开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
  1. CAD-CAM-EDM-DRO
  2. Topics

Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!

lawrence jackman
 

As far as I know
Larry

Carlos Guillermo wrote:

Matt Shaver wrote:

AFAIK
Jon Elson
 

Carlos Guillermo wrote:

Matt Shaver wrote:

AFAIK
OK, I figure out IMHO, FWIW, TIA, and a few others, but this one I do
not
get! Anyone know where to find an NG-addict's acronym dictionary?
As Far As I Know

There are some acronym dictionaries for the net, but I can't cite a
particular URL for one.

Jon
Darrell
 

I don't think he was using the Bridgeport drivers.
Darrell

----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Goldstein <timg@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very
long!


Interesting...

When I talked to Matt Shaver about his Bridgeport conversion he said he
was
able to get 60 ipm if I remember correctly. Makes you wonder why he
managed
3X the speed you are getting??

Tim
[Denver, CO]

----- Original Message -----
From: Darrell <dgehlsen@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very
long!


Tim,
I am running an AMD K6 II 400 and only require 2000 steps per inch. I am
running freqmod Feb 29 I believe. When I tried it on my Bridgeport,
movement
started getting ratty at 15 IPM and maxed out at 20 IPM. Looking at the
pulse train with a scope, pulse jitter (timing between steps) got worse
up
to 20 IPM and then smoothed out to near perfect at 30 IPM and then
started
going bad again. At 20 IPM the pulse train was varying by as much as
3/4s
of
the signal width. I talked to Fred Proctor and he agreed that timing in
EMC
was the problem.
Using micro stepping and small motors would probably let you move much
faster but with 1100 oz in motors and full stepping on the Bridgeport it
requires a clean signal. I am used to getting 120 IPM.
I have used the Microkinetics 8010 drivers with good success and I think
the
problems that users have been having on this group is directly related
to
the poor step signal timing.
Darrell


------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have a voice mail message waiting for you at iHello.com:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.

Addresses:
Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
URL to this page:
FAQ:
bill,
List Manager
 

In a message dated 5/3/0 3:52:58 PM, ginger@... writes:

<< QUESTION
Should we carry on this discussion here on this list or start a new
list devoted to CPNC? Remember, this is going to need to get into a lot
of detail if we are going to really develop a good package, and we are
going to have to exchange large files and screen shots.
>>

I personally would like to see it stay on this list. I liked what I saw of
your program while at NAMES, I will be home by the end of this week, and
hope to get some good time in the shop playing with the CPNP program then. I
lucked into some ball end mills, so have figured out what I need to do to the
Sherline Mill for my first conversion.
bill

21 - 24 of 24