Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Si5351 VFO - Low Pass?
Just another thing to keep in mind, with the stock vfo 4.8 to 5.00 MHz, 30 times the vfo frequency will produce birdies in the 2 metre band, a case for using a metal enclosure, pardon the pun.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Alf vk2yac iam74@... [BITX20] wrote:
|
Mvs Sarma
After all we have? band pass filter and crystal filter (for LSB /USB) after the mixer to take care of unwanted. we also have a Low pass filter to cut off harmonics possibly created by Lin PA. Best of 2017 sarma ?vu3zmv ? On Thursday, 5 January 2017 9:16 AM, "Baruch Atta baruchatta@... [BITX20]" wrote:
?
I thought that a pure sine wave was best. Isn't a square wave a mix of waves?? That would result in all sorts birdies and products?
On Jan 4, 2017 10:28 PM, "Ken Chase chase8043@... [BITX20]" <BITX20@...> wrote:
|
When I bought the VFO kit from Qrp-Labs, I also bought a 40 meter low pass filter kit. I installed it in line with the output of the VFO. Pretty simple, The receiver seems quiet, at least as quiet as with the analog tuning. However I don't have a scope and currently I'm experiencing a high level local noise, but without the antenna it's very quiet.?
|
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýIf your using the QRPlabs VFO for the BitX40, then the LPF you bought for 40 meters is optimized for 7-7.5MHz. You need a LPF for the actual VFO output which is 4.5-5MHz. The 7MHz one is probably helping to clean the output somewhat, but is not optimal. Joel? KB6QVI On Jan 5, 2017, at 9:53 PM, dvoorhees@... [BITX20] <BITX20@...> wrote:
|
It's quite common for noise sources in the house to go up the coax and come back in from the antenna.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Could be you need a good "common mode choke". ?? ?? My totally uninformed opinion: ?I think the Si5351 noise everybody's talking about is likely hash from the processor driving it. ?And that if this less-than-optimal LPF is reducing the noise to where it's as good as the analog VFO, that's good enough. ?The ideal would be to clean up the noise somehow without band specific filters, then we're back to switching only two filters if we want a multiband rig. ? The diode ring mixer wants to be driven hard. ?The ideal is for two of the diodes to turn on for 1/2 the LO cycle, the other two diodes to turn on for the other half of the cycle. ?Anything less, and changes in the other input signal (from the antenna when receiving) can disrupt the desired action of this commutating mixer. ?A square wave is actually preferred, and a perfectly clean sine wave from the LO will have a totally non-linear response from the diodes anyway since the current through a diode is exponential with voltage, not linear like a resistor. Of course I may well have totally different opinions once I get a Bitx to play with. Jerry ---In BITX20@..., <caulktel@...> wrote : If your using the QRPlabs VFO for the BitX40, then the LPF you bought for 40 meters is optimized for 7-7.5MHz. You need a LPF for the actual VFO output which is 4.5-5MHz. The 7MHz one is probably helping to clean the output somewhat, but is not optimal.? On Jan 5, 2017, at 9:53 PM,?dvoorhees@...?[BITX20] <BITX20@...> wrote:...I'm experiencing a high level local noise, but without the antenna it's very quiet.? ? |
I know I have RFI problems in the house, between the WiFi and the CFL lamps. So much so, that I can only reliably receive two or three of the local AM broadcast stations in the house whereas if I take a radio outside I can pick up a LOT more (and no, I don't live in a "Faraday cage - we have a wood framed house with vinyl siding; only the roof is metal, but the problem existed before the metal roof was installed). Rich KC8MWG On Friday, January 6, 2017 12:29 PM, "jgaffke@... [BITX20]" wrote:
|
I agree with Jerry I don't think any detectable extra noise will be caused by the Si5351A. If you have noise it is likely coming in from elsewhere - such as the processor for example. (By the way I have not heard of anyone reporting the QRP Labs VFO is noisy, I think the earlier comments about noise were from an SI5351A in a different system). It would be quite nice to have some more specific details, everything so far was a bit vague. Fact is, when you use the analogue VFO built on the BITX40 board, everything is close by. When you pipe in an external VFO then unless you are careful, you have introduced much longer wire lengths, and opportunity for ground loops etc. All of these can help pick up noise. As far as I can tell a lot of ground loop elimination is as much black magic as it is science. Easy things to try are to put an inductor in series with the supply voltage to digital circuits, with a decoupling capacitor either side. That's a Low Pass Filter and keeps RF out of the supply lines. A lot of times if there is interference from digital circuits, this helps a lot. I agree also, the 40m LPF is not the right one to use, because the VFO is at 5MHz not 7MHz. We have a 60m LPF which would be suitable .? 73 Hans G0UPL |
P.S. I meant to also mention, I agree with those who said that a squarewave is ideally better for a diode ring mixer. I think that theoretically the diode ring mixer should be more noisy with a sinewave drive, than squarewave. I think if there is noise its source is probably elsewhere... On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Hans Summers <hans.summers@...> wrote:
|
Whether a LPF at the VFO frequency lowers your noise level may or may not be noticeable, however the Si5351 outputs Square waves that are inherently high in harmonic energy which is why you need a LPF. The mixer should be mixing ONLY the signal we want and not all of the harmonics being generated, so, in the end you may not notice anything different with your ears, but I'm going to include a LPF because it's the proper way to do it and it's easy. Nobody is saying that it wont work without one. Also there are many commercially designed VFO's driving diode ring mixers with sine wave outputs that perform perfectly, I've built many of them including simple Collpits Crystal oscillators, they work perfectly. YMMV.
Joel KB6QVI |
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýSpurious responses caused by the odd-order harmonics inherent in a square-wave local oscillator are relatively easy to eliminate with front-end filtering. What is much more difficult to eliminate is the intermodulation distortion caused by having the mixer diodes only partially conducting for a significant proportion of a cycle - that's what happens if you use a sine-wave local oscillator.Steve G3TXQ |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss