¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: microstepping torque

 

Hi Jon,

I use indeed pretty big steppers maximun holding torque is something
like 8.5 Nm, there also hybrid steppers. I don't know the diffenence
between hybrid and normal, but the curve (speed vs torque) of hybrid
steppers are more stretcht out, so they have more torque at high
speed. I have them run at 50.000 Hz, so that 1500 rpm, I use this for
rapid feed only.
All this is, as you mentioned, holding torque. Thanks for your
feedback.

Hugo




steppers --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:


hugo_cnc wrote:

Hi all,

I've a question about microstepping. If I look at the speed vs.
torque diagram, the steppers I'm using have a torque of 3 Nm (460
0z/in) at 5000 Hz. This in half step mode, if use microsteppers
what
happens with the torque.
With microsteppers I use 5 times more steps for the same
revolution,
so at 5000hz the microsteppersriver is sending 25.000 steps. The
torque at 25.000 Hz is pretty low.
So basicly the questions is how does microstepping inflect the
torque?

Microstepping should not affect the torque. Have you actually
observed 3
Nm at 5000 half-steps
per second? I would be very suspicious of this measurement. In
general,
most steppers lose a
great deal of their holding torque even at moderate speed. 5000
half-steps/sec (where half-steps
give 400 pulses/rev) comes out to 12.5 Rev/sec, or 750 RPM. That is
going pretty fast for
large, two-phase steppers. If they really give 3 Nm at this speed,
they
must have holding torque
of nearly 10 Nm, I'd guess. (5-phase steppers do much better in
this
regard, though.)

I wonder if this "spec" is really a typo, and the meaning was
supposed
to be that you get
3 Nm HOLDING torque, and "usable" torque to 5000 half-steps/sec.

Jon


Re: Ideas for matching drives on a YY axis design?

Jim Brown
 

Just curious............
Why cant you just space out the linear bearings on the z/y axis' so it will have less of a chance of binding when traversing in the x axis, and drive it from the center with the ballscrew/leadscrew?
I realize that this will be a big feat to perform, being the width of the gantry. But It can be done, cant it?

Regards,
Jim
caudlet <tom@...> wrote:Group:

Here is the basic design. Moving gantry table 72" X 80" (outside)
with twin ballscrew servo drives on the YY axis. Just got my Gecko
340's in yesterday and in reading the tuning instructions I started
to think about ways to "balance" the two YY drives. The servos have
500 count encoder as well as tach feedback.

What is the best way to setup the twin screws so they have the same
characteristics? I have lots of test equipment (300Mhz Tek Scope,
power supplies, scope current probe, function generator, etc). For
those of you that have used and setup the Gecko's feel free to throw
in your 2 cents!


Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.


I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site


Re: CAM Software Options?

j.guenther
 

IMHO the biggest problem with TurboCADCAM is the lack of documentation for
the CAM functions AND the just plain s*^&^^y tutorials provided. It may
turn out to be a nice product but the sure as heck need to spend some
serious money on the documentation if they plan on getting any substantial
piece of the CAM market.

John Guenther
'Ye Olde Pen Maker'
Sterling, Virginia

-----Original Message-----
From: natchamp_87 [mailto:mark@...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 16:45 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAM Software Options?


Thanks Alan. I downloaded and am trying out CapsMill. From what
I've seen so far I really like it. It appears to be somewhat
powerfull and user freindly. Thanks again!
Mark

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Alan Matheson" <hokianga@i...> wrote:
Have a look at CapsMill and at Powerstation 2002. I also got an
evaluation
copy of TruboCADCam and gave up in disgust. I use TurboCAD v8 prof.
as my
drawing package but couldn't get the the CAM part to work well.
Alan Matheson


----- Original Message -----
From: "natchamp_87" <mark@h...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:54 PM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAM Software Options?


While I'm waiting to find the right machine for my cnc retrofit, I
thought I'd start playing around with the software. So far I have
download TurboCadCam which does both. I want to take a look at
some
of the other CAM solutions available. Any recomendations where I
can
download some eval copies? I am a beginner but kind of a an E-
geek
anyways so ease of use, as well as functionality are important.

Mark
www.mark.hargett.com


Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@y...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@y...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@y..., wanliker@a...
Moderator: jmelson@a... timg@k... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
reach it if
you have trouble.


I consider this
to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to




Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
reach it if you have trouble.


I consider this
to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same
members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to



Re: CAM Software Options?

natchamp_87
 

Thanks Alan. I downloaded and am trying out CapsMill. From what
I've seen so far I really like it. It appears to be somewhat
powerfull and user freindly. Thanks again!
Mark

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Alan Matheson" <hokianga@i...> wrote:
Have a look at CapsMill and at Powerstation 2002. I also got an
evaluation
copy of TruboCADCam and gave up in disgust. I use TurboCAD v8 prof.
as my
drawing package but couldn't get the the CAM part to work well.
Alan Matheson


----- Original Message -----
From: "natchamp_87" <mark@h...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:54 PM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAM Software Options?


While I'm waiting to find the right machine for my cnc retrofit, I
thought I'd start playing around with the software. So far I have
download TurboCadCam which does both. I want to take a look at
some
of the other CAM solutions available. Any recomendations where I
can
download some eval copies? I am a beginner but kind of a an E-
geek
anyways so ease of use, as well as functionality are important.

Mark
www.mark.hargett.com


Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@y...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@y...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@y..., wanliker@a...
Moderator: jmelson@a... timg@k... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
reach it if
you have trouble.


I consider this
to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to




Re: Dumb question on the drilling of holes

Marv Frankel
 

Guys,
I'm following this subject with great interest. One of the reasons I
subscribe to this group, is to learn enough to convert my mill to CNC. I
have been fabricating some parts on a mill, using the DRO, and have run into
problems drilling holes. Using certain drill bits, many of the holes have
come out oversize, and some completely out-of-round. Changing bits has
helped, especially if I use a shorter length bit, but I'm going to
investigate using the 135 degree, or other similar drills. I'm looking
forward to a CNC conversion, when I intend to center drill the holes before
using the correct drill bit.

Marv Frankel
Los Angeles

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Marconett KM6VV" <KM6VV@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dumb question on the drilling of holes


Hi Alan,

I've read that you DON'T want to center punch the holes for CNC,
although you might want to make light "witness" crosshairs to mark their
location. Best would be to always start with a center drill, then
follow with the appropriate drill. The trouble with a punch mark if not
EXACTLY where you want it, is that it will pull a drill bit off. If the
CNC has moved to the proper location, then you just want to drill where
you are!

To position the mill to a hole's location, set up a "wiggler" in the
spindle, and, using a magnifying glass if necessary, move it tho the
crosshairs. Or, you might prefer to locate everything relative to a
pair of edges (LL corner is often good), and let the CNC work from
that. I like using the edges if it's a new part, and then let the CNC
find the other points.

I'm using Vector CAD/CAM, and if I put a point at each hole location,
down at the depth I need for the center drill, Vector will do a move to
a location ABOVE Z=0, and then a slow Z down to the required depth,
center drilling it for me. It will also generate a following G81 with
the coordinates, which I modify to G83 to actually drill the hole (I
like the "peck" and "dwell"). I "comment out" the G83's with a '/' in
the part program, and turn on "block deletes" on the controller program
(DON'T FORGET!). With the center bit "touched off" in Z, I run the
program with block deletes on. This way, the center drill drills all
the holes I want. Then I replace the center drill with a drill bit of
the required size (you may want to repeat the process with two or more
drill bits), disable block deletes, and run the part program again.
With block deletes disabled, the G83's will be run, and the holes
drilled. OK, this may not work for a "PRO" shop with tool changers and
the like, but it works fine for my Sherline's, and I assume it will work
as well on my RF-31 mill (when I finally get it converted) and possible
a lathe in the future.

HTH

Alan KM6VV
P.S. You can set the Z depth to just "kiss" the stock with the center
drill, and thus run a "verify pass" first, to check your program! Also,
a "pen holder" in the spindle, and a piece of paper can give you
re-assurances that you've programmed the Gcode correctly. I've taken to
printing a 1:1 of the part and the cuts on paper (HP laser is not far
off), and this also helps to verify setup, CLAMPS, etc.

alan@... wrote:

Forgive me this seemingly dumb question, but how does a person "drill"
accurately placed holes under CNC control without first center-punching
them.

I currently use a center drill to start the hole ( for deep holes ) or
just mill the hole via G02/03 command for shallow ones.

But it occurs to me that there's got to be a better way. Are "spotting
drills" that better way ?

Thanks in advance for any thoughts.

Alan

--

Alan Rothenbush | The Spartans do not ask the number of
the
Academic Computing Services | enemy, only where they are.
Simon Fraser University |
Burnaby, B.C., Canada | Agix of Sparta

Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.


I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to



Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.


I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


Re: Dumb question on the drilling of holes

 

Vector can also generate the G83 from the get go. Depends upon the NC object
you are using. It is set up in the EMC configuration. You choose it on the
NC Cycle menu.

Tim
[Denver, CO]

It will also generate a following G81 with
the coordinates, which I modify to G83 to actually drill the hole (I
like the "peck" and "dwell").


Re: Dumb question on the drilling of holes

Alan Marconett KM6VV
 

Hi Alan,

I've read that you DON'T want to center punch the holes for CNC,
although you might want to make light "witness" crosshairs to mark their
location. Best would be to always start with a center drill, then
follow with the appropriate drill. The trouble with a punch mark if not
EXACTLY where you want it, is that it will pull a drill bit off. If the
CNC has moved to the proper location, then you just want to drill where
you are!

To position the mill to a hole's location, set up a "wiggler" in the
spindle, and, using a magnifying glass if necessary, move it tho the
crosshairs. Or, you might prefer to locate everything relative to a
pair of edges (LL corner is often good), and let the CNC work from
that. I like using the edges if it's a new part, and then let the CNC
find the other points.

I'm using Vector CAD/CAM, and if I put a point at each hole location,
down at the depth I need for the center drill, Vector will do a move to
a location ABOVE Z=0, and then a slow Z down to the required depth,
center drilling it for me. It will also generate a following G81 with
the coordinates, which I modify to G83 to actually drill the hole (I
like the "peck" and "dwell"). I "comment out" the G83's with a '/' in
the part program, and turn on "block deletes" on the controller program
(DON'T FORGET!). With the center bit "touched off" in Z, I run the
program with block deletes on. This way, the center drill drills all
the holes I want. Then I replace the center drill with a drill bit of
the required size (you may want to repeat the process with two or more
drill bits), disable block deletes, and run the part program again.
With block deletes disabled, the G83's will be run, and the holes
drilled. OK, this may not work for a "PRO" shop with tool changers and
the like, but it works fine for my Sherline's, and I assume it will work
as well on my RF-31 mill (when I finally get it converted) and possible
a lathe in the future.

HTH

Alan KM6VV
P.S. You can set the Z depth to just "kiss" the stock with the center
drill, and thus run a "verify pass" first, to check your program! Also,
a "pen holder" in the spindle, and a piece of paper can give you
re-assurances that you've programmed the Gcode correctly. I've taken to
printing a 1:1 of the part and the cuts on paper (HP laser is not far
off), and this also helps to verify setup, CLAMPS, etc.

alan@... wrote:


Forgive me this seemingly dumb question, but how does a person "drill"
accurately placed holes under CNC control without first center-punching
them.

I currently use a center drill to start the hole ( for deep holes ) or
just mill the hole via G02/03 command for shallow ones.

But it occurs to me that there's got to be a better way. Are "spotting
drills" that better way ?

Thanks in advance for any thoughts.

Alan

--

Alan Rothenbush | The Spartans do not ask the number of the
Academic Computing Services | enemy, only where they are.
Simon Fraser University |
Burnaby, B.C., Canada | Agix of Sparta

Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.


I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


Re: Newbie Questions

 

Hi C.S.,

Firstly I have a concern about your band saw and mill stands.
Although your welds look very good, you still should consider adding
braces to the legs! As you raise and lower your saw head you're
going to cause metal fatigue in those joints. This is especially
going to be a problem if you convert your mill to CNC. Given that
the inertia of the table will be repeatedly torquing your stand. All
you need to do is throw in some 45-degree braces or the like.

As for questions about the Rong Fu mill, there is a Yahoo group
that specifically covers this mill.

Go here:

That's what I know! Now let's talk about what I don't know. I
also have a Rong Fu mill drill ( RF31 ). Parts created zero and my
CNC conversion knowledge is minimal. So, I'm sort of in the same
boat as your self. I just started collecting tooling as I just got
the mill a few weeks ago. But as far as indexing the head, I plan to
do something along the lines of a laser from the head to the base
rather than the popular head to the wall method. Problem with the
later is I plan on building a stand with casters. I'm thinking of
some kind of microscopic sensor of some kind. But haven't drawn any
plans yet. Take a look at a program under development called Mach 1
formerly known as Maser5.

Go here:

And here:

I'm not certain, but think Mach 1 will read your rotary optical
encoders and give the readouts on your computer monitor. This in
addition to acting as a software based controller for G code
interpretation and motion control.

Well that's about all I can think of for now. I hope you continue to
enjoy your new shop!

All the best,
James


--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., C.S. Mo <cs@v...> wrote:
I'm pretty new to machining, so please forgive me if my questions
have
already been re-hashed ad nauseam. I have a Rong Fu Geared Head
Mill/Drill from Enco. So far I've only made one part!

(nothing about machining until
the
very end)

At any rate, I've discovered that I really can't stand using the
dials
and I want to reduce the backlash of the machine. I've also started
working on converting the machine to CNC. So, here's my questions:

1) I have roughly .015" backlash in my X and Y travels. I've heard
talk
about "double-nutting" in order to reduce backlash. Has anyone done
this
to one of the little Mill/Drills? Any advice on how to go about
doing it?
I've considered going to ball screws but my understanding is that
ball
screws make it so that the machine can not be used for manual
milling -
is that correct?

2) Judging by others' comments, it appears that one of the biggest
disadvantages to the little Mill/Drills is that you lose your
position
when you move the head up and down. Has anyone done anything to
address
this?

3) I don't expect to have the machine converted to CNC anytime in
the
near future, in the meantime I'd really like a DRO for at least the
X and
Y axis.

The least expensive method (once you factor in the cost of the
PC/Monitor..etc) and the quickest to get setup seems to be to use
digimatic scales (the ones that are kind of like digital calipers
without
the caliper part) with SPC output to an external 3-axis readout.
WTtool
sells the readout for $249 and the individual scales are available
for
roughly $200 for three, so call it $500 once I make the
brackets/shipping..etc. The disadvantage to this is, as far as I
know, I
can't get the SPC outputs into a PC.

I'm planning on using servo motors (already have two) with Gecko
drives
for my CNC upgrade. The servo motors have encoders attached so in a
sense
the external DRO would be redundant. So, I *could* get the X/Y
motors
hooked up (which has a lot of other advantages, but will be very
expensive because all of a suddenly I will have my credit card out
and
will be calling Gecko for drives, and getting a power supply
and...and..and..) and use the encoders on the motors with one of
the free
DRO software utilities. One disadvantage to this is the servo
encoders
will have to compensate for backlash which may or may not be a
problem. I
assume it isn't a huge problem because it appears to be common
practice.

The other method would be to build my own rotary-to-linear encoder
system
which certainly has appeal and could have better resolution than
either
of the two previous methods. However I don't know that it is
necessary...

So, bottom line, is there an advantage to having two DRO systems on
a
single mill? If I put on a digimatic scale system will I end up
junking
it once I get my CNC stuff completed?

Thanks!

--C.S.


DynaCADD ???

mueller914
 

On evilBay, these are being sold pretty darn cheap (considering they
are out of business I think)

Is this a true CAD/CAM software or only CAD??

If only CAD, I think I just wasted 88 bucks :(

Thanks,

Mike


Re: MSc Degree in Mech. Eng.

Alan Marconett KM6VV
 

Hi Semih,

Congratulations! Have you published your thesis on the web? URL? A
quick search for the title didn't find anything. We'd like to read it
(I'd need English)!

Alan KM6VV

Semih Diken wrote:


Finally I am graduated, thank you for all...

ABSTRACT

CONVERSION OF A CONVENTIONAL LATHE TO A NUMERICALLY CONTROLLED FORM
BY USING A COMPUTER BASED MOTION CONTROL UNIT

DKEN, Semih
Ms. in Mechanical Engineering
University of Gaziantep
Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Cengiz DOGAN
September 2002, 87 Pages

The aim of this study is to convert a conventional lathe to numerical
control by using a computer based motion control unit. Main theme of
this is to obtain the movement of stepper motor system with lead
screw, which is moved by given commands through the computer in
certain limits. To obtain this action the movement of machine tools
is taken as the model. The shaft with lead screw is beared at two
ends by ball bearing. To drive the system, two stepper motors are
used. Four-axis stepper motor driver used to drive the motors by
sending pulses is fed with a transformer. Stepper motors have been
controlled from PC parallel port by a software program, written in
Turbo Pascal. It is not used any interface control card between
motors driver and computer. It reduced the cost of the system.

Keywords: Stepper motor, Computer Numerical Control, Electromechanic,
Motion Control Systems.


Re: Ideas for matching drives on a YY axis design?

deanc500
 

I have a machine with dual y motors and matching them didnt seem to be
an issue. I just kept the tuning pots at approx the same place by eye
and it works great. I dont think the tuning is that critical. In other
words, close is good enough.

Just a sidenote for those having trouble tuning G320's: My main
problem was trying to get good rapid speeds out of the machine. My
G320 drives would fault randomly at frequencies over about 25Khz. I
need 40Khz+ to get 100 ipm travel speed. I finally booted the machine
into "safe mode command prompt only" (yes dos safe mode doesnt load
himem.sys or anything)and now I can reliably get 60Khz out of it. At
those frequencies, it only takes a 2.1 ms glitch to fault the drives.
Dean

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "caudlet" <tom@t...> wrote:
Group:

Here is the basic design. Moving gantry table 72" X 80" (outside)
with twin ballscrew servo drives on the YY axis. Just got my Gecko
340's in yesterday and in reading the tuning instructions I started
to think about ways to "balance" the two YY drives. The servos have
500 count encoder as well as tach feedback.

What is the best way to setup the twin screws so they have the same
characteristics? I have lots of test equipment (300Mhz Tek Scope,
power supplies, scope current probe, function generator, etc). For
those of you that have used and setup the Gecko's feel free to throw
in your 2 cents!


Re: Dumb question on the drilling of holes

doug98105
 

Alan,

Use a spotting drill. Center drills are not good for spotting, too
much likelyhood of breaking the tip off in the workpiece especially
on imperfect drilling surfaces.

If you don't want to go to the trouble of spotting the holes then use
drill bits with points suitable for self starting. The most common
of these is the 135 degree split point. Other proprietary drill
points work well too, like the Winslow point and others of that type.

Doug

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., alan@s... wrote:
Forgive me this seemingly dumb question, but how does a
person "drill"
accurately placed holes under CNC control without first center-
punching
them.

I currently use a center drill to start the hole ( for deep holes )
or
just mill the hole via G02/03 command for shallow ones.

But it occurs to me that there's got to be a better way.
Are "spotting
drills" that better way ?

Thanks in advance for any thoughts.

Alan

--

Alan Rothenbush | The Spartans do not ask the number
of the
Academic Computing Services | enemy, only where they are.
Simon Fraser University |
Burnaby, B.C., Canada | Agix of
Sparta


Ideas for matching drives on a YY axis design?

caudlet
 

Group:

Here is the basic design. Moving gantry table 72" X 80" (outside)
with twin ballscrew servo drives on the YY axis. Just got my Gecko
340's in yesterday and in reading the tuning instructions I started
to think about ways to "balance" the two YY drives. The servos have
500 count encoder as well as tach feedback.

What is the best way to setup the twin screws so they have the same
characteristics? I have lots of test equipment (300Mhz Tek Scope,
power supplies, scope current probe, function generator, etc). For
those of you that have used and setup the Gecko's feel free to throw
in your 2 cents!


Re: Dumb question on the drilling of holes

caudlet
 

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., alan@s... wrote:
Forgive me this seemingly dumb question, but how does a
person "drill"
accurately placed holes under CNC control without first center-
punching
them.
Alan: I have used both methods in a manual mill setup with a DRO. I
draw the part in CAD and have it display the XY cooridinates in the
print. Because twist drills will "walk" prior to making penetration
I start the hole with a 1/4" diameter NC peck drill, then switch over
to the real drill and drill the hole. I have talked to several guys
that just use the CNC table to peck drill all of the through holes
then they drill them on a conventional drill press. I am converting
my large Gorton to CNC and I plan to continue to first peck drill
then go back and finish drill the final hole. On thicker material
(> .375) I will probably manually drill the final hole so I can back
the drills out and clear the chips. I find that using the DRO and
first drilling a locator hole is faster and more accurate than center
punching and drilling (they way I used to do it prior to the purchase
of my DRO).


OT Metric mills bits?

 

OK, this is totally off topic and I am sure Bill will scold me for it.

I am looking for a source of metric sized end mills and ball end mills at a
reasonably price. Are there any online suppliers in Europe that would offer
these at reasonable prices? In the USA they are hard to find (particularly
the ball end) and priced about double what a comparable sized inch sized
cutter goes for. I am guessing that in most of the rest of the world the
situation is the other way around and metric is easy to find and low cost
and inch is expensive.

Because this is OT please reply off list directly to timg@...

Thanks,
Tim
[Devner, CO]
All Sherline products at deep discount
www.KTMarketing.com/Sherline


Dumb question on the drilling of holes

 

Forgive me this seemingly dumb question, but how does a person "drill"
accurately placed holes under CNC control without first center-punching
them.

I currently use a center drill to start the hole ( for deep holes ) or
just mill the hole via G02/03 command for shallow ones.

But it occurs to me that there's got to be a better way. Are "spotting
drills" that better way ?

Thanks in advance for any thoughts.

Alan

--

Alan Rothenbush | The Spartans do not ask the number of the
Academic Computing Services | enemy, only where they are.
Simon Fraser University |
Burnaby, B.C., Canada | Agix of Sparta


Fowler Clinometer accuracy and theodolite, was Re: Mill needs levelers

 

Ken Garver <dunlapsville@...> writes:

Subject: Re: Mill needs levelers
> Starret and Fowler sell precision levels for
this. The 8" Starrett is about $70.00 after your discount (two years
ago pricing). The 6" is cheaper but it may not span the ways of
your lathe. Hit Ebay. I got a $2500 Fowler Clinometer, adjustable to
any angle, accurate to 1 second, for $98 delivered to my door!
Is this the Clino 2000?
I think this is the best one.
Accuracy is rated as 30", or 5" + .07% of readout. This is after "quick
calibration aids" have been used.

Take the 30", this is an angle of .0017 inch/foot. Looks like it is good
enough for the job.

Some of the other Fowler Clinometers have linearities of 3', which is .01
inch/foot, wouldn't be reliable for that sort of work. Still a fine tool,
though.

If you decide to measure angles more precisely, use a theodolite. My Wild
T3A will do better than 1", it reads directly to 0.2", but that is only
really achievable with some averaging of multiple measurements.

I intend to cut some tapers (J33 & M2) using the theodolite. A straight rod
will be indicated on the lathe, and the compound turned so that its travel
is parallel to the lathe axis. A reference mirror will be placed on the
compound, and zeroed to the theodolite, which is sitting on the lathe (HLVH)
bed. The theodolite will then be rotated to the proper angle, which is
149'6.2" for J33, and the compound rotated to center the image on the
theodolite reticle.

The theodolite is useful for lots of machine accuracy measurements, this is
why the T3A has an autocollimator built in. It can be use to measure
straightness, orthogonality, level, runout, and so on to arc second
accuracy. Surface plates flatness can be measured to <.00005" with them.
When electronic ones came out my older mechanical ones became available on
the surplus market.

For big mills and routers they are ideal to check out way accuracy.

In the range of precision for which it is intended, the Clinometer will be
much quicker. It will not measure horizontal angles though.


Elliot B.


Re: MSc Degree in Mech. Eng.

alex
 

Is it available for a general public?
Alex

----- Original Message -----
From: Semih Diken <sdiken@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:44 AM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] MSc Degree in Mech. Eng.


Finally I am graduated, thank you for all...

ABSTRACT

CONVERSION OF A CONVENTIONAL LATHE TO A NUMERICALLY CONTROLLED FORM
BY USING A COMPUTER BASED MOTION CONTROL UNIT

DKEN, Semih
Ms. in Mechanical Engineering
University of Gaziantep
Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Cengiz DOGAN
September 2002, 87 Pages

The aim of this study is to convert a conventional lathe to numerical
control by using a computer based motion control unit. Main theme of
this is to obtain the movement of stepper motor system with lead
screw, which is moved by given commands through the computer in
certain limits. To obtain this action the movement of machine tools
is taken as the model. The shaft with lead screw is beared at two
ends by ball bearing. To drive the system, two stepper motors are
used. Four-axis stepper motor driver used to drive the motors by
sending pulses is fed with a transformer. Stepper motors have been
controlled from PC parallel port by a software program, written in
Turbo Pascal. It is not used any interface control card between
motors driver and computer. It reduced the cost of the system.


Keywords: Stepper motor, Computer Numerical Control, Electromechanic,
Motion Control Systems.



Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.


I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


MSc Degree in Mech. Eng.

Semih Diken
 

Finally I am graduated, thank you for all...

ABSTRACT

CONVERSION OF A CONVENTIONAL LATHE TO A NUMERICALLY CONTROLLED FORM
BY USING A COMPUTER BASED MOTION CONTROL UNIT

D?KEN, Semih
Ms. in Mechanical Engineering
University of Gaziantep
Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Cengiz DOGAN
September 2002, 87 Pages

The aim of this study is to convert a conventional lathe to numerical
control by using a computer based motion control unit. Main theme of
this is to obtain the movement of stepper motor system with lead
screw, which is moved by given commands through the computer in
certain limits. To obtain this action the movement of machine tools
is taken as the model. The shaft with lead screw is beared at two
ends by ball bearing. To drive the system, two stepper motors are
used. Four-axis stepper motor driver used to drive the motors by
sending pulses is fed with a transformer. Stepper motors have been
controlled from PC parallel port by a software program, written in
Turbo Pascal. It is not used any interface control card between
motors driver and computer. It reduced the cost of the system.


Keywords: Stepper motor, Computer Numerical Control, Electromechanic,
Motion Control Systems.


Re: Re, AutoRout

John Guenther
 

No I have not, my original need has changed but I think I will still build
it. I bought the plans with the intention of increasing the size in one
direction to 36". However since I am no longer building RC airplanes the
original use has gone away. I am think of building it to do some engraving
and milling on thin stock. I don't have the full motion Z axis upgrade but
I need to get it.

John Guenther
Sterling, Virginia

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Edinger [mailto:ledinger@...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 00:08
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re, AutoRout


Have you started to build it yet? I just got the Plans. He has a
upgrade to
full Z-Axis Machine.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Guenther" <j.guenther@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:50 PM
Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re, AutoRout


I have the plans and have seen the finished machine a couple of
years ago.

John Guenther
Sterling, Virginia

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Edinger [mailto:ledinger@...]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 23:39
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re, AutoRout


Has anyone seen the Autorout by Diversi-tech inc. (David
Anthony)? Plans or finished ?




Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
reach it if you have trouble.


I consider this
to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same
members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED
list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to




Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
reach it if
you have trouble.


I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to





Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.


I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to