I don't understand this. Low resistance, ideally NO resistance, of the key contacts is their normal condition. What am I missing here?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 12/30/2024 12:19 PM, Jay W6CJ via groups.io wrote: Gary & Group, A straight key with intermittently low-R contacts was the cause of this meltdown.
I discovered this when I plugged the key into another transmitter - so check those contacts.
73
Jay
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
SKCC 19998
|
Where can I find details of Sherwood's product detector fix for the 4B? I have one, which I need to work on for other reasons. If its not an extensive mod, and it really makes a difference, I would like to do it.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 12/30/2024 1:11 PM, Gary WB6OGD via groups.io wrote: without the cap is from 1966.
BTW, the real fix for the 11 tube R-4A and the R-4B is Rob Sherwood's product detector mod.
This makes a real difference, mostly in the Slow AVC.? Highly recommended, my R-4B has never
sounded better.
73,
Gary
WB6OGD
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
SKCC 19998
|
Re: Want: List of Drake Repairers
Check out the last page of the following document on WB4HFN's web site.??
?
?
73's,
Mark, WB0IQK
|
Re: TR-5 BPF AMP Board Oddness
Jim, you're looking at the wrong board. The picture you sent is
of the pre-mixer board. The board you want is accessed through the
bottom of the chassis. Open the radio on its back, with the rear
panel facing you. The BPF Amp board is on the left side, above the
compartment where the output filters live.
See the picture on page 5-9 of the manual.
--lyndon
|
Re: TR-5 BPF AMP Board Oddness
Lyndon my TR5 is serial 1159 and picture added.?
73, Jim VE1RB
Lyndon VE7TFX writes:
> Anybody know what's going on here?? I have another TR-5 (s/n 1024)
> that I got from Steve; I haven't opened it up yet to see if it's
> the same.
I popped the other one open, and it has the expected board (see
attached).? So it would appear that something changed between #1024
and #1051.? But in my rather limited searching I can't find any
documentation related to this.? If any of you have a TR-5 in the
s/n range 1025-1050 and are inclined towards doing a bit of detective
work, I'd appreciate it if you could pop off the bottom panel and
let me know which version of the board you have.
--lyndon
|
Yeah, I think the cap is the correct fix.? But Steve, you did fix it, can't argue with success.
?
Your receivers must have worked in the past, without cap nor resistor!? Aging must explain it.
This year it might take a 1K, next year a 2K?
?
If you are lowering the supply voltage, you are probably also lowering the output amplitude too.
Might not be any problem but might lead to signal degradation?
?
Interesting, you both seem to have 1967 radios, the "bad" schematic without the cap is from 1966.
?
BTW, the real fix for the 11 tube R-4A and the R-4B is Rob Sherwood's product detector mod.
This makes a real difference, mostly in the Slow AVC.? Highly recommended, my R-4B has never
sounded better.
?
73,
Gary
WB6OGD
?
|
Re: TR-5 BPF AMP Board Oddness
Lyndon VE7TFX writes: Anybody know what's going on here? I have another TR-5 (s/n 1024)
that I got from Steve; I haven't opened it up yet to see if it's
the same. I popped the other one open, and it has the expected board (see attached). So it would appear that something changed between #1024 and #1051. But in my rather limited searching I can't find any documentation related to this. If any of you have a TR-5 in the s/n range 1025-1050 and are inclined towards doing a bit of detective work, I'd appreciate it if you could pop off the bottom panel and let me know which version of the board you have. --lyndon
|
Gary & Group, RGR - the solder blob could have fallen from where the parasitic chokes connect to the top of the larger choke. Looks like I'll be buying parasitic chokes, Sylvania (?) finals and maybe a driver.
A straight key with intermittently low-R contacts was the cause of this meltdown.?? I discovered this when I plugged the key into another transmitter - so check those contacts.
73 Jay
Are you saying that the parasitic choke got hot enough to melt solder? Safe bet the tube(s) are bad.
Gary
W0DVN
Gary & Group,
More info- Suspecting that I slagged my finals, I looked in the cage. Saw a fresh solder blob near the base of the choke and a lead popped out from one of the parasitic choke resistors.
Looks like I'll need parasitic chokes (my hands can't make my own) and a pair of finals to substitute?
Suggestions welcome
73 Jay W6CJ
Gary- About 50mA, keying in CW mode. In Tune mode, about 90-100mA.
Do you get idle plate current when you key the radio?
Gary
W0DVN
Gary- Using an AC4-R supply. PA plate, plate, filament, dial light and bias voltages are getting to the T4XC. Dead driver or finals?
There was a reason the power supply fuse popped. Check voltages there first.
Gary W0DVN
Group, I'd welcome any advice on where to start looking.??
The 5A fuse on the AC4 blew in my absence. Replaced the fuse, and cannot get a peak greater than 0.1A when switching from SSB to tune, regardless of the gain setting on 80 and 40.??
D'oh.....? ??
73 Jay
|
L4B replacement potentiometer
Fellow Drake Enthusiasts,
Happy New Year to all!!!
A while back somebody had mentioned that Mouser part number?313-1601F-100K was a direct replacement for the L4B pot, right resistance, with a push pull switch. ?However, that particular pot does not have a shaft that is long enough for the L4B. ?Might I have the part number wrong?
I already have some pots that are direct replacements after I machine the mounting collar to the right length. ?However, if there are direct replacements it would save me some time.
Can you help?
73,
Evan, K9SQG
|
Re: TR-4C problem on 40 meters FIXED
On 2024-12-30 07:42, Dieter Horst wrote: But isn't it wonderful to be able to bring all these Drakes back to
life...? Try that with a TS990 in 50 years! ;-) *** Or a FTDX10. Mine has a problem with the CAT control over USB. Unfixable. I did identify the chip responsible for that function, and replaced it. What a PITA. Still doesn't work. And there's no WAY to get that big card out and still have it function for troubleshooting. Yaesu doesn't fix them either. Just replace. $850 for the card, plus a couple hours of labor. - Jerry, KF6VB
|
Welp, I guess I need to put my receiver back on the bench and take a butcher's...
Steve Wedge, W1ES
Time flies like an arrow.? Fruit flies like a banana.
Sent with secure email.
On Monday, December 30th, 2024 at 10:49 AM, Gary WB6OGD via groups.io <winbladgary@...> wrote:
> I have no idea what the added capacitor started the oscillator, but it has worked ever since.
?
Drake had an error for a short while (like one month) and fixed the schematic with a missing capacitor.
From message #65666
?
"C188 seems to be added to the same BFO circuit in the R-4B.
It decouples the exact node you propose to put a 1K to ground!!
Might be something Drake discovered in later models??
Also, schematic 919664054 seems to have a big error in the BFO, my downloaded from somewhere
copy has the correction marked in, that makes it like the R-4B schematic (the emitter connects to C163)."
Steve somehow found that a resistor (to lower the supply voltage?) fixed the problem, but the real fix is
probably a capacitor like you and Drake used.
73,
Gary
WB6OGD
|
I'll have to go and look.? I can remember that it was built in 1967 because it has the QC tag with it.? Since I reported it to Ron, the s/n is between 6136 and 6968.? Mint condition.? I bought it from a friend who was collecting as much Drake stuff as he could but never got around to putting the station together.? He has a good eye and my A Line is a great proof of that.
Steve Wedge, W1ES
Time flies like an arrow.? Fruit flies like a banana.
Sent with secure email.
On Monday, December 30th, 2024 at 10:18 AM, Dave W7GZ via groups.io <w7gz@...> wrote:
Many tnx reply, Steve. Mine is an 11-tube with S/N 6717B. How does it compare in age to yours? It works fine with the pull-down resistor now, before I had to wait many minutes, sometimes forever for the BFO to start.
?
This one is an interesting specimen. It was sold to me for dirt cheap as a parts radio because it had been left in humidity and has quite a bit of rust on the top surface, but underneath it is pristine. After replacing 5 tubes that had vented through their pins, I discovered it was actually a working set. Not as nice looking as my R-4C, but it is completely usable and sensitive.
?
Thanks for posting your issue, it helped me realize it has been seen before. Dave
|
Re: Looking for advice on T4XB issues
Excellent.? Yes, I know that removing covers -- especially on the transmitters and transceivers can bump tubes and that can cause them to be intermittent or not work at all.? The transmitters and transceivers are move vulnerable because of tubes located very close to the back that are not protected.? The C versions have better protection but there are still one or two tubes that can get pushed over when you're rolling the rig around doing work on it.
Glad to hear that you've got her going again.? I hope to try and do some SKN and would like to use my T-4X with my 1-A but not sure if I'll get those connections made up in time.? If not, either my A Line or my Collins S Line will be employed.
73,
Steve Wedge, W1ES
Time flies like an arrow.? Fruit flies like a banana.
Sent with secure email.
On Monday, December 30th, 2024 at 10:28 AM, Jason Hissong via groups.io <jhissong@...> wrote:
Steve,
?
Did the reset thing. The radio is working normally (I forgot that Tune mode is different than CW mode and I adjusted the gain to get the output in CW).
?
I need to get some new DeOxit as the one I have is old and lost pressure. It just dribbles out HIHI!
?
Not tossing the 12AX7, but leaving the new one in.
?
The twins are set for SKN! Really like the blue LEDs.
?
Jason N8XE
|
Thanks, Gary, for the explanation. I replaced my 1K pull-down resistor with a 0.1uf and it seems to work fine. Obviously that point of the oscillator wants to be at RF ground. I feel much better about the capacitor solution than the 1K solution that matched my knob fiddling. I'll confirm it tonight when the radio is truly cold. The flux around the .47 is from my swapping it out to see if it was bad. Dave
?
?
?
|
Are you saying that the parasitic choke got hot enough to melt solder? Safe bet the tube(s) are bad.
Gary
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Dec 29, 2024, at 2:13?PM, Jay W6CJ via groups.io <lastradioman@...> wrote:
Gary & Group,
More info- Suspecting that I slagged my finals, I looked in the cage. Saw a fresh solder blob near the base of the choke and a lead popped out from one of the parasitic choke resistors.
Looks like I'll need parasitic chokes (my hands can't make my own) and a pair of finals to substitute?
Suggestions welcome
73 Jay W6CJ
Gary- About 50mA, keying in CW mode. In Tune mode, about 90-100mA.
Do you get idle plate current when you key the radio?
Gary
W0DVN
Gary- Using an AC4-R supply. PA plate, plate, filament, dial light and bias voltages are getting to the T4XC. Dead driver or finals?
There was a reason the power supply fuse popped. Check voltages there first.
Gary W0DVN
Group, I'd welcome any advice on where to start looking.??
The 5A fuse on the AC4 blew in my absence. Replaced the fuse, and cannot get a peak greater than 0.1A when switching from SSB to tune, regardless of the gain setting on 80 and 40.??
D'oh.....? ??
73 Jay
|
That is WAY too high!!
The maximum that should be seen at this point is ~15 volts, the high end of 10 meters. 20 volts here would push the VCO to its maximum frequency, if it is running at all.?
Is there any RF signal coming out of the VCO? You may have answered this previously but I seem to have forgotten the answer. If there IS RF, here, what is its frequency?
Something is telling the PLL phase detector to put out a voltage thinking that the frequency is too low, which is why the voltage on RFC505 is so high.
Can you short RFC505 cold end to ground? This SHOULD make the VCO, if it is operating, go to the low end of its range in frequency. This point is fed via a 100K resistor from U504B so this will not hurt anything.
Gary
W0DVN
PS: Not taking into account C516 and C517, I had previously stated that voltage across the tuning diodes depended one the voltage at Q504 Drain. This was an error on my part. Those two capacitors isolate the DC on the tuning diodes from the Drain of the oscillator FET.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Dec 30, 2024, at 5:39?AM, Jim Harris via groups.io <radiove1rb@...> wrote:
Gary I just checked that voltage again with the band switch on 10 meters and the DC voltage at that RFC505 is 20.52 DC. Hope that helps.
Jim VE1RB On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 8:37?PM Gary Follett via ??<xntrick1948= [email protected]> wrote: What is the voltage on RFC 505?
Gary
W0DVN
Worked on the VCO board today and founds that the 5 volt regulator is working just fine 5.02 VDC. So am thinking about it trying to decide what I check next. Might make a chart of voltages on the transistors from the working one and compare to the non working section.
73, Jim Ve1RB On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 11:08?PM Gary Follett via ??<xntrick1948= [email protected]> wrote: The power supply that is the subject of this issue is the 7805 regulator on the VCO board. That is the one that denies power to just the one VCO (high bands, in this case) when it fails.
Regards,
Gary
W0DVN On Dec 28, 2024, at 8:28?PM, Tony N5DIM < tony@...> wrote:
The WB4HFN website has a section with great information related to that power supply board. I just used it to resurrect a TR7 that was DOA. Good luck. 73 Tony N5DIM? On Dec 28, 2024, at 5:52?PM, Gary Follett via??<xntrick1948=[email protected]> wrote:
?Sounds like you are on the right track. Don¡¯t ocelot the electrolytic capacitors on that supply as well.
Gary
W0DVN
Gary, I found a few minutes to work on the TR7 and discovered that the high VCO is not working at all. It does have the 10 vdc supply switch?on it but I don't know if that reulagor?is working or not. I will check it out but have to work on getting the metal shield off. I Hope that is the problem but I will work on it maybe tomorrow. Thanks for all your help.
73, Jim VE1RB On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 9:06?PM Gary Follett via ??<xntrick1948= [email protected]> wrote: It is worth asking, did the failure of your VCO board (displaying 51.950) occur on its own? That is to ask, did the radio work properly and then just fail or has it, as long as you have had it, always operated with this fault??
If it once worked for you and then failed, then it would make sense to see what gets disconnected if those pins are not in line ?and look for a way that same thing could happen without the pin alignment problem.
The pin alignment fix is pretty easy though, if the board alignment is the cause. It just SOUNDS difficult.
That whole DR7 was always a source of issues due to its complexity and difficulty of installation. I don¡¯t know how a DR7 could even endure the stresses of removal and reinsertion more than once!
Gary?
W0DVN
Thanks Tom. I printed that off but hope that is not the problem.
73, Jim VE1RB In 2010 there was a thread regarding the Drake TR-7 display showing 51950.0 on the old retired Drakelist.
The thread is archived at?
Please click the link so the owner knows that we find the archive useful.
Hope this helps. Tom, AG9X
================? Below are the posts from Brian Koontz WA3ITE, Jim Shorney NU0C and Garey Barrell K4OAH (SK)? (just in case Drake TR-7 DR-7 problems outlive the??site)
Re: [Drakelist] Almost there: TR-7 display issues -- FIXED!
Brian Koontz Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:36:54 -0700
Well, the TR-7 from hell is now a fully operational TR-7 from hell!
In preparation for some signal tracing, I decided to extend the DR-7
board using the extenders I have.? To do this, you have to unmount the
two voltage regulators mounted to the chassis, and jumper the
connector farthest to the right. ?(I didn't bother connecting the
up/down band buttons.) ?Lo and behold, the display worked!?
Some further investigation revealed that the chassis has warped over
the years, so the two 3-prong connectors on the VCO board were no
longer in a horizontal line.? So I was determined to make sure the
board was fully seated on all the connectors.
To do this, I had to drop the front panel.? Not a major chore, just
one knob to remove (the band knob) and 6 side screws. With that now
out of the way, it was an easy job to determine if all the pins were
where they belonged.? The only snag was that the front panel, when
canted downwards, angles the PTO can upwards.? So you have to hold the
front panel perpendicular and steady with slight downward pressure to
fully seat the board.? Once all the pins were visually confirmed to be
seated, I remounted the front panel, reattached the regulators and all
the connectors, and fired the rig up.? Everything now seems to work!
It turns out the original DR-7 board was indeed defective as well
(possibly because it had been seated incorrectly).? And a visual
confirmation from topside indicates the chassis is, indeed, warped:
The screw hole is misaligned with the mounting hole in the board.?
So, for archival purposes in case anyone else decides to search for
this problem: ?If the display if fixed on "51950", one possible cause
is that one or more DR-7 pins, possibly the VCO pins, are not
correctly seated.? The best solution is to drop the front panel and
confirm visually that the pins are fully seated.
Now it's time to get on the air!
??--Brian/WA3ITE
=================?
Jim Shorney Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:17:58 -0700
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:40:52 -0500, Brian Koontz wrote:
>Well, the TR-7 from hell is now a fully operational TR-7 from hell!
>
>Now it's time to get on the air!
Congratulations, Brian! You have been assimilated into the collective.
Resistance is futile.
73
-Jim
================= ? Garey Barrell ?k4oah@...?via ?Sat, Jul 31, 2010, 8:34?AM to drakelist Brian Koontz wrote: > Some further investigation revealed that the chassis has warped over > the years, so the two 3-prong connectors on the VCO board were no > longer in a horizontal line.? So I was determined to make sure the > board was fully seated on all the connectors. > > > > So, for archival purposes in case anyone else decides to search for > this problem: ?If the display is fixed on "51950", one possible cause > is that one or more DR-7 pins, possibly the VCO pins, are not > correctly seated.? The best solution is to drop the front panel and > confirm visually that the pins are fully seated. >
Brian -
Congratulations!! ? It's always nice when one 'comes together'.
Just as an aside, someone suggested earlier (and correctly) that the
"51950" problem may indicate a loss of the 500 kHz reference signal.?
You might find it interesting that the left-most three pin connector on
the VCO board is the 500 kHz reference signal!
Those pins on the bottom of the DR-7 are ALWAYS a problem, ya' just
can't see 'em!!
Your 'trials' have been an interesting 'trip' for others, thanks for
documenting it for us all.
73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA
Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line& ?TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
<>
=================
? Search terms to make this post easier to find:? Drake TR-7 TR7 DR-7 DR7 display frozen locked stuck ? 51950?? 51,950?? 51 950?? 5195? 51950.0 ? 51,950.0 ? 51 950 0
???
|
On 2024-12-29 20:37, Jim Shorney via groups.io wrote: The component leads are flat soldered to the top side. You do need to take care though that you do not rip the
top side traces off.
Space permitting, I would access the top with a nice sharp pair of snips, and cut the leads of that regulator flush with its body. Then desolder each lead, one at a time. - Jerry, KF6VB
|
Thanks Jim!?
?
I now have switched +5V from U2301 after replacement. Still no keyed output. The hunt continues.?
--
Craig/W8CS
Greenville, SC
|
> I have no idea what the added capacitor started the oscillator, but it has worked ever since.
?
Drake had an error for a short while (like one month) and fixed the schematic with a missing capacitor.
From message #65666
?
"C188 seems to be added to the same BFO circuit in the R-4B.
It decouples the exact node you propose to put a 1K to ground!!
Might be something Drake discovered in later models??
Also, schematic 919664054 seems to have a big error in the BFO, my downloaded from somewhere
copy has the correction marked in, that makes it like the R-4B schematic (the emitter connects to C163)."
Steve somehow found that a resistor (to lower the supply voltage?) fixed the problem, but the real fix is
probably a capacitor like you and Drake used.
73,
Gary
WB6OGD
|
Re: TR-4C problem on 40 meters FIXED
Sorry Tom, I hijacked the thread! Of course, my problem did
affect all bands.
Couldn't resist when I read about a solder joint problem.
73, Dieter DL5RDO
Am 30.12.2024 um 14:46 schrieb Tom
Smith:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Why would this only affect 40m? It would seem to me that a PTO problem would affect all bands.
Thanks and happy new year to all!
|
Gary WB6OGD
Jay W6CJ
Craig W8CS