¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: How do I 'make' a ballscrew antibacklash nut?

dspinnett
 

Thanks Ray.

My work envelope at one shot is rarely over 6" anyway. Would that
justify .001 screws and anti-backlash? I'd like to be accurate over
6" within a couple thou if practical.

Final goal is to make mini running engines, and probably a full size
engine too. The 'Griz' doesn't seem too bad overall - better quality
that the lathe anyway. (both are brand new).

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Raymond Heckert" <jnr@a...> wrote:
Ball screws are practically anti-backlash, nevertheless,
FYO, you'd basically put the two nuts back-to-back, and
screw them together, until they almost 'bind'. now you have
a backlash-free nut. Of course, you wouldn't really mount
them back-to-back, you'd mount each 'back' to either side
of a mounting plate, and use spring washers to 'pre-load'
the screws, allowing some 'give' under severe pressures,
instead of making it a 'hard' mechanical back-to-back
interface. With a Grizzly, and 0.004"/ft screws, I'd not
bother with the antibacklash, as 'machine slop' coupled
with the 0.004"/ft will be the real test for your system.
'Less'n, of course, you're looking for some REAL accurate
work.

RayHex


Re: How do I 'make' a ballscrew antibacklash nut?

dspinnett
 

Some ballnuts has one end with outside fine treads on it, put both
ballnuts agaist each other and using the adjusting outside nut you
can put pressure on the two ballnuts forcing them to pull apart
from
each other thus, preloading them.
sort of split acme nuts.
The springs, takes the adjusting nut place ,and it works ok only
for
small loads.

Ah, I think get it.

If I went the adjusting nut route, I would thread both ball nuts into
the center coupling nut then mount just one of the ball nuts to the
bed attaching where the original split brass nut went?

If so, should be easy enough.. On the square ball nuts, is there room
to bolt the flat directly through the corners of the body, or do you
always have to have a flange to mount to?

Thanks for the input..

Dave.


Re: DRO issue "HEDs in hand"

j_e_f_f_williams
 

OUCH, $85.00 each for the scales?? Guess I might not get more from
them.....


Here is the text from them when I ordered back in January:
They are 12.5 Cycles Per mm scales that you could piece end to end.
They produce 25CPMM when used with the Module. The price for the scale
is $49.00 each. The Module model # would be LM-25CPMM-3T. We do not
have Distributors in Canada as yet. You may order directly from the
factory here in Fallbrook CA. We accept Visa and MC.
The 12.5 [scales] are CPMM (Cycles Per Millimeter). When used with
the LM-25CPMM-3T Modules, which doubles the scale resolution, they
will produce 25 cycles per mm in quadrature or 0.01 mm resolution
after x4 edge detection

I wonder why the huge increase in the scale price.

Jeff


--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "John A. McFadden" <mcfadden@c...> wrote:
Fast response time on Encodertech's part (like within 3 minutes of my
query), there wont be any 720CPI scales in lengths longer than 3.25"
until
someone pays for the master to be made ($1200) and then only the
length that
customer pays for will be made. The price of the LM25cpmm-3S Module is
$39.00 each, the price of the 25cpmm-600 mm Scale is $85.00 each.

John


Re: DRO issue "HEDs in hand"

j_e_f_f_williams
 

Hello,

I was told the same thing. It's actually the 12.5CPMM scales I have
but the 25CPMM modules somehow double the resolution?! I eventually
had to specifically ask for the scales that matches the 25CPMM modules.

Jeff

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "John A. McFadden" <mcfadden@c...> wrote:
As of 10/11, Encodertech did not have any 720CPI strips in stock in
lengths
above 3.25", that might have changed, I did not ask. I'll look into it.

John

Hello,

I am using linear strips/encoders from www.encodertech.com. The
encoder and strips are about the same price as the US Digital stuff
and comes in a 0.01mm resolution which is about 0.0004". The module
is a LM-25CPMM-3T and you can get 600mm length strips. The scales are
$49.00 and modules $39.00 (almost a year ago). You can order right
from them and they are in Fallbrook CA. I have no connection to them
other than I used their product on my lathe.

I am in Canada and am used to working in mm so the .01mm accuracy
worked out well for me.

TTYL, Jeff


Re: Tonmac Mills - Good Choice for Retrofit?

Jerry Kimberlin
 

natchamp_87 wrote:



I can purchase this brand spankin new for 2k. Only problem is
shipping which is 1,700 to West coast.
I know its not a BP, but what do you guys think?
It is an attractive price and machine size. In fact I might be
interested. They are made in China, however. That may be a
downside against which one could compare those made in Taiwan.
See offerings at: .
If you go thru all the pages, you will come to the GEM500GV and
the GEM600PV. A couple years ago these machines were offered in
CNC versions with ball screws, etc. We were all wondering if the
GEM500 could be had without the control, but with the ball
screws. Inquiries never came to anything so far as I know. The
GEMs are mill drills but very unordinary ones.

I've never seen a tonmac so far as I know. They may be rebranded
over here, of course. Have you actually seen one in the flesh?

OTOH, a decent Bridgeport (Boss 6 or better with servo motors)
can be had for less money, or so I'm told.

JerryK


Tonmac Mills - Good Choice for Retrofit?

natchamp_87
 

I'm still in the process of deciding what mill to get for my retrofit
project, burning lots of midnight oil on the net. I came across this
manufacture:



I can purchase this brand spankin new for 2k. Only problem is
shipping which is 1,700 to West coast. I might be able to piggy back
on another shipment because the 20' cargo container can hold way more
than one machine.

I know its not a BP, but what do you guys think?
Mark


Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?

 

gittt2000 wrote:

Linear - without a shadow of doubt. Here's why :



Well, yes, in $100,000 CNC machining centers, no argument! Notice, though,
that the graphs are in uM units, the ballbar plots are 5 uM/division!
To be of much use, the linear scales must have resolution on that scale, or these errors
would lie undetected underneath the basic resolution of the scale. What is the standard
resolution of typical DRO scales? .0005" ~= 12.7 uM if I computed it right.
So, the backlash errors they showed would be barely one quantum on the typical
DRO scale. Linear errors due to screw expansion depend on how hard you run
the machine. Note the thermograph of the hot screw was run continuously for
6 hours at 24 M/Min. That equals 945 IPM. Are you planning to keep your machine
running at almost 1000 IPM for 6 hours? If I tried to move my Bridgeport at
1000 IPM, if would hurl itself over so hard it would break the floor slab!

So, while the things stated in the Heidenhain article are real concerns for makers
of dedicated, HIGH-precision CNC machining centers, and more important as
size and speed increase, they may not be so significant for small machines.
If you price linear scales with sub-micron resolution, you'll find them pretty
expensive.

Jon


Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?

 

While the linear encoders may be better for the purposes of this list I
think the question is really:
1 - Is my machine such that I would notice any difference?
2 - Even if I could notice a difference is the cost/benefit at a point that
makes sense for me.

I run my Bridgett my Bridgeport series II on Gecko G320 drives with rotary
encoders on the motors. The accuracy and precision with the rotary encoders
is more than adequate for my purposes. It will easily hold to less than
.001" and I can sell all the stuff I produce on the machine. Spending the
money to upgrade to linear strips would buy me nothing as the items I am
producing would not become any more valuable and no one would pay more money
for then. It is all a balancing act to get the accuracy and precision needed
and not waste money getting more. Also remember what the rest of your
machine is capable of. Putting on super high resolution linear encoders on a
mill drill conversion is probably a waste as the rest of the machine will
have enough play and flex that you will not likely see an improvement. Also
remember that setup of the part can have a huge impact on machining
precision. A weak setup will introduce more inaccuracy than the difference
between linear and rotary encoders. Ditto with thermal expansion. So, if you
are not using flood with the coolant being held to a relatively constant
temperature than you will also have inaccuracy.

In summary, my point is that you have to consider the whole and not just
focus on one part. Like so many things in this hobby it is easy to get into
a pissing match where the claims of what is required no longer fit the
reality of most machining much less hobby machining. So if you really feel
your setups will be rigid enough to allow machining to .0001" and you will
control the temperature, and your machine is capable of moving that small an
increment, than maybe the linear encoders will make sense.

Tim
[Denver, CO]

----- Original Message -----

Linear - without a shadow of doubt. Here's why :






Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.


I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........


Re: Bridgeport Series II CNC specifications

 

tmartin23 wrote:

I have the opportunity to try to squeeze one of these machines into
my garage and I have been having difficulty finding out the
dimensions of this beast. This is an early 1980's Boss5 / stepper
motor controlled machine with the rigid ram and kwik-switch tooling. Does anyone know the specific height requirements? A manual Series
II Special Bridgeport is 84" - I've been told. I know this CNC
machine is a bit taller than that. Any ideas?
Series II specs :
Height 92.75" with 4J head and rigid ram
Depth 76.25"
Width 79.75"
Weight 4750 Lbs

These are for the manual machine, so the depth and width may be different for CNC.

Jon


Re: Free 3-D simulator

Raymond Heckert
 

Did anybody else get the advert from cncsimulator.com
offering a free 'hobby' version of their 3-D program, as a
download? Anybody try it yet? I'll foreward the ad sent to
me to the list, if it's okay with 'Mom' & others on the
list

RayHex


Re: Bridgeport Series II CNC specifications

 

Mine is not a rigid ram, but the style that allows the head to tilt side to
side. It is about 94" to the top of the motor. 84" sounds more like a series
I. There are pictures of the machine at www.KTMarketing.com/CNC.html in the
pictures section.

Tim
[Denver, CO]
Sherline products at Deep Discount
www.KTMarketing.com/Sherline

----- Original Message -----
I have the opportunity to try to squeeze one of these machines into
my garage and I have been having difficulty finding out the
dimensions of this beast. This is an early 1980's Boss5 / stepper
motor controlled machine with the rigid ram and kwik-switch tooling.
Does anyone know the specific height requirements? A manual Series
II Special Bridgeport is 84" - I've been told. I know this CNC
machine is a bit taller than that. Any ideas?

Thanks,
Tim


Re: plasma cutter/machine torch

 

Any plasma cutter and torch you select follow the
recommendations Peter from prenolds@... ,
sent to me.
"If you believe that you may automate your plasma
cutting at
some point, you must select a unit that does not use a
high-frequency
starting circuit.
This causes electrical interference such as locking up
the computer, destroying files, etc.
None of Hypertherm's Powermax units use a high
frequency starting circuit."
One website that has a good FAQ is:

If I had known this ruler before, I had avoid more
than 6 frustrating months and a lot of money.
Raul


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now


DeskWinNC & Rutex servo drivers

 

Is anyone in the CCED group using:
1)a combo of DeskWinNC & Rutex servo drivers? or
2)Rutex servo drivers?
Can you pls give me some feedback on these products.
btw, if this is off topic, pls email me off list
TIA
Femi


Re: DRO issue "HEDs in hand"

 

is the url for the
linear encoders. I don't think it showed how I mounted the mylar strip
in the 1X2 rectangular tubing. Bascially, I used double sided 3 mil tape
cut down to 1/4" wide which was used to stick the mylar strip to a piece
of 1/4" aluminum square stock that was installed into the housing. The
slider machine to allow for the square stock.
Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Linscheid [mailto:r.linscheid@...]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 7:48 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO issue "HEDs in hand"

Thanks for the info, I think I'm going to give it a try. I feel that
the resolution should be adaquate for the majority of the work that I
do.

Dan, how did you mount the strip? I was thinking about a fiberglass
plane to support the strip. Hopefully this would lessen the effects
of temperature on the system, but perhaps this isn't needed.

I remember a website with pics of a linear encoder installation but I
guess I didn't bookmark it. Does anyone have a URL showing this
setup?


Re: Drill press & cross-slide vice

 

Been there and done that. I used the 5" version from harbor freight for
around 60.00 I had to take a lot of slop out of the drive mechanism and
made some stepper motor mounts. I install Torrington needle thurst
bearings on each axis. I used it to cnc drill some stepper motor mounts.
The problem is that you cannot use a drill press as a mill because of
the slop in the spindle assembly. The enco mill drill tables for $119 is
a better deal in the long run but figure out how you plan to do the
spindle first.
Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: vandersandtc [mailto:vandersandtc@...]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:52 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Drill press & cross-slide vice


Now my question : I bought a cross-slide vice yesterday and my first
thought was 'Hey, if I stick some steppers on this sucker, mount it
on my drill press then I might have a cheap mill' - I suppose a lot
of people have asked this question before. I would like to hear your
comments please.

Regards
Coert



Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it
if you have trouble.


I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there,
for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?

John A. McFadden
 

Matt:
Thats probably the system my dad saw at Lockheed (one of his friends works
for Lockheed in a machine shop and my dad asked him for advice on my DRO
idea), it was a brand new CNC mill, just delivered the week before. I guess
the problem would be putting the load on the roller, it doesnt seem like it
would be easy to do.

John


Re: DRO issue "HEDs in hand"

John A. McFadden
 

Roger:
The strip has to be seperated from any support by a fraction of an inch
(1/4" I think), as the encoder surrounds the strip on three sides (as it
uses light passed through the strip to read the lines).

John

[snip]

Dan, how did you mount the strip? I was thinking about a fiberglass
plane to support the strip. Hopefully this would lessen the effects
of temperature on the system, but perhaps this isn't needed.
[snip]
Thanks again, Roger Linscheid


Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?

alex
 

Thank you.
Alex

----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Elson <elson@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?




alex wrote:

This may be a stupid question, but why not to use a normal bicycle
chain&#92;sprocket combination for driving an encoder?
Is it a backlash issue?

Sprockets and chains, unless very carefully designed have an inherent
cogging effect
that causes cyclical errors every tooth, and then the chains have
variations in pitch
from roller to roller, which varies as the chain ages, and the rollers
and pins wear.
There may be instrument-grade chains, but normal bicycle chain, besides
being heavy
enough to break an encoder, are certainly not manufactured to the
tolerances needed.

W. M. Berg has all sorts of miniature instrument-type cable-chains that
use plastic
molded over aircraft cable. These are not instrument-grade accuracy,
but might work
better than the bicycle chain. I use them in my mill, but only for
tachometer drive,
not the encoders.

Jon


Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.


I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?

alex
 

OK, thank you.

----- Original Message -----
From: Raymond Heckert <jnr@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:18 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?


Alex, It's not merely a backlash issue. (Although, a
properly designed roller chain transmission *must* have
some slack built in. As any kind of roller chain meets the
sprocket, and changes from linear to rotary motion, the
chain jumps up, and down at each pitch. This is more
pronounced with low tooth numbers, and double pitch chain.
Immediately, upon full engagement with the tooth, the
linear section of the chain begins to swing downward, as
the disappearing tooth 's rotary motion moves it downward.
When the next tooth engages, the chain is brought up to
tangency with the pitch circle again. This is only minute
movement, but it sets up a quite a vibration. Timing chain
is about the only chain that doesn't exhibit this quirk,
which is why they're called timing chains, because that's
what they're used for. Virtually vibration free, and they
take up their own slack by climbing to the highest
available form on the tooth.

RayHex

----------
From: alex <telecomt@...>

This may be a stupid question, but why not to use a
normal bicycle
chain&#92;sprocket combination for driving an encoder?
Is it a backlash issue?

Addresses:
FAQ:
FILES:
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...

Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@...
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@...
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@..., wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this group:

OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.


I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.

NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


Re: DRO issue "HEDs in hand"

j_e_f_f_williams
 

Hello,

I am using linear strips/encoders from www.encodertech.com. The
encoder and strips are about the same price as the US Digital stuff
and comes in a 0.01mm resolution which is about 0.0004". The module
is a LM-25CPMM-3T and you can get 600mm length strips. The scales are
$49.00 and modules $39.00 (almost a year ago). You can order right
from them and they are in Fallbrook CA. I have no connection to them
other than I used their product on my lathe.

I am in Canada and am used to working in mm so the .01mm accuracy
worked out well for me.

TTYL, Jeff

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Ken Jenkins <kjenkins@b...> wrote:
I posted a message a few days ago regarding the U.S. Digial Linear
strip options ... 360 is the highest and in my opinion not
high enough (360 x 4 = 1440 then 1 / 1440 = .00069 per increment.
I want something closer to .0005 which would need 500 lpi. U.S.
Digital in a recent email response did not sound very hopeful
re: a linear strip with 500 lpi res. So that leaves a rotary
encoder and wire arrangement. One would think you would want the
highest res possible ... 2048?

I have done several postings here in the past and recently ...
other than Bubba (who has been very helpful) no one seems to
have much information regarding what encoder works well with
the Camtronics board. Has anyone used the 360 US Digital strips
with the Camtronics board and got it to work and been satisfied
with the result? OR Has anyone used a rotary encoder with wire
loop arrangement with the Camtronics board and got it to work
and been satisfied with the results? Could you share your experience
here.

Also, you should be aware that just having a couple HEDS does not
help you unless they are matched to the particular encoder
you select. The HEDS unit and the encoders are selected together
and will not work if used with out matching them. There are linear
HEDS and rotary HEDS and within those two groups there are specific
ones for each resolution.

Ken


Message: 4
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:26:52 -0000
From: "Roger Linscheid" <r.linscheid@a...>
Subject: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?

Hi, I am ready to begin adding a DRO to my G4003 lathe. What is the
current thought on the best method to accomplish my goal?

IIRC, when I was looking into this before, the linear strips from
U.S. Digital were only available in 250 CPI and this was not
considered high enough to provide the necessary resolution. Using
rotary encoders meant the possibility of losing counts if the drive
cable slipped or stretched.

Now U.S. Digital has linear strips in 300 and 360 CPI. Will these
provide a resolution of 0.0005 or better?

I have a completed DRO board from Camtronics and several HEDS on
hand, so I just need to scrounge an old PC and start the installation.

Thanks for any input!