开云体育

As Far As I Know - Sorry, I debated using this acronym and laziness won out over clarity. Matt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, Want full Autocad compatibility (except solids). You can get it FREE (good price huh?) at www.cadopia.com - That's where Intellicad

Matt Shaver wrote: OK, I figure out IMHO, FWIW, TIA, and a few others, but this one I do not get! Anyone know where to find an NG-addict's acronym dictionary? Carlos Guillermo VERVE Engineering &

I use Lt both at home and work. I switched from full Acad to Lt as I was tired of the excessive cost of the upgrades when 99.99% of my work was 2d. Yes, I miss the Lisp capability and the many Lisp

Eric writes: Last year I was out in California working on a project for a foundation who's primary product is publicity. One of the PR people was taking pictures of me making a part on a Bridgeport.

List Has any one used Auto Cad Lt, if so what do you think of it. I have access to it at work ,and was thinking about learning it. Jim

54ipm to be exact, perhaps it's because I was using a scale of 4000, I don't know for sure. That said, Darrell is right, the stepper pulse output of the EMC, even using freqmod, isn't good enough for

I am wondering if this is the type of work the hecklers were thinking of when they were talking about CNCing one off parts, I kind of doubt it. I work in a very small shop (one full sized commercial

My Rong Fu RF-45 has the Z-axis movement tied to the column. The quill is still stock- so it's great to be able to run the table around and then manually drill and tap a hole fast. If I have to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Sorry for any of you who receive this more than once Due to the increase in email viruses , all e-mail that I send out from this time forward

Hi, I know I shouldn't laugh but I find that two people, both intelligent, appear to have to defend their view to this degree. You both have a valid point. Terry. For those of you who missed

Hi, I concur with the comment below and would add that if I understood the code words, used by those that use this system, what is a GUI. Terry The 5 minute install for EMC would make it

Hi, I trained as a draughtsman and finished my Indentures in 1973. I still own drawing instruments and drawing boards. On discovering ACAD at version 10, I thought there is no reason to learn this

Interesting... When I talked to Matt Shaver about his Bridgeport conversion he said he was able to get 60 ipm if I remember correctly. Makes you wonder why he managed 3X the speed you are

Ron Ginger wrote: Well, what really happens is you find a new, better way to do things. On a manual, because it is hard to repeat an XY position, you center drill, drill through, ream, countersink

Tim, I am running an AMD K6 II 400 and only require 2000 steps per inch. I am running freqmod Feb 29 I believe. When I tried it on my Bridgeport, movement started getting ratty at 15 IPM and maxed out

Hey All, Feel like this is my time to chime in as I had to do a little research on this exact topic once and found out the following things as best I remember along with my perspective: 1. Given equal

I use 3D solids every day and find that it is absolutely perfect for 95% of what we do. I know people who belive it to be the be-all end-all. Not Yet! What is missing is the ability to

Again, I sure wish I could get you in front of an AcuRite machine. All you do there is create geometry by filling in blanks, enter the tool size, and run it. The screen shows the part, the offsets

Jon Anderson wrote: Ahh, but there's the difference. I make a lot of instrument panels and such stuff. Very simple rectangular cutouts, holes drilled in various spots, etc. I DON'T use a CAD/CAM