¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

.

 

unsubscribe.


Re: Still lurking

 

I don't know if these book marks work with everyone's internet servers but
here are a bunch I've got so far...(Thay're named so I know what they mean,
but if you see a subject that sounds interesting click on it. Also I
recommend checking out all of the pages with someone's name on it....they are
very helpful!)
<A href=" ">some store?</A>
<A href=">cnc1</A>
<A href=">cnc2 Jon
elsons page
</A> <A href=" ">servo supplier
san diego motion
</A> <A href=" ">cad/cam supplier</A>
<A href=" www.jrkerr.com">servo boards?</A>
<A href=">motors</A>
<A href=">computer stuff</A>
<A href=" ">stepper motors</A>
<A href=">cnc3</A>
<A href=">cnc4</A>
<A href=">testbeds?</A>
<A href=">ted's page</A>
<A href=">matt shavers page</A>
<A href=">redhat software</A>
<A href=">Home machining & CNC</A>
<A href="www.meci.com">electronics surplus</A>
<A href=">CADEM</A> <A
href=">capsmill
</A> <A href=">NSK Corporation
manufacturer of bearings and related precision products
</A> <A href=">ron gingers
page
</A> <A href=">G codes</A>
<A href=">more cad manufactureres</A>
<A href=">Lindsay Publications
Inc</A>
<A href="www.metalworking.com">dan's stuff</A>
<A href=">ballscrews</A>
<A href=">Paramount Machinery
Corp. Inventory Price List
</A> <A href=">CNC Retro-Fit
Links
</A> <A href=">free
software
</A> <A href=" ">dans page 2?</A>
<A href=">thomson</A>


Re: List question

 

Sorry newbe question.....what is a pic board/chip?
Tracey


List Question

Stephen Barmash
 

I'm still a lurker at this point but I favor keeping this group together. Although most of the discussions go right over my head some of the talk has been superficially absorbed. I hope to see some more discussion aimed at the newbie level, especially the small inexpensive machines since I'm limited to apartment size equipment. With no electronic background and only a little home shop experience this is an intimidating subject without even getting involved with Linux. It was only 4 or 5 months ago that I became aware of the Linux OS.

A few months ago I had a chance to bid on a bench-top CNC machine, the Dyna Myte 2400c, sold by Dyna Mechtronics of Sunnyvale, CA. Although I ended up not bidding on this machine, it seemed like a much better package than all the Sherline conversions I had seen advertised. And it was a rather expensive machine if you bought one new. However, this machine has been out of production for 7 years and there is little factory support available. Is anybody familiar with this machine or the larger machines Dyna Mechtronics sells. I still wonder if I made a mistake not bidding on this machine.

One of the problems with this group is that a few of you guys don't appear to get any sleep; this is an incredibly active discussion group. Even a lurker has a hard time just keeping up with the postings. But please keep in mind that some of the audience to these discussions are not up to speed on this subject.

Let the members be responsible for their own editing of the list's threads.


Regards,

Stephen Barmash
Rockville, MD


Re: List question

 

On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 01:50:07 -0500, mike grady <mgrady@...> wrote:

why cant all emc posts have emc at the beginning of the subject
so mail filters could be set to move to a different folder
for those who don't want to see them or read separately??
That would work, but requires voluntarism from just the opposite folks,
than are being annoyed by a barnburner. Still, I've seen that used
effectively to shield tangential stuff from the general listener.

One minute problem, BTW, with making use of this "diplomacy" step, is
that the current prefix [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] is sooooo bloody long to begin
with, that adding another further filtering suffix like EMC: just makes
it even HARDER to read the subject lines in any reasonable length field.

Now that the group's at "cruise altitude", how hard would it be,
ObieWan, to shorten that some? Maybe to "CNC+" or something short.

Gar


Re: List question

mike grady
 

it does but it took me about 30 seconds to set a mail filter in netscape

the cnc+ or something short is a good idea
mike

Gar Willis wrote:

From: garfield@... (Gar Willis)

On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 01:50:07 -0500, mike grady <mgrady@...> wrote:

why cant all emc posts have emc at the beginning of the subject
so mail filters could be set to move to a different folder
for those who don't want to see them or read separately??
That would work, but requires voluntarism from just the opposite folks,
than are being annoyed by a barnburner. Still, I've seen that used
effectively to shield tangential stuff from the general listener.

One minute problem, BTW, with making use of this "diplomacy" step, is
that the current prefix [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] is sooooo bloody long to begin
with, that adding another further filtering suffix like EMC: just makes
it even HARDER to read the subject lines in any reasonable length field.

Now that the group's at "cruise altitude", how hard would it be,
ObieWan, to shorten that some? Maybe to "CNC+" or something short.

Gar

------------------------------------------------------------------------
How many communities do you think join ONElist each week?

More than 5,000! Create yours now!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for the discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
To Unsubscribe:

bill, List Manager


Re: List question

 

On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 00:37:52 -0600, "Tim Goldstein"
<timg@...> wrote:

Actually, Fred Proctor (the honcho that is in charge of EMC over at the
NIST) posted to the EMC list that they should subscribe here as there was
more active discussion on EMC subjects here.(heavy paraphrase of his
posting)
Good heavens, now WHY would he do a thing like that?? Oh well, I guess
it works both ways, eh? But IF that's the case, that's perhaps mutha
naicha's way of suggesting that the focus of a purely EMC list is
sub-optimally narrow? But geez, how can that be?; EMC alone is no
smallish puppy, in itself. Guess I dunno.

It's a problem similar to evolution maybe, that shows just how much
diversity or focus is the best balance. A successful organism is a
flexible one. Heh.

Gar


Re: List question

mike grady
 

why cant all emc posts have emc at the beginning of the subject
so mail filters could be set to move to a different folder
for those who don't want to see them or read separately??

mike
Tim Goldstein wrote:

From: "Tim Goldstein" <timg@...>

Actually, Fred Proctor (the honcho that is in charge of EMC over at the
NIST) posted to the EMC list that they should subscribe here as there was
more active discussion on EMC subjects here.(heavy paraphrase of his
posting)

Tim
[Denver, CO]

-----Original Message-----
From: Gar Willis [mailto:garfield@...]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 1999 12:07 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] List question


From: garfield@... (Gar Willis)

On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 00:44:16 -0500, Jon Elson <jmelson@...>
wrote:

There is an EMC mail list, at emc@...
OH, so there ya go; once people get turned onto EMC, they're likely to
migrate much of their questions over thar anyhoo. So long term, not
likely we have to worry about this becoming "another EMC list".

Again, just me dos centavos.

Gar


------------------------------------------------------------------------
With more than 20 million e-mails exchanged daily...

...ONElist is home to the liveliest discussions on the Internet!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for
the discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
To Unsubscribe:

bill, List Manager
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ONElist members are using Shared Files in great ways!

Are you? If not, see our homepage for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for the discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
To Unsubscribe:

bill, List Manager


Re: List question

Tim Goldstein
 

Actually, Fred Proctor (the honcho that is in charge of EMC over at the
NIST) posted to the EMC list that they should subscribe here as there was
more active discussion on EMC subjects here.(heavy paraphrase of his
posting)


Tim
[Denver, CO]

-----Original Message-----
From: Gar Willis [mailto:garfield@...]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 1999 12:07 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] List question


From: garfield@... (Gar Willis)

On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 00:44:16 -0500, Jon Elson <jmelson@...>
wrote:

There is an EMC mail list, at emc@...
OH, so there ya go; once people get turned onto EMC, they're likely to
migrate much of their questions over thar anyhoo. So long term, not
likely we have to worry about this becoming "another EMC list".

Again, just me dos centavos.

Gar


------------------------------------------------------------------------
With more than 20 million e-mails exchanged daily...

...ONElist is home to the liveliest discussions on the Internet!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for
the discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
To Unsubscribe:

bill, List Manager


Re: Still lurking

Tim Goldstein
 

Raynor,

It sounds as if the parts you are looking to make are quite small. What do
you think is the max dimension of parts you are thinking of making?

If it is not too large you may want to look at converting a mill drill
machine to CNC as it would be much quicker than building your own from
scratch and would handle heavier work than a router if you need to at some
point.

Grizzly is a supplier of a variety of reasonably priced machines. Check them
out at

EMC is a free controller software developed by the National Institute of
Standards and Technology that has most of the features of the top end
systems and can run steppers or servos. Check out


Linux is the computer operating system that EMC runs on. It is written as
part of the open source movement and is available for free, but the
consensus of the people running it is to buy a commercial package that
includes an installation manual for $30 - $50 to give yourself a reasonable
chance to actually get it to work. Currently EMC is configured for the 5.2
version of Linux put out by RedHat. Check out

Hope this helps you follow the action.

Glad to see you stepping out from the closet.



Tim
[Denver, CO]

-----Original Message-----
From: Raynor Johnston [mailto:rhj-rbj@...]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 11:45 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Still lurking


It sounds like it's all great stuff. I only wish I knew what the hang you
guys are talking about Linux and Grizzly and EMC but what i do know is that
one or all of those subjects are likely to become damn important to me when
I come to want to control my router so I reckon keep it all together as only
by exposure to it am I going to get to understand whats being said.
By all means have some other threads going afterall I want to know about
guideways rods ballscrews and etc to decide what to use. Any recommendations
for starters (routing sheet metals brass, aluminium and plastics
abs,acrylics and styrene mostly for model components in 1:72 and 1:24
scales).
Keep up the terrific work everyone.
Raynor J


Re: MaxNC modifications

Tim Goldstein
 

I don't know if your problem is the same, but I had the same thing happen to
me as I increased the amps I started getting problems with lost steps on
curves. It was particularly bad with about a 1/2" radius and moving around 7
ipm. The step loss was quite consistent on the parts with curves, but I
could do slow or rapid moves along an axis all day long and the moves were
perfect with no steps lost. It ended up being a shielding problem. I thought
the interference was coming from the mosfets & heatsinks, but Jon made a
post and thinks it is from the circuit board (with his knowledge and
understanding I don't have much reason to disagree). Dan Falck posted about
having a similar problem as he upped the juice on his system also.

The fact that your loss of steps increased as you upped the amps makes me
think you are experiencing the same type of thing. When I was lossing steps
I also would notice that the motor was running very ragged. More shielding
caused my step loss to go away and the motor started sounding much smoother
running.


Tim
[Denver, CO]

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Anderson [mailto:janders@...]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 11:46 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] MaxNC modifications


From: Jon Anderson <janders@...>

Tim,

The only that that has remained the same since I first ran into lost
steps is the MAXNC ways and thrust bearings on the leadscrews.
Everything else has been swapped or scrapped at least once. We've even
tried swapping drivers to different axis' and moving motors around. To
be sure, it's a LOT better than it was. Initially we were getting some
pretty random lost steps. Sometimes a little, sometimes a lot, this with
the MAXNC software. Ah-ha reduced lost steps a lot and at first we
thought we'd licked it. MAX software would lose 4-5 steps just
interpolating a single circle. Ah-ha lost steps didn't surface until we
tried running real world parts. All the little test routines I'd written
for debugging the MAX passed muster with Ah-ha. I should have made that
distinction up front.
We've cranked the motors up to 5 amps and they just get noisier.
Can't recall, but I think it did change the lost step amount for the
worse. I can do single axis linear moves at 60"/min all day and not lose
steps, running at 3 amps.
Did have someone mention quite some time back that I ought to put some
large capacitors between each driver and the PS to help reduce current
draw during sudden acceleration. Does this sound like something I ought
to try? I should have made notes then and there, but I don't recall how
I was to size the caps.

Jon

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Campaign 2000 is here!

Discuss your thoughts; get informed at ONElist. See our homepage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for
the discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
To Unsubscribe:

bill, List Manager


Re: MaxNC modifications

Jon Anderson
 

Tim,

We'll take another look at things and see just how much further we can
separate and shield things. At least that'll only cost some time and a
few cents worth of foil.

Thanks,

Jon


Re: List question

 

On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 00:44:16 -0500, Jon Elson <jmelson@...>
wrote:

There is an EMC mail list, at emc@...
OH, so there ya go; once people get turned onto EMC, they're likely to
migrate much of their questions over thar anyhoo. So long term, not
likely we have to worry about this becoming "another EMC list".

Again, just me dos centavos.

Gar


Re: List question

 

On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 01:17:18 EDT, WAnliker@... wrote:

Right now there
is a very strong thread on Lunix/EMC. And if this continues to make progress,
it appears it will be the system of choice for many of us. And the price
seems to be right.
But soon Dan will have the DRO cards out, so expect to see a good thread
there. Also STEPSTER is in the wings waiting awaiting more discussion.
Dan also has a system in the works for the Sherline sized equipment, this
should also develop a good thread.
As to whether to split the list, a few I's and about 190 saying
nothing????????
On our aviation engine list that's now over 2 years old, we've
repeatedly had the same sorta "firehose" phenom, whenever we get some
barnburner of a thread going. It might seem plausible to split the list,
but it becomes obvious to list denizens that this is infeasible, as soon
as a few such barnburners have come and gone, and people realize that
with such an interesting and rich focus area, it's inevitably gonna
actually happen overNover again. Hee.

The BEST solution to those annoyed by the firehose on topics they're not
currently jazzed about, is to freely switch backNforth from "firehose
mode" to "lounge lizard mode" (aka digest). When something like the EMC
thread fires up (which I TOO am not currently hot for, but like to watch
from the sidelines, cuz someday, who knows...), and the volume gets to
be too much for ya, consider going to lounge mode if skipping thru
individual posts isn't your cupOtea. That way, in digest mode, you can
scan thru the digest very quickly to find any morsels you're hoping for,
and when YOUR barnburner of a topic fires off, or when the current
barnburner abates, then switch back to normal mode. Since it's easy as
pie to switch backNforth, via the Onelist interface, it's a no-brainer.

We should just be thankful that the list is so hot as to keep the topics
focused on the chartered subjects. If you wuz askin me opinion, I see no
real justification for a split. Just me dos centavos.

I would say to anyone if your subject is not being discussed, jump in and
teach the rest of us, or ask questions to get the rest of us to teach you.
I agree, the best way to get a barnburner going is to light the match,
then stoke the fire.

Gar


Re: List answer

George Potter
 

Hi Bill (and list),

As a confirmed lurker, I'll just say that I'm extremely interested in the EMC / Linux
stuff currently going on ...... I'll probably have a Linux machine running shortly (have
all the pieces, just no time) ..... and then once I get finished building our house, I'll
start a CNC conversion on my trusty and well worn Bridgeport (yes, I'll have to
grind / scrape the ways, install ball screws, and all that), and then will become
a bit more active in the list.

To all actively posting, THANKS, as I'm getting lots of good ideas.

Regards,
George Potter

WAnliker@... wrote:


a message that said the list is over 200 names, but it appears to me
there are less than a dozen participating on the EMC/linuc thread.

just a thought for discussion.
As of tonight there 203 on the list, we have lost around 15-20 that have
unsubscribed for whatever reason. I have asked for more input from the
lurkers,


Re: MaxNC modifications

Jon Anderson
 

Tim,

The only that that has remained the same since I first ran into lost
steps is the MAXNC ways and thrust bearings on the leadscrews.
Everything else has been swapped or scrapped at least once. We've even
tried swapping drivers to different axis' and moving motors around. To
be sure, it's a LOT better than it was. Initially we were getting some
pretty random lost steps. Sometimes a little, sometimes a lot, this with
the MAXNC software. Ah-ha reduced lost steps a lot and at first we
thought we'd licked it. MAX software would lose 4-5 steps just
interpolating a single circle. Ah-ha lost steps didn't surface until we
tried running real world parts. All the little test routines I'd written
for debugging the MAX passed muster with Ah-ha. I should have made that
distinction up front.
We've cranked the motors up to 5 amps and they just get noisier.
Can't recall, but I think it did change the lost step amount for the
worse. I can do single axis linear moves at 60"/min all day and not lose
steps, running at 3 amps.
Did have someone mention quite some time back that I ought to put some
large capacitors between each driver and the PS to help reduce current
draw during sudden acceleration. Does this sound like something I ought
to try? I should have made notes then and there, but I don't recall how
I was to size the caps.

Jon


Still lurking

"Raynor Johnston" <[email protected]
 

It sounds like it's all great stuff. I only wish I knew what the hang you guys are talking about Linux and Grizzly and EMC but what i do know is that one or all of those subjects are likely to become damn important to me when I come to want to control my router so I reckon keep it all together as only by exposure to it am I going to get to understand whats being said.
By all means have some other threads going afterall I want to know about guideways rods ballscrews and etc to decide what to use. Any recommendations for starters (routing sheet metals brass, aluminium and plastics abs,acrylics and styrene mostly for model components in 1:72 and 1:24 scales).
Keep up the terrific work everyone.
Raynor J


Re: List question

Jon Elson
 

Ron Ginger wrote:

From: Ron Ginger <ginger@...>

I am finding this Linux talk extremenly intresting, but is it possible
this is overwheleming the rest of the world of CNC in the home shop?
Might it make sense to split off into two groups, one just on EMC/linux,
the other as the origianl charter of this group. I noticed the other day
a message that said the list is over 200 names, but it appears to me
there are less than a dozen participating on the EMC/linuc thread.
There is an EMC mail list, at emc@...

I can't find subscription info, but if you email Fred Proctor at
proctor@...
he should be able to put you on the list.

Jon


Re: List question

Andy Olney
 

----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Goldstein <timg@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] List question


From: "Tim Goldstein" <timg@...>

I checked out the JR Kerr web site. Interesting product. I couldn't quite
understand though, does the pic board handle the input from the encoders
or
is that handled by the computer it is attached to?
The picservo board reads the encoders (750000 Khz?) with a dedicated pic
chip sends it to the controller chip then closes the loop all on the board.
He sells a chip set for 32 bucks if you want to build your own board. I had
a small servo running in a couple of hours with the included test software.


I was looking at the Grizzly G1004 in the catalog the other day. How long
have you had it? How do you like it? What don't you like about it?
It is a nice machine, good fit and paint, adjustable bearings on all the
lead screws, seems tight. I am an ME not a machinist and don't have enough
experience to know what it is lacking. I wanted a machine with a knee and
this was the least expensive new machine.

Have you started to convert your machine to NC yet? What are you planning
to
use for your servo motors?
I have to go.

Tim
[Denver, CO]


-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Olney [mailto:aolney@...]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 9:01 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] List question


From: "Andy Olney" <aolney@...>

I am very interested in the EMC information here as well as the other
threads ( encoders, vacuum forming etc. ) and would prefer it remain all
mashed together.

I have a small Grizzly knee mill (G1004?), and some pic based servo
boards
from www.jrkerr.com that I am intending to use to move my table.

Andy Olney


------------------------------------------------------------------------
ONElist: where real people with real interests get connected.

Join a new list today!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for
the discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
To Unsubscribe:

bill, List Manager

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get involved. Share your thoughts!

Join the ONElist Weekly Survey. Go to homepage for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for the
discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
To Unsubscribe:

bill, List Manager


List splitting - NO

Mark Fraser
 

Dont split the list - I'm gonna do the Linux / CNC / Sherline Mill retro thing
within the next few weeks, and I also will be DRO'ing my lathe.
I can handle the extra traffic, but might miss something in a second list. / mark
(Whose EE dates to '68, when they STILL taught us vaccuum tubes....)