see any caps on these PC boards I recognize as tantalums.

Replacement electrolytics arrived from Mouser today so this will keep me busy for a bit.

Best,

Rick
K8EZB






--

73

-Jim
NU0C


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

My ears are burning.

I have some tubular ceramic capacitors that are probably either 25 or 50 volt parts.? These were used on TTL boards extensively in the 1970s.

Let me know what values you need.? I may have some in my "stockroom"!

Steve Wedge, W1ES/4

Time flies like an arrow.? Fruit flies like a banana.

Sent with secure email.

On Friday, February 2nd, 2024 at 3:10 PM, Rick K8EZB <frboswell@...> wrote:

Jim & Peter (aka "Steve ;-) )

Thanks for your speedy and most helpful replies. Slow learner here due to no prior experience in troubleshooting/repairing electronics of the vintage of the RV75. I assumed that the components that looked like and were marked similar to resistors were resistors, but they are indeed capacitors and are accounted for in the ckt diag. And, yes, the so called "damaged 10K resistor" is actually a damaged .01 mfd bypass capacitor. Hoping to find an identical replacement but if not will substitute something suitable. Happy to hear these ceramic capacitors rarely fail. Jim in a previous post referred to tantalum capacitors and this caused some concern as I have had my share of issues with failed tantalums. I dont yet see any caps on these PC boards I recognize as tantalums.

Replacement electrolytics arrived from Mouser today so this will keep me busy for a bit.?

Best,

Rick
K8EZB


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

Rick:

Aha!? OK guess that explains why I couldn't get a decent ohmeter reading on the 10K "resistor"!? Also explains why I was having trouble with the schematic as well as you.? Thanks for discovering this anomaly!? I don't recall anything like those "resistor-like" caps being used in the TR-7 anywhere - hope not - but good to know to be aware of them.? I don't recall ever coming across anything like these in the past.? Maybe Drake got a deal?

Good luck with the rest of the repair.? Do let us know how it ends.

73
Peter
VE7PS

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 12:10?PM Rick K8EZB <frboswell@...> wrote:
Jim & Peter (aka "Steve ;-) )

Thanks for your speedy and most helpful replies. Slow learner here due to no prior experience in troubleshooting/repairing electronics of the vintage of the RV75. I assumed that the components that looked like and were marked similar to resistors were resistors, but they are indeed capacitors and are accounted for in the ckt diag. And, yes, the so called "damaged 10K resistor" is actually a damaged .01 mfd bypass capacitor. Hoping to find an identical replacement but if not will substitute something suitable. Happy to hear these ceramic capacitors rarely fail. Jim in a previous post referred to tantalum capacitors and this caused some concern as I have had my share of issues with failed tantalums. I dont yet see any caps on these PC boards I recognize as tantalums.

Replacement electrolytics arrived from Mouser today so this will keep me busy for a bit.?

Best,

Rick
K8EZB


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

Jim & Peter (aka "Steve ;-) )

Thanks for your speedy and most helpful replies. Slow learner here due to no prior experience in troubleshooting/repairing electronics of the vintage of the RV75. I assumed that the components that looked like and were marked similar to resistors were resistors, but they are indeed capacitors and are accounted for in the ckt diag. And, yes, the so called "damaged 10K resistor" is actually a damaged .01 mfd bypass capacitor. Hoping to find an identical replacement but if not will substitute something suitable. Happy to hear these ceramic capacitors rarely fail. Jim in a previous post referred to tantalum capacitors and this caused some concern as I have had my share of issues with failed tantalums. I dont yet see any caps on these PC boards I recognize as tantalums.

Replacement electrolytics arrived from Mouser today so this will keep me busy for a bit.?

Best,

Rick
K8EZB


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

Not really. If it is in the position I think it is on the schematic it looks like a bypass cap. I'm guessing it is not too critical.

73

-Jim
NU0C

On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:37:28 -0800
"VE7PS" <ve7ps@...> wrote:

Hmmmmm...so Rick...that "broken resistor(?)" in your RV-75 that we thought
was a 10 Kohm.....didn't it have a beige body?

This complicates things a bit!

73
Peter
VE7PS

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 10:08?AM Jim Shorney <jimNU0C@...> wrote:


Based on what Mr. Google is showing me they are axial ceramic capacitors.
I'm thinking now that the pink ones are also. That would explain the
schematic discrepancies. I don't think I have ever heard of any failing.

73

-Jim
NU0C

On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 09:32:15 -0800
"Rick K8EZB" <frboswell@...> wrote:

Identifying RV75 capacitors:

The components in the photo below include both resistors and capacitors
on the RV75 RF & Analog board, with the capacitors having the beige colored
body and are designated on the ckt diag as C224, C225 etc. I am not
familiar with this type of capacitor; a link to online info appreciated.
The RV75 boards have many of this type of capacitor, the failure of which
can cause much difficulty.

Thanks,
Rick
K8EZB






--

73

-Jim
NU0C










--

73

-Jim
NU0C


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

Hmmmmm...so Rick...that "broken resistor(?)" in your RV-75 that we thought was a 10 Kohm.....didn't it have a beige body?

This complicates things a bit!

73
Peter
VE7PS

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 10:08?AM Jim Shorney <jimNU0C@...> wrote:

Based on what Mr. Google is showing me they are axial ceramic capacitors. I'm thinking now that the pink ones are also. That would explain the schematic discrepancies. I don't think I have ever heard of any failing.

73

-Jim
NU0C

On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 09:32:15 -0800
"Rick K8EZB" <frboswell@...> wrote:

> Identifying RV75 capacitors:
>
> The components in the photo below include both resistors and capacitors on the RV75 RF & Analog board, with the capacitors having the beige colored body and are designated on the ckt diag as C224, C225 etc. I am not familiar with this type of capacitor; a link to online info appreciated. The RV75 boards have many of this type of capacitor, the failure of which can cause much difficulty.
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
> K8EZB
>
>
>
>
>



--

73

-Jim
NU0C






Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

Based on what Mr. Google is showing me they are axial ceramic capacitors. I'm thinking now that the pink ones are also. That would explain the schematic discrepancies. I don't think I have ever heard of any failing.

73

-Jim
NU0C

On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 09:32:15 -0800
"Rick K8EZB" <frboswell@...> wrote:

Identifying RV75 capacitors:

The components in the photo below include both resistors and capacitors on the RV75 RF & Analog board, with the capacitors having the beige colored body and are designated on the ckt diag as C224, C225 etc. I am not familiar with this type of capacitor; a link to online info appreciated. The RV75 boards have many of this type of capacitor, the failure of which can cause much difficulty.

Thanks,
Rick
K8EZB






--

73

-Jim
NU0C


Re: RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

Identifying RV75 capacitors:

The components in the photo below include both resistors and capacitors on the RV75 RF & Analog board, with the capacitors having the beige colored body and are designated on the ckt diag as C224, C225 etc. I am not familiar with this type of capacitor; a link to online info appreciated. The RV75 boards have many of this type of capacitor, the failure of which can cause much difficulty.

Thanks,
Rick
K8EZB?







Re: MS4 speaker

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

You are absolutely right, Jim. I have never forgotten that warning.? And that is just one of the? reasons I was shocked when I got the combo shipment.

On 2/1/2024 7:34 PM, Jim Shorney wrote:

This is not ham paranoia. Drake documentation EXPLICITLY STATES that the power supply must be removed from the speaker for shipment or damage will occur.

73

-Jim
NU0C

On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 18:33:34 -0500
"K4GM-George" <k4gm@...> wrote:

Listmates,

The precautions mentioned about shipping an AC-4 and an MS-4? should be 
heeded.?? About 20 yrs ago a ham on the west coast shipped to me in 
Virginia an AC-4 mounted inside of an MS-4.?? When I opened the box I 
saw a bent up MS-4 barely holding on to an AC-4 by two screws.?? Ugh.?? 
I ended up getting my money back while keeping the shipment.? Converted 
the AC-4 to an AC-4R and gave the MS-4 some time in the vice!

73, George K4GM

On 2/1/2024 4:54 PM, Jack N0JVR wrote:
Thanks for the info Richard!

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:14?PM Richard Knoppow 
<1oldlens1@...> wrote:

    ? IMPORTANT: If you sell this take the AC-4 out of the speaker box
    and
    pack it separately. If you ship it assembled it can break loose and
    destroy the whole thing. Two separate boxes, one for the supply
    and one
    for the speaker. When you take the supply out of the box it will be
    obvious if its had an update kit installed. There are two common kits
    but one can also buy the caps from Hayseed Hamfest and replace them.
    That will be less obvious.

    On 2/1/2024 12:39 PM, Jack N0JVR wrote:  
    > I have an MS-4 w/AC4 power supply that I bought at a hamfest  
    last year  
    > with the intent of getting a Drake radio for it but since then my
    > situation has changed and I'd be willing to part with it.? It's  
    in very  
    > good condition and I know the ham I bought it from and he  
    assured me  
    > that it worked.? I'm not sure if it's had the cap rebuild but if  
    there's  
    > a way I can tell it's been done let me know and I'll look at it.
    > Thanks, Jack N0JVR
    >  

    -- 
    Richard Knoppow
    Los Angeles
    WB6KBL
    SKCC 19998





  








Re: MS4 speaker

 

This is not ham paranoia. Drake documentation EXPLICITLY STATES that the power supply must be removed from the speaker for shipment or damage will occur.

73

-Jim
NU0C

On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 18:33:34 -0500
"K4GM-George" <k4gm@...> wrote:

Listmates,

The precautions mentioned about shipping an AC-4 and an MS-4? should be
heeded.?? About 20 yrs ago a ham on the west coast shipped to me in
Virginia an AC-4 mounted inside of an MS-4.?? When I opened the box I
saw a bent up MS-4 barely holding on to an AC-4 by two screws.?? Ugh.??
I ended up getting my money back while keeping the shipment.? Converted
the AC-4 to an AC-4R and gave the MS-4 some time in the vice!

73, George K4GM

On 2/1/2024 4:54 PM, Jack N0JVR wrote:
Thanks for the info Richard!

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:14?PM Richard Knoppow
<1oldlens1@...> wrote:

? IMPORTANT: If you sell this take the AC-4 out of the speaker box
and
pack it separately. If you ship it assembled it can break loose and
destroy the whole thing. Two separate boxes, one for the supply
and one
for the speaker. When you take the supply out of the box it will be
obvious if its had an update kit installed. There are two common kits
but one can also buy the caps from Hayseed Hamfest and replace them.
That will be less obvious.

On 2/1/2024 12:39 PM, Jack N0JVR wrote:
> I have an MS-4 w/AC4 power supply that I bought at a hamfest
last year
> with the intent of getting a Drake radio for it but since then my
> situation has changed and I'd be willing to part with it.? It's
in very
> good condition and I know the ham I bought it from and he
assured me
> that it worked.? I'm not sure if it's had the cap rebuild but if
there's
> a way I can tell it's been done let me know and I'll look at it.
> Thanks, Jack N0JVR
>

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
SKCC 19998










--

73

-Jim
NU0C


RV75 ISSUES: Part 2

 

A follow-up to my previous post ¡°RV75 Issues:¡± Current status following additional trouble shooting time:

?? Burned 150 ohm resistor (R218) in PTO ENABLE line on RF & Analog board: so far no cause of resistor damage apparent. The only DC path through this resistor showing on my manual ckt diag is from the TR7 ENABLE line via the PIN diode and to the TR7 RV7 connector via P207.

?? When I connect an RV7 to the TR7, the RV7 works as expected suggesting that the PTO switching circuits are working normally in the TR7, and that my problem is likely contained to the RV75.

?? Using an in-ckt test instrument, the capacitance value and ESR value for each electrolytic on both boards is fairly close to the labeled value for capacitance and fairly close to the published ¡°typical¡± ESR values ?for aluminum electrolytics taking into account capacitance and voltage. My current thinking is that none of the ESR values are outliers to the extent that there is an obvious problem with the capacitor. I will change all of these caps on Jim¡¯s recommendation but currently doubt that these are linked to the burned resistor.

?? Damaged 10K resistor (no R2xx designation, not shown on my ckt diag): The damage appears to be of a mechanical nature, and not due to heating. ??This is in a part of the ckt that does not appear to be associated with the burned resistor. ?How such damage might have occurred is a mystery. This RV75 was in Ron Baker¡¯s shop in 2015 and got a clean bill of health.

?? My best thinking at the moment is that the evidence points (weakly) to the PIN diode as far as the burned resistor is concerned. I have new ones on the way and will change this out.?

?? There may be other problems than the burned and broken resistors and we will sort these out one step at a time.

Any informed insights most welcome as I am seeing this for the first time ever.

Thanks,

Rick

K8EZB

?