Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
[C14] Digest Number 58
W. Gondella
Hi Mark,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
No I never deal with the dealers. I've done all of my business directly through Scott. I've found Scott to be extremely helpful and excellent to deal with. Frankly, none of the dealers even mention the 200. If you didn't know it existed, you would think Los only make the 8 and 11. I called Scott and ordered the 200 off of him and was apparently extremely lucky in getting it so fast. I have been very satisfied with it. I've used it with a Q7, C14 and 10" f/6.5 Parallax. Soon, I will add a TMB 6" APO. The AP1200 seems easier to detach the dec shaft from the polar shaft, but I am soon going to machine my 200 to modify it and address that issue. The 200 has a superb clutch and dovetail system, however the dec axis IS top-heavy in that regard and that can be a little trouble (requires additional counterweight). Also, the AP1200 uses the much better Amphenol connectors and the wire routing is generally a better scheme. However, I like the black anodized machined surface and adjustable pier-pod legs (I'm seldom on the level) of the 200 over the cabled legs with tensioners that AP uses and the white painted cast surfaces, plus the lack of a dovetail (though this probably has advantages to the orthogonality of the OTA). And the 200 is less expensive. The steppers have not been a real issue, but I can replace them with a system from Sof-Tec if I should choose. All in all, the AP is probably the ultimate mount for some people and I confess a deep admiration for it. But it is also significantly at a higher cost and waiting time as well. Since you previously had the 200 and then bought the AP1200, I assume there was some issue with the 200 that you found problematic? I know the 200 is much more "tweeky" and requires much more fiddling around with the gears, etc., to get the best from it. I'll say that I think the HGM-200 is the best "under $7,000" mount I know of. Correct me if I'm wrong! :-) I have also made a tool which attaches to the mount and allows one to polar align while in daylight, which is an aid in places where you are not familiar with the settings and directions, and allows one to get polar alignment close enough that no additional adjustments are needed after dark for visual use, and only minor tweeks for photography. Thereby, I do not have to wait for dark to align on polaris and waste time, nor do I ever have to re-setup because I wasn't close enough to north to reach alignment through the range of adjustment in the mount (necessitating picking up and moving the entire mount). Once dark arrives, I'm totally ready to go! WayneG ----- Original Message -----
From: <C14@...> To: <C14@...> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 3:38 PM Subject: [C14] Digest Number 58 had to go through the dealer network for a complete mount from Losmandy. sure nothing has changed in this regard.
|
to navigate to use esc to dismiss